Literature DB >> 23652861

Cilostazol reduces angiographic restenosis after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal lesions in the Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol study.

Osamu Iida1, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Yoshimitsu Soga, Naoto Inoue, Kenji Suzuki, Yoshiaki Yokoi, Daizo Kawasaki, Kan Zen, Kazushi Urasawa, Yoshiaki Shintani, Akira Miyamoto, Keisuke Hirano, Yusuke Miyashita, Taketsugu Tsuchiya, Norihiko Shinozaki, Masato Nakamura, Takaaki Isshiki, Toshimitsu Hamasaki, Shinsuke Nanto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether cilostazol, which has been shown to improve the clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal lesions, also reduces angiographic restenosis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Sufficient Treatment of Peripheral Intervention by Cilostazol (STOP-IC) study investigated whether cilostazol reduces the 12-month angiographic restenosis rate after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with provisional nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal lesions. Two hundred patients with femoropopliteal lesions treated from March 2009 to April 2011 at 13 cardiovascular centers were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral aspirin with or without cilostazol. The primary end point was 12-month angiographic restenosis rate. Secondary end points were the restenosis rate on duplex ultrasound, the rate of major adverse cardiac events, and target lesion event-free survival. Researchers evaluated all follow-up data and assessed the end points in a blinded fashion. The mean lesion length and reference vessel diameter at the treated segment were 128±86 mm and 5.4±1.4 mm, respectively. The frequency of stent used was similar between groups (88% versus 90% in the cilostazol and noncilostazol group, respectively, P=0.82). During the 12-month follow-up period, 11 patients died and 152 patients (80%) had evaluable angiographic data at 12 months. The angiographic restenosis rate at 12 months was 20% (15/75) in the cilostazol group versus 49% (38/77) in the noncilostazol group (P=0.0001) by intention-to-treat analysis. The cilostazol group also had a significantly higher event-free survival at 12 months (83% versus 71%, P=0.02), although cardiovascular event rates were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol reduced angiographic restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with provisional nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal lesions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00912756; and URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp. Unique identifier: UMIN000002091.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angioplasty; peripheral vascular disease; restenosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652861     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  26 in total

1.  Long term outcomes in diabetic patients treated with atherectomy for peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Adam J Janas; Krzysztof P Milewski; Piotr P Buszman; Wojciech Trendel; Aleksandra Kolarczyk-Haczyk; Mariusz Hochuł; Maciej Pruski; Wojciech Wojakowski; Paweł E Buszman; Radosław S Kiesz
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  Anti-inflammatory therapies for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Magnus Bäck; Göran K Hansson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Pharmacology in peripheral arterial disease: what the interventional radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Gnaneswar Atturu; Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam; David A Russell
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Prognostic risk factors for loss of patency after femoropopliteal bailout stenting with dual-component stent: results from the TIGRIS Italian Multicenter Registry.

Authors:  Maria Antonella Ruffino; Marco Fronda; Laura Bergamasco; Massimiliano Natrella; Gianluca Fanelli; Raffaello Bellosta; Matteo Pegorer; Luca Attisani; Massimo Ruggiero; Pierantonio Malfa; Domenico Patane'; Pierleone Lucatelli; Mario Corona; Carmelo Ricci; Laura Candeloro; Michelangelo Ferri; Sara Varello; Lorenzo Gibello; Gian Franco Veraldi; Luca Mezzetto; Paolo Fonio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Clinical efficacy and safety of cilostazol: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly C Rogers; Carrie S Oliphant; Shannon W Finks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Antiplatelet therapy for peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Rosetta Melfi; Elisabetta Ricottini
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10

7.  Nitinol stent implantation for femoropopliteal disease in patients on hemodialysis: results of the 3-year retrospective multicenter APOLLON study.

Authors:  Masahiko Fujihara; Akihiro Higashimori; Yoshihiro Kato; Hiromasa Taniguchi; Yusuke Iwasaki; Tomonori Amano; Akinori Sumiyoshi; Daisuke Nishiya; Yoshiaki Yokoi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Effects of Cilostazol-Based Triple Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Shijie Zhao; Zhaoshuang Zhong; Guoxian Qi; Liye Shi; Wen Tian
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Cilostazol ameliorates collagenase-induced cerebral hemorrhage by protecting the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Toshinori Takagi; Takahiko Imai; Keisuke Mishiro; Mitsue Ishisaka; Masanori Tsujimoto; Hideki Ito; Kazunori Nagashima; Haruka Matsukawa; Kazuhiro Tsuruma; Masamitsu Shimazawa; Shinichi Yoshimura; Osamu Kozawa; Toru Iwama; Hideaki Hara
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Literature review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of cilostazol on limb salvage rates after infrainguinal endovascular and open revascularization.

Authors:  Kshitij Desai; Britta Han; Laila Kuziez; Yan Yan; Mohamed A Zayed
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.