Literature DB >> 34059802

Severe infections and infection-related mortality in a large series of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Albert Esquirol1, Maria Jesús Pascual2, Mi Kwon3, Ariadna Pérez4, Rocio Parody5, Christelle Ferra6, Irene Garcia Cadenas7, Beatriz Herruzo2, Nieves Dorado3, Rafael Hernani4, Isabel Sanchez-Ortega5, Anna Torrent6, Jorge Sierra7, Rodrigo Martino7.   

Abstract

Severe infections and their attributable mortality are major complications in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We herein report 236 adult patients who received haploSCT with PTCy. The median follow-up for survivors was 37 months. The overall incidence of bloodstream infections by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria at 37 months was 51% and 46%, respectively. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was 69%, while Epstein Barr virus infections occurred in 10% of patients and hemorrhagic cystitis in 35% of cases. Invasive fungal infections occurred in 11% at 17 months. The 3-year incidence of infection-related mortality was 19%. The median interval from transplant to IRM was 3 months (range 1-30), 53% of IRM occurred >100 days post-haploSCT. Risk factors for IRM included age >50 years, lymphoid malignancy, and developing grade III-IV acute GvHD. Bacterial infections were the most common causes of IRM (51%), mainly due to gram-negative bacilli BSI. In conclusion, severe infections are the most common causes of NRM after haploSCT with PTCy, with a reemergence of gram-negative bacilli as the most lethal pathogens. More studies focusing on the severe infections after haploSCT with PTCy and differences with other types of alloSCT in adults are clearly warranted.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34059802      PMCID: PMC8165955          DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01328-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


Introduction

Over the last decade, several haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) strategies have been developed to overcome HLA barriers [1-4], improving the high incidence of graft rejection and graft versus host disease associated with earlier haploSCT experiences. Currently, haploSCT has become a real alternative for patients lacking identical donor, mostly after the introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide [5-11]. Bloodstream infections (BSI) are the most common severe infections and are a major cause of mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) [12], with an incidence ranging from 13 to 46% [13]. Many risk factors for BSI and severe infectious complications exist, such as prolonged severe neutropenia, myeloablative conditioning regimens, severe mucosal damage, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics; acute graft versus host disease, prolonged corticosteroids, and previous infectious history [13-16]. Moreover, delayed immune recovery, as seen with ex-vivo T cell-depleted alloSCT leads to high incidence of late infections in the haploSCT setting, as reported with the Perugia platforms [1, 17]. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was a major milestone in the haploSCT setting. PTCy removes selectively alloreactive donor T cells that are proliferating in response to host alloantigen while preserving non-alloreactive donor T cells [18], with surprisingly fast quantitative immune reconstitution [4, 19]. Despite initial encouraging results with PTCy [20], infection-related mortality (IRM) is still the most common cause of mortality, and possibly higher than in alloSCT from HLA identical sibling donor (21% vs. 13%, p = 0.002) [11]. Likewise, IRM was higher in haploSCT without PTCy than a matched cohort of recipients of HLA identical sibling alloSCT (26 + 6% vs. 10 + 4%, p = 0.04) [21]. Currently, despite several advances that have improved the outcomes after alloSCT, infectious complications remain a significant problem and a major cause of transplant failure. In the present study, we describe the incidence of infections and causative pathogens in different post-SCT periods (pre-engraftment [<31 days] (PE), early post-engraftment [31–100 days] and late post-engraftment [>100 days]), the IRM and causative pathogens, as well as the overall transplant outcomes, in a large retrospective series of haploSCT with PTCy as graft versus host disease (GvHD).

Patients and methods

Patients

Two-hundred thirty-six adult consecutive patients were transplanted between November 2013 and November 2018 in six centers of the Spanish transplant group (Grupo Español de Transplante Hematopoyético [GETH]). All patients received a haploSCT using PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis [16] followed by calcineurin inhibitors, with or without mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Transplants were done according to the local institutional protocols, and all patients signed informed consent. As a general rule, exclusion criteria were a poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3 or Karnofsky score <60%), HIV infection, impaired cardiac or pulmonary functions, active viral hepatitis, and renal failure (creatinine > x 1.5 ULN). The information was evaluated retrospectively for each patient.

Conditioning regimens, Gvhd prophylaxis, and stem cell source

The conditioning regimens were selected by each institution according to patients’ characteristics and local protocols. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens were fludarabine (40 mg/m2 IV) from day −6 to −3 and busulphan (3.2 mg/kg IV) from day −6 to −3 (FluBu4) [22]; or thiotepa (5 mg/kg IV) on days −7 and −6, fludarabine (50 mg/m2 IV) on days −5, −4, and −3 and busulphan (1 mg/kg/6 h on days −5, −4, and −3 oral dose, or 3.2 mg/kg/day IV dose on the same days) (TBF) [23]. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2 IV) from day −6 to −2, cyclophosphamide (14.5 mg/kg IV) on days −6 and −5 and busulphan (3.2 mg/kg IV) on days −4 and −3 (FluCyBu2). If the TBF platform was used as RIC, busulphan was reduced from three to 2 days (days −5 and −4). All patients received PTCy (50 mg/kg IV on days +3 and +4) as GvHD prophylaxis followed by cyclosporine combined with MMF or tacrolimus alone since day +5 [22, 23]. Intravenous MESNA was given at a dose of 10 mg/kg/6 h on days +3 and +4 (total daily dose of 40 mg/kg) as hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) prevention. Each institution chose to use either peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) as the stem cell (SC) source. The target dose of CD34 + cells/kg of recipient weight to be infused was 5 × 106/kg (range 4–6 × 106/kg) in recipients of PBSC transplantation (PBSCT), while the target dose total nucleated cells (TNC)/kg recipient weight in BM recipients was 3 × 108/kg. The centers selected the haploidentical donor based on availability and their preference among the first-degree relatives. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) were studied in all patients; a local protocol of desensitisation was in place in case of inevitable high DSA titers were found (details not shown).

