Literature DB >> 30742873

Feasibility of using social media to monitor outdoor air pollution in London, England.

Yulin Hswen1, Qiuyuan Qin2, John S Brownstein3, Jared B Hawkins3.   

Abstract

Air pollution is a serious public health concern. Innovative and scalable methods for detecting harmful air pollutants such as PM2.5 are necessary. This study assessed the feasibility of using social media to monitor outdoor air pollution in an urban area by comparing data from Twitter and validating it against established air monitoring stations. Data were collected from London, England from July 29, 2016 to March 17, 2017. Daily mean PM2.5 data was downloaded from the LondonAir platform consisting of 26 air pollution monitoring sites throughout Greater London. Publicly available tweets geo-located to Greater London containing air pollution terms were captured from the Twitter platform. Tweets with media URL links were excluded to minimize influence of news stories. Sentiment of the tweets was examined as negative, positive, or neutral. Cross-correlation analyses were used to compare the relationship between trends of tweets about air pollution and levels of PM2.5 over time. There were 16,448 tweets without a media URL link, with a mean of 498.42 (SD = 491.08) tweets per week. A significant cross-correlation coefficient of 0.803 was observed between PM2.5 data and the non-media air pollution tweets (p < 0.001). The cross-correlation coefficient was highest between PM2.5 data and air pollution tweets with negative sentiment at 0.816 (p < 0.001). Discussions about air pollution on Twitter reflect particle PM2.5 pollution levels in Greater London. This study highlights that social media may offer a supplemental source to support the detection and monitoring of air pollution in a densely populated urban area.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; London; PM2.5; Social media; Surveillance; Twitter; Urban area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30742873      PMCID: PMC7316422          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  23 in total

1.  The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution.

Authors:  Aaron J Cohen; H Ross Anderson; Bart Ostro; Kiran Dev Pandey; Michal Krzyzanowski; Nino Künzli; Kersten Gutschmidt; Arden Pope; Isabelle Romieu; Jonathan M Samet; Kirk Smith
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2005 Jul 9-23

2.  Using Digital Media Advertising in Early Psychosis Intervention.

Authors:  Michael L Birnbaum; Chantel Garrett; Amit Baumel; Maria Scovel; Asra F Rizvi; Whitney Muscat; John M Kane
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 3.  Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lauren Sinnenberg; Alison M Buttenheim; Kevin Padrez; Christina Mancheno; Lyle Ungar; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Richard Fuller; Nereus J R Acosta; Olusoji Adeyi; Robert Arnold; Niladri Nil Basu; Abdoulaye Bibi Baldé; Roberto Bertollini; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Jo Ivey Boufford; Patrick N Breysse; Thomas Chiles; Chulabhorn Mahidol; Awa M Coll-Seck; Maureen L Cropper; Julius Fobil; Valentin Fuster; Michael Greenstone; Andy Haines; David Hanrahan; David Hunter; Mukesh Khare; Alan Krupnick; Bruce Lanphear; Bindu Lohani; Keith Martin; Karen V Mathiasen; Maureen A McTeer; Christopher J L Murray; Johanita D Ndahimananjara; Frederica Perera; Janez Potočnik; Alexander S Preker; Jairam Ramesh; Johan Rockström; Carlos Salinas; Leona D Samson; Karti Sandilya; Peter D Sly; Kirk R Smith; Achim Steiner; Richard B Stewart; William A Suk; Onno C P van Schayck; Gautam N Yadama; Kandeh Yumkella; Ma Zhong
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The effects of air pollution on individual psychological distress.

Authors:  Victoria Sass; Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz; Steven M Karceski; Anjum Hajat; Kyle Crowder; David Takeuchi
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.078

6.  Impact of 2013 south Asian haze crisis: study of physical and psychological symptoms and perceived dangerousness of pollution level.

Authors:  Roger C Ho; Melvyn W Zhang; Cyrus S Ho; Fang Pan; Yanxia Lu; Vijay K Sharma
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Social media as a sensor of air quality and public response in China.

Authors:  Shiliang Wang; Michael J Paul; Mark Dredze
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Economic evaluation of internet-based interventions for harmful alcohol use alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthijs Blankers; Udo Nabitz; Filip Smit; Maarten W J Koeter; Gerard M Schippers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  National and local influenza surveillance through Twitter: an analysis of the 2012-2013 influenza epidemic.

Authors:  David A Broniatowski; Michael J Paul; Mark Dredze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analysis of the Capacity of Google Trends to Measure Interest in Conservation Topics and the Role of Online News.

Authors:  Le T P Nghiem; Sarah K Papworth; Felix K S Lim; Luis R Carrasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review of the use of Twitter for public health research.

Authors:  Oduwa Edo-Osagie; Beatriz De La Iglesia; Iain Lake; Obaghe Edeghere
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Association of "#covid19" Versus "#chinesevirus" With Anti-Asian Sentiments on Twitter: March 9-23, 2020.

Authors:  Yulin Hswen; Xiang Xu; Anna Hing; Jared B Hawkins; John S Brownstein; Gilbert C Gee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  A scoping review of the use of Twitter for public health research.

Authors:  Oduwa Edo-Osagie; Beatriz De La Iglesia; Iain Lake; Obaghe Edeghere
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 4.  Visualization and Analysis of Air Pollution and Human Health Based on Cluster Analysis: A Bibliometric Review from 2001 to 2021.

Authors:  Diyi Liu; Kun Cheng; Kevin Huang; Hui Ding; Tiantong Xu; Zhenni Chen; Yanqi Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review.

Authors:  Claudio Crema; Giuseppe Attardi; Daniele Sartiano; Alberto Redolfi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  Using Social Media Mining and PLS-SEM to Examine the Causal Relationship between Public Environmental Concerns and Adaptation Strategies.

Authors:  Chia-Lee Yang; Chi-Yo Huang; Yi-Hao Hsiao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.