| Literature DB >> 33808899 |
Keiichi Shirasu1, Shunsuke Kitayama2, Fan Liu2, Go Yamamoto1,3, Toshiyuki Hashida2.
Abstract
To apply carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as reinforcing agents in next-generation composites, it is essential to improve their nominal strength. However, since it is difficult to completely remove the defects, the synthesis guideline for improving nominal strength is still unclear, i.e., the effective strength and the number of nanotube layers required to improve the nominal strength has been undermined. In this study, molecular dynamics simulations were used to elucidate the effects of vacancies on the mechanical properties of CNTs. Additionally, the relationships between the number of layers and effective and nominal strengths of CNTs were discussed theoretically. The presence of extensive vacancies provides a possible explanation for the low nominal strengths obtained in previous experimental measurements of CNTs. This study indicates that the nominal strength can be increased from the experimentally obtained values of 10 GPa to approximately 20 GPa by using six to nine nanotube layers, even if the increase in effective strength of each layer is small. This has advantages over double-walled CNTs, because the effective strength of such CNTs must be approximately 60 GPa to achieve a nominal strength of 20 GPa.Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanotube; defect density; mechanical properties; molecular dynamics simulations; tensile strength
Year: 2021 PMID: 33808899 PMCID: PMC8003771 DOI: 10.3390/nano11030795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic of computational models with different pitting densities from 0 to 12%.
Figure 2Numerical data indicating trends in (a) effective strength and (b) Young’s modulus. (c) Relationship between effective strength and Young’s modulus. The line in (c) indicates ideal strength with respect to the effective modulus, approximately one-tenth of the Young’s modulus.
Figure 3Relationships between carbon nanotube (CNT) diameter, pitting density, and nominal tensile strength of a single-walled CNT (SWCNT).
Figure 4(a) Model scheme for nominal strength and (b) relationships between number of layers, effective strength of the outermost layer, and nominal strength of multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs).
Figure 5Nominal strength of CVD-grown and arc-discharge-grown MWCNTs obtained experimentally [12,29], and simulated nominal strengths obtained using Equation (7) and σef f= Eeff/10 plotted as a function of the experimentally obtained Young’s modulus.