| Literature DB >> 34065768 |
Marcin Waligóra1, Matylda Gliniak2, Jan Bylica2, Paweł Pasieka2, Patrycja Łączak2, Piotr Podolec3, Grzegorz Kopeć1.
Abstract
In pulmonary hypertension (PH), T wave inversions (TWI) are typically observed in precordial leads V1-V3 but can also extend further to the left-sided leads. To date, the cause and prognostic significance of this extension have not yet been assessed. Therefore, we aimed to assess the relationship between heart morphology and precordial TWI range, and the role of TWI in monitoring treatment efficacy and predicting survival. We retrospectively analyzed patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) treated in a reference pulmonary hypertension center. Patients were enrolled if they had a cardiac magnetic resonance (cMR) and 12-lead surface ECG performed at the time of assessment. They were followed from October 2008 until March 2021. We enrolled 77 patients with PAH and 56 patients with inoperable CTEPH. They were followed for a mean of 51 ± 33.5 months, and during this time 47 patients died (35.3%). Precordial TWI in V1-V6 were present in 42 (31.6%) patients, while no precordial TWI were observed only in 9 (6.8%) patients. The precordial TWI range correlated with markers of PH severity, including right ventricle to left ventricle volume RVEDVLVEDV (R = 0.76, p < 0.0001). The presence of TWI in consecutive leads from V1 to at least V5 predicted severe RV dilatation (RVEDVLVEDV ≥ 2.3) with a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 84.1% (AUC of 0.90, 95% CI = 0.83-0.94, p < 0.0001). Presence of TWI from V1 to at least V5 was also a predictor of mortality in Kaplan-Meier estimation (p = 0.02). Presence of TWI from V1 to at least V5 had a specificity of 64.3%, sensitivity of 58.1%, negative predictive value of 75%, and positive predictive value of 45.5% as a mortality predictor. In patients showing a reduction in TWI range of at least one lead after treatment compared with patients without this reduction, we observed a significant improvement in RV-EDV and RV-EDVLV-EDV. We concluded that the extension of TWI to left-sided precordial leads reflects significant pathological alterations in heart geometry represented by an increase in RV/LV volume and predicts poor survival in patients with PAH and CTEPH. Additionally, we found that analysis of precordial TWI range can be used to monitor the effectiveness of hemodynamic response to treatment of pulmonary hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: T wave inversion; chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; electrocardiography; pulmonary arterial hypertension; pulmonary hypertension; right ventricle dilatation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065768 PMCID: PMC8156460 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10102147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Characteristics of study patients at the time of study enrollment. Abbreviations (in order of appearance): PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; IPAH, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; CTD-APAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease; CTEPH, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; CAD, coronary artery disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; WHO FC, World Health Organization functional class; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; 6 MWD, distance in 6-min walking test; RHC, right heart catheterization; iRBBB, incomplete right bundle branch block; RBBB, complete right bundle branch block; LBBB, left bundle branch block; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; RAP, right atrial pressure; CO, cardiac output; CI, cardiac index; SpO2, oxygen saturation; MVB, mixed venous blood; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; LV-m, left ventricle mass; LV-EDV, left ventricle end-diastolic volume; LV-EF, left ventricle ejection fraction; RV-EDV, right ventricle end-diastolic volume; RV-m, right ventricle mass; RV-EF, right ventricle ejection fraction; RAA, right atrial area.
|
| 133 |
|---|---|
| Etiology: | |
| PAH ( | 77 |
| IPAH ( | 64 (48.1%) |
| CTD-APAH ( | 13 (9.8%) |
| CTEPH ( | 56 (42.1%) |
| Concomitant diseases: | |
| CAD with prior PCI ( | 4 (3%) |
| Arterial hypertension ( | 43 (32.3%) |
| Diabetes ( | 11 (8.3%) |
| COPD ( | 4 (3%) |
| Thyroid gland disease ( | 21 (15.8%) |
| Sex, female ( | 86 (64.7%) |
| Age (years) | 54.7 ± 15.6 |
| Weight (kg) | 72.2 ± 17 |
| WHO FC: | |
| I | 0 |
| II | 18 (13.5%) |
| III | 97 (72.9%) |
| IV | 18 (13.5%) |
| Newly diagnosed (“incident cases”) ( | 113 (85%) |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 2539 ± 3167 |
| 6 MWD (m) | 337.5 ± 117.4 |
| ECG: | |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 77.6 ± 14 |
| RHC: | |
| mPAP (mmHg) | 48.1 ± 14.3 |
| RAP (mmHg) | 6.1 ± 4.6 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 127 ± 21.3 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77.8 ± 17.2 |
| CO (L/min) | 3.3 ± 1.4 |
| CI (L/min/m2) | 1.8 ± 0.7 |
| Peripheral blood SpO2 (%) | 92.2 ± 5.3 |
| MVB SpO2 (%) | 59.7 ± 9.7 |
| PVR (WU) | 12.1 ± 6.1 |
| cMR: | |
| LVm (g) | 96.4 ± 28.7 |
| LVEDV (mL) | 105 ± 42.8 |
| LVEF (%) | 61.8 ± 9.5 |
| RVEDV (mL) | 200 ± 75 |
| RVm (g) | 57.3 ± 32.4 |
| RVEF (%) | 37.2 ± 11.7 |
| RAA (cm2) | 30.9 ± 9.4 |
Correlation between structural, functional, and biochemical markers of pulmonary hypertension severity and the range of T wave inversions in precordial leads. Abbreviations (in order of appearance): TWI, T wave inversions; cMR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; RVEDV, right ventricle end-diastolic volume; RVm, right ventricle mass; RVEF, right ventricle ejection fraction; LVEDV, left ventricle end-diastolic volume; LMm, left ventricle mass; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; , left ventricle to right ventricle volume ratio; RAA, right atrial area; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; CI, cardiac index; RAP, right atrial pressure; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; 6 MWD, six-minute walking test distance.
