| Literature DB >> 34066650 |
Enrique Bellido1, Purificación de la Haba1, Eloísa Agüera1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: C/N ratio; biofertilization; nutrients; oxidative stress; photosynthetic pigments
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066650 PMCID: PMC8150476 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Percentage root colonization and growth parameters of sunflower plants inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (a CO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ±SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| Root Colonization | Leaf Dry Weight | Stem Dry Weight | Leaf Area | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (mg plant−1) | (mg plant−1) | (cm2) | ||
| aCO2 | |||||
| NM | ND | 940 ± 31.5 a | 913 ± 2.6 a | 15.9 ± 0.36 a | |
| M | 40.5 ± 0.48 b | 1213 ± 36.1 b | 1190 ± 23.5 b | 17.9 ± 0.44 b | |
| eCO2 | |||||
| NM | ND | 1438 ± 31.7 c | 1398 ± 22.6 c | 21.85 ± 0.32 c | |
| M | 47.8 ± 0.83 d | 1634 ± 40.2 d | 1564 ± 24.7 d | 25.56 ± 0.28 d | |
| Source of variation | |||||
| AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| CO2 | ** | * | ** | ** | |
| AM × CO2 | ** |
|
|
| |
Concentration of starch, total soluble sugar (TSS) and proteins (TSP); percentages of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), C/N ratio in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ±SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| Starch | TSS | TSP | Leaf C | Leaf N | C/N | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | (%) | (%) | |||
| aCO2 | |||||||
| NM | 30.5 ± 0.53 a | 258.2 ± 0.61 a | 30.7 ± 0.44 a | 39.6 ± 0.61 a | 1.42 ± 0.04 a | 27.9 a | |
| M | 126.6 ± 1.38 b | 261.5 ± 0.41 b | 35.6 ± 0.36 b | 40.5 ± 0.20 a | 1.80 ± 0.44 b | 22.5 b | |
| eCO2 | |||||||
| NM | 108.7 ± 1.92 c | 270.6 ± 0.45 c | 31.8 ± 0.49 a | 41.9 ± 0.37 a | 1.21 ± 0.32 c | 34.9 c | |
| M | 308.7 ± 2.24 d | 285.7 ± 0.16 d | 38.7 ± 0.47 d | 40.1 ± 0.45 a | 1.45 ± 0.28 ad | 27.6 ad | |
| Source of variation | |||||||
| AM | ** | ** | ** |
| * | ** | |
| CO2 | ** | ** | ** |
| * | ** | |
| AM × CO2 | ** | ** |
|
|
|
| |
P, K (%) B and Fe, B (mg kg−1) concentrations in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ±SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| P | K | Mg | Fe | B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | ||
| aCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 0.12 ± 0.004 a | 0.463 ± 0.008 a | 0.18 ± 0.004 a | 39.6 ± 0.61 a | 12.3 ± 0.20 a | |
| M | 0.20 ± 0.012 b | 0.511 ± 0.004 b | 0.26 ± 0.008 b | 40.5 ± 0.20 a | 14.2 ± 0.24 b | |
| eCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 0.17 ± 0.008 c | 0.494 ± 0.004 c | 0.23 ± 0.016 c | 41.9 ± 0.36 a | 12.9 ± 0.36 c | |
| M | 0.25 ± 0.004 d | 0.540 ± 0.024 d | 0.31 ± 0.012 d | 40.1 ± 0.45 a | 17.1 ± 0.20 d | |
| Source of variation | ||||||
| AM | ** |
| * |
| ** | |
| CO2 | ** |
| ** |
| ** | |
| AM × CO2 |
|
|
|
| * | |
Chlorphyll a, chlorophyll b, total Chl content, Chl a/b and carotenoids in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis (AM) and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2. Data are means ± SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.
| Chlorophyll | Chorophyll | Total Chl Content | Chl | Carotenoids | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | (mg g−1 DW) | Ratio | (mg g−1 DW) | ||
| aCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 5.45 ± 0.03 a | 1.50± 0.01 a | 6.95 ± 0.04 a | 3.63± 0.004 a | 1.72± 0.012 a | |
| M | 6.40± 0.04 b | 1.89± 0.02 b | 8.29 ± 0.060 b | 3.38± 0.005 b | 2.01± 0.016 b | |
| eCO2 | ||||||
| NM | 4.13± 0.03 c | 1.08 ± 0.02 c | 5.21 ± 0.050 c | 3.82± 0.005 c | 1.42± 0.008 c | |
| M | 6.65± 0.085 d | 1.77 ± 0.01 d | 8.42 ± 0.098 d | 3.75± 0.013 d | 2.44± 0.012 d | |
| Source of variation | ||||||
| AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| CO2 | ** | ** | ** |
| ** | |
| AM × CO2 | * | ** | ** |
| ** | |
Figure 1H2O2 content (A), catalase (B) and APX (C) activities in leaves of sunflower inoculated (M) or not inoculated (NM) with R. irregularis and ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 treatments (eCO2). Data are means ± SE. Different letters show significant difference among the treatments according to Tukey’s test (p 0.05). ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NS = not significant.