| Literature DB >> 34067159 |
Mercè Pollina-Pocallet1, Eva Artigues-Barberà2,3,4,5, Glòria Tort-Nasarre2,6,7, Joaquim Sol3,4,8, Laura Azlor4, Quintí Foguet-Boreu9,10,11, Marta Ortega-Bravo3,4,5,12.
Abstract
Adolescence is associated with a higher vulnerability that may result in a high dissatisfaction, the practice of unhealthy weight-control behaviors (UWCB) and, eventually, the onset of body image-related mental disorders. These factors are strongly associated with the social context, so it is important to characterize them in local or regional studies. To assess the relationship between body image and UWCB presence, a cross-sectional study was performed among 2496 schooled adolescents from Lleida (Spain) between 2017 and 2019. Their perceived and desired images were evaluated and compared with the real image in order to obtain the body distortion and the body dissatisfaction and relate them with UWCB. The studied individuals perceived themselves thinner than they actually were, with no differences between males and females. However, differences were found regarding body dissatisfaction, showing that females desired to be thinner, while males desired a more corpulent body image. Furthermore, one out of ten individuals reported UWCB, with higher prevalence among females. UWCB was associated with a desire to be thinner and with distorted body images. It is essential to work on self-perception and self-acceptance in early adolescence from an interdisciplinary perspective at educational, social and health levels to promote health in adolescence.Entities:
Keywords: adolescence; adolescent behavior; body dissatisfaction; body image
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067159 PMCID: PMC8125803 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive table of the participants.
| Item | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 14.1 (1.61) |
| Age group, | |
| <15 | 1593 (63.8%) |
| ≥15 | 903 (36.2%) |
| Sex, | |
| Female | 1278 (51.2%) |
| Male | 1218 (48.8%) |
| Body Mass Index z-score, mean (SD) | 0.31 (1.02) |
Evaluation of the perceptual, cognitive affective and behavioral dimensions of the participants (n = 2496).
| Item | All Participants | Female | Male | <15 | ≥15 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceptual dimension | |||||||
| Real image ( | 1.05 (3.64) * | 0.82 (3.58) * | 1.30 (3.68) * | <0.001 | 1.35 (3.71) * | 0.52 (3.45) * | <0.001 |
| Perceived image ( | −2.42 (2.42) * | −2.61 (2.37) * | −2.22 (2.47) * | <0.001 | −2.42 (2.42) * | −2.42 (2.43) * | 0.834 |
| Body distortion score ( | −3.47 (2.92) * | −3.41 (2.88) * | −3.53 (2.97) * | 0.161 | −3.77 (3.00) * | −2.94 (2.71) * | <0.001 |
| Cognitive-affective dimension | |||||||
| Desired image ( | −2.79 (2.01) * | −3.57 (1.60) * | −1.98 (2.07) * | <0.001 | −2.86 (1.95) * | −2.67 (2.10) * | 0.053 |
| Body dissatisfaction score ( | 0.37 (2.22) * | 0.96 (1.90) * | −0.25 (2.35) * | <0.001 | 0.44 (2.26) * | 0.25 (2.13) * | 0.021 |
| Behavioral dimension | |||||||
| Presence of unhealthy behavior ( | 257 (10.3%) | 160 (12.6%) | 97 (7.98%) | <0.001 | 161 (10.1%) | 96 (10.7%) | 0.712 |
| Self-induced vomiting ( | 65 (2.61%) | 43 (3.38%) | 22 (1.81%) | 0.020 | 43 (2.70%) | 22 (2.45%) | 0.803 |
| Laxatives intake ( | 23 (0.92%) | 11 (0.86%) | 12 (0.99%) | 0.914 | 17 (1.07%) | 6 (0.67%) | 0.429 |
| Diuretics intake ( | 11 (0.44%) | 6 (0.47%) | 5 (0.41%) | 1.000 | 10 (0.63%) | 1 (0.11%) | 0.111 |
| Weight loss pills intake ( | 11 (0.44%) | 7 (0.55%) | 4 (0.33%) | 0.598 | 8 (0.50%) | 3 (0.33%) | 0.756 |
| Fasting ( | 205 (8.23%) | 135 (10.6%) | 70 (5.75%) | <0.001 | 122 (7.67%) | 83 (9.22%) | 0.201 |
* One-Sample Mann-Whitney U Test p-value < 0.05, indicating that the mean of the group is significantly different from 0.
