Rollover Cyclometalation vs Nitrogen Coordination in Tetrapyridyl Anticancer Gold(III) Complexes: Effect on Protein Interaction and Toxicity.

In this work, a pair of gold(III) complexes derived from the analogous tetrapyridyl ligands H2biqbpy1 and H2biqbpy2 was prepared: the rollover, bis-cyclometalated [Au(biqbpy1)Cl ([1]Cl) and its isomer [Au(biqbpy2)Cl ([2]Cl). In [1]+, two pyridyl rings coordinate to the metal via a Au-C bond (C∧N∧N∧C coordination) and the two noncoordinated amine bridges of the ligand remain protonated, while in [2]+ all four pyridyl rings of the ligand coordinate to the metal via a Au-N bond (N∧N∧N∧N coordination), but both amine bridges are deprotonated. As a result, both complexes are monocationic, which allowed comparison of the sole effect of cyclometalation on the chemistry, protein interaction, and anticancer properties of the gold(III) compounds. Due to their identical monocationic charge and similar molecular shape, both complexes [1]Cl and [2]Cl displaced reference radioligand [3H]dofetilide equally well from cell membranes expressing the Kv11.1 (hERG) potassium channel, and more so than the tetrapyridyl ligands H2biqbpy1 and H2biqbpy2. By contrast, cyclometalation rendered [1]Cl coordinatively stable in the presence of biological thiols, while [2]Cl was reduced by a millimolar concentration of glutathione into metastable Au(I) species releasing the free ligand H2biqbpy2 and TrxR-inhibiting Au+ ions. The redox stability of [1]Cl dramatically decreased its thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) inhibition properties, compared to [2]Cl. On the other hand, unlike [2]Cl, [1]Cl aggregated into nanoparticles in FCS-containing medium, which resulted in much more efficient gold cellular uptake. [1]Cl had much more selective anticancer properties than [2]Cl and cisplatin, as it was almost 10 times more cytotoxic to human cancer cells (A549, A431, A375, and MCF7) than to noncancerous cells (MRC5). Mechanistic studies highlight the strikingly different mode of action of the two compounds: while for [1]Cl high gold cellular uptake, nuclear DNA damage, and interaction with hERG may contribute to cell killing, for [2]Cl extracellular reduction released TrxR-inhibiting Au+ ions that were taken up in minute amounts in the cytosol, and a toxic tetrapyridyl ligand also capable of binding to hERG. These results demonstrate that bis-cyclometalation is an appealing method to improve the redox stability of Au(III) compounds and to develop gold-based cytotoxic compounds that do not rely on TrxR inhibition to kill cancer cells.

Introduction

The discovery of cisplatin’s anticancer activity has brought a new era for the bioinorganic and medicinal chemistry communities.[1] Nowadays, cisplatin is one of the main chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of various cancers. However, the corresponding trans isomer, trans-[Pt(NH3)2Cl2], is clinically inefficient, which is attributed to its much lower efficiency to form cross-linked DNA adducts.[2] Overall, the anticancer properties of a metal compound can be strongly influenced by the intrinsic (stereo)chemical differences between two isomers.[3] Recently, establishing a structure–activity relationship between isomers of the same molecule has emerged as a new frontier in bioinorganic medicinal chemistry.[4,5]

