| Literature DB >> 34064572 |
Alessia Romeo1, Teresa Musumeci1,2, Claudia Carbone1,2, Angela Bonaccorso1, Simona Corvo1, Gabriella Lupo3, Carmelina Daniela Anfuso3, Giovanni Puglisi1, Rosario Pignatello1,2.
Abstract
Ferulic acid (FA) is an antioxidant compound that can prevent ROS-related diseases, but due to its poor solubility, therapeutic efficacy is limited. One strategy to improve the bioavailability is nanomedicine. In the following study, FA delivery through polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) consisting of polylactic acid (NPA) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (NPB) is proposed. To verify the absence of cytotoxicity of blank carriers, a preliminary in vitro assay was performed on retinal pericytes and endothelial cells. FA-loaded NPs were subjected to purification studies and the physico-hemical properties were analyzed by photon correlation spectroscopy. Encapsulation efficiency and in vitro release studies were assessed through high performance liquid chromatography. To maintain the integrity of the systems, nanoformulations were cryoprotected and freeze-dried. Morphology was evaluated by a scanning electron microscope. Physico-chemical stability of resuspended nanosystems was monitored during 28 days of storage at 5 °C. Thermal analysis and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy were performed to characterize drug state in the systems. Results showed homogeneous particle populations, a suitable mean size for ocular delivery, drug loading ranging from 64.86 to 75.16%, and a controlled release profile. The obtained systems could be promising carriers for ocular drug delivery, legitimating further studies on FA-loaded NPs to confirm efficacy and safety in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: PLA; PLGA; antioxidant; controlled release; endothelial cell; retinal pericytes
Year: 2021 PMID: 34064572 PMCID: PMC8150711 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Cytotoxicity of NPA and NPB NPs on primary endothelial cells after (A) 24 h and (B) 48 h of incubation and on primary retinal pericytes cells after (C) 24 h and (D) 48 h of incubation at different concentrations (5; 2.5; 1; 0.5; 0.25 mg/mL). Three independent experiments were performed in sixfold. Error bars depict the S.D. of the mean. t-test was used to calculate statistical significance of the percentages obtained versus control group. [ns = not significant (p > 0.05); * = significant (p < 0.05); ** = very significant (p < 0.01); *** = extremely significant (p < 0.001)].
Mean size, PDI, zeta potential (ZP), osmolarity and pH of loaded (NPA-FA, NPB-FA) and unloaded (NPA, NPB) nanoparticles. Data represent mean standard deviation (SD), n = 3.
| Sample | Mean Size | PDI ± SD | ZP (mV) ± SD | Osmolarity ± SD (mOsm/kg) | pH ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 170.400 ± 5.781 | 0.128 ± 0.028 | −39.00 ± 1.40 | - | - |
|
| 178.600 ± 0.289 | 0.056 ± 0.035 | −33.70 ± 1.31 | 258.3 ± 0.023 | 7.30 ± 0.533 |
|
| 158.700 ± 1.700 | 0.130 ± 0.023 | −29.70 ± 0.90 | - | - |
|
| 219.300 ± 2.751 | 0.207 ± 0.028 | −23.80 ± 2.22 | 265.6 ± 0.027 | 7.33 ± 0.495 |
Figure 2Mean size, PDI (A) and zeta potential (B) of the samples NPA-FA and NPB-FA. t-test was used to calculate statistical significance of the percentages obtained versus control group. [ns = not significant (p > 0.05); * = significant (p < 0.05); *** = extremely significant (p < 0.001)].
Purification efficiency (%) of NPA-FA and NPB-FA referred to the purification processes using the dialysis method performed with frequency of water exchanges of 0.5 and 1 L/h.
| Sample | Frequency of Water Changes (L/h) | Purification Efficiency (%) ± SD |
|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 28.60 ± 0.211 |
| 0.5 | 24.13 ± 0.015 | |
|
| 1 | 53.29 ± 2.258 |
| 0.5 | 30.00 ± 0.785 |
Encapsulation efficiency (%) of NPA-FA and NPB-FA and apparent encapsulation efficiency (%) of NPA-FA and NPB-FA referred to the purification processes using the dialysis method performed with frequency of water exchanges of 0.5 and 1 L/h.
| Sample | Encapsulation Efficiency (%) ± SD | Frequency of Water Changes (L/h) | Apparent Encapsulation Efficiency (%) ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 75.16 ± 5.148 | 1 | 89.36 ± 0.085 |
| 0.5 | 90.22 ± 0.007 | ||
|
| 64.86 ± 6.357 | 1 | 81.27 ± 0.792 |
| 0.5 | 89.46 ± 0.276 |
Figure 3In vitro release profiles of pure drug, NPA-FA and NPB-FA in phosphate buffered solution (pH 7.4) at 37 °C.
Figure 4SEM micrographies of: (A) NPA (B) NPB-FA (C) NPB and (D) NPB-FA.
Figure 5Mean size (A) index of polydispersion (B) zeta potential (C) osmolarity (D) and pH (E) of the samples stored at 5 °C.
Figure 6(A) DSC and (B) FT-IR curves of FA (a) PLA polymer (b) HP-β-CD (c) unloaded NPA (d) and FA-loaded NPA nanoparticles (e).
Figure 7(A) DSC and (B) FT-IR curves of FA (a) PLGA polymer (b) HP-β-CD (c) unloaded NPB (d) and FA-loaded NPB nanoparticles (e).