| Literature DB >> 34063119 |
Karolina H Markiewicz1, Katarzyna Niemirowicz-Laskowska2, Dawid Szymczuk1,3, Kacper Makarewicz1, Iwona Misztalewska-Turkowicz1, Przemysław Wielgat4, Anna M Majcher-Fitas5, Sylwia Milewska2, Halina Car2, Agnieszka Z Wilczewska1.
Abstract
One of the promising strategies for improvement of cancer treatment is application of a combination therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the anticancer activity of nanoformulations containing doxorubicin and iron oxide particles covered with polymeric shells bearing cholesterol moieties. It was postulated that due to high affinity to cell membranes, particles comprising poly(cholesteryl acrylate) can sensitize cancer cells to doxorubicin chemotherapy. The performed analyses revealed that the developed systems are effective against the human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 even at low doses of the active compound applied (0.5 µM). Additionally, high compatibility and lack of toxicity of the tested materials against human red blood cells, immune (monocytic THP-1) cells, and cardiomyocyte H9C2(2-1) cells was demonstrated. Synergistic effects observed upon administration of doxorubicin with polymer-iron oxide hybrids comprising poly(cholesteryl acrylate) may provide an opportunity to limit toxicity of the drug and to improve its therapeutic efficiency at the same time.Entities:
Keywords: anticancer activity; combination therapy; doxorubicin; polymer–iron oxide particles
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063119 PMCID: PMC8125246 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Scheme 1Formation of polymer–magnetic hybrids.
Polymeric shells formed on the surface of MNP@X.
| Nanohybrids | Type of Monomer | TG Weight Loss at 1120 K | |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | (%) | |
| MNP@PNIPAAm-X |
| - | 25 |
| MNP@PNIPAAm- |
|
| 34 |
| MNP@PNVCL-X |
| - | 19 |
| MNP@PNVCL- |
|
| 25 |
| MNP@PCholA-X |
| - | 16 |
Figure 1Types of polymeric shells formed on the surface of MNP@X.
Figure 2(A) FT IR spectra and (B) TG curves of the modified iron oxide particles. (C) Magnetization of chosen samples at 400 K with fits of Langevin function and law of approach to saturation.
Figure 3(A) DLS and (B) zeta potential results of modified iron oxide particles: 1—MNP@NH2, 2—MNP@PNIPAAm-X, 3—MNP@PNIPAAm-b-PCholA-X, 4—MNP@PNVCL-X, 5—MNP@PNVCL-b-PCholA-X, 6—MNP@PCholA-X. (C) TEM images of MNP@PNIPAAm-b-PCholA-X particles.
Figure 4Hemocompatibility of polymer–iron oxide hybrids.
Figure 5Lack of toxicity of the mixtures of DOX and polymer–iron oxide hybrids against representative immune THP-1 cells (A–E) and cardiomyocyte H9c2(2-1) cells (F–J).
Figure 6Toxic effect of the polymer–iron oxide hybrids against estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent breast cancer cells. Viability of estrogen-dependent (A) and estrogen-independent (B) breast cancer cells in the presence of the polymer–iron oxide hybrids. Cytotoxic effect of the mixtures of DOX and polymer–iron oxide hybrids against estrogen-dependent (C–G) and estrogen-independent (H–L) breast cancer cells. Statistical significance for the tested hybrid vs. control was marked with (*); dose-dependent effect: 10 µg/mL vs. 50 µg/mL marked with (#) and 10 µg/mL vs. 100 µg/mL marked with (^), p ≤ 0.05. The data presented constitute average results from three measurements ± SD.