Next to platinum itself, many heavy metal complexes are being investigated for their potential anticancer properties. They may show different modes of action (MOA), such as DNA binding, disruption of membranes, enzyme inhibition, or reactive oxygen species generation, which allows them in many cases to overcome the resistance of tumors to cisplatin.[6−9] In particular, gold complexes have been considered as an alternative to platinum because of the specific affinity of gold(I) ions for the thiol groups present in many biomolecules,[10] especially thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and glutathione (GSH).[8,11−14] The TrxR/GSH system and its different components have been reported as the major cellular line of defense against increased oxidative stress and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); when it works properly, it helps the cell to stay alive. Meanwhile, the expression of these two biomolecules is known to be higher in cancer cells than in normal cells, as the former need to sustain a higher metabolism than the latter do.[15,16] Altogether, the TrxR/GSH system has been recognized as a good target for anticancer therapy,[17,18] notably for gold prodrug candidates.[14] For example, auranofin, a Au(I) compound characterized by the coordination of a phosphine and a thiol ligand in a linear arrangement, has been clinically approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis for years.[19] More recently, it has also been thoroughly investigated as an anticancer drug for its significant inhibition properties toward TrxR.[20,21] Next to Au(I), many Au(III) compounds have been evaluated as anticancer drugs,[22−32] with many of them based on polypyridyl ligands. Interestingly, polypyridyl Au(III) complexes are typically reduced to Au(I) species upon cellular uptake, which is often accompanied by the release of the polypyridyl ligand(s).[12,23] Some Au(III) polypyridyl complexes are also reactive to the thiol residue of human serum albumin,[33] which may lead to the dissociation of the complex before it reaches cancer tissues. By contrast, cyclometalated Au(III) complexes, i.e., compounds that have at least one metal–carbon σ bond, have been considered because of their higher redox stability in physiological conditions.[8,12] On the other hand, cyclometalation typically reduces the positive charge of a Au(III) complex, which can strongly modify its biological properties, notably its cellular uptake and/or interaction with serum proteins.[34]

Most cytotoxic, cyclometalated Au(III) complexes known to date are based on the combination of a bipyridine or terpyridine ligand and monodentate ligand(s),[14,15] while cyclometalated Au(III) complexes based on tetradentate ligands are rare in a biological context.[34−36] Among the different reactions available to prepare cyclometalated complexes, the unconventional method called “rollover” has been identified in recent years, in particular for catalyst design where noncoordinated nitrogen atoms generated by the rollover may provide additional catalytic activity.[37] Rollover cyclometalation is a specific reversal of the coordination mode of a pyridyl moiety, from the expected metal–nitrogen bonding mode to a cyclometalated coordination mode where a meta CH group in the same heterocyclic ring is deprotonated to generate a metal–carbon bond (Scheme a).[37] Rollover compounds have been predominantly described for bipyridine ligands coordinated to heavy atoms such as Pt(II) or Ir(III)[37,38] and were extensively developed by the Zucca group.[39,40] Recently, Hartinger et al. evaluated the anticancer abilities of a series of rollover cyclometalated bipyridine Pt(II) complexes, which appeared to be significantly influenced by the ancillary ligands.[41] Though Au(III) is isoelectronic to Pt(II) and shares its ability to cyclometalate, the synthesis of rollover cyclometalated Au(III) complexes has been rarely reported,[42−44] while the effects of rollover cyclometalation vs nitrogen coordination on the biological properties of analogous Au(III) complexes are, to our knowledge, unknown.

Scheme 1

(a) Scheme for rollover cyclometalation. Adapted from ref (40). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. “B” represents a base. (b) Synthesis of the gold complexes [1]Cl and [2]Cl.

In this work, we studied the coordination of two isomers of a tetrapyridyl ligand, i.e., (N6,N6′-di(isoquinolin-3-yl)-[2,2′-bipyridine]-6,6′-diamine (H2biqbpy1) and N6,N6′-di(quinolin-2-yl)-[2,2′-bipyridine]-6,6′-diamine (H2biqbpy2), to Au(III) (Scheme b). Unexpectedly, in the same reaction conditions, the former ligand led to the formation of the rollover bis-cyclometalated monocationic Au(III) complex [1]Cl, while the latter led to the tetrapyridyl coordination isomer, [2]Cl, which is characterized by deprotonated NH bridges and hence also bears a single positive charge. Both monocationic complexes were fully characterized, the reason for rollover was studied by DFT calculations, and the biological activities of the two compounds were compared. Our results demonstrate that rollover cyclometalation dramatically influenced the reactivity of the gold complex toward thiol groups, its interactions with proteins, and the selectivity of its cytotoxic properties toward cancer cells.

