| Literature DB >> 34066688 |
Hung-En Liao1, Yueen-Mei Deng1.
Abstract
While parenting style has been linked with parent feeding behavior (FB), little is known about the role FB plays in the relationship between parents' eating behavior (PEB) and children's eating behavior (CEB). Based on social learning theory, we hypothesized that children learn to develop healthy CEB by obeying and imitating parents' healthy eating and feeding behaviors, and that FB is the mediator between PEB and CEB. In total, 257 survey responses from parents of children up to 5 years old were included in the study. Results indicated that CEB did not differ by children's age, gender, or birth order; for parents, older age and lower educational levels were associated with less healthy unhealthier FB and PEB. Healthy PEB and FB explained 46.8% and 21.7% of the variance in healthy CEB, respectively. The model confirmed that FB reduced the coefficient of healthy PEB from 0.563 to 0.468 and increased the variance explained from 35.0% to 38.5%. FB was a mediator for PEB and CEB. Discussion covers the complexity of ideal parenting styles and child feeding and their associated effects on CEB in varied environments, including different cultures. We concluded that PEB was the main predictor of CEB, and healthy feeding acted as a mediator.Entities:
Keywords: dietary intake; early childhood; feeding behavior; food behavior; high-fat high sugar (HFHS)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066688 PMCID: PMC8151811 DOI: 10.3390/children8050369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Figure 1Valid subjects entered in the study.
Demographic distributions.
| Factors | Category |
| % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preschool children | |||
| Gender | Male | 136 | 52.92 |
| Female | 121 | 47.08 | |
| Age (Child) | <3 | 36 | 14.01 |
| 3–4 | 97 | 37.74 | |
| 4–5 | 124 | 48.25 | |
| Order of child | Only child | 75 | 29.18 |
| Oldest | 72 | 28.02 | |
| Second & Younger | 110 | 42.80 | |
| Parent or major caregiver | |||
| Relationship | Mothers | 218 | 84.82 |
| Others | 39 | 15.18 | |
| Age (Parent) | <30 | 34 | 13.23 |
| 31–35 | 81 | 31.52 | |
| 36–40 | 90 | 35.02 | |
| 41–45 | 25 | 9.73 | |
| >46 | 27 | 10.51 | |
| Education | <High school | 14 | 5.45 |
| High school | 55 | 21.40 | |
| Vocational college | 28 | 10.89 | |
| Bachelor’s & up | 160 | 62.26 | |
n = 257.
Mean, standard deviation, t-test, and ANOVA of variables.
| Variables | Group |
| M | SD | t/F |
| Post hoc b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| Gender | Male | 136 | 3.54 | 0.37 | 1.18 | 0.240 | - |
| Female | 121 | 3.48 | 0.37 | ||||
| Birth order | Only child | 75 | 3.50 | 0.30 | 3.90 | 0.022 | Only child > Oldest |
| Oldest | 72 | 3.42 | 0.37 | ||||
| 2nd+ c | 110 | 3.58 | 0.40 | ||||
| Age | <3 | 36 | 3.40 | 0.42 | 2.77 | 0.064 | - |
| 3–4 | 97 | 3.56 | 0.35 | ||||
| 4–5 | 124 | 3.51 | 0.37 | ||||
| Overall | 257 | 3.51 | 0.37 | ||||
|
|
| ||||||
| Healthy Eating | Mothers | 218 | 3.58 | 0.46 | 3.86 | <0.001 | - |
| Non-mothers | 39 | 3.31 | 0.38 | ||||
| Health Feeding | Mothers | 218 | 3.86 | 0.46 | 2.19 | 0.032 | - |
| Non-mothers | 39 | 3.70 | 0.39 | ||||
|
|
| ||||||
| Healthy Eating | <30 | 34 | 3.53 | 0.52 | 2.10 | 0.082 | - |
| 31–35 | 81 | 3.50 | 0.43 | ||||
| 36–40 | 90 | 3.61 | 0.47 | ||||
| 41–45 | 25 | 3.63 | 0.42 | ||||
| >46 | 27 | 3.35 | 0.40 | ||||
| Healthy Feeding | <30 | 34 | 3.74 | 0.51 | 3.55 | 0.008 | (>46) < (31–35), (36–40), (41–45) |
| 31–35 | 81 | 3.81 | 0.49 | ||||
| 36–40 | 90 | 3.91 | 0.40 | ||||
| 41–45 | 25 | 4.00 | 0.41 | ||||
| >46 | 27 | 3.61 | 0.39 | ||||
|
|
| ||||||
| Healthy Eating | <HS a | 14 | 3.43 | 0.32 | 4.88 | 0.003 | Bachelor > HS |
| HS a | 55 | 3.37 | 0.51 | ||||
| VET. Coll a | 28 | 3.47 | 0.34 | ||||
| Bachelor + d | 160 | 3.62 | 0.45 | ||||
| Overall | 257 | 3.54 | 0.46 | ||||
| Healthy Feeding | <HS a | 14 | 3.60 | 0.43 | 1.35 | 0.260 | - |
| HS a | 55 | 3.85 | 0.51 | ||||
| VET. Coll a | 28 | 3.81 | 0.37 | ||||
| Bachelor + d | 160 | 3.85 | 0.45 | ||||
| Overall | 257 | 3.83 | 0.45 | ||||
a HS, High school; VET. coll, Vocational Education and Training college. b Posthoc: Scheffe’s method is applied for pairs with a significant F-statistic. c 2nd+, the second child or younger. d Bachelor+ a bachelor degree and above.
Mediating effects of parent’s healthy feeding.
| Variables | Healthy FB | Healthy CEB | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | |
| C. Gender | −0.005 | 0.041 | −0.111 | −0.051 | −0.060 |
| C. Age | 0.291 *** | 0.203 *** | 0.084 | −0.030 | −0.074 |
| C. Birth order | 0.047 | 0.039 | 0.071 | 0.060 | 0.051 |
| P. Caregiver | −0.157 * | −0.058 | −0.221 ** | −0.092 | −0.079 |
| P. Age | 0.047 | 0.004 | 0.090 | 0.034 | 0.033 |
| P. Education | 0.041 | −0.042 | 0.103 | -0.005 | 0.004 |
| Independent Variable | |||||
| Healthy PEB | 0.435 *** | 0.563 *** | 0.468 *** | ||
| Mediator | |||||
| Healthy FB | 0.217 *** | ||||
|
| 0.104 | 0.270 *** | 0.074 * | 0.350 *** | 0.385 *** |
|
| 0.083 | 0.249 *** | 0.052 | 0.332 *** | 0.365 *** |
| △ | 0.166 | 0.277 | 0.034 | ||
|
| 4.86 | 13.155 | 3.321 | 105.989 | 13.884 |
n = 257; C, children; P, parent; FB, parent’s feeding behavior; PEB, parent’s eating behavior, CEB, children’s eating behavior; R2, R-squared; Adj. R2, adjusted R2; △R2, R2 change; F, F statistic value; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Parent’s healthy feeding as a mediator of parents’ and children’s healthy eating behaviors (*** p < 0.001).