| Literature DB >> 34063471 |
Barbara Gieroba1, Grzegorz Kalisz1, Anna Sroka-Bartnicka1,2, Anita Płazińska1, Wojciech Płaziński3, Małgorzata Starek4, Monika Dąbrowska4.
Abstract
The formation of cefuroxime axetil+Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; cefuroxime axetil; cyclodextrins; drug delivery; inclusion complexes; molecular dynamics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063471 PMCID: PMC8156438 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical structures of cefuroxime axetil (CA) and the most common natural cyclodextrins: α-, β-, and γ-CDs as well as 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (2HP-β-CD). The functionalization pattern of 2HP-β-CD was accepted according to the compound used in the present study.
Selected physicochemical properties of CDs [15,16,17,18,19].
| Cyclodextrin | Number of | Molecular Weight | Cavity Inner Diameter | Cavity Outer Diameter | Cavity Height | Cavity Volume | Specific Rotation, | Solubility in H2O [g/100 mL, 25 °C] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-CD | 6 | 973 | 4.7–5.3 | 14.6 | 7.9 | 174 | +150.5° | 14.5 |
| β-CD | 7 | 1135 | 6.0–6.5 | 15.4 | 7.9 | 262 | +162.5° | 1.85 |
| γ-CD | 8 | 1297 | 7.0–8.3 | 17.5 | 7.9 | 427 | +177.4° | 23.20 |
| 2HP-β-CD | 7 | 1460 | 6.0 | - | - | - | +135.0° | 33 |
Figure 2The Raman spectrum and the chemical structure of cefuroxime axetil.
Figure 3The Raman spectra of pure α-, β-, γ- and 2HP-β-CDs.
Figure 4Raman spectra of inclusion complexes of cefuroxime axetil with α-, β-, γ-CDs and 2HP-β-CD along with band assignments.
The most significant bands recorded in the Raman spectra of studied CA–CD complexes (assignments were made in accordance with refs. [44,45,46,47]).
| Raman Shift/cm−1 | Band Assignments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | ||||
| α-CD+CA | β-CD+CA | γ-CD+CA | 2HP-β-CD+CA | |
| 2993 | - | - | - | CH3 antisymmetric stretching |
| - | - | 2975 | 2982 | CH stretching |
| 2920 | - | - | - | |
| 2892 | 2908 | 2883 | 2881 | |
| 2956 | - | - | - | CH stretching or wagging |
| - | 2939 | 2932 | 2931 | CH2 antisymmetric stretching, CH3 symmetric stretching |
| 2918 | - | - | - | CH stretching or wagging |
| - | - | - | 2866 | CH2 symmetric stretching |
| - | - | 2839 | 2839 | CH3 stretching |
| 1476 | - | 1472 | - | CH deformational |
| 1456 | 1449 | 1453 | 1456 | CH2 deformational |
| - | 1414 | 1400 | 1403 | C–O–C symmetric and antisymmetric stretching |
| - | 1389 | - | - | C–H stretching or wagging |
| 1366 | - | 1370 | - | C–C stretching and ring deformation |
| - | - | - | 1346 * | Deformations of the CH2OH group, C–O, C–N stretching |
| 1331 | 1335 | 1327 | 1335 | CH2 deformational |
| 1264 | - | 1264 | 1267 | C=O stretching |
| 1244 | 1248 | - | - | C=O stretching, CH in plane bending of the aromatic rings, OH in plane bending, CH2 stretching |
| - | - | 1157 * | - | –C=C–H antisymmetric angular deformation in plane, furanyl ring in CA |
| 1137 | - | 1133 | 1142 | C-O-C stretching |
| 1127 | 1127 | - | 1126 | C–O–C symmetric stretching |
| - | 1111 | 1109 | - | C–O–C symmetric and antisymmetric stretching of glycosidic bonds |
| 1081 | 1083 | - | 1082 | |
| 1057 | 1046 | 1040 | 1040 | C–O stretching |
| - | 1000 * | - | - | “breathing mode” of the aromatic carbon ring, C=C–H stretching |
| - | - | 969 * | - | C–H and C–OH deformational |
| 952 | 948 | 948 | 948 | Skeletal mode of α-(1–4) linkage (delocalized mode), C–O stretching |
| 938 | 926 | 917 | 925 | Glucopyranose (C–O–C) skeletal mode of α-anomers |
