| Literature DB >> 34067836 |
Junko Yamasaki1, Kayako Sakisaka1, Parolita A Mission2, Nasudi G Soluta2, Norre Jean V Delos Santos2, Julie Vannie Palaca2, Retz Pol O Pacalioga2.
Abstract
The prevalence of overweight/obesity in the adult population in the Philippines has doubled in the past 20 years. Zumba exercise has recently been implemented throughout the Philippines. However, there is scarce information on the effects of Zumba on obesity and Zumba participants' characteristics in the Philippines. This study described the current practice of Zumba in the Philippines, along with the practitioners' characteristics, and identified factors associated with Zumba participation. In this observational, cross-sectional study, a structured questionnaire was used to survey 10 Zumba locations in September 2019. Anthropometric measurements of participants were assessed. Respondents included 171 women (88.6%) and 22 men (11.4%), with a mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age of 44.1 (±8.9) years. All respondents answered that Zumba was enjoyable, and some answered "very enjoyable". Determinants of frequent participation were as follows: being older than the mean age of participants, starting Zumba to enjoy dancing, starting Zumba not to lose weight, shopping mall location, and participation fee required. "To enjoy dance" being a motivation for Zumba practice was identified as a determinant of frequent participation rather than "to lose weight." The element of "enjoyable" may strongly influence the continuation and frequent participation of Zumba exercise in the Philippines.Entities:
Keywords: Cebu city; Philippines; Zumba; exercise; non-communicable diseases; physical activity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067836 PMCID: PMC8157069 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of Zumba participants (n = 193).
| Variable |
| % | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Female | 171 | 88.6 |
| Male | 22 | 11.4 | |
|
| 30–39 | 65 | 33.7 |
| Mean: 44.1(8.9) | 40–49 | 70 | 36.3 |
| Minimum Value: 30 | 50–59 | 50 | 25.9 |
| Maximum Value: 81 | 60–69 | 6 | 3.1 |
| ≥70 | 2 | 1.0 | |
| Full-time work (Office work) | 87 (32) | 45.1 (16.6) | |
| Part-time work | 19 | 9.8 | |
| Housewife | 39 | 20.2 | |
| Other work | 20 | 10.4 | |
| None | 26 | 13.5 | |
| None | 6 | 3.1 | |
| (Philippines Peso) | 0 < 10,000 | 42 | 21.8 |
| (1 peso = about 0.02 US$) | 10,000–20,000 | 61 | 31.6 |
| 20,000–40,000 | 60 | 31.1 | |
| >40,000 | 21 | 10.9 | |
| University completed | 84 | 43.5 | |
| Average of schooling years: | University uncompleted | 47 | 24.4 |
| 12.2 (2.0) | High school completed | 44 | 22.8 |
| High school uncompleted | 15 | 7.8 | |
| Primary school completed | 2 | 1.0 | |
|
| 1 | 11 | 5.7 |
| (Total individuals) [ | 2–4 | 95 | 49.2 |
| Mean: 4.6 | 5–9 | 71 | 36.8 |
| 10≥ | 8 | 4.1 | |
|
| Diabetes | 11 | 5.4 |
| Hypertension | 54 | 26.3 | |
| Heart Diseases | 7 | 3.4 | |
| Cancer | 1 | 0.5 | |
| Gastric Problem | 5 | 2.4 | |
| Other Diseases | 22 | 10.7 | |
| None | 105 | 51.2 | |
| 1 | 17.0–18.5 | 6 | 3.2 |
| Mean: 25.3 (4.13) | 18.5–25.0 | 88 | 46.6 |
| Minimum Value: 17.0 | 25.0–30.0 | 70 | 37.0 |
| Maximum Value: 38.3 | 30.0–35.0 | 21 | 11.1 |
| 35.0–40.0 | 4 | 2.1 | |
| 2 | ≤19 | 1 | 0.5 |
| [Score: 10–40] | 20–24 | 4 | 2.1 |
| Mean: 33.9 (4.1) | 25–29 | 17 | 9.0 |
| Minimum Value: 13 | 30–34 | 71 | 37.8 |
| Maximum Value: 40 | 35–40 | 95 | 50.5 |
| 3 | Low physical activity | 56 | 32.4 |
| Excluding Zumba activity | Moderatephysical activity | 48 | 27.7 |
| Vigorousphysical activity | 69 | 39.9 | |
| <3 | 65 | 39.1 | |
| Mean: 4.26 | 3–5 | 54 | 32.4 |
| 6–10 | 48 | 24.0 | |
| 10≥ | 16 | 9.6 | |
| <1/week | 9 | 4.7 | |
| Mean: 3.2 times/week (SD:1.5) | 1/week | 18 | 9.4 |
| 2/week | 46 | 24.0 | |
| 3/week | 62 | 32.3 | |
| 4/week | 22 | 11.5 | |
| 5/week | 20 | 10.4 | |
| 6/week | 5 | 2.6 | |
| 7/week | 10 | 5.2 | |
| <6 months | 33 | 17.1 | |
| 6 months–1 year | 27 | 14.0 | |
| 1–5 years | 82 | 42.5 | |
| 5–10 years | 41 | 21.2 | |
| ≥10 years | 10 | 5.2 |
1 BMI: Body Mass Index, 2 GSE: General Self-Efficacy, 3 IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Reasons for starting Zumba classes (n = 193) and for absence from Zumba classes (n = 183).
