Literature DB >> 31368213

Dimensions of national culture associated with different trajectories of male and female mean body mass index in countries over 25 years.

Chelsea Wallace1, Stefanie Vandevijvere1, Arier Lee1, Lindsay M Jaacks2, Michael Schachner3, Boyd Swinburn1,4.   

Abstract

Cultural determinants of obesity prevalence have been little studied but could explain significant variations in body mass index (BMI) trajectories among countries. This ecological study quantified longitudinal associations between six dimensions of national culture and mean population BMI over 25 years. National mean male and female BMI data 1990 to 2014 provided dependent variables. National dimensions of culture (from the Hofstede database for up to 87 countries) were independent variables: Individualism, Uncertainty avoidance, Indulgence, Long-term orientation, Power distance, and Masculinity. Analyses used mixed models for repeated measures for each dimension of national culture with male and female adult BMI trajectories, controlling for confounders. A higher mean BMI was significantly associated with higher Individualism, Uncertainty avoidance, Indulgence, and Masculine orientation and with lower Power distance (males only) and lower Long-term orientation (males only). Overall, the national cultural dimensions explained 62.4% (males) and 53.5% (females) of the variance in mean BMI among countries. National cultural characteristics, especially Individualism and Uncertainty avoidance, are strongly related to obesity prevalence, explaining over half of the variance among countries. More research and theory development is needed to understand the pathways for these associations so that cultural contexts can be better accounted for in policies, social marketing messages, and community-based actions for obesity prevention.
© 2019 World Obesity Federation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI trajectories; ecological analyses; national cultural dimensions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31368213     DOI: 10.1111/obr.12884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  7 in total

Review 1.  National and Local Strategies in the Netherlands for Obesity Prevention and Management in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jacob C Seidell; Jutka Halberstadt
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties-Revised (AAQW-R) in a United States Sample of Adults with Overweight and Obesity.

Authors:  Cara Dochat; Niloofar Afari; Jennalee S Wooldridge; Matthew S Herbert; Marianna Gasperi; Jason Lillis
Journal:  J Contextual Behav Sci       Date:  2020-01-10

Review 3.  Understanding the rise of cardiometabolic diseases in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  J Jaime Miranda; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Camila Corvalan; Adnan A Hyder; Maria Lazo-Porras; Tolu Oni; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Variation in the Socioeconomic Gradient of Obesity by Ethnicity - England's National Child Measurement Programme.

Authors:  Claudia Strugnell; Shireen Mathrani; Loretta Sollars; Boyd Swinburn; Vicky Copley
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Body size preferences and food choice among mothers and children in Malawi.

Authors:  Valerie L Flax; Chrissie Thakwalakwa; John C Phuka; Lindsay M Jaacks
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  The Role of Caregiver's Feeding Pattern in the Association between Parents' and Children's Healthy Eating Behavior: Study in Taichung, Taiwan.

Authors:  Hung-En Liao; Yueen-Mei Deng
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

Review 7.  Democracy, Culture and Cancer Patients' Willingness to Pay for Healthcare Services: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mayula Chaikumbung
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.099

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.