Literature DB >> 3406413

MR imaging of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities.

R E Wendt1, M R Wilcott, W Nitz, P H Murphy, R N Bryan.   

Abstract

A 90 degrees-tau 1-90 degrees-tau 2-image acquisition pulse sequence allows spatial mapping of resonant frequency. This sort of sequence has previously been used for magnet shimming, and its use in chemical-shift imaging has been proposed. The authors used this sequence in magnetic resonance imaging of a phantom to demonstrate the magnetic field gradients arising from susceptibility differences within the phantom and allow those gradients to be measured. Gradients may arise near interfaces between substances that cannot support the same magnetic flux density. The pulse sequence was found to work well in lower-field-strength instruments.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3406413     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.168.3.3406413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MRI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral lesions.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Michael Meier-Schroers; Daniel Lloyd Kuetting; Andreas Feißt; Jürgen Gieseke; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Application of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in evaluation of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Jason L Dragoo; Brian A Hargreaves; Marc E Levenston; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  New MR imaging methods for metallic implants in the knee: artifact correction and clinical impact.

Authors:  Christina A Chen; Weitian Chen; Stuart B Goodman; Brian A Hargreaves; Kevin M Koch; Wenmaio Lu; Anja C Brau; Christine E Draper; Scott L Delp; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art.

Authors:  P Stradiotti; A Curti; G Castellazzi; A Zerbi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  View-Angle Tilting and Slice-Encoding Metal Artifact Correction for Artifact Reduction in MRI: Experimental Sequence Optimization for Orthopaedic Tumor Endoprostheses and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Pia M Jungmann; Carl Ganter; Christoph J Schaeffeler; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Reinhard Meier; Mathias Nittka; Florian Pohlig; Hans Rechl; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T2-weighted Images.

Authors:  Young Han Lee; Seok Hahn; Eunju Kim; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  MRI as Diagnostic Modality for Analyzing the Problematic Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Femke F Schröder; Corine E Post; Frank-Christiaan B M Wagenaar; Nico Verdonschot; Rianne M H A Huis In't Veld
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Novel MR imaging method--MAVRIC--for metal artifact suppression after joint replacement in musculoskeletal tumor patients.

Authors:  Michiro Susa; Sota Oguro; Kazutaka Kikuta; Kazumasa Nishimoto; Keisuke Horiuchi; Masahiro Jinzaki; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Chiba; Hideo Morioka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Examining the identification of age-related atrophy between T1 and T1 + T2-FLAIR cortical thickness measurements.

Authors:  Heidi Lindroth; Veena A Nair; Casandra Stanfield; Cameron Casey; Rosaleena Mohanty; Daniel Wayer; Paul Rowley; Roger Brown; Vivek Prabhakaran; Robert D Sanders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.