| Literature DB >> 34062921 |
Nguyen Thi Thu Nga1, Tran Ngoc Tran1, Dominique Holtappels2, Nguyen Le Kim Ngan1, Nguyen Phuoc Hao1, Marta Vallino3, Doan Thi Kieu Tien1, Nguyen Huan Khanh-Pham4, Rob Lavigne2, Kaeko Kamei5, Jeroen Wagemans2, Jeffrey B Jones6.
Abstract
Bacterial leaf blight, which is caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii, annually causes significant yield losses to Welsh onion in many producing countries, including Vietnam. In this study, we isolated and characterized lytic phages Φ16, Φ17A and Φ31, specific to X. axonopodis pv. allii and belonging to a new phage species and genus within the Autographiviridae, from four provinces in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Moreover, we evaluated their efficacy for the biocontrol of leaf blight in greenhouse and field conditions. When applying the three highly related phages individually or as a three-phage cocktail at 108 PFU/mL in greenhouse conditions, our results show that treatment with Φ31 alone provides higher disease prevention than the two other phages or the phage cocktail. Furthermore, we compared phage concentrations from 105 to 108 and showed optimal disease control at 107 and 108 PFU/mL. Finally, under field conditions, both phage Φ31 alone and the phage cocktail treatments suppressed disease symptoms, which was comparable to the chemical bactericide oxolinic acid (Starner). Phage treatment also significantly improved yield, showing the potential of phage as a biocontrol strategy for managing leaf blight in Welsh onion.Entities:
Keywords: Welsh onion; Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii; bacterial leaf blight; bacteriophages; biocontrol
Year: 2021 PMID: 34062921 PMCID: PMC8147253 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Different Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii strains and phages isolated from infected Welsh onion leaves collected from different provinces in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.
| Location | Host Isolate | Bacteriophage Isolate |
|---|---|---|
| Binh Tan-Vinh Long | XaaVL02 | |
| Chau Phu-An Giang | XaaAG04 | |
| Binh Tan-Vinh Long | XaaVL05 | Φ5A, Φ5B |
| Binh Tan-Vinh Long | XaaVL06 | Φ6 |
| Binh Tan-Vinh Long | XaaVL07 | Φ7A, Φ7B |
| O Mon-Can Tho | XaaCT10 | |
| Hiep Thanh-Bac Lieu | XaaBL11 | |
| Vinh Trach Đong-Bac Lieu | XaaBL12 | |
| Hiep Thanh-Bac Lieu | XaaBL13 | Φ14 |
| Hiep Thanh-Bac Lieu | XaaBL14 | Φ16 |
| Vinh Trach Đong-Bac Lieu | XaaBL17 | Φ17A, Φ17B |
| Vinh Chau-Soc Trang | XaaST22 | Φ31 |
Evaluation of the host spectrum of ten Xaa phage isolates against twelve Xaa strains. Susceptibility of the Xaa strain to a phage is indicated with a ‘+’, while resistance is indicated with a ‘−‘. The bottom row indicates the total amount of strains susceptible to a certain phage.
| Xaa Strain | Xaa Phage | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Φ5A | Φ5B | Φ6 | Φ7A | Φ7B | Φ14 | Φ16 | Φ17A | Φ17B | Φ31 | |
| XaaVL02 | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| XaaAG04 | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | + |
| XaaVL05 | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| XaaVL06 | − | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| XaaVL07 | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| XaaCT10 | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + |
| XaaBL11 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| XaaBL12 | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | + |
| XaaBL13 | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + |
| XaaBL14 | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | + |
| XaaBL17 | − | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| XaaST22 | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + |
| Total | 5 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 12 |
Halo sizes of five phages on a lawn of Xaa strain XaaBL11, 24, 48 and 72 h after plating.
| Phage Isolate | Location of Isolation | Halo Diameter (mm) 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||
| Φ6 | Binh Tan-Vinh Long | 4.9 b | 5.9 c | 8.7 b |
| Φ16 | Vinh Trach Dong-Bac Lieu | 5.9 a | 11.2 a | 12.7 a |
| Φ17A | Hiep Thanh-Bac Lieu | 5.2 b | 7.2 b | 10.3 b |
| Φ17B | Hiep Thanh-Bac Lieu | 3.9 c | 6.0 c | 6.6 c |
| Φ31 | Vinh Chau-Soc Trang | 6.5 a | 11.5 a | 12.3 a |
1 Means followed by a different letter (a–c) in the same column do differ significantly (Tukey’s test; p-value < 0.05).
Figure A1Plaque morphology of five phage isolates at 72 h after culturing on X. axonopodis pv. allii XaaBL11 strain.
Figure 1TEM analysis shows the morphology of the three selected phages. All three phage virions contain an icosahedral head and a short tail, typically for the podoviruses. The white scale bar represents 20 nm.
Figure 2Genome maps of Φ16, Φ17A and Φ31 and comparison between the genomes and related phages Paz and Prado using a BLASTn analysis. The selected phages follow a modular genome organization, typical for lytic phages of the Autographiviridae: first an early transcribed region with a lot of ORFan genes, followed by the DNA metabolism region, the structural protein region and the lysis cassette. Arrows represent the different coding sequences: in white—encoding hypothetical proteins, blue—encoding DNA-associated proteins, green—encoding structural proteins and red—encoding the lysis cassette (adapted from EasyFig).