Results

Synthesis

The ligands H2biqbpy1 and H2biqbpy2 were prepared according to the literature.[45] Upon refluxing for 3 days under N2, with a mixture of each ligand with 1 equiv of HAuCl4 in methanol, the gold complexes [Au(biqbpy1)]+ ([1]+) and [Au(biqbpy2)]+ ([2]+) were obtained after purification by silica column chromatography (Scheme b). The complexation of gold(III) to the ligands was confirmed via NMR. The 1H NMR peak at 11.70 ppm (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) demonstrated the protonation of the two secondary amine bridges of the ligand in [1]+. By contrast, similar high-chemical shift peaks were not observed for [2]+, suggesting at least partial deprotonation of the amine bridges. Next to these differences, the 2D-NMR analysis also provided strong evidence that [1]+ and [2]+ were coordinated following a different pattern. The 13C-APT NMR showed that [1]+ had two quaternary carbon atoms more than [2]+, indicating that [1]+ had two more Au–C bonds. It should be noticed that at that stage 1H NMR and ESI mass spectrometry did not yield insight in the nature of the counterion of these Au(III) complexes; probably, these samples had mixed counterions, i.e., AuCl4–, AuCl2–, and/or Cl–.[46] Thus, a chloride-loaded ion-exchange resin was used to better define the nature of the counteranion. Full characterization of the two compounds is given in the Supporting Information. The water/n-octanol log Pow value and water solubility of [1]Cl and [2]Cl were measured via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, see Table S1). The log Pow values were found to be close: +0.83 for [1]Cl and +0.35 for [2]Cl, showing the higher lipophilicity of the cyclometalated analogue. This was confirmed by the significantly lower water solubilities of [1]Cl (0.0064 mg/mL), compared to [2]Cl, that dissolves in water at concentrations up to 1.45 mg/mL.

X-ray Crystallography and Structure Determination

Slow vapor diffusion of ethyl acetate into a methanol/DCM solution containing [1]+ or [2]+ gave red and black single crystals, respectively, suitable for X-ray crystal structure determination. The crystallographic data and selected bond distances and angles are shown in Tables S2–S4. The two crystal structures are shown to contain different counteranions: one chloride anion per gold center for [1]+, and one AuCl4– complex anion per cationic gold complex for [2]+. The compound [1]Cl crystallized in the monoclinic P21/c space group, while [2](AuCl4) crystallized in the monoclinic P21 space group. The cationic part of the two complexes showed a strikingly similar, helical molecular shape. The crystal structure of [1]+ showed that it was a double “rollover” cyclometalated complex, characterized by a C∧N∧N∧C coordination mode (Figure a), while [2]+ was a classical tetrapyridyl complex, characterized by a N∧N∧N∧N coordination mode (Figure a). The M–C bond distances in [1]+ (2.030(7)–2.060(5) Å) were similar to the M–N bond distances in [2]+ (1.995(18)–2.081(18)). The two complexes exhibited distorted square-planar coordination spheres, as confirmed by the moderate tetradentate τ distortion values, i.e., τ = 0.19 for [1]Cl and τ = 0.21 for [2](AuCl4) (τ = [360 – (α + β)]/141, where α and β are the two greatest coordination angles of the tetradentate coordination sphere; τ = 0 reflects perfect planar coordination, and τ = 1 indicates perfect tetrahedral coordination). Besides showing different coordination spheres, the two complexes were also characterized by significant differences in the geometry of their amine bridges. Clearly, in [1]+, the bond distances in the bridge C9–N2, N2–C10, C19–N5 and N5–C20 fell within 1.348(10)-1.415(14) Å, indicative of a single bond character for both C-NH bonds. On the contrary, the amine-carbon bonds in [2]+ were shorter, 1.331(7) and 1.40(3) Å, suggesting a higher double bond character for both amine–carbon bonds (C=N–C). This result suggested that the amine bridge in [1]+ was protonated while that in [2]+ was deprotonated, thus generating conjugation between the lone pairs on the nitrogen bridges with the π system of the polypyridyl ligand. Last but not least, the highly distorted coordination sphere in both complexes generated a strongly helical structure, with both enantiomers being present as a 1:1 mixture in the crystal lattice because of the centrosymmetric space groups. In [1]+, a quite similar helical structure, compared with [2]+, was obtained due to the rollover cyclometalation. It was accompanied by a short centroid–centroid distance between rings A and I of the quinoline groups (Figure a, 3.982 Å for [1]+, 3.343 Å for [2]+), which is close to the typical π–π stacking distance of aromatic rings (3.4 Å),[47] indicative of intramolecular π–π stacking between the two quinoline moieties in both complexes.

