| Literature DB >> 34062776 |
Andreas Follmann1,2, Franziska Schollemann1, Andrea Arnolds1, Pauline Weismann1, Thea Laurentius3, Rolf Rossaint1, Michael Czaplik1,2.
Abstract
The bans on visiting nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, while intended to protect residents, also have the risk of increasing the loneliness and social isolation that already existed among the older generations before the pandemic. To combat loneliness and social isolation in nursing homes, this trial presents a study during which social networks of nursing home residents and elderly hospital patients were maintained through virtual encounters and robots, respectively. The observational trial included volunteers who were either residents of nursing homes or patients in a geriatric hospital. Each volunteer was asked to fill in a questionnaire containing three questions to measure loneliness. The questionnaire also documented whether video telephony via the robot, an alternative contact option (for example, a phone call), or no contact with relatives had taken place. The aim was to work out the general acceptance and the benefits of virtual encounters using robots for different roles (users, relatives, nursing staff, facilities). Seventy volunteers with three possible interventions (non-contact, virtual encounters by means of a robot, and any other contact) took part in this trial. The frequency of use of the robot increased steadily over the course of the study, and it was regularly used in all facilities during the weeks of visitor bans (n = 134 times). In the hospital, loneliness decreased significantly among patients for whom the robot was used to provide contact (F(1,25) = 7.783, p = 0.01). In the nursing homes, no demonstrable effect could be achieved in this way, although the subject feedback from the users was consistently positive.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; bans on visitors; loneliness; robotics; social isolation; video telephony
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34062776 PMCID: PMC8124278 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Within the study, the home care robot temi (Medisana GmbH, Neuss, Germany) was used to establish video telephony between relatives and residents of two elderly care facilities and patients of a geriatric clinic via the Skype application during COVID-19 pandemic visitor bans.
Three-item loneliness score by Hughes et al. [17].
| Question | Hardly Ever | Some of the Time | Often |
|---|---|---|---|
| How often do you feel that you lack companionship? | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| How often do you feel left out? | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| How often do you feel isolated from others? | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Overview of the number of completed questionnaires and the demographic data of participants of the study sites.
| Demographic | Study Groups | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Gender | Total | Intervention | Total | |||||
| Male | Female | TEMI | Non-Contact | Alternative | |||||
| Heinsberg | 83.6 | 8 | 32 | 40 | 31 | 0 | 135 | 166 | |
| Study sites | Aachen | 80.4 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 32 | 77 | 0 | 109 |
| Euskirchen | 82.5 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 71 | 195 | 32 | 298 | |
| stotal | 82.6 | 19 | 51 | 70 | 134 | 272 | 167 | 573 | |
Figure 2The cumulative number of virtual encounters increased rapidly during a “training period”, reaching a plateau after 6 to 7 weeks.
Figure 3Average loneliness score. (a) A positive effect regarding loneliness was shown for the hospital study site. Here, the loneliness score was significantly decreased when virtual encounters took place compared to the control group (non-contact) (p = 0.01). Both in (b,c) there was no significant difference between the average loneliness score of the different intervention types.
Frequently expressed benefits related to virtual visits mediated by a robot.
| Role | Benefits and Other Expressed Issues |
|---|---|
| Users | Capability to contact friends and family members frequently |
| No risk of infection | |
| Embodiment of the visitor by the humanoid-resembling robot | |
| Maintaining social contacts | |
| Entertainment aspects of the robot (autonomous driving, speaking, etc.) | |
| Exciting event preventing boredom | |
| Voice control offers good operating comfort/high usability | |
| Possibility to show objects or their rooms during video telephony | |
| Relatives | Continue to be in contact, despite the ban on visits |
| Direct contact with nursing staff possible | |
| Feeling informed and can get a picture of the current state of health | |
| Fulfilment of the “duty” with simultaneous time saving | |
| No risk of infection | |
| No travel expenses (both financially and in terms of health) | |
| Nursing staff | Direct contact with relatives |
| Easier to handle than a tablet | |
| Temi can drive autonomously into quarantine rooms | |
| Temi can be left alone with the elderly: no supervision necessary. | |
| Temi surface able to be disinfected | |
| Entertainment capabilities (e.g., by providing YouTube content or music) | |
| Facility | Increasing the attractiveness of employers (use of digitization products) |
| Temi used in everyday life (temi as a part of the community) |