Figure A2Read pileup (in grey) of Φ31 with Φ16 as reference. Blue lines at the bottom represent the end and beginning of gp39 and gp40, respectively. The red box indicates the hypervariable region in the intergenic region. There is a clear drop in het read pileup sequencing depth suggesting a deletion event. The remaining reads (each grey line) show an accumulation of mutations (colored dots in the reads) in this specific region.
Percentage of leaf area infection caused by X. axonopodis pv. allii (XaaBL11) after different treatments in greenhouse conditions.
| Treatment | Percentage of Infected Leaf Area (%) 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 dai 2 | 7 dai 2 | 9 dai 2 | |
| Φ16 | 20.2 b | 33.2 b | 37.2 b |
| Φ17A | 22.6 b | 38.9 b | 39.8 b |
| Φ31 | 11.4 c | 22.4 c | 26.6 c |
| Three-phage cocktail | 26.3 ab | 40.3 b | 43.3 b |
| Starner | 7.7 c | 15.7 c | 18.3 d |
| Bacteria only | 30.5 a | 51.2 a | 67.5 a |
1 Means followed by a different letter (a–c) in the same column do differ significantly (Duncan’s test; p-value < 0.05). 2 Days after inoculation with XaaBL11.
Bacteriophage density (pfu/g leaf) on Welsh onion phyllosphere at various timepoints after pathogen inoculation.
| Treatment | Density of Bacteriophage on Leaf Surface (pfu/g leaf) 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 hai 2 | 48 hai 2 | 72 hai 2 | |
| Φ16 | 3.53 b | 8.55 a | 7.35 bc |
| Φ17A | 4.04 ab | 8.42 a | 7.89 b |
| Φ31 | 3.97 b | 8.73 a | 9.03 a |
| Three-phage cocktail | 4.15 a | 7.60 b | 6.97 c |
1 Means followed by a different letter (a–c) in the same column do differ significantly (Duncan’s test; p-value < 0.05). 2 Hours after inoculation with XaaBL11.
Figure 3Development of leaf blight caused by X. axonopodis pv. allii on Welsh onion in greenhouse conditions. Five different treatments were tested for their efficacy to control leaf blight symptoms nine days after infection: (A) Oxolonic acid (Starner), (B) Φ 31, (C) Φ 16, (D) Φ 17A, (E) three-phage cocktail (Φ 16, Φ 17A and Φ 31) and (F) Control (bacteria only).
Percentage of leaf area infection caused by X. axonopodis pv. allii (XaaBL11) in different phage titer treatments of phage Φ31 in greenhouse conditions.
| Treatments | Percentage of Leaf Area Infection (%) 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 dai 2 | 6 dai 2 | 8 dai 2 | |
| 105 pfu/mL | 8.2 b | 21.4 b | 43.1 b |
| 106 pfu/mL | 6.1 bc | 16.6 bc | 34.8 c |
| 107 pfu/mL | 3.3 cd | 9.4 cd | 20.3 d |
| 108 pfu/mL | 0.6 d | 4.9 d | 18.4 d |
| Control | 15.9 a | 34.1 a | 60.0 a |
1 Means followed by a different letter (a–d) in the same column do differ significantly (Duncan’s test; p-value < 0.05). 2 Days after inoculation with XaaBL11.
Figure A3Development of leaf blight caused by X. axonopodis pv. allii on onion after different phage titer treatments (A–E) in greenhouse conditions.
Efficacy of phage and oxolinic acid treatments on the control of bacterial leaf blight of rice caused by X. axonopodis pv. allii (XaaBL11) and on yield under field conditions.
| Treatments | Disease Index 1 | AUDPC 3 | Actual Yield (kg/25 m2) | Commercial Yield (kg/25 m2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 dai 2 | 9 dai 2 | 15 dai 2 | ||||
| Control | 18.3 a | 23.2 a | 28.2 a | 288.8 a | 31.4 b | 26.3 b |
| Φ31 | 11.5 b | 13.1 c | 18.2 bc | 178.8 b | 34.0 ab | 30.9 a |
| Three-phage cocktail | 13.1 b | 17.8 b | 22.1 b | 216.6 b | 33.9 ab | 29.0 ab |
| Starner | 13.9 b | 14.6 bc | 15.9 c | 189.2 b | 34.8 a | 31.3 a |
| 0.0087 | 0.0030 | 0.0013 | 0.0001 | 0.0238 | 0.0027 | |
1 Means followed by the same letter ((a–c) in the same column do not differ statistically among themselves by a Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). 2 Days after inoculation with XaaBL11. 3 Area under disease progress curve. 4 Probability that there are no differences in treatment means according to an analysis of variance.
Figure 4Bacterial leaf blight infection caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii in field conditions. Two different treatments are being shown: (A) bacteria only treatment and (B) bacteria and phage Φ31 treatment.