| Literature DB >> 34067428 |
Hsiu-Ju Huang1, Chih-Wei Lee1,2, Tse-Hsi Li3, Tsung-Cheng Hsieh1,4.
Abstract
This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the difference in ranking of risk factors of onset age of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between urban and rural areas in Eastern Taiwan. Data from 2013 initial onset of AMI patients living in the urban areas (n = 1060) and rural areas (n = 953) from January 2000 to December 2015, including onset age, and conventional risk factors including sex, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body mass index (BMI). The results of multiple linear regressions analysis showed smoking, obesity, and dyslipidemia were early-onset reversible risk factors of AMI in both areas. The ranking of impacts of them on the age from high to low was obesity (β = -6.7), smoking (β = -6.1), and dyslipidemia (β = -4.8) in the urban areas, while it was smoking (β = -8.5), obesity (β= -7.8), and dyslipidemia (β = -5.1) in the rural areas. Furthermore, the average onset ages for the patients who smoke, are obese, and have dyslipidemia simultaneously was significantly earlier than for patients with none of these comorbidities in both urban (13.6 years) and rural (14.9 years) areas. The findings of this study suggest that the different prevention strategies for AMI should be implemented in urban and rural areas.Entities:
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; dyslipidemia; hypertension; obesity; reversible risk factors; rural areas; smoking; urban areas
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067428 PMCID: PMC8197001 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Distribution of conventional risk factors for urban and rural areas.
| All | Urban (n = 1060) | Rural (n = 953) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD | 66.9 ± 13.8 | 66.3 ± 14.0 | 67.7 ± 13.4 | 0.019 * |
| Male, n (%) | 1358 (67.5) | 758 (71.5) | 600 (63.0) | 0.001 * |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 1404 (69.7) | 744 (70.2) | 660 (69.3) | 0.649 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 856 (42.5) | 436 (41.1) | 420 (44.1) | 0.183 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 720 (35.8) | 357 (33.7) | 363 (38.1) | 0.039 * |
| Smoking, n (%) | 780 (38.7) | 424 (40.0) | 356 (37.4) | 0.224 |
| Obesity, n (%) | 599 (29.8) | 321 (30.3) | 278 (29.2) | 0.586 |
SD: standard deviation; #: p-value for comparing the urban and rural areas. *: p < 0.05.
The onset age of AMI with and without conventional risk factors by area.
| Variable. | Urban Areas (n = 1060) | Rural Areas (n = 953) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |||
| Male | 64.0 ± 14.1 | 72.2 ± 12.1 | <0.001 | 65.8 ± 13.8 | 71.0 ± 12.1 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 68.7 ± 13.1 | 60.7 ± 14.7 | <0.001 | 69.5 ± 12.3 | 63.7 ± 14.9 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes | 68.5 ± 12.2 | 64.7 ± 15.0 | <0.001 | 68.5 ± 12.0 | 67.1 ± 14.4 | 0.117 |
| Dyslipdemia | 62.0 ± 13.4 | 68.5 ± 13.9 | <0.001 | 64.0 ± 13.5 | 70.0 ± 12.8 | <0.001 |
| Smoking | 60.5 ± 13.1 | 70.2 ± 13.3 | <0.001 | 61.2 ± 13.6 | 71.6 ± 11.7 | <0.001 |
| Obesity | 61.3 ± 13.7 | 68.5 ± 13.6 | <0.001 | 61.5 ± 13.9 | 70.3 ± 12.3 | <0.001 |
| With smoking, obesity, and dyslipidemia simultaneously | 54.4 ± 11.1 | 68.0 ± 13.6 | <0.001 | 54.5 ± 11.6 | 69.4 ± 12.7 | 0.332 |
SD: standard deviation; #: p-value for comparing the urban and rural areas.
Figure 1The onset age of AMI with and without conventional risk factors by area. N.S.: no significant difference (p ≥ 0.05). ***: p < 0.001. Error bar: standard deviation.
Multiple linear regression analysis for association of conventional risk factors and the onset age of AMI for urban and rural areas.
| Variables | Urban (n = 1060) | Rural (n = 953) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | t | β | t | ||||
| Male | −4.5 | −4.9 | 0.001 * | −2.2 | −2.6 | 0.009 * | 0.056 |
| Hypertension | 5.7 | 6.6 | 0.001 * | 4.5 | 5.4 | 0.001 * | 0.307 |
| Diabetes | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.206 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.739 | 0.256 |
| Dyslipidemia | −4.8 | −6.0 | 0.001 * | −5.1 | −6.5 | 0.001 * | 0.826 |
| Smoking | −6.1 | −7.2 | 0.001 * | −8.5 | −10.3 | 0.001 * | 0.039 * |
| Obesity | −6.7 | −8.2 | 0.001 * | −7.8 | −9.5 | 0.001 * | 0.350 |
β: unstandardized regression coefficient; t: t-value calculated based on t-test statistics for testing if β is statistically significantly different from zero; #: p-value for testing β based on the regression model including the conventional risk factors as the predicators; &: p-value for testing interaction effect between area and each conventional risk factor based on the model including area, the conventional risk factors, and the interaction term between area and each conventional risk factor; *: p-value < 0.05.