| Literature DB >> 34066650 |
Enrique Bellido1, Purificación de la Haba1, Eloísa Agüera1.
Abstract
Sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) in a CO2-enriched atmosphere (eCO2) were used herein to examine the developmental and physiological effects of biofertilization with mycorrhizae (Rhizophagus irregularis). The eCO2 environment stimulated colonization using R. irregularis mycorrhizal fungi, as compared to plants grown under ambient CO2 conditions (aCO2). This colonization promotes plant growth due to an increased nutrient content (P, K, Mg, and B), which favors a greater synthesis of photosynthetic pigments. Biofertilized plants (M) under eCO2 conditions have a higher concentration of carbon compounds in their leaves, as compared to non-biofertilized eCO2 plants (NM). The biofertilization (M) of sunflowers with R. irregularis decreased the C/N ratio, as compared to the NM plants, decreasing the hydrogen peroxide content and increasing the antioxidant enzyme activity (catalase and APX). These results suggest that sunflower symbiosis with R. irregularis improves the absorption of N, while also decreasing the plant's oxidative stress. It may be concluded that biofertilization with mycorrhizae (R. irregularis) may potentially replace the chemical fertilization of sunflower plants (H. annuus L.), resulting in more environmentally friendly agricultural practices. This information is essential to our understanding of the mechanisms influencing the C and N dynamic in future climate change scenarios, in which high CO2 levels are expected.Entities:
Keywords: C/N ratio; biofertilization; nutrients; oxidative stress; photosynthetic pigments
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066650 PMCID: PMC8150476 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Percentage root colonization and growth parameters of sunflower plants inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (a CO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ±SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| Root Colonization | Leaf Dry Weight | Stem Dry Weight | Leaf Area | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (mg plant−1) | (mg plant−1) | (cm2) | ||
| aCO2 | |||||
| NM | ND | 940 ± 31.5 a | 913 ± 2.6 a | 15.9 ± 0.36 a | |
| M | 40.5 ± 0.48 b | 1213 ± 36.1 b | 1190 ± 23.5 b | 17.9 ± 0.44 b | |
| eCO2 | |||||
| NM | ND | 1438 ± 31.7 c | 1398 ± 22.6 c | 21.85 ± 0.32 c | |
| M | 47.8 ± 0.83 d | 1634 ± 40.2 d | 1564 ± 24.7 d | 25.56 ± 0.28 d | |
| Source of variation | |||||
| AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| CO2 | ** | * | ** | ** | |
| AM × CO2 | ** |
|
|
| |
Concentration of starch, total soluble sugar (TSS) and proteins (TSP); percentages of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), C/N ratio in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ±SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| Starch | TSS | TSP | Leaf C | Leaf N | C/N | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | (%) | (%) | |||
| aCO2 | |||||||
| NM | 30.5 ± 0.53 a | 258.2 ± 0.61 a | 30.7 ± 0.44 a | 39.6 ± 0.61 a | 1.42 ± 0.04 a | 27.9 a | |
| M | 126.6 ± 1.38 b | 261.5 ± 0.41 b | 35.6 ± 0.36 b | 40.5 ± 0.20 a | 1.80 ± 0.44 b | 22.5 b | |
| eCO2 | |||||||
| NM | 108.7 ± 1.92 c | 270.6 ± 0.45 c | 31.8 ± 0.49 a | 41.9 ± 0.37 a | 1.21 ± 0.32 c | 34.9 c | |
| M | 308.7 ± 2.24 d | 285.7 ± 0.16 d | 38.7 ± 0.47 d | 40.1 ± 0.45 a | 1.45 ± 0.28 ad | 27.6 ad | |
| Source of variation | |||||||
| AM | ** | ** | ** |
| * | ** | |
| CO2 | ** | ** | ** |
| * | ** | |
| AM × CO2 | ** | ** |
|
|
|
| |
P, K (%) B and Fe, B (mg kg−1) concentrations in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ±SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| P | K | Mg | Fe | B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | ||
| aCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 0.12 ± 0.004 a | 0.463 ± 0.008 a | 0.18 ± 0.004 a | 39.6 ± 0.61 a | 12.3 ± 0.20 a | |
| M | 0.20 ± 0.012 b | 0.511 ± 0.004 b | 0.26 ± 0.008 b | 40.5 ± 0.20 a | 14.2 ± 0.24 b | |
| eCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 0.17 ± 0.008 c | 0.494 ± 0.004 c | 0.23 ± 0.016 c | 41.9 ± 0.36 a | 12.9 ± 0.36 c | |
| M | 0.25 ± 0.004 d | 0.540 ± 0.024 d | 0.31 ± 0.012 d | 40.1 ± 0.45 a | 17.1 ± 0.20 d | |
| Source of variation | ||||||
| AM | ** |
| * |
| ** | |
| CO2 | ** |
| ** |
| ** | |
| AM × CO2 |
|
|
|
| * | |
Chlorphyll a, chlorophyll b, total Chl content, Chl a/b and carotenoids in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2. Data are means ± SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| Chlorophyll | Chorophyll | Total Chl Content | Chl | Carotenoids | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | Ratio | (mg g−1 DW) | ||
| aCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 5.45 ± 0.03 a | 1.50± 0.01 a | 6.95 ± 0.04 a | 3.63± 0.004 a | 1.72± 0.012 a | |
| M | 6.40± 0.04 b | 1.89± 0.02 b | 8.29 ± 0.060 b | 3.38± 0.005 b | 2.01± 0.016 b | |
| eCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 4.13± 0.03 c | 1.08 ± 0.02 c | 5.21 ± 0.050 c | 3.82± 0.005 c | 1.42± 0.008 c | |
| M | 6.65± 0.085 d | 1.77 ± 0.01 d | 8.42 ± 0.098 d | 3.75± 0.013 d | 2.44± 0.012 d | |
| Source of variation | ||||||
| AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| CO2 | ** | ** | ** |
| ** | |
| AM × CO2 | * | ** | ** |
| ** | |
Figure 1H2O2 content (A), catalase (B) and APX (C) activities in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ± SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.