| Literature DB >> 34063459 |
Chia-Lee Yang1, Chi-Yo Huang2, Yi-Hao Hsiao1.
Abstract
With growing scientific evidence showing the harmful impact of air pollution on the environment and individuals' health in modern societies, public concern about air pollution has become a central focus of the development of air pollution prevention policy. Past research has shown that social media is a useful tool for collecting data about public opinion and conducting analysis of air pollution. In contrast to statistical sampling based on survey approaches, data retrieved from social media can provide direct information about behavior and capture long-term data being generated by the public. However, there is a lack of studies on how to mine social media to gain valuable insights into the public's pro-environmental behavior. Therefore, research is needed to integrate information retrieved from social media sites into an established theoretical framework on environmental behaviors. Thus, the aim of this paper is to construct a theoretical model by integrating social media mining into a value-belief-norm model of public concerns about air pollution. We propose a hybrid method that integrates text mining, topic modeling, hierarchical cluster analysis, and partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). We retrieved data regarding public concerns about air pollution from social media sites. We classified the topics using hierarchical cluster analysis and interpreted the results in terms of the value-belief-norm theoretical framework, which encompasses egoistic concerns, altruistic concerns, biospheric concerns, and adaptation strategies regarding air pollution. Then, we used PLS-SEM to confirm the causal relationships and the effects of mediation. An empirical study based on the concerns of Taiwanese social media users about air pollution was used to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed framework in general and to examine gender differences in particular. Based on the results of the empirical studies, we confirmed the robust effects of egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric concerns of public impact on adaptation strategies. Additionally, we found that gender differences can moderate the causal relationship between egoistic concerns, altruistic concerns, and adaptation strategies. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of enhancing perceptions of air pollution and environmental sustainability by the public. The results of the analysis can serve as a basis for environmental policy and environmental education strategies.Entities:
Keywords: air pollution; environmental concerns; gender difference; partial least squares technique of structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM); social media; value-belief-norm model
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063459 PMCID: PMC8156109 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The proposed research model.
Figure 2Research Framework.
Figure 3LDA graphic model. Source: adapted from [75].
Identified topics and topic clustering.
| Latent Variables | Item Code | Item Name | Count | Top Five Keywords Belonging to Each Topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egoistic Concerns |
| Fuel | 55 (36/19) | U.S., Taiwan, natural, fuel, smoking forbidden |
|
| Mask | 146 (99/47) | air, air pollution, air quality, mask, research | |
|
| E-cigarette | 50 (36/14) | e-cigarette, tobacco, Taiwan, harm reduction, cigarette | |
|
| Smoking | 140 (83/57) | smokes, cigarette smoke, cigarette butts, smells, school | |
| Altruistic Concerns |
| Coal-fired power generation | 61 (42/19) | shen’ao power plant, air poolution, govermenal, EPA(*), coal burning |
|
| Refuse combustion | 62 (39/23) | air, garbage, earth, burning, joss paper | |
|
| Power generation | 68 (50/18) | tai-power, power plant, power unit, generator set, gas | |
| Biophere Concerns |
| Policy ambiguity | 30 (26/4) | plebiscite, green with nuclear, nuclear, gavernment, cosignatory |
|
| Climate change | 83 (63/20) | climate, energy, global, climate change, renewable energy | |
| Adaptation Strategies |
| Wind power generation policy | 64 (39/25) | Taiwan, wind power, offshore wind power, polar bear, |
|
| Allergy and healthy | 165 (56/109) | allergy, nose, dortor, feel | |
|
| Air purifier products | 119 (52/67) | air purifier, allergy, recommad, air filter |
Remark: * EPA is the abbreviation of the Environment Protection Agency, Taiwan.
