Literature DB >> 25052475

Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy or strain is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients independent of blood pressure reduction - A LIFE review.

Casper N Bang1, Richard B Devereux2, Peter M Okin2.   

Abstract

Cornell product criteria, Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria and electrocardiographic (ECG) strain (secondary ST-T abnormalities) are markers for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and adverse prognosis in population studies. However, the relationship of regression of ECG LVH and strain during antihypertensive therapy to cardiovascular (CV) risk was unclear before the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study. We reviewed findings on ECG LVH regression and strain over time in 9193 hypertensive patients with ECG LVH at baseline enrolled in the LIFE study. The composite endpoint of CV death, nonfatal MI, or stroke occurred in 1096 patients during 4.8±0.9years follow-up. In Cox multivariable models adjusting for randomized treatment, known risk factors including in-treatment blood pressure, and for severity ECG LVH by Cornell product and Sokolow-Lyon voltage, baseline ECG strain was associated with a 33% higher risk of the LIFE composite endpoint (HR. 1.33, 95% CI [1.11-1.59]). Development of new ECG strain between baseline and year-1 was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of the composite endpoint (HR. 2.05, 95% CI [1.51-2.78]), whereas the risk associated with regression or persistence of ECG strain was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (both p>0.05). After controlling for treatment with losartan or atenolol, for baseline Framingham risk score, Cornell product, and Sokolow-Lyon voltage, and for baseline and in-treatment systolic and diastolic blood pressure, 1 standard deviation (SD) lower in-treatment Cornell product was associated with a 14.5% decrease in the composite endpoint (HR. 0.86, 95% CI [0.82-0.90]). In a parallel analysis, 1 SD lower in-treatment Sokolow-Lyon voltage was associated with a 16.6% decrease in the composite endpoint (HR. 0.83, 95% CI [0.78-0.88]). The LIFE study shows that evaluation of both baseline and in-study ECG LVH defined by Cornell product criteria, Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria or ECG strain improves prediction of CV events and that regression of ECG LVH during antihypertensive treatment is associated with better outcome, independent of blood pressure reduction.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-hypertensive treatment; Atrial fibrillation; Cardiovascular death; Cardiovascular outcome; Congestive heart failure; Cornell voltage criteria; Hypertension; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Myocardial infarction; Sokolow-Lyon criteria; Strain; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25052475     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  26 in total

Review 1.  Hypertension and Stroke: Epidemiological Aspects and Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Francesca Pistoia; Simona Sacco; Diana Degan; Cindy Tiseo; Raffaele Ornello; Antonio Carolei
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-07-10

2.  Absence of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with increased mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Polydoros N Kampaktsis; Ajayram V Ullal; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Robert M Minutello; Luke Kim; Geoffrey S Bergman; Dmitriy N Feldman; Harsimran Singh; Shing Chiu Wong; Peter M Okin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Sokolow-Lyon voltage is suitable for monitoring improvement in cardiac function and prognosis of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Kenji Fukaya; Kyosuke Takeshita; Takahiro Okumura; Hiroaki Hiraiwa; Soichiro Aoki; Takeo Ichii; Yuki Sugiura; Katsuhide Kitagawa; Toru Kondo; Naoki Watanabe; Naoaki Kano; Kenji Furusawa; Akinori Sawamura; Ryota Morimoto; Yasuko Bando; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Antihypertensive Therapies and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Elsayed Z Soliman; Ronald J Prineas
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Predicts Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Hypertensive Patients: The ALLHAT Study.

Authors:  Casper N Bang; Elsayed Z Soliman; Lara M Simpson; Barry R Davis; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Short-term repeatability of electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Michelle L Meyer; Elsayed Z Soliman; Dominique Drager; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  QTc dispersion and Cornell duration product can predict 10-year outcomes in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Dragan B Djordjević; Ivan S Tasić; Svetlana I Kostić; Bojana N Stamenković; Aleksandar D Djordjević; Dragan B Lović
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Relations among depressive symptoms, electrocardiographic hypertrophy, and cardiac events in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.

Authors:  William Whang; Karina W Davidson; Nicholas O Palmeri; Anupama B Bhatt; James Peacock; William F Chaplin; Daichi Shimbo; Donald E Edmondson
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2015-10-08

9.  Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: A meta-analysis of electrocardiographic studies.

Authors:  Hongsheng Zhang; Lingai Hu; Xiqing Wei
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in hypertension.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Elsayed Z Soliman; Barry R Davis; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.