Definitions and supportive care

The definitions used in the current study are also shown in detail in the Supplementary online material. In general, any bacterial, viral, or invasive fungal infection (IFI) requiring intravenous treatment or hospitalization was considered a severe infectious episode. In the case of common bacterial skin contaminants (mostly coagulase-negative staphylococci), a bloodstream infection (BSI) was diagnosed only if ≥2 consecutive blood cultures were positive for the same species. Infection data were collected retrospectively until the patient’s death or last follow-up, using standardized definitions of severe infections after SCT based on the most recent guidelines (https://www.ebmt.org/working-parties/infectious-diseases-working-party-idwp). Common respiratory virus infections and virus-related hemorrhagic cystitis were also included in the study. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was defined as the presence of at least 2 consecutive (within a minimum interval of 48 h) positive results of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for CMV in peripheral blood (PB) with a viral load >1000 IU/mL, while CMV disease was defined as the demonstration of CMV in biopsy or autopsy specimens from clinically involved visceral sites by culture and/or histology or if CMV was detected in samples from clinically-defined sites of disease. Epstein-Bar virus (EBV) infection was defined as the presence of at least 2 consecutive (within a minimum interval of 7 days) positive results of a PCR test for EBV in peripheral blood (PB) with a viral load >1000 e.g.c./mL, with or without evidence of EBV-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-PTLD). Human herpes virus 6 disease was defined as the presence of positive PCR test in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with neurological symptoms (encephalitis), and a positive intestinal biopsy (colitis). All patients were nursed in HEPA-filtered rooms. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was given following institutional policies, but which can be summarized as follows. Bacterial prophylaxis consisted of ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin during neutropenia or until the start of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Antifungal prophylaxis was administered according to the protocols at each site, with either fluconazole and a pre-emptive strategy; or a mold-active antifungal agent (posaconazole, voriconazole or other systemic antifungal drugs) until engraftment or whenever the patient was given steroids for the treatment of GVHD. Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecci consisted of cotrimoxazole until day −2 and then was restarted after engraftment. Pentamidine was used if cotrimoxazole was contraindicated. For prevention of Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-related disease, all institutions followed a preemptive approach with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) monitoring; the treatment started with positive PCR consisted of ganciclovir or foscarnet if severe neutropenia or ganciclovir toxicities. Acyclovir was recommended for a minimum of 1-year post-HSCT or until immunosuppressive therapy was stopped. Galactomannan testing and CMV PCR analysis were performed twice weekly, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) PCR analysis was performed weekly until day +100, in case of EBV infection, rituximab was used. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement was recommended whenever the total IgG blood level was < 400 mg/dL, especially if the patient had prior infection by encapsulated bacteria or were considered to be at high risk of humoral immunodeficiency-linked opportunistic infections. All centers started the practice of vaccination after 6th months unless patients had severe active GvHD or were receiving IVIG therapy

Statistical analyses

SPSS statistics (IBM SPSS Statistics 21) and R studio programs (R studio, Boston, MA) were used for statistical analyses. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from day 0 to date of death by any cause, and progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from day 0 to disease progression or death. The Kaplan Meier method was used for estimating the actuarial PFS and OS, and the log rang test was used to study the univariate impact of any given variable on OS and PFS. The cumulative incidence (CI) estimate with competing risk(s) analysis was used to calculate the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD, non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and infection-related mortality (IRM). The competing risk for NRM was relapse, while for relapse it was NRM. Competing risks for acute and chronic GvHD were disease relapse and NRM up to 100 days after stem cell infusion for acute GvHD and until the last follow up for chronic GvHD. Competing risk for IRM was NRM not due to infection or relapse. Competing risk of infection during a period of infectious risk was NRM or relapse during the time period. Gray test was used to study the impact of any given variable on a CI. We used landmark studies to find the incidence of infections in different time points, and thus time-dependent variables which occurred before each landmark point were included as binary variables. If the patients were alive at every time point they were categorized in two groups (with or without infection). Patients who died before the time of any given landmark point were excluded from the next time point. The time points: day 100 (late post-engraftment) were used for infections by GPB, GNB, and conventional respiratory virus infection. For CMV and EBV, hemorrhagic cystitis and fungal infections, the time points selected were <31 and ≥31 days. COX regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis with documentation of proportional hazards over time for each outcome and covariate analyzed. In addition, variables or events that occurred post-transplant but before a given landmark point were analyzed as possible risk factors for IRM, NRM and relapse in the framework of Cox models as time-dependent covariates (for instance, occurrence of aGVHD), switching from absent to present at the moment of occurrence of each covariate/event.

Results

Patient and donor characteristics

Patient and donor characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median follow up of survivors was 37 months (range 12–82). The median patient age was 50 years (range 17–71), and 61% were male. Seventy-six patients (32%) had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which was the most common underlying disease, followed by lymphoma in 70 patients (30%). Twenty-seven patients (11%) had failed a first alloSCT.
Table 1

Patient and donors’ characteristics.

