| Literature DB >> 34066583 |
Zhongdian Dong1,2,3, Xueyou Li1, Zebin Yao1, Chun Wang1, Yusong Guo1,2,3, Qian Wang4, Changwei Shao4, Zhongduo Wang1,2,3,5.
Abstract
Hainan medaka (Oryzias curvinotus) is distributed in the coastal waters of the South China Sea and is able to adapt to a wide range of salinities. In this study, we characterized O. curvinotus in Sanya River (SY-medaka), which lacks dmy (a male sex-determining gene in O. latipes and O. curvinotus). In a comparison of SY-medaka and Gaoqiao medaka (GQ-medaka), the morphological difference between the two populations does not reach the subspecies level and they can be considered two geographic populations of O. curvinotus. A mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (CoI) sequence alignment showed that the sequence identities between SY-medaka and other geographic populations of O. curvinotus are as high as 95%. A phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome also indicated that SY-medaka belongs to O. curvinotus. Molecular marker-based genetic sex assays and whole genome re-sequencing showed that SY-medaka does not contain dmy. Further, in RNA-Seq analyses of the testis and ovaries of sexually mature SY-medaka, dmy expression was not detected. We speculate that high temperatures resulted in the loss of dmy in SY-medaka during evolution, or the lineage has another sex-determining gene. This study provides a valuable dataset for elucidating the mechanism underlying sex determination in Oryzias genus and advances research on functional genomics or reproduction biology in O. curvinotus.Entities:
Keywords: Oryzias curvinotus; RNA-Seq; dmy; sex determining gene
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066583 PMCID: PMC8148570 DOI: 10.3390/ani11051327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Comparison of morphological traits between GQ-medaka and SY-medaka.
| Countable Traits | GQ-Medaka | SY-Medaka | Variable Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| dorsal fin ray counts | 6.02 ± 0.15 | 6.04 ± 0.19 | 0.05 |
| anal fin ray counts | 19.49 ± 0.87 | 19.71 ± 0.80 | 0.13 |
| pectoral fin ray counts | 8.09 ± 0.29 | 8.12 ± 0.32 | 0.05 |
| caudal fin ray counts | 18.51 ± 0.69 b | 19.31 ± 1.02 a | 0.47 |
| ventral fin ray counts | 6.00 ± 0.00 | 6.00 ± 0.00 | |
|
| |||
| Body weight/g | 0.203 ± 0.06 | 0.204 ± 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Total length/mm | 27.71 ± 2.25 a | 27.59 ± 1.83 b | 0.03 |
| Head length/mm | 5.20 ± 0.62 b | 5.44 ± 0.50 a | 0.2 |
| Snount length/mm | 1.21 ± 0.25 | 1.29 ± 0.22 | 0.17 |
| Eye orbit diameter/mm | 2.06 ± 0.27 | 2.00 ± 0.22 | 0.12 |
| Maximum depth of body/mm | 5.01 ± 0.72 | 5.12 ± 0.44 | 0.09 |
| Length of caudal fin/mm | 4.32 ± 0.35 | 4.21 ± 0.31 | 0.17 |
| Tips of snout to anus/mm | 12.22 ± 0.94 | 12.04 ± 0.80 | 0.1 |
| Tip of snout to dorsal fin/mm | 13.14 ± 0.98 a | 12.63 ± 0.92 b | 0.27 |
| Caudal peduncle length/mm | 4.19 ± 0.33 | 4.17 ± 0.23 | 0.04 |
| Caudal peduncle depth/mm | 2.09 ± 0.25 b | 2.24 ± 0.18 a | 0.35 |
| Length of dorsal fin/mm | 3.30 ± 0.67 b | 3.68 ± 0.67 a | 0.28 |
| Length of base of anal fin/mm | 2.78 ± 0.35 b | 2.96 ± 0.41 a | 0.23 |
| Length of pectoral fin/mm | 3.90 ± 0.41 b | 4.36 ± 0.37 a | 0.58 |
Note: The value in the table is mean ± standard deviation (sd), different letters (a, b) indicate significant differences between GQ-medaka (Gaoqiao medaka) and SY-medaka (medaka in the Sanya River).
Figure 1Structure of the mitochondrial genome of SY-medaka (medaka in the Sanya River) (A) and phylogenetic tree analysis of the mitochondrial sequence of Oryzias (B). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6.0 with the maximum likelihood method. Black point indicates SY-medaka.
Figure 2Genetic sex identification of O. curvinotus. (A) Gel electrophoresis results of PCR products amplified from the genome of O. curvinotus by primer Ocsex-F/Ocsex-R. Male SY-medaka (medaka in the Sanya River): 1–17 and 18–37. Male GQ-medaka (Gaoqiao medaka): G3, G4, G7, and G8. Female SY-medaka: 38–57. Female GQ-medaka: G1, G2, G5, and G6. 0 is a negative control; M is a DL 5000 DNA marker. (B) Coverage of dmy by whole genome re-sequencing reads of GQ-medaka and SY-medaka. M indicates male and F indicates female. Only five males of SY-medaka (7, 9, 12, 15, and 16) had complete sexual identification records, unfortunately the sampling records of the remaining 10 samples (six females and four males) were missing, making it impossible to pinpoint the sex of each sample.
Figure 3(A) MA plot of differentially expressed genes between the testis and ovary. (B) Validation of RNA-Seq data using qPCR. The RNA-Seq results are displayed as log2 Fold Change (ovary/testis), (n = 3 for each sex). qPCR results were evaluated by relative expression using eef1b and rps4x as reference genes and the optimized comparative Ct (2-ΔΔCt). (C) Consistency of log2 Fold Change(ovary/testis) between RNA-Seq data (x-axis) and qPCR data (y-axis) was high (R2 = 0.965) based on 20 genes.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of the evolution of dmy in SY-medaka (medaka in the Sanya River).