Figure 1

(a) Cationic part and ring numbers (red characters) in the crystal structures (wireframe style) of gold complexes [1]Cl and [2](AuCl4). The counterions were omitted for clarity. (b) Selected angles (deg) and distances (Å) in [1]Cl and [2](AuCl4). The least-squares plane defined by the rings D and F is shown as a red line. For [1]Cl, only one of the three crystallographically independent cations is shown in (a) and (b). (c) Space fill construction and schematic pictures of the supramolecular helixes in the crystal structure of [1]Cl and [2](AuCl4). The Au atoms are labeled in yellow, Cl in pink, coordinated N in pale blue, coordinated C in gray, and noncoordinated C in green, dark blue, and red.

The prototypical molecular helixes, helicenes, are organic compounds.[48,49] However, metal-based molecular helixes have also been described by Lehn,[50,51] Sauvage,[52,53] and Hannon,[54−56] for example. In this work, the helical structures of the gold complexes [1]+ and [2]+ indicate that gold complexation can be a new strategy to develop helical systems from planar ligands. In [1]+, the perpendicular distances between the centroids of the terminal ring A and I to the least-squares plane defined by the central two pyridyl rings D and F (red characters in Figure a) were dA-DF = 1.946 Å and dI-DF = 1.586 Å, while in [2]+ they were dA-DF = 1.984 Å and dI-DF = 1.040 Å (Figure b). The sum of the two values in [1]+ (ΣdA/I-DF = 3.532) is about 17% larger than that in [2]+ (ΣdA/I-DF = 3.024), indicating a more helical geometry for the bis-cyclometalated complex [1]+, possibly as a consequence of the repulsion between the terminal negatively charged carbon atoms. A difference in helical distortion was also found in the angle of the centroids of ring A and I with the Au(III) center (θAu-AI). The θAu-AI of [1]+ was 54.16°, which was larger than that for [2]+ (θAu-AI = 46.66°), demonstrating again the larger distortion in [1]+ than in [2]+. Some Au(III) complexes have been shown to interact via supramolecular Au···Au bonds.[57] However, in the crystal lattice of [1]Cl and [2](AuCl4), the metal centers were too far from each other (d(Au···Au) ∼ 4.2–5.5 Å) to suggest any aurophilic interactions. On the other hand, intermolecular π–π stacking occurs between the quinoline rings of two adjacent molecules (π–π distance around 3.9 Å in [1]Cl, Figure S1), leading to an interesting supramolecular packing of the helixes (Figure c). The crystal structure of [2](AuCl4) showed slightly different supramolecular helical arrangements cut by the larger AuCl4– counteranions, placed at a relatively short Au···Au distance (around 4.27 Å, Figure c). These packing differences are a probable consequence of the higher distortion of the coordination sphere in [1]+ combined with the smaller size of chloride counter-anions, which leads to the generation of tighter intermolecular π–π stacking.