Number of cases236
Patients’ characteristicsN (%)
Median age [range]50 (17–71)
 Age ≥50 years/≥60 years115 (49%)/57 (24%)
Male and female sex144 (61%)/92 (39%)
 Female donor to male recipient64 (27%)
Underlying disease
 AML76 (32%)
 MDS39 (17%)
 ALL22 (9%)
 Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma39 (17%)
 Hodgkin disease31 (13%)
 CLL8 (3%)
 CML or other MPS12 (5%)
 Multiple myeloma5 (2%)
 Biphenotypic acute leukemia2 (1%)
 Aplasia1
 Prolymphocytic leukemia1
Response at transplant
 Complete remission (first and second)130 (55%)
 Third complete remission16 (7%)
 Partial remission33 (14%)
 Stable disease17 (7%)
 Progression or refractory disease33 (14%)
 Induction chemotherapy aplasia5 (2%)
 Primary graft failure2 (1%)
Refined Disease Risk Index (rDRI)
 Low rDRI29 (12%)
 Intermediate rDRI125 (54%)
 High rDRI72 (31%)
 Very High rDRI7 (3%)
Prior HSCT, num. (%)77 (33%)
 Previous aloSCT27 (11%)
Conditioning regimen
 FluBu23 (10%)
 FluBuCy87 (37%)
 TBF121 (51%)
 Other (FluCyTBI, FluATG)5 (2%)
Conditioning intensity
 Myeloablative75 (32%)
 Reduced intensity161 (68%)
Stem cell source
 Peripheral blood stem cells191 (81%)
 Bone marrow45 (19%)
GvHD prophylaxis following PTCy
 Cyclosporine with MMF115 (49%)
 Tacrolimus121 (51%)
 CD34 + cells infused (×106/kg)(median, range)5,4 (1.95–11.42)
 Median follow-up in survivors, months (range)37 [1–82]
Donors’ characteristics
 Male and female sex132 (56%)/104 (44%)
Donor relationship with patient
 Mother/Father13 (6%)/23 (10%)
 Son/Daughter61 (26%)/41 (17%)
 Brother/Sister55 (23%)/39 (16%)
 Other donors4 (2%)
Donor and recipient CMV IgG combination
 D+/ R + −112 (48%)
 D−/R+69 (29%)
 D+/ R−29 (12%)
 D−/R−25 (11%)

AML acute myeloid MDS Myelodysplastic syndrome, ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CLL chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CML chronic myeloid leukemia, MPN myeloproliferative neoplasm, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, AlloSCT allogeneic stem cell transplantation, FluBu fludarabine-busulfan, FluBuBy fludarabine-busulfan-cyclophosphamide, TBF thiotepa-fludarabine-busulfan, FluCyTBI fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-total body irradiation, FluATG fludarabine-ATG, GvHD graft versus host disease, PTCy post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, CMV cytomegalovirus, D donor, R recipient.

Patient and donors’ characteristics. AML acute myeloid MDS Myelodysplastic syndrome, ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CLL chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CML chronic myeloid leukemia, MPN myeloproliferative neoplasm, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, AlloSCT allogeneic stem cell transplantation, FluBu fludarabine-busulfan, FluBuBy fludarabine-busulfan-cyclophosphamide, TBF thiotepa-fludarabine-busulfan, FluCyTBI fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-total body irradiation, FluATG fludarabine-ATG, GvHD graft versus host disease, PTCy post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, CMV cytomegalovirus, D donor, R recipient. One hundred thirty-five patients (57%) were in early disease phase at transplant (first and second CR; and post-induction aplasia), although 79 patients (34%) had a high or very high refined Disease Risk Index (rDRI) [24]. MAC regimen was used in 32% of the transplants (75 patients). One hundred thirty-two donors (56%) were male, and the most common donors used was a son (26%) or a daughter (17%). An IgG seropositive CMV donor for a seropositive patient was the most frequent combination in 112 donor-patient CMV serostatus (48%), only 23% of patients were CMV seronegative.

Hematological recovery; acute and chronic GVHD

One hundred ninety-one patients (81%) received PBSC. The median number of CD34 + in PBSCT was 5.4 × 106/kg (range 1.95–11.42), while the TNC infused in BM recipients was 3.5 × 106/kg (range 0.84–19.6). The CI of neutrophil and platelet recovery was 94% (95% CI, 91–97%) and 90% (95% CI, 86–94%), respectively. Six patients (2.5%) had primary graft failure. Nine patients died early (before day +21) without engraftment (with a severe infection as primary cause of death), including 5/27 (19%) previously allotransplanted patients. In the 221 remaining patients, the median time to neutrophil (>0.5 × 109/L) and platelet (>20 × 109/L) recovery was 18 days (range 9–49) and 26 days (range 10–156), respectively. The CI of grade II-IV and III-VI acute GvHD at day +100 was 31% (95% C.I., 25–37%) (79 patients) and 11% (95% C.I., 7–15%) (30 patients), respectively; 5 patients died as a consequence of steroid-refractory grade III-IV acute GvHD. The CI of limited, moderate, and severe chronic GvHD at 37 months was 16% (95% C.I., 12–22%), 8% (95% C.I., 5–11%), and 7% (95% C.I., 4–10%), respectively. Four patients died due to severe chronic GvHD.

Transplant outcomes

The OS at 12 and 37 months was 64% (95% C.I., 61–67%) and 50% (95% C.I., 46–54%), respectively, and the PFS was 57% (95% C.I., 54–60%) and 47% (95% C.I., 44–50%), respectively. Several variables had an independent impact on these outcomes in multivariate analysis (MVA); first and second CR at transplant, patients ≤ 50 years and grade III-IV acute GvHD for OS; and first and second CR at transplant, rDRI and patient age ≤ 50 years for PFS [Table 2].
Table 2

Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analysis (37 months).

