| Literature DB >> 34065454 |
Jiansheng Wen1, Min Su1.
Abstract
In our randomized controlled trial, we investigated whether Wu-style Tai Chi (Tai Chi combined with Daoyin) as a potential exercise prescription is more effective than simplified Tai Chi in the prevention and treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia in the middle-aged and elderly. We randomly assigned 66 patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia to one of the two groups: the Wu-style Tai Chi group or the simplified Tai Chi group; the simplified Tai Chi group only exercised simplified Tai Chi three times a week for 6 weeks. The Wu-style Tai Chi group participated in 60 min of Wu-style Tai Chi three times a week for 6 weeks. Serum biochemical tests were conducted at baseline and at the end of the study. Measurements of blood pressure were performed at the same time. Primary outcomes were compared within and between groups at baseline and at 6 weeks. The participants in the Wu-style Tai Chi group performed, at 6 weeks, significantly better than baseline on all of the primary outcomes (p value ≤ 0.05). The results also show significant difference within the simplified Tai Chi group from baseline to 6 weeks in TCHO (mmol/L), SBP (mmHg), and LDL-C (mmol/L) (p value < 0.05). From baseline to 6 weeks, the Wu-style Tai Chi group had significant differences at more test indexes in serum and blood pressure than the simplified Tai Chi group. At 6 weeks, the Wu-style Tai Chi group had a significantly greater mean improvement in the SBP (mmHg) than did the simplified Tai Chi group (mean between-group difference, -5.80 (mmHg) [95% CI, -14.01 to 2.41]; p = 0.007). The results showed that, compared with simplified Tai Chi, Wu-style Tai Chi had a better effect on hypertension in the middle-aged and elderly. At 6 weeks in LDL-C (mmol/L), the Wu-style Tai Chi group had significantly greater improvement between the two groups (means between-group difference, -0.45 (mmol/L) [95% CI, -0.89 to -0.17]; p = 0.03). The results showed that Wu-style Tai Chi protected the cardiovascular system of the middle-aged and elderly in improving LDL-C (mmol/L), and was more significant than simplified Tai Chi. After 6 weeks of exercise, Wu-style Tai Chi could effectively improve hyperlipidemia and hypertension. The total effective rate of cardiovascular disease was 90.00%. There was significant difference in the treatment effect of hypertension and hyperlipidemia between the two groups during 6 weeks (p = 0.039), showing that, in a small population of middle-aged and elderly subjects, Wu style Tai Chi could be useful in managing important CV risk factors, such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia.Entities:
Keywords: Tai Chi; cardiovascular disease; the middle-aged and elderly
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065454 PMCID: PMC8160700 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Screening, randomization, and completion of baseline and 6-week evaluations.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants at baseline *.
| Wu-Style Tai Chi | Simplified Tai Chi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | ( | ( | |
| Gender (female/male) | 12/18 | 12/18 | 1.000 |
| Age-year | 57.77 ± 9.46 | 57.20 ± 9.00 | 0.813 |
| Education Years † | 9.33 ± 2.84 | 9.03 ± 2.50 | 0.666 |
| Body mass index ‡ | 23.51 ± 2.32 | 23.83 ± 2.40 | 0.604 |
| Duration of disease—y | 3.92 ± 1.99 | 3.80 ± 2.05 | 0.824 |
| Chronic disease stages (no./ | 0.953 | ||
| Stage 1 | 11/30 | 12/30 | |
| Stage 2 | 10/30 | 9/30 | |
| Stage 3 | 9/30 | 9/30 | |
| Self-reported coexisting number of chronic diseases | 1.63 ± 1.13 | 1.73 ± 1.11 | 0.731 |
* Plus–minus values are means ±SD with the 95% confidence intervals. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables. There were no significant between-group differences in any baseline characteristics. † High school or higher education; ‡ The body mass index is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters; § We randomized 66 patients with stage 1 to 3 disease on a staging scale to one of the following two groups. In recent years, the medical community has formed a three-stage prevention program for early detection, early treatment, and prevention of chronic disease prevention and treatment.
Study measures, differences within groups at baseline and 6 weeks *.
