Literature DB >> 29968078

Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony follows the physical-not the perceived-temporal order.

Erik Van der Burg1,2, David Alais3, John Cass4.   

Abstract

In natural scenes, audiovisual events deriving from the same source are synchronized at their origin. However, from the perspective of the observer, there are likely to be significant multisensory delays due to physical and neural latencies. Fortunately, our brain appears to compensate for the resulting latency differences by rapidly adapting to asynchronous audiovisual events by shifting the point of subjective synchrony (PSS) in the direction of the leading modality of the most recent event. Here we examined whether it is the perceived modality order of this prior lag or its physical order that determines the direction of the subsequent rapid recalibration. On each experimental trial, a brief tone pip and flash were presented across a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). The participants' task alternated over trials: On adaptor trials, audition either led or lagged vision with fixed SOAs, and participants judged the order of the audiovisual event; on test trials, the SOA as well as the modality order varied randomly, and participants judged whether or not the event was synchronized. For test trials, we showed that the PSS shifted in the direction of the physical rather than the perceived (reported) modality order of the preceding adaptor trial. These results suggest that rapid temporal recalibration is determined by the physical timing of the preceding events, not by one's prior perceptual decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audition; Awareness; Multisensory processing; Temporal order; Temporal recalibration; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29968078     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1540-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Zachary Lovelady; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Shared neural underpinnings of multisensory integration and trial-by-trial perceptual recalibration in humans.

Authors:  Hame Park; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  The Neurophysiological Basis of the Trial-Wise and Cumulative Ventriloquism Aftereffects.

Authors:  Hame Park; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sensory- and memory-related drivers for altered ventriloquism effects and aftereffects in older adults.

Authors:  Hame Park; Julia Nannt; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Musical training refines audiovisual integration but does not influence temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Matthew O'Donohue; Philippe Lacherez; Naohide Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Rapid Temporal Recalibration to Audiovisual Asynchrony Occurs Across the Difference in Neural Processing Speed Based on Spatial Frequency.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-10-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.