IRMNRMRelapseOSPFS
UVAMVAUVAMVAUVAMVAUVAMVAUVAMVA
Incidence %(HR. 95% C.I.)Incidence %(HR. 95% C.I.)Incidence %(HR. 95% C.I.)Probability %(HR. 95% C.I.)Probability %(HR. 95% C.I.)
(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)
Disease status at transplant
 Complete remission (1st and 2nd)a20 (13–27)NA27 (19–34)NA11 (5–16)0.26 (0.14–0.5)61 (57–65)0.41 (0.28–0.6)59 (54–64)0.44 (0.3–0.63)
 Other status/responses18 (10–25)36 (26–46)35 (25–45)34 (29–39)31 (26–36)
 p value0.10.70.070.050.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.001
rDRI
 Low-intermediate*20 (13–26)NA30 (23–38)NA16 (10–22)0.44 (0.24–0.79)54 (50–58)NA52 (48–56)0.64 (0.44–0.9)
 High-very high17 (8–25)30 (19–40)32 (21–42)40 (34–46)39 (33–45)
 p value0.70.60.660.380.0010.0060.0080.070.0030.02
Prior alloSCT
 No*18 (11–23)NA28 (22–34)0.55 (0.33–0.9)19 (14–25)NA52 (48–56)NA49 (45–53)NA
 Yes26 (9–42)44 (26–63)26 (9–42)29 (21–38)29 (20–38)
 p value0.30.30.020.020.30.80.0010.1170.0010.09
Recipient years at transplant
 <50*13 (7–1990.34 (0.17–0.64)25 (17–33)0.5 (0.3–0.83)21 (14–29)NA54 (49–59)0.62 (0.43–0.9)52 (47–57)0.65 (0.45–0.9)
 ≥5026 (17–34)37 (28–46)20 (12–28)44 (39–49)42 (37–47)
 p value0.020.0020.060.0080.70.350.130.020.20.023
Grade 3–4 acute GvHD
 No*17 (11–22)0.47 (0.23–0.9)26 (20–33)0.41 (0.24–0.72)21 (15–26)NA53 (49–57)0.48 (0.29–0.78)50 (46–54)NA
 Yes36 (18–53)58 (41–76)17 (3–31)28 (20–36)24 (16–32)
 p value0.030.050.0010.0020.60.220.0070.0030.020.07
Underlying disease
 Myeloid*15 (9–22)0.49 (0.26–0.9)28 (20–36)NA18 (11–25)NA51 (46–56)NA50 (45–55)NA
 Lymphoid23 (15–31)33 (24–42)24 (16–33)49 (44–54)44 (39–49)
 p value0.10.0320.40.80.340.720.40.70.240.3

aReference variables in the MVA. In addition to the variables included in the table, other variables analyzed in the UVA and subsequently included in the MVA were: patient and donor sex, stem cell source, type of conditioning regimen (myeloablative vs. reduced-intensity), TBF conditioning vs. other, type of GvHD prophylaxis (tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine-MMF).

Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analysis (37 months). aReference variables in the MVA. In addition to the variables included in the table, other variables analyzed in the UVA and subsequently included in the MVA were: patient and donor sex, stem cell source, type of conditioning regimen (myeloablative vs. reduced-intensity), TBF conditioning vs. other, type of GvHD prophylaxis (tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine-MMF). The CI incidence of relapse at 12 and 37 months was 17% (95% CI, 12–22%) and 21% (95% CI, 16–26%), respectively. Variables that impacted on relapse in MVA were the disease response at transplant (first and second CR vs. other responses) and low-intermediate rDRI [Table 2]. Forty patients (17%) died owing to relapse. The CI of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 26% (95% CI, 21–31%) and 31% (95% CI, 25–37%) at 12 and 37 months. Prior alloSCT, age ≥50 years and grade III–IV acute GVHD were risk factors in the MVA [Table 2]. The main cause of NRM was an IRM (58% of NRM, 43 patients) [Table 3].
Table 3

Causes of nonrelapse mortality.

Pre-engraftment (<31 days)Early post-engraftment (31–100 days)Late post-engraftment (>100 days)
Causes of IRM N 43 (58%)8 (19)12 (28)23 (53)
Gram positive bacterial (N 7)232
Enterococcus faecium2
Enterococcus faecalis11
Streptococcus mitis1
Stretococcus pneumoniae1
Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus1
Gram negative bacterial (N 13)229
Escherichia coli1
ESBL Escherichia coli1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa1
Multidrug resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa111
Klebsiella pneumoniae2
ESBL or KPC Klebsiella pneumoniae11
Acinetobacter baumannii1
Stenotrophomonas maltophila1
Serratia marcescens1
Viral infection (N 7)133
CMV disease (pneumonitis)121
Metapneumovirus1
Human herpes 6 virus1
EBV-PTLD1
Invasive fungal infection (N 2)11
Probable IFI11
Gram negative bacterial + fungal infection (N 2)11
Gram negative and positive bacterial (N 2)2
Without positive microbiological (N 10)235
Other causes of NRM N 26 (35%)4 (15)9 (35)13 (50)
Graft rejection122
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome21
Idiophatic encephalitis21
Refractory acute GvHD23
Chronic GvHD4
Other NRM causes123
Secondary neoplasms N 5 (7%)5

Other NRM causes: non-infectious endocarditis (x1), adult respiratory distress syndrome (x1), refractory bleeding (x1), alveolar refractory bleeding (x2) and sudden death (x1).