DFT Calculation of the Classical and Rollover Complexes

Considering the structural similarity between both ligands H2biqbpy1 and H2biqbpy2 and the different coordination modes obtained in [1]+ and [2]+ using identical reaction conditions, we investigated by DFT calculations at the PBE0/TZP/COSMO level the influence of rollover cyclometalation on the frontier orbitals of [1]+ and the cause(s) of the rollover observed for [1]+. As shown in Figure , both [1]+ and [2]+ show similar highly distorted coordination structures in the DFT minimized structures, with a short π–π distance on the centroid of the terminal ring of the quinoline groups (4.55 and 4.06 Å for [1]+ and [2]+, respectively, Table ). The HOMO orbitals of both [1]+ and [2]+ have similar π-symmetry and similar energies (−6.028 eV for [1]+, −6.118 eV for [2]+) and are both centered on the ligand with a negligible contribution of the Au(III) center (2.2% for [1]+, 0% for [2]+). By contrast, they show significantly different LUMO orbitals. The LUMO of [1]+ was found centered on the bipyridine part of the ligand, while that of [2]+ was essentially the expected antibonding combination of the Au(III) d orbitals (33%) and the p orbitals of the coordinated nitrogen atoms, which altogether results in drastically different LUMO energies (−2.520 eV for [1]+ vs −3.267 for [2]+). Consequently, [1]+ is predicted to be much more difficult to reduce than [2]+, as expected for cyclometalated complexes. Moreover, the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps of [1]+ and [2]+ are very different, i.e., 3.51 eV in [1]+ and 2.61 eV in [2]+, suggesting that both isomers should have different absorbance spectra. This hypothesis was further confirmed by time-dependent density functional theory calculations (TDDFT) using COSMO to simulate solvent effects in water. As shown in Figure S3, the classical N-bonded [2]+ exhibited a red-shifted lowest-energy transition (694 nm), compared with that of the cyclometalated [1]+ (451 nm).

Figure 2

Structure, calculated geometry, and frontier orbitals (HOMO, LUMO) of (a) [1]+ and [1a]+, (b) [2]+ and [2a]+. (c) Proposed mechanism for the C–H activation and cyclometalation of H2biqbpy1 to form [1]Cl.

Table 1

Calculated Information of Complexes [1]+, [2]+, [1a]+ and [2a]+

complex	HOMO	LUMO	ΔE (eV)	relative total bind energy (eV)	end ring π–π distance (Å)
[1]+	–6.028	–2.520	3.508	0	4.55
[2]+	–6.118	–3.267	2.851	+0.8790	4.06
[1a]+	–5.707	–3.096	2.611	+0.7726	6.70
[2a]+	–6.332	–2.586	3.746	–0.6004	7.29

To understand the reason for rollover cyclometalation, we also simulated by DFT the tetrapyridyl coordination mode of biqbpy12– (the isomer of [1]+ called [1a]+, Figure a) and the rollover cyclometalated binding mode of biqbpy22- (the isomer of [2]+ called [2a]+, Figure b). In the rollover cyclometalated binding mode [1]+ and [2a]+, the HOMO and LUMO orbitals showed similar metal-independent π-symmetry and a LUMO located on the bipyridine ligand. The tetrapyridyl molecules [2]+ and [1a]+ shared similar metal-independent, π-symmetry HOMO orbitals; however, their LUMO orbitals were centered on the Au–N4 antibonding d–y–p interaction, suggesting that, upon reduction, coordination of the tetrapyridyl ligand to the metal might be weakened. Interestingly, the relative total binding energies of both cyclometalated molecules [1]+ and [2a]+ were found to be significantly lower than those of [1a]+ and [2]+ (Table ). This result suggested that the thermodynamic stability of [1]+ and [2]+ might not be the only factor influencing which isomer is obtained in the reaction conditions and hence that both reactions were under kinetic control. However, it should also be noted that both hypothetical structures [1a]+ and [2a]+ show much longer centroid–centroid distances (6.70 and 7.29 Å, respectively) between the terminal rings of the quinolines, compared with that in the isomers obtained experimentally [1]+ and [2]+ (4.55 and 4.06 Å, respectively). This difference also suggests that intramolecular π–π stacking of the quinoline moieties may play an important role in the mechanism leading to the final structures and hence in the occurrence of rollover cyclometalation for [1]+.[40] Overall, a probable mechanism for the C–H activation of rollover [1]+ is described in Figure c. First, the precursor HAuCl4 reacts with H2biqbpy1 to generate the first intermediate [Au(H2biqbpy1)Cl2]Cl, in which the Au(III) center bind with the bipyridine part and two chloride ligands. In a second step, the intramolecular C–H···Cl hytrogen bond weakens the C–H bond, which triggers the generation of the first M–C bond and the second intermediate [Au(Hbiqbpy1)Cl]Cl. Repeating this process a second time finally results in the rollover bis-cyclometalated [1]Cl.