| Within-Group Differences (95% CI) † | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Mean ± SD (95% CI) | ||
| Baseline | Week 6 | ||
| TCHO (mmol/L) ‡ | |||
| Simplified Tai Chi ( | 5.17 ± 1.09 | 4.90 ± 1.09 | 0.012 |
| Wu-style Tai Chi ( | 5.02 ± 1.20 | 4.54 ± 0.79 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) § | |||
| Simplified Tai Chi ( | 134.30 ± 20.81 | 124.30 ± 19.01 | 0.009 |
| Wu-style Tai Chi ( | 136.83 ± 19.91 | 123.50 ± 11.98 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) § | |||
| Simplified Tai Chi ( | 80.26 ± 13.43 | 77.90 ± 12.78 | NS |
| Wu-style Tai Chi ( | 80.83 ± 13.16 | 76.30 ± 8.81 | 0.004 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | |||
| Simplified Tai Chi ( | 3.27 ± 0.98 | 2.94 ± 0.96 | <0.001 |
| Wu-style Tai Chi ( | 3.01 ± 1.01 | 2.48 ± 0.71 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C(mmol/L) | |||
| Simplified Tai Chi ( | 1.36 ± 0.35 | 1.36 ± 0.42 | NS |
| Wu-style Tai Chi ( | 1.40 ± 0.34 | 1.51 ± 0.27 | 0.036 |
| TG (mmol/L) ‖ | |||
| Simplified Tai Chi ( | 1.70 ± 0.81 | 1.64 ± 0.79 | NS |
| Wu-style Tai Chi ( | 1.73 ± 0.63 | 1.52 ± 0.47 | 0.050 |
* Plus–minus values are means ± SD, with the 95% confidence intervals. NS denotes not significant. † p values were calculated with paired t-tests. Paired t-tests were used to examine within group changes from baseline to 6 weeks. ‡ Total cholesterol, normal value 3–5.2 mmol/L or so. § The normal blood pressure range is: systolic blood pressure (SP) 140–90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DP) 90–60 mmHg. ‖ Low density lipoprotein cholesterol: low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is about 2.7 mmol/L (105 mg/dL) in young adults and 3.1 mmol/L (120 mg/dL) in middle-aged and elderly adults. If LDL-C is above 4.14 mmol/L, it indicates that LDL-C is on the high side. ‖ Triglyceride: The normal range is: male 0.44~1.76 mmol/L; female 0.39~1.49 mmol/L. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol: male <40 years old 0.9~1.83 mmol/L (30~59 mg/dL), female < 40 years old 1.1~2.0 mmol/L (33~77 mg/dL); ‖ triglyceride: the normal range is: male 0.44~1.76 mmol/L; female 0.39~1.49 mmol/L.
Study measures between-group differences in the change at baseline and 6 weeks *.
| Between-Group Mean Difference (95% CI) † | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Wu-Style Tai Chi | vs. | Simplified Tai Chi | |
| ( | ( | |||
| TCHO (mmol/L) ‡ | ||||
| Baseline | −0.15 (−0.76 | to | 0.44) | NS |
| Week 6 | −0.36 (−0.85 | to | 0.13) | NS |
| SBP (mmHg) § | ||||
| Baseline | 2.53 (−7.99 | to | 13.06) | NS |
| Week 6 | −5.80 (−14.01 | to | 2.41) | 0.007 |
| DBP (mmHg) § | ||||
| Baseline | 0.57 (−6.31 | to | 7.44) | NS |
| Week 6 | −1.60 (−7.29 | to | 4.09) | NS |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline | −0.26 (−.77 | to | −0.26) | NS |
| Week 6 | −0.45 (−0.89 | to | −0.17) | 0.03 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline | 0.04 (−0.14 | to | 0.21) | NS |
| Week 6 | 0.15 (−0.03 | to | 0.33) | NS |
| TG (mmol/L) ‖ | ||||
| Baseline | −0.03 (−0.34 | to | 0.41) | NS |
| Week 6 | −0.12 (−0.46 | to | 0.21) | NS |
* Plus–minus values are means ± SD, with the 95% confidence intervals. NS denotes not significant. Independent-sample t-tests (with 95% confidence intervals) were used to compare group means at Baseline. † The values shown are unadjusted means with the 95% confidence intervals. p values were calculated with analysis of covariance. Point estimates and estimates falling within the 95% confidence interval were generated from independent t-tests for group differences. Because the subjects of the study have different chronic diseases, the trend of blood indicators before intervention is not the same. This will mask the effects of the intervention during statistical analysis. Therefore, covariance analysis was used to analyze the difference between the two groups at 6 weeks after testing the adjusted covariates. A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. ‡ Total cholesterol, Normal value 3–5.2 mmol/L or so. § The normal blood pressure range is: systolic blood pressure (SP) 140–90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DP) 90–60 mmHg. ‖ Triglyceride: The normal range is: male 0.44~1.76 mmol/L; female 0.39~1.49 mmol/L. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol: male <40 years old 0.9~1.83 mmol/L (30~59 mg/dL), female <40 years old 1.1~2.0 mmol/L (33~77 mg/dL); triglyceride: the normal range is: male 0.44~1.76 mmol/L; female 0.39~1.49 mmol/L.
Cardiovascular disease clinically meaningful improvement between the Wu-style Tai Chi group and the simplified Tai Chi group during 6 weeks *.
| Wu-Style Tai Chi | Simplified Tai Chi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Cardiovascular disease | |||
| (Hypertension † + Hyperlipidemia ‡) | 0.039 | ||
| medication use (Cases) | |||
| No change | 3 | 8 | |
| Become better * | 18 | 17 | |
| Significant improvement * | 9 | 5 | |
| Total effective percentage (%) § | 90.00 | 73.33 |
* Because the subjects of the study have different chronic diseases, the trend of blood indicators before intervention is not the same. This will mask the effects of the intervention during statistical analysis. Therefore, covariance analysis was used to analyze the difference between the two groups at 6 weeks after testing the adjusted covariates. A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. According to the diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO). See clinical treatment effect criteria for criteria of significant improvement and become better in outcome measures section. † Hypertension is a clinical syndrome characterized by elevated systemic arterial blood pressure (systolic blood pressure (>140 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (>90 mm Hg). ‡ Hyperlipidemia refers to high blood lipid levels, which can directly cause diseases that seriously endanger human health, such as atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, pancreatitis, etc., fasting TCHO, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C. § Become better + Significant improvement/total cases (%).