NRM non relapse mortality, IRM infection-related mortality, ESBL extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, CMV cytomegalovirus, PT-LPD post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, IFI invasive fungal infection, PTLD post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

Causes of nonrelapse mortality. Other NRM causes: non-infectious endocarditis (x1), adult respiratory distress syndrome (x1), refractory bleeding (x1), alveolar refractory bleeding (x2) and sudden death (x1). NRM non relapse mortality, IRM infection-related mortality, ESBL extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, CMV cytomegalovirus, PT-LPD post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, IFI invasive fungal infection, PTLD post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

Infection-related mortality and severe infectious complications

The CI of IRM at 12 months was 17% (95% C.I., 12–22%) and 19% (95% C.I., 14–24%) at 37 months, and the variables with an independent impact in the MVA analysis were age ≥ 50 years, lymphoid malignancy as underlying disease (vs. myeloid), and development of grade III-IV acute GvHD [Table 2]. Six hundred twenty-three severe infectious episodes were reported in the 236 patients, with 2.6 infections per patient (range 0–8). Only 17 patients (7%) did not develop any severe infections. In addition, 14% (32 patients) developed a clinically defined severe infection without microbiological documentation, and 10% required ICU admission due to a severe infection. Fifty-six percent of patients developed at least one bacterial infection (19% of patients had gram-positive bacterial infections, 15% had gram-negative bacterial infections, and 22% had both types of bacterial infections). CMV infection (CMV-I) was found in 69% of patients, and 52% had at least one non-CMV viral infection. An invasive fungal infection (IFI) occurred in 41 patients (17%), including 10% of possible, probable, or proven invasive aspergillosis. Specific pathogens involved, their distribution post-transplant, and the median time to onset of the major types of infections per time period are shown in detail in Table 4.
Table 4

Microbiological etiology in time of onset.

Pre-engraftment (<31 days)Early post-engraftment (31–100 days)Late post-engraftment (>100 days)
Total infectious episodes N = 623 (100%)205 (33)214 (34)204 (33)
Gram positive bacteria N = 122 (20%)56 (46)25 (20)41 (34)
Median time of GPB infections days or months (range)10 days (0–28)72 days (32–97)7 months (3–29)
Staphylococcus spp311322
Enterococcus spp171010
Streptococcus spp57
Corynebacterium spp2
Bacillus spp1
Listeria monocytogenes21
Nocardia spp1
Gram N = egative bacterial N = 107 (17%)23 (21)34 (32)50 (47)
Median time of GNB infections days or months (range)13 days (0–28)51 days (35–97)7 months (3–33)
Escherichia coli10817
Pseudomonas aeruginosa71014
Klebsiella pneumoniae278
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia313
Serratia marcescens121
Enterobacter cloacae51
Haemophilus influenzae4
Veillonella spp1
Acinetobacter baumannii1
Leptotricia trevisanii1
Clostridium difficile N = 17 (3%)10 (59)5 (29)2 (12)
Median time of CD infection days or months (range)5 days (2–20)42 days (32–47)
Viral infections
Cytomegalovirus N = 155 (25%)58 (38)84 (54)13 (8)
Median time of CMV infections days or months (range)21 days (0–30)42 days (31–100)5 months (3–31)
Reactivation548412
Disease41
Epstein–Barr Virus N = 23 (4%)5 (22)18 (72)
Median time of EBV infections days or months (range)85 days (69–98)5 months (3–20)
Reactivation516
EBV-PTLD2
Hemorrhagic cystitis N = 77 (12%)32 (42)37 (48)8 (10)
Median time of HC infection days or months (range)14 days (0–30)45 days (31–98)4 months (3–7)
BK Poliomavirus-related20313
Adenovirus131
Without viral infection1134
Upper respiratory tract viral infections N = 34 (5%)2 (6)10 (29)22 (65)
Median time of URT infections days or months (range)70 days (63–84)10 months (4–42)
Influenza virus510
Respiratory syncytial virus52
Parainfluenza virus16
Rhinovirus12
Adenovirus2
Lower respiratory tract viral infections N = 28 (4%)5 (18)3 (11)20 (71)
Median time of LRT infections days or months (range)17 days (19–22)7 months (3–37)
Respiratory syncytial virus28
Influenza virus116
Parainfluenza virus11
Coronavirus11
Rhinovirus13
Metapneumovirus11
Other viral infections N = 19 (3%)5 (26)5 (26)9 (48)
Median time of other virus infections days or months (range)15 days (5–21)63 days (40–93)5,5 months (3–12)
Human herpes type 6 virus133
Adenovirus31
Rotavirus2
Herpes simplex virus2
Hepes zoster virus2
Enterovirus1
Norovirus1
Invasive fungal infections N = 41 (7%)14 (34)13 (32)14 (34)
Median time of fungal infections days or months (range)10 days (0–28)72 day (31–99)11 months (4–46)
Possible IA222
Probable IA512
Proven IA134
Pneumocystis jirovecci pneumonia2
Candida spp uncomplicated fungemia673
Penicillinum spp1

GPB gram positive bacteria, GNB gram negative bacteria, CD clostridium difficile, CMV cytomegalovirus, EBV-PTLD EBV-related Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, HC Hemorrhagic cystitis, URT upper respirtory tract, LRT lower respiratory tract, IA invasive aspergillosis.

