| Literature DB >> 30206292 |
Edison A Díaz-Álvarez1,2, Erick de la Barrera3.
Abstract
An increase of nitrogen deposition resulting fromEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30206292 PMCID: PMC6134112 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32000-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Localization of the Valley of Mexico. Red and yellow dots represent the spatial distribution of the air quality network stations for wet deposition and the automatic monitoring network for NOx, respectively. This network is located mainly in Mexico City and its metropolitan area. Green triangles represent the sites where biomonitors were collected throughout the Valley. The red line delimits the basin, the white line indicates state division, and the blue line shows Mexico City limits. The map was created with ArcGIS 10 (Esri, Redlands, California, USA). Image data: Google Earth; image date: 5 September 2016.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of the total wet deposition in Kg N ha−1 year−1 during 2014 (A), and atmospheric concentration of NOx in ppb (B). Data is available for public access in the website of the Mexico City government (http://www.aire.cdmx.gob.mx/default.php). The map was created with ArcGIS 10 (Esri, Redlands, California, USA). Image data: Google Earth; image date: 5 September 2016.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of the nitrogen content (A,C,E,G) and δ15N values (B,D,F,H) for Anaptychia sp. (A,B), Grimmia sp. (C,D), Fabronia sp. (E,F) and Tillandsia recurvata (G,H). The map was created with ArcGIS 10 (Esri, Redlands, California, USA). Image data: Google Earth; image date: 5 September 2016.
Two-way ANOVA for responses of potential biomonitoring organisms growing in the Valley of Mexico.
| d.f. | %N (dry weight) | C:N ratio | δ15N (‰) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | |||
| Site | 33 | 26.16 | <0.001 | 34.78 | <0.001 | 29.04 | <0.001 | |
| Season | 1 | 7.83 | 0.005 | 10.14 | 0.002 | 0.99 | <0.001 | |
| Site × Season | 33 | 3.18 | <0.001 | 3.22 | <0.001 | 2.34 | <0.001 | |
| Site | 31 | 34.33 | <0.001 | 40.73 | <0.001 | 123.04 | <0.001 | |
| Season | 1 | 1.47 | 0.226 | 30.02 | <0.001 | 2.95 | 0.087 | |
| Site × Season | 31 | 5.27 | <0.001 | 3.25 | <0.001 | 4.95 | <0.001 | |
| Site | 29 | 24.92 | <0.001 | 15.50 | <0.001 | 46.87 | <0.001 | |
| Season | 1 | 2.57 | 0.11 | 6.14 | 0.014 | 1.44 | 0.232 | |
| Site × Season | 29 | 5.80 | <0.001 | 3.93 | <0.001 | 6.62 | <0.001 | |
|
| Site | 21 | 34.82 | <0.001 | 33.92 | <0.001 | 57.47 | <0.001 |
| Season | 1 | 96.05 | <0.001 | 6.53 | 0.011 | 136.29 | <0.001 | |
| Site × Season | 21 | 16.02 | <0.001 | 3.97 | <0.001 | 7.56 | <0.001 | |
Figure 4Relationship between wet deposition of ammonium (green circles), nitrate (blue squares), and total deposition, NH4+ + NO3− (red triangles) during 2014 and the δ15N values of the moss Grimmia sp.
Figure 5Relationship between wet deposition of ammonium (green circles), nitrate (blue squares) and total deposition, NH4+ + NO3− (red triangles) during 2014 and the δ15N values of the moss Fabronia sp.
Figure 6Relationship between NOx concentration during the 2014 dry season and the nitrogen content (A), C:N ratio (B), and the δ15N values (C) of the bromeliad Tillandsia recurvata. Open circles were excluded from the regression analysis because they were collected from non-typical environmental conditions that skewed the isotopic signatures of T. recurvata to very negative values.