Literature DB >> 34063870

Short-Term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after B2.1 Type Pelvic Fractures for Surgically and Non-Surgically Treated Young Patients.

Giedrius Petryla1, Valentinas Uvarovas1, Rokas Bobina1, Jaunius Kurtinaitis1, Tomas Sveikata1, Sigitas Ryliškis1, Roma Puronaitė1, Giedrius Kvederas1, Igoris Šatkauskas1.   

Abstract

Background and
Objectives: Lateral compression injuries of the pelvic ring are most common among young and elderly patients. Of all pelvic ring fracture injuries, the B2.1 type-involving lateral compression of the pelvic ring-is the most common. Despite this, we still have no high-level evidence to consult when choosing between the surgical and non-operative approaches. The purpose of this research was to compare the short-term functional and quality of life outcomes between operatively and non-operatively treated young patients after a B2.1 type pelvic fracture. Materials and
Methods: Patients aged 18 to 65 years with pelvic B2.1 type fractures-according to AO/Tile classification-that were hospitalized in a single trauma center between 2016 November and 2019 September were included in the research. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups regarding their treatment: non-operative and operative. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Majeed score, and SF-36 was used for the evaluation of quality of life. Patients completed these questionnaires twice: first during hospitalization, regarding their pre-traumatic condition (timepoint I); and again 10 weeks after the injury, regarding their current condition (timepoint II).
Results: A total of 55 patients (70.6% of whom were female) with type B2.1 pelvic fractures were included in the analysis, with an average age of 37.24 ± 13.78 years. There were 21 (38.18%) patients with high injury severity, and 37 (67.3%) patients were treated operatively versus 18 (32.7%) non-operatively. Between the two timepoints, Majeed score reduced by 34.08 ± 18.95 for operatively and 31.44 ± 14.41 for non-operatively treated patients. For operatively and non-operatively treated patients, the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36 questionnaire reduced by 19.45 ± 9.95 and 19.36 ± 7.88, respectively, while the mental component summary (MCS) reduced by 6.38 ± 11.04 and 7.23 ± 10.86, respectively. Conclusions: We observed that operative treatment of B2.1 type pelvic fractures for young patients is not superior to non-operative in the short-term, because the functional outcomes and quality of life are similar in both groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional outcomes; pelvic fracture; pelvic injury; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34063870     DOI: 10.3390/medicina57060513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  21 in total

1.  Functional outcome of patients with unstable pelvic ring fracture.

Authors:  Yasuo Kokubo; Hisashi Oki; Daisuke Sugita; Kenichi Takeno; Tsuyoshi Miyazaki; Kohei Negoro; Hideaki Nakajima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.118

Review 2.  Pelvic ring disruptions: treatment modalities and analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  C Papakostidis; N K Kanakaris; G Kontakis; P V Giannoudis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Operative agreement on lateral compression-1 pelvis fractures. a survey of 111 OTA members.

Authors:  James T Beckmann; Angela P Presson; Stuart H Curtis; Justin M Haller; Ami R Stuart; Thomas F Higgins; Erik N Kubiak
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Changes in epidemiology and treatment of pelvic ring fractures in Germany: an analysis on data of German Pelvic Multicenter Study Groups I and III (DGU/AO).

Authors:  G Tosounidis; J H Holstein; U Culemann; F Holmenschlager; F Stuby; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.531

6.  Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making.

Authors:  H C Pape; D Remmers; J Rice; M Ebisch; C Krettek; H Tscherne
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-09

7.  What are predictors of mortality in patients with pelvic fractures?

Authors:  Joerg H Holstein; Ulf Culemann; Tim Pohlemann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Lateral compression type B 2-1 pelvic ring fractures in young patients do not require surgery.

Authors:  A Höch; I Schneider; J Todd; C Josten; J Böhme
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Nonoperative treatment of intermediate severity lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries with minimally displaced complete sacral fracture.

Authors:  Greg E Gaski; Theodore T Manson; Renan C Castillo; Gerard P Slobogean; Robert V OʼToole
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  [Clinical application of percutaneous iliosacral screws combined with pubic ramus screws in Tile B pelvic fracture].

Authors:  Qi-Fei Xu; Kui-Ran Lin; Dai-Jie Zhao; Song-Qin Zhang; Sheng-Kai Feng; Chen Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Gu Shang       Date:  2017-03-25
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment of Unstable Lateral Compression Type I (LC1) Injuries of the Pelvis With Complete Sacral Fractures in Non-fragility Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonny R Varma; Michael Foxall-Smith; Richard L Donovan; Michael R Whitehouse; Chris Rogers; Mehool Acharya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.