Literature DB >> 34057667

Prognostic risk factors for loss of patency after femoropopliteal bailout stenting with dual-component stent: results from the TIGRIS Italian Multicenter Registry.

Maria Antonella Ruffino1, Marco Fronda2, Laura Bergamasco3, Massimiliano Natrella4, Gianluca Fanelli4, Raffaello Bellosta5, Matteo Pegorer5, Luca Attisani5, Massimo Ruggiero6, Pierantonio Malfa7, Domenico Patane'7, Pierleone Lucatelli8, Mario Corona8, Carmelo Ricci9, Laura Candeloro9, Michelangelo Ferri10, Sara Varello11, Lorenzo Gibello12, Gian Franco Veraldi13, Luca Mezzetto13, Paolo Fonio11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors associated with patency loss after bailout stenting with third-generation hybrid heparin-bonded nitinol stent of the femoropopliteal segment.
METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm registry including 156 patients (50 females, mean age 72 ± 11 years) subjected, from February 2017 to December 2018, to provisional stenting with Gore Tigris vascular stent of the distal superficial femoral artery, with or without involvement of the popliteal artery, in 9 different centers. The 194 lesions, with Rutherford score ≥ 3, were stented in case of recoil, dissection or residual stenosis not responding to percutaneous trans-luminal angioplasty (PTA). The follow-up (FU) was performed with clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasound (DUS) at 1, 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: The primary patency rate was 99(95%CI 98-100)% at 1 month, 86(80-92)% at 6 months and 81(74-88)% at-12 months. After patency loss, 13/23 (56.5%) patients were re-treated, yielding a primary assisted patency of 91(86-96)% at 6 months and 88(82-94)% at 12 months and a secondary patency of 94(90-98)% at 6 months and 90(84-95)% at 12 months. Rutherford score ≥ 4 (p = 0.03) and previous severe treatments (p = 0.01) were identified as risk factors for early patency loss during FU. The involvement of the popliteal artery was not an independent risk factor for loss of patency.
CONCLUSIONS: The bailout stenting of the femoropopliteal segment with third-generation nitinol stents is a safe and effective option in case of recoil, dissection or residual stenosis not responding to PTA. Critical limb ischemia and history of previous major treatment at the same level are significant prognostic factors for patency loss during FU.
© 2021. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peripheral artery disease; Popliteal artery; Risk factors; Self-expandable metal stents; Superficial femoral artery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34057667     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01373-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  11 in total

1.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II).

Authors:  L Norgren; W R Hiatt; J A Dormandy; M R Nehler; K A Harris; F G R Fowkes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Treatment of complex arteriosclerotic lesions with nitinol stents in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries: a midterm follow-up.

Authors:  Herbert F Lugmayr; Hermann Holzer; Manfred Kastner; Harald Riedelsberger; Alexandra Auterith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cilostazol reduces angiographic restenosis after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal lesions in the Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol study.

Authors:  Osamu Iida; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yoshimitsu Soga; Naoto Inoue; Kenji Suzuki; Yoshiaki Yokoi; Daizo Kawasaki; Kan Zen; Kazushi Urasawa; Yoshiaki Shintani; Akira Miyamoto; Keisuke Hirano; Yusuke Miyashita; Taketsugu Tsuchiya; Norihiko Shinozaki; Masato Nakamura; Takaaki Isshiki; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Shinsuke Nanto
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Update on peripheral artery disease: Epidemiology and evidence-based facts.

Authors:  Jun Shu; Gaetano Santulli
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  Prevalence and clinical impact of stent fractures after femoropopliteal stenting.

Authors:  Dierk Scheinert; Susanne Scheinert; Jacqueline Sax; Christopher Piorkowski; Sven Bräunlich; Matthias Ulrich; Giancarlo Biamino; Andrej Schmidt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  French multicenter experience with the GORE TIGRIS Vascular Stent in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries.

Authors:  Maxime Sibé; Adrien Kaladji; Claire Boirat; Alain Cardon; Xavier Chaufour; Jean-Pierre Bossavy; Bertrand Saint-Lebes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery.

Authors:  Martin Schillinger; Schila Sabeti; Christian Loewe; Petra Dick; Jasmin Amighi; Wolfgang Mlekusch; Oliver Schlager; Manfred Cejna; Johannes Lammer; Erich Minar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of femoral-popliteal arterial disease. A systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Kasapis; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-11

Review 9.  ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation.

Authors:  Alan T Hirsch; Ziv J Haskal; Norman R Hertzer; Curtis W Bakal; Mark A Creager; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; William R C Murphy; Jeffrey W Olin; Jules B Puschett; Kenneth A Rosenfield; David Sacks; James C Stanley; Lloyd M Taylor; Christopher J White; John White; Rodney A White; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J Gibbons; Sharon A Hunt; Alice K Jacobs; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Primary patency of femoropopliteal arteries treated with nitinol versus stainless steel self-expanding stents: propensity score-adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Schila Sabeti; Martin Schillinger; Jasmin Amighi; Camillo Sherif; Wolfgang Mlekusch; Ramazanali Ahmadi; Erich Minar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Management of cutaneous melanoma: radiologists challenging and risk assessment.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Igino Simonetti; Roberta Fusco; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Francesco Izzo; Luigi Scarpato; Vito Vanella; Lucia Festino; Ester Simeone; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 2.  Complications Risk Assessment and Imaging Findings of Thermal Ablation Treatment in Liver Cancers: What the Radiologist Should Expect.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Federica De Muzio; Carmen Cutolo; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Igino Simonetti; Federica Dell'Aversana; Francesca Grassi; Federico Bruno; Andrea Belli; Renato Patrone; Vincenzo Pilone; Antonella Petrillo; Francesco Izzo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.