Behavior in Solution

The absorbance spectra of both complexes in PBS solution at 310 K presented no significant changes over 24 h (Figure S4), suggesting that they were thermally stable in aqueous solutions. [2]Cl had a significant intense metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorbance band around 450–500 nm, while that of [1]Cl was not remarkable, matching well with the trend observed by DFT and TDDFT calculation. However, when dissolving the complexes (50 μM) in PBS containing GSH (100 μM), the two complexes showed completely different behavior. The absorbance spectra of [2]Cl rapidly changed (in <30 s), with a significant decrease of the absorption band in the visible region of the spectrum, which hereafter remained stable (for 25 min), while the spectrum of [1]Cl remained constant in these conditions (Figure a). The fast reaction of [2]Cl with GSH suggested that reduction of Au(III) to Au(I) might take place.[58] In order to check this, 1H NMR was used to monitor the reaction between [2]Cl and GSH in D2O, using a complex/GSH ratio of 1:2. After mixing GSH with [2]Cl, the 1H NMR peaks of [2]Cl showed a dramatic change, accompanied by the generation of a peak for GSSG in the aliphatic region (2.98 and 3.26 ppm, blue star in Figure b). Although the peaks in the aromatic region can be split into two different Au(I) species involving the H2biqbpy2 ligand (indicated as yellow circle or green triangle in Figure b), their interpretation is difficult. After 24 h, a precipitate was formed, which after filtration and 1H NMR analysis was found to be the free tetrapyridyl ligand (Figure S5). These UV–vis and NMR spectroscopy experiments demonstrate that [2]Cl is easily reduced by GSH, while [1]Cl is much more stable in the presence of GSH, suggesting that the rollover cyclometalation stabilizes the gold complexes in thiol-containing solutions.

Figure 3

(a) Time evolution of the absorbance spectrum of [1]Cl and [2]Cl (50 μM) in PBS solution containing GSH (100 μM) for 25 min: Measurement interval, 12 s; color changes from black (0 s) to red (25 min). (b) 1H NRM monitoring of a [2]Cl/GSH mixture in D2O (concentration ratio 3 mM/6 mM). Orange circle and green triangle indicate different Au(I) species. (c) Time evolution of the absorbance spectrum of [1]Cl and [2]Cl (50 μM) in Opti-MEM medium solution containing FCS (2.5% v/v) for 24 h. Measurement interval, first 30 min every 0.5 min, the left 23.5 h every 15 min; color changes from black (0 s) to red (25 min). (d) DLS size distribution and derived count rate of [1]Cl and [2]Cl (50 μM) in Opti-MEM medium solution containing FCS (2.5% v/v).

