| Literature DB >> 34065049 |
Edison A Díaz-Álvarez1, Erick de la Barrera2.
Abstract
Biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution is an increasingly accepted practice. However, most existing biomonitors are usually epiphytic species from mesic environments. This workEntities:
Keywords: biomonitoring; carbon emissions; environmental pollution; global ecology; nitrogen deposition; stable isotopes
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065049 PMCID: PMC8151467 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Study area in Sonora, Mexico. Green circles indicate the sites where buffelgrass was collected. Numbers indicate the collection site from small (sites 13 and 21), medium (9, 33 and 11) and large urban areas (1–4, 15, 17–19), agricultural (5–8, 10, 14, 16, and 24–30) and rural sites (20, 22, 23, 31, 32, and 34). Image data: Google Earth; date: 20 April 2020.
Climate and soil attributes from the study region in Sonora, Mexico. Data are means ± 1 S.E. (n = 34 sites).
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean temperature (°C) | 23.5 ± 0.1 |
| Minimum temperature (°C) | 7.5 ± 0.2 |
| Maximum temperature (°C) | 38.0 ± 0.1 |
| Annual precipitation (mm) | 287 ± 20 |
| Primary soil type | Cambisol (26% of sites), luvisol (26%), vertisol (24%), leptosol (12%), regosol (6%), phaeozem (6%) |
| Geological origin | Alluvial (85%), sedimentary (12%), igneous (3%) |
| Clay content (%) | 32.2 ± 3.0 |
| Silt content (%) | 22.5 ± 2.0 |
| Sand content (%) | 45.3 ± 3.6 |
| Electrical conductivity (mmho/cm) | 0.71 ± 0.14 |
| pH | 8.45 ± 0.14 |
Figure 2Principal Components Analysis for climate and soil characteristics from 34 collection sites with different land use. Data are plotted along the two main components from Table 2 for sites with agricultural (circles), large (squares), medium (triangles), and small (open circles) urban, or rural (diamonds) use. The numbers are the site identity from Figure 1. Ellipses indicate the 95% confidence interval for each land-use class. Percentages along the axes indicate the variance explained by each component.
Principal Components Analysis for climate and soil attributes from 34 sites in Sonora, Mexico. Data are the component loadings for each attribute considered and the percent of the variance explained by each component individually and cumulative. For each component, the p-values are from a Kruskal–Wallis test for the axis values for each land use class.
| Principal Component | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
| Sand | 0.32 | 0.39 | −0.28 | 0.14 | −0.35 | −0.28 | 0.29 | −0.04 | 0.59 |
| Silt | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.37 | −0.55 | 0.47 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.39 |
| Clay | −0.29 | −0.54 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.13 | −0.27 | −0.01 | 0.70 |
| Minimum temperature | −0.51 | 0.21 | 0.06 | −0.13 | −0.13 | −0.27 | −0.09 | −0.76 | −0.00 |
| Maximum temperature | 0.13 | −0.39 | −0.63 | −0.44 | 0.32 | −0.06 | 0.27 | −0.24 | −0.00 |
| Mean Temperature | −0.49 | 0.03 | −0.13 | −0.24 | −0.02 | −0.58 | −0.01 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
| Precipitation | −0.35 | 0.30 | −0.47 | −0.15 | −0.29 | 0.65 | −0.12 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| Electrical conductivity | 0.40 | 0.03 | −0.13 | −0.31 | −0.16 | −0.18 | −0.82 | −0.02 | −0.00 |
| pH | −0.07 | 0.35 | −0.35 | 0.50 | 0.65 | −0.09 | −0.27 | −0.02 | −0.00 |
| Individual variance | 0.41 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cumulative variance | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 0.328 | 0.812 | 0.036 | 0.232 | 0.812 | 0.079 | 0.814 | 0.085 | 1.00 | |
Figure 3Spatial distribution for the elemental composition for buffelgrass in Sonora, Mexico. Carbon content (C%, dry weight) for (A) leaves and (B) seeds, nitrogen content (N%, dry weight) for (C) leaves and (D) seeds, and the C:N ratio for (E) leaves and (F) fascicles. Image data: Google Earth; date: 20 April 2020.