Microbiological etiology in time of onset. GPB gram positive bacteria, GNB gram negative bacteria, CD clostridium difficile, CMV cytomegalovirus, EBV-PTLD EBV-related Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, HC Hemorrhagic cystitis, URT upper respirtory tract, LRT lower respiratory tract, IA invasive aspergillosis. There were 43 cases of IRM; the median interval from transplant to IRM was 3 months (range 10–927); eight (19%) died during the PE period, 12 patients (28%) developed a lethal infectious complication in the early post-engraftment period, and 23 patients (53%) died beyond +100 days. In 51% (22 patients), the cause of IRM was bacterial, 16% (7 patients) developed a lethal viral infection, 5% (2 patients) an IFI, and two patients had a mixed bacterial and fungal infection. In 23% of clinically documented IRM no microbiological documentation was reported. The documented primary causes of IRM and NRM are shown in Table 3. All IS was discontinued in 161 of patients (68%) at a median time post-transplant of 199 days (range 1–37 months), and seven of these patients died as a consequence of infection (4.3% IRM). Six of these seven patients died after day +100. In 75 patients (32%) discontinuation of IS therapy had not been possible at last follow-up. Thirty-three patients died before 100 days, and the main causes of death were infection (19 patients, 25% IRM), while of the 42 patients who received IS drug/s after day +100, 17 died due to infections (40% IRM) and 12 patients were still alive at last follow-up more than 1 year post-transplant.

Bacterial infections

The incidence of PE ( < day +31), early post-engraftment (day +31 to +100) and late post-engraftment (> day +100) infections by gram-positive bacteria (GPB) was 20% (95% C.I., 15–25%), 11% (95% C.I., 7–15%) and 20% (95% C.I., 14–26%), respectively, with an overall incidence of 51%. The median time of infection was 10 days (range 0–28), 72 days (range 32–97), and 7 months (range 3–29), respectively. One hundred twenty-two infection episodes by GPB were reported (shown in detail in Table 4) of which 46% (56 episodes) occurred in the PE period. Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. were the most frequent GPB. Six of seven patients with Streptococcus spp. infection in the late post-engraftment period were caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Only eight GPB (6%) presented antibiotic resistance (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and MR S. epidermidis, with 4 infections each). All GPB infections were BSI except for 3 cases of listeriosis and one case of nocardiosis. There were 7 cases of IRM caused by GPB infections (16% of IRM), two infections before +30 days due to Enterococcus faecium, three in the post-engraftment period caused by Streptococcus mitis, Enterococcus faecalis, and MRSA and two late infections (> +100 days) due to Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae (shown in detail in Table 3). With respect to infections by gram-negative bacteria (GNB), the incidence of PE ( < day +31), early post-engraftment (day +31 to +100) and late post-engraftment (> day +100) infections was 10% (95% C.I., 6–14%), 14% (95% C.I., 9–19%) and 22% (95% C.I., 16–28%), respectively, with an overall incidence of 46%. The median time of infection was 13 days (range 0–28), 51 days (range 35–97), and 7 months (range 3–33). Details are shown in Table 4. One hundred seven GNB infections occurred, all were BSI, and as apposed to GPB infections the highest rate of GNB infections occurred in the late post-engraftment period risk, with 50 episodes (47%) of GNB infections. The most common pathogens isolated were Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which accounted for 83/107 (78%) of GNB infections among these three species, 16% were antibiotic-resistant (eight multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, three extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing (ESBL) Escherichia Coli and seven ESBL or carbapenamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae). Other innately MDR species included 7 infections by Stenotrophomonas maltophila and one case of Acinetobacter baumanii. The causes of IRM by GNB are shown in detail in Table 3, which accounted for 30% of IRM (13 patients); two lethal infections in the PE period (MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ESBL Escherichia coli), two in the early post-engraftment period (MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and ESBL Klebsiella pneumonia), and 9 patients in the late post-engraftment period (one Pseudomonas aeruginosa and one MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa; one ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae and two Klebsiella pneumoniae, one Escherichia coli, one Serratia marcescense, Stenotrophomona maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii).

Virus infections

CMV and EBV Infections

The incidence of CMV infection (CMV-I) in PE period (< day +31) and post-engraftment period (≥31 days) was 25% (95% CI, 20–30%) and 44% (95% CI, 38–50%), respectively. In three patients were showed the CMV infection after 12 months. Among CMV seropositive patients the incidence of CMV-I was 78% (95% C.I., 72–84%), whereas it was 24% (95% C.I., 12–36%) in seronegative recipients. Five patients developed CMV pneumonitis, in four cases before day +31 and one on day +155, and four died from this complication. The incidence of EBV reactivation was 10% (95% CI, 6–14%), mainly in the late post-engraftment period (18/23 cases). Fifteen patients were treated with rituximab due to high EBV DNAemia (>1000 e.g.c./mL). EBV-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD) was diagnosed in two patients and was lethal in one of these cases.

Community/conventional respiratory virus (CRV) infections

Sixty-two episodes of CRV infections were reported, and the incidence of at least one episode of CRV infection was 4% (95% C.I., 1–7%) in the PE period, 5% (95% C.I., 2–8%) in the early post-engraftment and 15% (95% C.I., 10–20%) in the late post-engraftment period. Only one patient died as a consequence of metapneumovirus pneumonia. Upper (URTI) and lower (LRTI) respiratory tract infections by a CRV accounted for 34 and 28 episodes (55% and 45%), respectively (details shown in Table 4). Both URTI and LRTI occurred mostly in the late post-engraftment period (65 and 71% of CRV infections, respectively). The most CRV in URTI were influenza viruses (14 episodes), respiratory sincytial virus (7 episodes) and parainfluenza viruses (7 episodes), whereas respiratory sincytial virus (10 episodes) and influenza viruses (6 episodes) were the most common in LRTI.