The reactivity of both complexes in the cell-growing medium Opti-MEM complete (containing 2.5% fetal calf serum (FCS)) was also studied for 24 h using absorption spectroscopy (Figure c). For [1]Cl, only the baseline of the spectrum increased gradually, suggesting the formation of nanoparticles, but there was no obvious reaction or isosbestic point, suggesting the coordination sphere of the metal did not change in such conditions. By contrast, the absorbance band of [2]Cl in the visible region exhibited a rapid decrease during the first 10 min and finally disappeared without any spectroscopic signature for increased scattering, suggesting that a chemical reaction occurred in the medium leading to a change of the Au coordination sphere, while nanoaggregation did not take place. Considering these results, reduction by thiol species present in the medium, like GSH or serum albumin, is the most likely explanation for the reaction of the Au(III) complex [2]Cl in FCS-containing medium. The nanoparticle formation observed for [1]Cl in the cell medium was confirmed by dynamic light scattering measurements (DLS, Figure d): the Opti-MEM solution of [1]Cl showed a significant signature of nanoparticles in the range 100–500 nm and much higher particle numbers than the Opti-MEM control and [2]Cl groups did. Aggregation of [1]Cl was found to be water-dependent. In pure DMSO-d6, the 1H NMR spectra of [1]Cl were found to be identical (Figure S2a) at high (5 mg/mL) and low (1 mg/mL) concentrations, indicating that supramolecular aggregation did not take place in such conditions. When varying amounts of water were added, however, the 1H NMR spectrum changed dramatically: when the DMSO-d6/H2O ratio decreased from 10:0 to 5:5 (Figure S2b), most aromatic peaks broadened while the signal/noise ratio became lower, indicating the formation of aggregates. It was impossible to interpret these changes in terms of specific supramolecular interactions; simple polarity changes of the solvent would also lead to aggregation of slightly hydrophobic molecules (log Pow = +0.85). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was finally used to determine the size and morphology of the aggregates generated by incubation of [1]Cl in cell-growing medium. The TEM images obtained for a sample of [1]Cl in Opti-MEM complete (Figure S6) showed high-contrast spherical nanoparticles, while a control sample only showed regular crystals typical for the crystallization of salts, and a sample containing [2]Cl showed large amorphous particles that can be attributed to the precipitate generated upon applying vacuum before running TEM imaging. The average particle diameter measured in the image of [1]Cl was 76 ± 20 nm, which is slightly smaller than the hydrodynamic diameter determined by DLS; this effect is very common and has been well-explained in the literature.[59] In summary, the Au(III) center in [1]Cl is stable to reduction by thiol groups present in, e.g., GSH- or FCS-containing medium, proving that bis-cyclometalation results in the stabilization of Au(III). However, the rollover cyclometalated complex interacts supramolecularly in DMSO/water mixtures, and when dissolved in cell growing medium it forms nanoparticles. By contrast, [2]Cl does not form nanoparticles in cell growing medium, but its Au(III) center is sensitive to reduction by thiol groups, which is a direct consequence of the high electronegativity and positive charge of the Au(III) center. Reduction by thiols generates a Au(I) intermediate complex, which is followed by slow release of the insoluble tetrapyridyl ligand and concomitant formation of gold(I) ions probably bound to GSH.[60]

Anticancer Properties

The cytotoxicity of both gold complexes [1]Cl and [2]Cl against 2D monolayers of four human cancer cell lines (lung cancer A549, skin cancer A431, melanoma cancer A375, and breast cancer MCF7) and one noncancerous cell line (MRC5) was determined using a reported SRB assay, both in normoxic and hypoxic conditions.[61] The half-maximal effective concentrations (EC50 in μM), defined as the concentration necessary to kill 50% of the cells, compared to untreated wells, are shown in Table (dose–response curves are shown in Figures S7–S9). Similar to cisplatin, [1]Cl showed a broad-spectrum anticancer ability with EC50 values in all cancer cells in the range of 3.3–16 μM, in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Interestingly, [1]Cl exhibited a relatively higher EC50 value of 27 and 28 μM in normoxic and hypoxic conditions, respectively, in noncancerous MRC5 cells, suggesting some form of selectivity toward cancer cells for [1]Cl. By comparison, [2]Cl showed generally lower EC50 values to cancer cells, i.e., higher cytotoxicity, with significant antiproliferative properties against A375 and MCF7 cancer cells (EC50 = 0.7 and 0.3 μM, respectively, in normoxic conditions). In addition, [2]Cl also showed high cytotoxicity to healthy MRC5 cells (3.3 and 1.5 μM in normoxic and hypoxic conditions, respectively), which means that [2]Cl is less selective to cancer cells than [1]Cl. The Annexin V/propidium iodide double staining assay was used in order to investigate what kind of cell death was triggered by [1]Cl and [2]Cl. The different fluorescence states of both dyes in each cell indicates its status, i.e., healthy (−/−), early apoptotic (+/−), later apoptotic (+/+), or necrotic (−/+). As shown in Figure a, 24 h following treatment with complex [1]Cl or [2]Cl (10 μM), the percentage of A549 cells in the early and late apoptotic quadrants increased with compound concentration, compared with the control group, suggesting that both [1]Cl and [2]Cl kill A549 cells via apoptosis.