| 854 | 851 | 858 | 852 | Skeletal vibrations, OCH side group deformational of |
| 843 | - | - | - | C–O–C antisymmetric stretching |
| 749 | 756 | 757 | 759 | |
| 708 | 710 | 706 | 707 | C–H out-of-plane bending of CA |
| 609 * | - | - | - | C–C–C ring in-plane bending of CA |
| - | 588 | 592 | 590 | Symmetric oxygen breathing vibration, C–O bending |
| 570 | 571 | - | - | OH wagging |
| - | - | 513 * | - | In-plane C–C stretching and ring deformation of CA |
| 496 | 497 | - | 496 | C–C–C bending |
| 479 | 477 | - | 478 | Skeletal vibrations, amylose |
| 456 | 439 | - | 443 | CH stretching |
| 416 | - | 427 | - | OH stretching |
| 389 | - | 374 | - | C–C stretching |
| - | 321 * | - | External C–OH out of plane bending of glucopyranose units | |
| 310 | - | 302 | - | C–C antisymmetric stretching |
| 286 | - | 272 | - | C–O stretching |
| 153 * | - | - | - | Breathing motions of oxygen atoms in the macrocyclic ring |
| 138 * | - | - | - | Stretching or bending vibrations of hydrogen bonds |
Asterisks (*) indicate the most significant differences between the samples.
Figure 5The relative intensities of Raman spectra and their second derivatives in the selected ranges: 1500–1200 cm−1 ((A,B), respectively), 1200–800 cm−1 ((C,D), respectively), and 550–400 cm−1 ((E,F), respectively). Numbers in black indicate the same Raman shift values for all samples.
The comparison of Raman intensity ratios for specific chemical groups. The calculated results are demonstrated as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
| The Raman Intensity Ratio | Sample | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-CD+CA * | β-CD+CA ** | γ-CD+CA *** | 2HP-β-CD+CA **** | |
| IC=O/CH2 | 0.249 ± 0.055 | 0.330 ± 0.056 | 0.394 ± 0.100 | 0.238 ± 0.081 |
| IOH/CH2 | 0.492 ± 0.081 | 0.574 ± 0.084 | 0.495 ± 0.133 | 0.132 ± 0.086 |
| IC=O/OH | 0.505 ± 0.094 | 0.588 ± 0.138 | 0.837 ± 0.250 | 1.770 ± 0.990 |
* C=O stretching 1264 cm−1, CH2 deformational 1331 cm−1, OH stretching 357 cm−1; ** C=O stretching 1248 cm−1, CH2 deformational 1335 cm−1, OH stretching 363 cm−1; *** C=O stretching 1264 cm−1, CH2 deformational 1327 cm−1, OH stretching 427 cm−1; **** C=O stretching 1267 cm−1, CH2 deformational 1335 cm−1, OH stretching 234 cm−1.
Figure 6Raman spectra normalized to 1127 cm−1 (α-CD+CA and β-CD+CA), 1133 cm−1 (γ-CD+CA) and 1126 cm−1 (2HP-β-CD+CA) bands.
Figure 7Raman chemical maps of structural moiety distribution in CA–CD complexes. Black scale bar at the bottom of the images corresponds to 20 µm.
Figure 8Deconvolution of 880–820 cm−1 band into particular sub-bands using mixed Lorentzian/Gaussian curve fitting. Each sub-band has marked a maximum value and a percentage share of its entire band surface area.
Figure 9The MD simulation snapshots, illustrating the patterns of interactions typical for the studied complexes. Guest (CA) molecule is shown by an opaque ball-and-stick representation, while host (CD) molecule is represented by a transparent stick representation. The two views of each complex along perpendicular axes are shown.
Figure 10The most favorable structures of the CA–CD complexes identified in the docking simulations. The rest of details as in Figure 9.
Figure 11The radial distribution functions (RDFs) calculated from the MD simulations for selected parts of the system. They included pyranose rings of CDs (center-of-mass) and either the whole CA molecule (upper panels) or some of the functional groups present in the CA molecules and identified as significant in CA–CD binding.