Figure 1Boxplots of the real, perceived and desired body images according to a 13-Card Scale (13-CS) (a) including all the participants; (b) stratifying by sex; (c) stratifying by age group.
Association between age, sex, body dissatisfaction and body distortion with unhealthy weight control behaviors (n = 2496).
| Variable | Presence of UWCB | Self-Induced Vomiting | Fasting | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | |||
| Age | 1.070 (0.979–1.170) | 0.136 | 0.977 (0.825–1.148) | 0.780 | 1.154 (1.048–1.269) | 0.003 |
| Sex (Male) | 0.808 (0.476–1.371) | 0.430 | 1.233 (0.453–3.389) | 0.681 | 0.632 (0.338–1.157) | 0.142 |
| Body dissatisfaction (linear component) | 1.406 (1.174–1.682) | <0.001 | 1.965 (1.352–3.021) | 0.001 | 1.291 (1.101–1.565) | 0.005 |
| Body dissatisfaction (quadratic component) | 1.008 (0.979–1.037) | 0.605 | 0.964 (0.905–1.015) | 0.209 | 1.020 (0.991–1.046) | 0.155 |
| Body distortion (linear component) | 1.056 (0.919–1.212) | 0.443 | 1.041 (0.837–1.276) | 0.709 | 1.056 (0.907–1.224) | 0.471 |
| Body distortion (quadratic component) | 1.019 (1.004–1.035) | 0.016 | 1.029 (1.006–1.052) | 0.009 | 1.019 (1.002–1.036) | 0.024 |
| Sex (Male): Body dissatisfaction (linear component) | 0.804 (0.669–0.967) | 0.021 | 0.538 (0.345–0.797) | 0.004 | 0.868 (0.713–1.029) | 0.132 |
| Sex (Male): Body dissatisfaction (quadratic component) | 1.025 (0.994–1.058) | 0.119 | 1.048 (0.984–1.122) | 0.154 | 1.018 (0.989–1.052) | 0.249 |
| Sex (Male): Body distortion (linear component) | 0.991 (0.829–1.184) | 0.918 | 1.000 (0.772–1.278) | 0.998 | 0.968 (0.790–1.182) | 0.750 |
| Sex (Male): Body distortion (quadratic component) | 0.997 (0.975–1.019) | 0.781 | 0.996 (0.965–1.028) | 0.815 | 0.993 (0.969–1.018) | 0.592 |
UWCB: Unhealthy weight control behaviors; aOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 2Random-intercept mixed effects logistic regression model for the presence of unhealthy weight control behaviors as a function of (a) Body dissatisfaction score; (b) Body distortion score; and their interaction with sex. Each point represents a participant, the lines represent the fitted model and the shades represent the 95% confidence interval. The points are slightly jittered in order to avoid overplotting. F: Female; M: Male.
Figure 3Random-intercept mixed effects logistic regression model for the presence of self-induced vomiting as a function of (a) Body dissatisfaction score; (b) Body distortion score; and their interaction with sex. Each point represents a participant, the lines represent the fitted model and the shades represent the 95% confidence interval. The points are slightly jittered in order to avoid overplotting. F: Female; M: Male.
Figure 4Random-intercept mixed effects logistic regression model for the presence of fasting as a function of (a) Body dissatisfaction score; (b) Body distortion score; and their interaction with sex. Each point represents a participant, the lines represent the fitted model and the shades represent the 95% confidence interval. The points are slightly jittered in order to avoid overplotting. F: Female; M: Male.