| R Coefficient for Comparison with Listed Variable and Precordial TWI Range |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical variables | ||
| Age (years) | −0.04 | 0.69 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 0.46 | <0.0001 |
| 6 MWD (m) | −0.37 | 0.0001 |
| cMR variables | ||
| RVEDV (mL) | 0.44 | <0.0001 |
| RVm (g) | 0.43 | <0.0001 |
| 0.09 | 0.34 | |
| RVEF (%) | −0.61 | <0.0001 |
| LVEDV (mL) | 0.35 | 0.0001 |
| LVm (g) | −0.07 | 0.4 |
| LVEF (%) | −0.19 | 0.03 |
|
| 0.68 | <0.0001 |
| RAA (cm2) | 0.42 | <0.0001 |
| Hemodynamic variables | ||
| mPAP (mmHg) | 0.42 | <0.0001 |
| PVR (WU) | 0.48 | <0.0001 |
| CI (L/min/m2) | −0.26 | 0.004 |
| RAP (mmHg) | 0.27 | 0.002 |
Figure 1(A) Right ventricle ejection fraction (RVEF), right ventricle end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), right ventricle mass (RVm), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in relation to the presence of T wave inversions (TWI) in consecutive precordial leads. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. Each unit on the y-axis corresponds to one unit for the presented variables (e.g., 1 for 1 mL of volume or for 1% of ejection fraction, etc.). (B) RVEDV to left ventricle end-diastolic volume ratio ( ratio) in relation to the presence of T wave inversions (TWI) in consecutive precordial leads. Data are presented as median and interquartile range.
Figure 2Localization of precordial leads in relation to the left and right ventricles in an apparently healthy subject (A) and in a patient with advanced pulmonary hypertension. y.o.–years old (B). The left-sided leads (V4–V6) in a patient with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension “look” at the right ventricle instead of the left ventricle. IPAH–idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Figure 3Graphical representation of right ventricle dislocation towards lead V6 in patients with different stages of pulmonary hypertension. In a healthy subject, lead V4 is located over the apex. As the right ventricle volume increases and the left ventricle volume decreases, the apex is rotated towards lead V6. Consequently, most precordial leads represent electrical processes in the right ventricle rather than in the left ventricle. TWI–T waves inversions.
Figure 4Precordial T wave inversion (TWI) range as a predictor of severe right ventricular dilatation (right ventricular end-diastolic volume/left ventricular end-diastolic volume > 2.3). Area under curve of 0.90, 95% CI = 0.83–0.94, p < 0.0001.
Comparison of patients with and without improvement in precordial TWI range after specific treatment. Abbreviations (in order of appearance): WHO FC, World Health Organization functional class; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; 6 MWD, distance in 6-min walking test; cMR, cardiac resonance imaging; LVm, left ventricle mass; LVEDV, left ventricle end-diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; RVEDV, right ventricle end-diastolic volume; RVm, right ventricle mass; RVEF, right ventricle ejection fraction; RAA, right atrial area; RHC, right heart catheterization; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; RAP, right atrial pressure; CI, cardiac index; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance.
| Patients with No Improvement in Precordial TWI Range ( | Patients with Improvement in Precordial TWI Range ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical and ECG characteristics | |||
| Baseline WHO FC | 3.05 ± 0.22 | 2.94 ± 0.42 | 0.33 |
| Δ WHO FC | −0.33 ± 0.7 | −0.61 ± 0.85 | 0.27 |
| Baseline NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 1812 ± 1664 | 2407 ± 2483 | 0.4 |
| Δ NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | −714 ± 1112 | −2202 ± 2198 | 0.01 |
| Baseline 6 MWD (m) | 358 ± 110 | 316 ± 81.7 | 0.21 |
| Δ 6 MWD (m) | +51.4 ± 58.9 | + 77.9 ± 68.2 | 0.22 |
| cMR | |||
| Baseline RVEF (%) | 35.9 ± 12.1 | 39.2 ± 9.4 | 0.35 |
| Δ RVEF (%) | +4.8 ± 9.4 | +10.2 ± 13.5 | 0.25 |
| Baseline RVEDV (mL) | 188.1 ± 58.2 | 182 ± 53.1 | 0.74 |
| Δ RVEDV (mL) | +10.9 ± 41 | −40.9 ± 37.4 | <0.0001 |
| Baseline RVm (g) | 52.8 ± 18.2 | 50.4 ± 26.9 | 0.75 |
| Δ RVm (g) | −3.1 ± 19 | −15.1 ± 27.8 | 0.17 |
| Baseline LVEDV (mL) | 95.1 ± 35.8 | 95.2 ± 26.1 | 0.99 |
| Δ LVEDV (mL) | +2.5 ± 18.3 | +29.6 ± 26.6 | 0.005 |
|
| 2.16 ± 0.87 | 1.97 ± 0.52 | |
|
| 0 ± 0.55 | −0.8 ± 0.46 | <0.0001 |
| Baseline RAA (cm2) | 31.3 ± 13.6 | 29 ± 13.6 | 0.53 |
| Δ RAA (cm2) | +0.3 ± 5.2 | −4.8 ± 7.5 | 0.05 |
Figure 5Survival differences between groups with TWI ranging up to V4 or extending to V5/V6 (A), p = 0.02. Survival differences between groups with severe dilatation ( ≥ 2.3 ≥ 2.3) or with < 2.3 (B), p = 0.008.