Literature DB >> 34058337

Clinical outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy.

Shauna Jacobson Junco1, Mary Catherine Bowman2, R Brigg Turner3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The historical treatment of choice for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; this is primarily based on pre-clinical studies. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of patients receiving monotherapy with different agents.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients receiving monotherapy for S. maltophilia infection with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), a fluoroquinolone, or minocycline from 2010 to 2016. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of recurrence, alteration of therapy due to adverse reaction or concern for clinical failure, or 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. To account for treatment selection bias, multivariate regression and propensity score weighting was conducted.
RESULTS: 284 patients were included (217 received TMP-SMX, 28 received a fluoroquinolone, and 39 received minocycline). The TMP-SMX and minocycline groups appeared to include similar patients while the fluoroquinolone group appeared to represent a slightly less severely-ill population. Clinical failure was similar between groups (36%, 29%, and 31% in TMP-SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups respectively, P=0.69) as was 30-day mortality (15%, 7%, and 5% in TMP-SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups respectively, P=0.16). After controlling for confounding factors, receipt of minocycline (adjusted OR=0.2 [0.1-0.7]) but not a fluoroquinolone (adjusted OR=0.3 [0.1 to 2.1]) was associated with lower mortality compared to TMP-SMX. This association persisted after propensity-score weighting.
CONCLUSIONS: As outcomes were similar or better with alternatives, this study suggests that TMP-SMX monotherapy may not be the treatment of choice for infections caused by S. maltophilia.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; fluoroquinolone; minocycline; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Year:  2021        PMID: 34058337     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  4 in total

1.  In Vitro Time-Kill Studies of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Escherichia coli Using Cation-Adjusted Mueller-Hinton Broth and ISO-Sensitest Broth.

Authors:  Maxwell J Lasko; Matthew L Gethers; Jennifer L Tabor-Rennie; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 2.  Clinical challenges treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: an update.

Authors:  Maria F Mojica; Romney Humphries; John J Lipuma; Amy J Mathers; Gauri G Rao; Samuel A Shelburne; Derrick E Fouts; David Van Duin; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-05-05

Review 3.  Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Ravina Kullar; Eric Wenzler; Jose Alexander; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values.

Authors:  Alesia Vialichka; Mark Biagi; Kevin Meyer; Tiffany Wu; Aisha Shajee; Xing Tan; Eric Wenzler
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-07-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.