Other viral infections

A very frequent complication in haploSCT protocols with PTCy is hemorrhagic cystitis (HC), as confirmed in the current study. The incidence of HC until +30 days was 14% (95% C.I., 10–18%) and after day +31 it was 21% (95% C.I., 16–26%), for an overall incidence of 35%. BK-polyomavirus-related HC was diagnosed in 54 cases (70% of HC), while adenovirus-related HC was found in five cases (6% of HC). No viral pathogen was identified in 18/77 cases of HC (23%), 11 of which occurred early post-transplant. Human Herpes virus type 6 infection was diagnosed in 7 patients, with two cases of encephalitis and 5 cases of colitis. Other less common cutaneous and intestinal viral infections are shown in Table 4.

Invasive fungal infections

The incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFI) was 4% (95% C.I., 3–5%) before +31 days and 7% (95% C.I., 4–10%) after day +31, for a 3-year incidence of 11%. The most common IFI was invasive aspergillosis (IA), with eight cases of proven IA, eight probable IA and six cases of possible IA. An IFI was the primary cause of death for two patients with proven IA and one probable IA. Pneumocystis jirovecci pneumonia was diagnosed in the late post engraftment period in only two patients, while uncomplicated candidemia occurred in 16 patients (7%) [details in Table 4].

Discussion

In the current study, we describe the incidence of severe infections and the IRM in a large series of adult recipients of a haploSCT with PTCy. As previously described in other studies infectious complications are the main cause of NRM, as occurs with other types of alloSCT [25, 26]. The 3-year incidence of NRM was 31% and 19% for IRM in the present study. In our series, the 3-year incidence of GPB and GNB infections was 51% and 46%, respectively (246 episodes), similar to the incidence reported by others which range from 35% to 62% [27-30], albeit somewhat different definitions were used in different studies. The rates of GPB infections were similar in the pre-engraftment and late post-engraftment period, while GNB infections were more common in the late post-engraftment period (> day +100). Risk factors for these late GNB infections have been reported, although we did not analyze their risk factors due to the large number of species involved and thus small numbers per pathogen [14]. Bacterial infections were the most common causes of IRM (51%, 22 patients), mainly GNB infections (30%, 13 patients). As expected, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most common GNB species [14, 27, 29, 31]. Antibiotic resistance appeared to contribute to IRM. A MDR strain was involved in 6/13 (46%) deaths by GNB, while only 16/83 (19%) overall isolated were MDR, and three additional patients died due to Acinetobacter baumannii, Serratia marcescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Knowledge of the epidemiology of MDR GNB in each hospital as well as prior infections by these pathogens in any given patient is crucial in establishing the best empirical antibiotic strategy [14, 32, 33]. On the other hand, a high incidence of GPB was found during the study; however, antibiotic resistance was rare among GPB (6%), and only one patient died due to MRSA infection. Regarding CMV-I, a high incidence was found in our series (24% during PE period and 45% beyond ≥31 days), in contrast to a low rate of CMV disease (2%), as reported by others [27, 29, 34–36]. A higher incidence of CMV-I in haploSCT with PTCy compared with other donor types has been reported previously [27, 36–38]. Initial studies hypothesized that the high incidence of CMV-I correlated with delayed CD4 + T cell and dendritic cell recovery [39, 40]. Also, CMV-I has a strong impact on the integrity and heterogeneity of the T cell repertoire, leading to CD8 + effector memory T cell expansion and contraction of naïve cells [41]. However, a recent report found that CMV-specific-T-cell reconstitution in T-cell replete haploSCT with PTCy was comparable to other types of alloSCT without PTCy [42]. More studies are necessary to define the relationship between CMV-I and immunological reconstitution. Interestingly, we found a low incidence of EBV-I (10%) and EBV-PTLD (2 patients), as recently reported by other groups [27, 43]. The immunological hypothesis for the low incidence of EBV-I and EBV-PTLD is unclear, but the lack of in vivo or ex vivo T-cell depletion is of course a major determinant for the low incidence [42]. In haploSCT with PTCy the incidence of HC has been reported to range from 19% to 60% [38, 44]. Recent publications showed a higher incidence of HC in haploSCT with PTCy than in alloSCT from matched related donors also with PTCy (55% vs. 25%) [44, 45], suggesting that the use of PTCy is not the main risk factor for the higher incidence of HC in haploSCT. As expected, BK Polyomavirus was the most common virus linked to HC (70% of cases) in our series. In the haploSCT setting donor T lymphocytes are HLA mismatched with urothelial viral antigen-presenting cells, compromising the immune effector T cell response [45]. Although there is no treatment nor prophylaxis for viral-related HC, the continuous intravenous infusion of MESNA has been recently reported to reduce the incidence of HC when compared with bolus administration (5.6% vs. 27.8%) [46], although this requires confirmation with further studies. A low incidence of IFI was found (11% at 3 years), especially during the early aplastic post-transplant period (4%) and with a very low impact on IRM. Due to the low incidence, we were unable to analyze the risk factors for developing an IFI. Among the patients on immunosuppressive drugs (IS) during the entire study follow-up, 40% of all IRM (17 patients) occurred in patients after +100 days and 44% of all IRM occurred before day +100 (19 patients). However, in the 161 patients who discontinued IS post-transplant the IRM was low (7 patients, 4.3% rate of and 16% of all the cases of IRM). The present study shares the limitations inherent to retrospective studies, including potential selection bias; and the uncertainty of whether all infections were captured and included in the study. However, the study gives a useful picture of the overall epidemiology of different severe infections and their impact on IRM in the setting of adult haploSCT with PTCy in our country. In conclusion, our national study shows that IRM is the main cause of NRM in the haploSCT setting with PT-Cy. A major cause of IRM were GNB infections, possibly higher in patients with MDR GNB infections. Studies focusing on the immunological reconstitution, especially in patients without severe GVHD, may help in understanding the high incidence of late infections linked to cellular immunity, such as CMV and viral-related HC. Supplemental material
  24 in total

1.  Severity of acute gastrointestinal graft-vs-host disease is associated with incidence of bloodstream infection after adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Anita Modi; Lisa Rybicki; Navneet S Majhail; Sherif Beniameen Mossad
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Incidence, Risk Factors, Microbiology and Outcomes of Pre-engraftment Bloodstream Infection After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Comparison With HLA-identical Sibling Transplantation.