| Reason for Starting Zumba Classes (Multiple Answers) | Number of Responses (%) | Reason for Absence from Zumba Class | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relieve stress | 106 (54.9) | Busy | 158 (86.3) |
| For exercise therapy | 93 (48.2) | Far from your place | 8 (4.4) |
| Enjoy dancing | 90 (46.6) | Attendance fee is high | 0 (0.0) |
| Lose weight | 62 (32.1) | Other reasons | 17 (9.3) |
| Make more friends | 24 (12.4) | ||
| Enjoy Music | 22 (11.4) | ||
| Communicate with more people | 11 (5.7) | ||
| Other reasons | 4 (2.1) | ||
| Respect instructor | 2 (1.0) |
Feeling about Zumba class (n = 193).
| Feeling about Zumba Class | Strongly Agree | Agree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 151 (78.2) | 42 (21.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 14 (7.3) | 19 (9.8) | 95 (49.2) | 65 (33.7) |
|
| 157 (81.3) | 35 (18.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) |
|
| 147 (76.6) | 43 (22.4) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 138 (72.3) | 50 (26.2) | 3 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 135 (70.7) | 54 (28.3) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Factors associated with the Question: “Do you enjoy Zumba exercise?”: Results of univariate analysis.
| Variable | Very Enjoyable | Enjoyable ( | OR | 95% CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| Very effective | 124 | 83.8 | 14 | 35.0 | 9.60 | 4.39–21.00 | <0.001 |
| Effective | 24 | 16.2 | 26 | 65.0 | ||||
|
| Very effective | 123 | 82.0 | 12 | 30.8 | 10.25 | 4.62–22.75 | <0.001 |
| Effective | 27 | 18.0 | 27 | 69.2 | ||||
|
| Strongly agree | 130 | 86.1 | 17 | 43.6 | 8.01 | 3.66–17.53 | <0.001 |
| Agree | 21 | 13.9 | 22 | 56.4 | ||||
|
| ≥34 a | 99 | 65.6 | 14 | 33.3 | 3.81 | 1.85–7.85 | <0.001 |
| <34 | 52 | 34.4 | 28 | 66.7 | ||||
a: Average GSE of respondents: 34; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; GSE, general self-efficacy.
Factors associated with the frequency of participation in Zumba exercise (≥4 times/week): Results of logistic reguression analysis.
| ≥4 Times/Week | <4 Times/Week | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||||||||||||
|
| % |
| % | COR | 95% CI | AOR | 95% CI | ||||||
| Age, yrs | ≥ 44 a | 35 | 60.3 | 51 | 37.8 | 2.51 | 1.33 | 4.71 | 0.004 | 2.47 | 1.21 | 5.05 | 0.013 |
| <44 | 23 | 39.7 | 84 | 62.2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Sex | Female | 51 | 87.9 | 120 | 88.9 | 0.91 | 0.35 | 2.37 | 0.848 | ||||
| Male | 7 | 12.1 | 15 | 11.1 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| Reason for starting Zumba (1) | |||||||||||||
| Enjoy Dancing | 39 | 67.2 | 45 | 35.4 | 3.74 | 1.94 | 7.22 | <0.001 | 3.68 | 1.81 | 7.48 | <0.001 | |
| None of the above reasons | 19 | 32.8 | 82 | 64.6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Reason for starting Zumba (2) | |||||||||||||
| Lose weight | 12 | 20.7 | 47 | 37.0 | 0.44 | 0.21 | 0.92 | 0.027 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.96 | 0.040 | |
| None of the above reasons | 46 | 79.3 | 80 | 63.0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Location | |||||||||||||
| Shopping Mall | 37 | 63.8 | 52 | 38.5 | 2.81 | 1.49 | 5.32 | 0.001 | 2.41 | 1.18 | 4.91 | 0.015 | |
| Other than the shopping mall | 21 | 36.2 | 83 | 61.5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Participation Fee | |||||||||||||
| Paid | 28 | 48.3 | 41 | 30.4 | 2.14 | 1.14 | 4.03 | 0.017 | 2.60 | 1.28 | 5.29 | 0.008 | |
| Free | 30 | 51.7 | 94 | 69.6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Number of Times Held | |||||||||||||
| ≥3 Times/week | 41 | 70.7 | 72 | 53.3 | 2.11 | 1.09 | 4.08 | 0.025 | |||||
| <3 Times/week | 17 | 29.3 | 63 | 46.7 | 1.00 | ||||||||
a: average age of participants: 44.1 years; Multivariate analysis (Stepwise Method): Adjusted for Age, Sex, Reason for starting Zumba (enjoy dancing, lose weight); Held in shopping mall, Participation Fee, and Number of Times held; COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.