Measurement validation.
| Latent Variables | Items | Out Loadings | Cronbach’s Alpha | Dijkstra-Henseler’s Rho | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egoistic Concerns | 0.767 | 0.779 | 0.852 | 0.592 | ||
|
| 0.813 | |||||
|
| 0.651 | |||||
|
| 0.768 | |||||
|
| 0.833 | |||||
| Altruistic Concerns | 0.698 | 0.706 | 0.832 | 0.623 | ||
|
| 0.813 | |||||
|
| 0.821 | |||||
|
| 0.732 | |||||
| Biosphere Concerns | 0.557 | 0.660 | 0.809 | 0.682 | ||
|
| 0.914 | |||||
|
| 0.726 | |||||
| Adaptation Strategies | 0.731 | 0.733 | 0.8432 | 0.623 | ||
|
| 0.816 | |||||
|
| 0.793 | |||||
|
| 0.809 |
Discriminant validity-Fornell–Larcker criterion.
| Latent Variables | EC | AC | BC | AS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC |
| |||
| AC | 0.678 |
| ||
| BC | 0.611 | 0.667 |
| |
| AS | 0.647 | 0.633 | 0.576 |
|
Note: The square roots of AVEs are shown diagonally in bold.
Discriminant validity–Cross-loading Criterion.
| Variables | EC | AC | BC | AS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topics | |||||
|
|
| 0.582 | 0.522 | 0.552 | |
|
|
| 0.452 | 0.434 | 0.408 | |
|
|
| 0.523 | 0.464 | 0.474 | |
|
|
| 0.521 | 0.459 | 0.543 | |
|
| 0.555 |
| 0.544 | 0.509 | |
|
| 0.584 |
| 0.547 | 0.546 | |
|
| 0.459 |
| 0.485 | 0.438 | |
|
| 0.609 | 0.653 |
| 0.587 | |
|
| 0.359 | 0.410 |
| 0.317 | |
|
| 0.538 | 0.565 | 0.512 |
| |
|
| 0.528 | 0.475 | 0.439 |
| |
|
| 0.496 | 0.484 | 0.436 |
| |
Note: Bold values are loadings for the items which are above the recommended value, 0.7. An items’ loading on its variable is higher than all of its cross-loadings with other variables.
Significance testing results of the structural model path coefficients.
| Hypothesis | Sample Mean (M) | Std. | Path Coefficients | VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 (AC→EC) | 0.680 | 0.018 | 0.678 | 37.433 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| H2 (AC→BC) | 0.668 | 0.020 | 0.667 | 32.721 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| H3 (EC→AS) | 0.351 | 0.037 | 0.351 | 9.352 | 0.000 | 2.203 |
| H4 (AC→AS) | 0.277 | 0.041 | 0.277 | 6.776 | 0.000 | 2.279 |
| H5 (BC→AS) | 0.178 | 0.039 | 0.177 | 4.517 | 0.000 | 1.966 |
Remark:
Hypothesis testing results.
| Hypotheses | Results |
|---|---|
| H1 (AC | Supported |
| H2 (AC | Supported |
| H3 (EC | Supported |
| H4 (AC | Supported |
| H5 (BC | Supported |
Figure 4Path analysis results for posts by (a) both genders, (b) men, and (c) women. Notes: *: p < 0.050; **: p < 0.010; ***: p < 0.001.
Direct, indirect, and total effects.
| Relationships | Direct | Indirect | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 (AC → EC) | 0.678 | N.A. | 0.678 |
| H2 (AC → BC) | 0.667 | N.A. | 0.667 |
| H3 (EC → AS) | 0.351 | N.A. | 0.351 |
| H4 (AC → AS) | 0.277 | 0.356 | 0.277 |
| H5 (BC → AS) | 0.177 | N.A. | 0.177 |
Remark: N.A. means not applicable.
Multi-group comparison test results.
| Relationships | Path Coefficients-Diff (Men–Women) | |
|---|---|---|
| H6a (AC → EC) | 0.004 | 0.540 |
| H6b (AC → BC) | 0.107 | 0.997 |
| H6c (EC → AS) | 0.150 | 0.044 * |
| H6d (AC → AS) | 0.163 | 0.036 * |
| H6e (BC → AS) | 0.128 | 0.919 |
Notes: *: p < 0.050.
Gender differences of environmental concerns.
| Rank | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | EC → AS | BC → AS |
| 2 | AC → AS | EC → AS |
| 3 | BC → AS | AC → AS |