Authors:  Chen-Hua Yan; Yu Wang; Xiao-Dong Mo; Yu-Qian Sun; Feng-Rong Wang; Hai-Xia Fu; Yao Chen; Ting-Ting Han; Jun Kong; Yi-Fei Cheng; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Lan-Ping Xu; Kai-Yan Liu; Xiao-Jun Huang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Stefan O Ciurea; Mei-Jie Zhang; Andrea A Bacigalupo; Asad Bashey; Frederick R Appelbaum; Omar S Aljitawi; Philippe Armand; Joseph H Antin; Junfang Chen; Steven M Devine; Daniel H Fowler; Leo Luznik; Ryotaro Nakamura; Paul V O'Donnell; Miguel-Angel Perales; Sai Ravi Pingali; David L Porter; Marcie R Riches; Olle T H Ringdén; Vanderson Rocha; Ravi Vij; Daniel J Weisdorf; Richard E Champlin; Mary M Horowitz; Ephraim J Fuchs; Mary Eapen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Comparison of outcomes after unrelated cord blood and unmanipulated haploidentical stem cell transplantation in adults with acute leukemia.

Authors:  A Ruggeri; M Labopin; G Sanz; S Piemontese; W Arcese; A Bacigalupo; D Blaise; A Bosi; H Huang; D Karakasis; Y Koc; M Michallet; A Picardi; J Sanz; S Santarone; H Sengelov; J Sierra; L Vincent; F Volt; A Nagler; E Gluckman; F Ciceri; V Rocha; M Mohty
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults using CD3/CD19 depletion and reduced intensity conditioning: a phase II study.

Authors:  Birgit Federmann; Martin Bornhauser; Christoph Meisner; Lambros Kordelas; Dietrich W Beelen; Gernot Stuhler; Matthias Stelljes; Rainer Schwerdtfeger; Maximilian Christopeit; Gerhard Behre; Christoph Faul; Wichard Vogel; Michael Schumm; Rupert Handgretinger; Lothar Kanz; Wolfgang A Bethge
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  A review of infectious complications after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantations.

Authors:  Erden Atilla; Pinar Ataca Atilla; Sinem Civriz Bozdağ; Taner Demirer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Full haplotype-mismatched hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase II study in patients with acute leukemia at high risk of relapse.

Authors:  Franco Aversa; Adelmo Terenzi; Antonio Tabilio; Franca Falzetti; Alessandra Carotti; Stelvio Ballanti; Rita Felicini; Flavio Falcinelli; Andrea Velardi; Loredana Ruggeri; Teresa Aloisi; Jean Pierre Saab; Antonella Santucci; Katia Perruccio; Maria Paola Martelli; Cristina Mecucci; Yair Reisner; Massimo F Martelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Mucositis not neutropenia determines bacteremia among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  A H E Herbers; A F J de Haan; W J F M van der Velden; J P Donnelly; N M A Blijlevens
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcome of Pre-engraftment Gram-Negative Bacteremia After Allogeneic and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Italian Prospective Multicenter Survey.

Authors:  Corrado Girmenia; Alice Bertaina; Alfonso Piciocchi; Katia Perruccio; Alessandra Algarotti; Alessandro Busca; Chiara Cattaneo; Anna Maria Raiola; Stefano Guidi; Anna Paola Iori; Anna Candoni; Giuseppe Irrera; Giuseppe Milone; Giampaolo Marcacci; Rosanna Scimè; Maurizio Musso; Laura Cudillo; Simona Sica; Luca Castagna; Paolo Corradini; Francesco Marchesi; Domenico Pastore; Emilio Paolo Alessandrino; Claudio Annaloro; Fabio Ciceri; Stella Santarone; Luca Nassi; Claudio Farina; Claudio Viscoli; Gian Maria Rossolini; Francesca Bonifazi; Alessandro Rambaldi
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Haploidentical versus unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a report on 1578 patients from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.

Authors:  Eolia Brissot; Myriam Labopin; Gerhard Ehninger; Matthias Stelljes; Arne Brecht; Arnold Ganser; Johanna Tischer; Nicolaus Kröger; Boris Afanasyev; Jürgen Finke; Ahmet Elmaagacli; Herman Einsele; Mohamad Mohty; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 9.941

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Epstein-Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: update on management and outcomes.

Authors:  Julian Lindsay; Jad Othman; Madeleine R Heldman; Monica A Slavin
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.915

Review 2.  CMV Infection and CMV-Specific Immune Reconstitution Following Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: An Update.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Luo; Yan Zhu; Yu-Ting Chen; Li-Ping Shui; Lin Liu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Epidemiology of early infections and predictors of mortality after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation among multiple myeloma, Hodgkin, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the first experience from Palestine.

Authors:  Riad Amer; Husam Salameh; Sultan Mosleh; Adham Abu-Taha; Hamza Hamayel; Ahmad Enaya; Amro Adas; Ahmad Khursani; Mohamad Wild-Ali; Taghreed Mousa; Maher Battat; Aiman Daifallah; Amer Koni; Ramzi Shawahna
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.667

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.