| Literature DB >> 34065519 |
Nerea Jiménez-Picón1, Macarena Romero-Martín2, José Antonio Ponce-Blandón1, Lucia Ramirez-Baena1, Juan Carlos Palomo-Lara1, Juan Gómez-Salgado3,4.
Abstract
Emotional intelligence is an essential trait and skill for healthcare professionals. Mindfulness meditation has proved to be effective in increasing the wellbeing of those who practice it, leading to better mental health, self-care and job satisfaction. This paper aims to identify the recent evidence on the relationship between mindfulness and emotional intelligence among healthcare professionals and students. A systematic review was conducted including the databases PubMed, Cinhal, PsycINFO and Web of Science. The main variables were emotional intelligence skills and mindfulness practice. Data were extracted according to the following outcomes: authors, year of publication, country, study design, participants, mindfulness training intervention, tools used in data collection and main results. The following inclusion criteria were applied: peer-reviewed articles; published in English or Spanish; published between 2010 and 2020; quantitative methodology; a study population of healthcare professionals or students; the relationship with the aim of the study. The Joanna Briggs Institute criteria were followed for assessing the methodological quality of the selected studies. Three researchers were involved in the review. After the selection process, 10 studies were selected out of the 197 references initially identified. These studies revealed a positive relationship between mindfulness and emotional intelligence, particularly the capacity to regulate emotions. Furthermore, mindfulness is negatively related to emotional exhaustion. Training interventions based on mindfulness have proved to be useful in promoting emotional balance, emotional awareness, emotional acceptance, emotion recognition, expressive suppression and a reduction in emotional exhaustion. This study could serve as a basis for further research on the benefits of emotional intelligence and practicing mindfulness for the bio-psycho-social welfare of healthcare professionals.Entities:
Keywords: emotional intelligence; healthcare professionals; mindfulness; systematic review
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065519 PMCID: PMC8161054 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart of the selection process according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Critical appraisal of reviewed studies.
| Assessing Item | Vongareesawat et al. 2012 | Snowden et al. 2015 | Dubert et al. 2016 | Jacobs et al. 2016 | Orellana et al. 2017 | Kelm et al. 2018 | Lamothe et al. 2018 | Salvarani et al. 2019 | Salvarani et al. 2020 | Xie et al. 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Were confounding factors identified? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N |
| Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | Y |
| Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Overall appraisal | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I | I |
Possible scores: Y = yes, N = no, U = unclear, N/A = not applicable, I = include, E = exclude, S = seek for further info.
Summary of reviewed studies.
| Authors | Design | Participants | Intervention | Variables | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vongareesawat et al. [ | Pretest post-test (control group) | N = 26 | Mindfulness training 9 h/day | E Intelligence (TEISTTP) | EI scores significantly higher immediately after intervention (F = −2.13 |
| Snowden et al. [ | Cross-sectional | N = 870 | Mindfulness training | E Intelligence (TEIQue, SEIS) | No significant differences in TEIQ-SF scores after mindfulness training (U = 22,980, z = 0.864, |
| Dubert et al. [ | Cross-sectional | N = 80 | N/A | Dispositional mindfulnes (MAAS) | Positive correlation between MAAS and ERQ-R (r = 0.1905; |
| Jacobs et al. [ | Cross-sectional | N = 427 | N/A | Skills of mindfulness (KIMS) | Trait E Intelligence correlated with skills of mindfulness observed (r = 0.19, |
| Orellana et al. [ | Pretest post-test | N = 28 | Meditation training | E regulation (ERSQ-27) | E exhaustion decreased after meditation (t = −3.13, |
| Kelm et al. [ | Pretest post-test | N = 24 | Mindfulness meditation | CPR performance | More positive E balance after intervention (Mean difference = 0.33, Cohen’s d = 0.43, |
| Lamothe et al. [ | Pretest post-test | N = 37 | Mindfulness program | Dispositional mindfulness (MAAS) | Students showed significant differences after the program in E acceptance [d = 1.39; t(11) = 4.81, |
| Salvarani et al. [ | Cross-sectional | N = 97 | N/A | Dispositional mindfulness (FFMQ) | Significant negative correlation between E exhaustion and regulation of emotions and dimensions of FFQM ( |
| Salvarani et al. [ | Cross-sectional | N = 622 | N/A | Dispositional mindfulness (FFMQ) | Positive correlation between mindfulness and all dimensions of the ability to regulate emotions ( |
| Xie et al. [ | Cross-sectional | N = 883 | N/A | Dispositional mindfulness (MAAS) | Association between mindfulness, E intelligence, E exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment ( |
E = Emotional; FFMQ = Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire; DERS = Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; MAAS = Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; ERQ = Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; MBI = Maslach Burnout Inventory; TEIQue = Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire; SEIS = Emotional Intelligence Scale; TEISTTP = Thai Emotional Intelligence Screening Test for the Thai Population; PEC = Profile of Emotional Competence; AAQ-II = Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II; ERQ = Emotion Regulation Scale; GERT = Geneva Emotion Recognition Test; EI = Emotional Intelligence Scale; KIMS = Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills; MHB = Multiple Health Behavior Questionnaire; PANAS = positive and negative affect Schedule; ERSQ-27 = Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire; CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation.