| Literature DB >> 34065258 |
Qijun Duan1,2, Jun Xie1, Guowei Xia1, Chaoxuan Xiao1, Xinyu Yang1, Qing Xie1,2, Zhengyong Huang3.
Abstract
Traditional epoxy resin (EP) materials have difficulty to meet the performance requirements in the increasingly complex operating environment of the electrical and electronic industry. Therefore, it is necessary to study the design and development of new epoxy composites. At present, fluorinated epoxy resin (F-EP) is widely used, but its thermal and mechanical properties cannot meet the demand. In this paper, fluorinated epoxy resin was modified by ordered filling of fluorinated graphene oxide (FGO). The effect of FGO interlayer spacing on the thermal and mechanical properties of the composite was studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. It is found that FGO with ordered filling can significantly improve the thermal and mechanical properties of F-EP, and the modification effect is better than that of FGO with disordered filling. When the interlayer spacing of FGO is about 9 Å, the elastic modulus, glass transition temperature, thermal expansion coefficient, and thermal conductivity of FGO are improved with best effect. Furthermore, we calculated the micro parameters of different systems, and analyzed the influencing mechanism of ordered filling and FGO layer spacing on the properties of F-EP. It is considered that FGO can bind the F-EP molecules on both sides of the nanosheets, reducing the movement ability of the molecular segments of the materials, so as to achieve the enhancement effect. The results can provide new ideas for the development of high-performance epoxy nanocomposites.Entities:
Keywords: elastic modulus; fluorinated epoxy resin; fluorinated graphene oxide; glass transition temperature; microscopic parameters; molecular dynamics; ordered filling
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065258 PMCID: PMC8160737 DOI: 10.3390/nano11051344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Establishment of molecular models. (a) Monomer molecular models of DGEBA, BPAF, MTHPA, GO, and FGO. (b) Model of F-EP filled with FGO. (c) Crosslinking procedure.
Composition of FGO modified F-EP Composites.
| System | Layer Spacing (Å) | Number of Molecules | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGO | DGEBA | MTHPA | BPAF | ||
| F-EP | – | 0 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
| Random | – | 3 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
| 3-FGO/F-EP | 3 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
| 6-FGO/F-EP | 6 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
| 9-FGO/F-EP | 9 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
| 12-FGO/F-EP | 12 | 3 | 50 | 100 | 25 |
Figure 2Molecular models. (a) Unfilled F-EP. (b) F-EP with disorderly filled FGO nanosheets. Figure (c) to (e) are the F-EP composite models with ordered filling of FGO (epoxy resin molecules are hidden). The layer spacing of each model is as follows: (c) 3 Å, (d) 6 Å, (e) 9 Å, (f) 12 Å.
Binding energy of different modified graphene/F-EP systems (kcal/mol).
| System | Eresin | Efiber | Etotal | Einterface |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO/F-EP | −4761 | −769 | −4157 | 1373 |
| FGO/F-EP | −4761 | −805 | −3766 | 1799 |
Figure 3Static elastic modulus of FGO/F-EP composites with different distribution characteristics.
Figure 4Glass transition temperature of FGO/F-EP composites with different distribution characteristics.
Figure 5Coefficient of thermal expansion of FGO/F-EP composites with different distribution characteristics.
Figure 6Mechanism model for heat conduction calculation of RNEMD.
Figure 7Thermal conductivity of FGO/F-EP composites with different distribution characteristics.
Figure 8FFV of FGO/F-EP composites with different distribution characteristics.
Figure 9MSD of F-EP composite systems with different FGO layer spacing.
Figure 10Axial density distribution of FGO/F-EP composites with different distribution characteristics. (a) Random; (b) 3-FGO/F-EP; (c) 6-FGO/F-EP; (d) 9-FGO/F-EP; (e) 12-FGO/F-EP.