Two-way PERMANOVA for carbon and nitrogen parameters of buffelgrass growing in Sonora, Mexico. p-values in bold indicate significant differences.
| C Content | N Content | C:N Ratio | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d.f. | F |
| F |
| F |
| F |
| F |
| |
| Organ | 1 | 463.2 |
| 172.3 |
| 276.98 |
| 94.641 |
| 0.741 | 0.416 |
| Land use | 4 | 6.261 |
| 5.109 |
| 4.529 |
| 4.892 |
| 12.89 |
|
| Organ × Land use | 4 | 4.805 |
| 2.285 | 0.057 | 2.918 |
| 4.037 |
| 2.954 |
|
Underlying data on the elemental and isotopic carbon and nitrogen status for leaves and seeds of C. ciliaris collected from sites with different land use.
| Land-Use Class | Carbon Content | Nitrogen Content | C:N | ∂13C | ∂15N | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Seeds | Leaves | Seeds | Leaves | Seeds | Leaves | Seeds | Leaves | Seeds | |
| Small urban | 41.13 ± 0.64 | 44.31 ± 0.54 | 2.31 ± 0.20 | 1.75 ± 0.22 | 18.96 ± 1.43 | 29.05 ± 3.31 | −14.11 ± 0.12 | −14.13 ± 0.14 | 6.56 ± 0.42 | 9.32 ± 0.52 |
| Medium urban | 43.31 ± 0.53 | 48.48 ± 0.58 | 2.71 ± 0.20 | 1.90 ± 0.17 | 17.30 ± 1.33 | 29.81 ± 3.41 | −14.65 ± 0.16 | −15.51 ± 0.33 | 12.23 ± 1.04 | 11.40 ± 0.96 |
| Large urban | 41.95 ± 0.30 | 47.15 ± 0.32 | 2.32 ± 0.09 | 1.73 ± 0.08 | 19.34 ± 0.91 | 29.39 ± 1.27 | −14.67 ± 0.17 | −15.58 ± 0.23 | 7.33 ± 0.24 | 8.01 ± 0.26 |
| Agriculture | 42.17 ± 0.25 | 47.15 ± 0.32 | 2.86 ± 0.07 | 1.81 ± 0.06 | 15.66 ± 0.57 | 27.68 ± 0.85 | −14.28 ± 0.06 | −15.39 ± 0.15 | 8.67 ± 0.29 | 8.57 ± 0.35 |
| Rural | 41.12 ± 0.19 | 48.91 ± 0.61 | 2.48 ±0.10 | 1.51 ± 0.08 | 17.29 ± 0.74 | 35.38 ± 2.47 | –14.14 ± 0.08 | −16.12 ± 0.33 | 8.92 ± 0.30 | 8.85 ± 0.33 |
Figure 4Elemental and isotopic carbon and nitrogen composition for leaves and seeds of C. ciliaris collected from sites with different land use. (A) Carbon and nitrogen content (dry mass basis) for leaves (open symbols) and seeds (closed symbols) collected from small (circles), medium (inverted triangles), and large cities (squares), agricultural lands (diamonds), and rural sites (triangles). (B) Carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures for leaves and seeds of C. ciliaris collected from sites with different land use. Data are shown as mean ± S.E. See underlying data in Appendix A.
Figure 5Spatial distribution for buffelgrass isotopic composition in Sonora, Mexico. Carbon isotopic composition (δ13C, ‰) for (A) leaves and (B) seeds and nitrogen isotopic composition (δ15N, ‰) for (C) leaves and (D) seeds. Image data: Google Earth; date: 20 April 2020.