Table 2

Half-Maximal Effective Concentrations (EC50 in μM) of Gold Complexes [1]Cl and [2]Cl and Cisplatin toward 2D Cancer Cell and Healthy Cell Monolayers in Normoxic (21% O2) and Hypoxic (1% O2) Conditionsa

		EC50 (μM)
complex		A549	±CI	A431	±CI	A375	±CI	MCF7	±CI	MRC5	±CI	A549-3D	±CI
[1]Cl2	normoxic	3.3	+0.7, −0.6	4	+1, −1	5	+1, −1	4	+1, −1	27	+16, −9	7	+4, −2
	hypoxic	5	+2, −2	16	+7, −5	6	+3, −2	9	+2, −1	28	+9, −6	ND
[2]Cl	normoxic	3.1	+0.3, −0.3	3.5	+0.6, −0.5	0.7	+0.2, −0.1	0.3	+0.1, −0.1	3.3	+0.8, −0.7	4	+3, −2
	hypoxic	3.9	+0.7, −0.6	2.9	+0.8, −0.5	4	+4, −2	2.1	+0.1, −0.1	1.5	+0.2, −0.2	ND
cisplatin	normoxic	4.5	+0.7, −0.6	1.8	+0.5, −0.4	1.2	+0.1, −0.1	3.6	+1.2, −0.9	5.8	+1.5, −1.2	0.8	+0.3, −0.2
	hypoxic	24	+11, −5	13	+4, −3	3.4	+0.8, −0.7	ND		9.4	+5.7, −3.6	ND

95% confidence interval values (CI in μM over three independent biological experiments) are also indicated. ND: not determined.

Figure 4

(a) Flow cytometry quantification of healthy, early apoptotic, later apoptotic, and necrotic A549 cells after treatment with cisplatin (15 μM), [1]Cl (10 μM), or [2] Cl (10 μM) for 24 h. (b) Au content (ICP-MS) of A549 cells after treatment with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (1 μM) for 24 h. (c) Intracellular Au content (according to ICP-MS) for A549 cells treated with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (5 μM) for 2 h at 4 or 37 °C. (d) EC50 values for [1]Cl, [2]Cl, or cisplatin in 3D multicellular tumor spheroids of A549 cells, based on a 3D CellTiterGlo ATP end-point assay.

In humans, cancer appears as a 3D tumor characterized by a complicated microenvironment, which greatly influences the permeability, uptake, and cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs.[62] In recent years, in vitro 3D tumor spheroids have been developed as a more suitable model for the prescreening of anticancer drugs, as they provide better mimicry of nutrient and drug penetration of in vivo tumors. Thus, the cytotoxicity of both gold complexes was also determined in 3D tumor spheroids, using the final spheroid diameter as well as a fluorescence-based Cell Titer Glo 3D end-point assay quantifying ATP (Figure d).[63] As shown in Figure d, [1]Cl showed good antiproliferation properties in ∼1000 μm diameter A549 tumor spheroids (EC50 = 7 μM), while [2]Cl exhibited slightly higher cytotoxicity (EC50 = 4 μM). Both were found to be less toxic than cisplatin (EC50 = 0.6 μM). Notably, the spheroid diameter (Figures S14 and S15) was found to not be a good measure of the effect of these compounds, as the dose–diameter curves were found to be very different from the dose–response curves using the Cell TiterGlo3D assay. In summary, the cytotoxicity of the two gold complexes remained high in a 3D tumor model, where [2]Cl kept the higher cytotoxicity observed in a 2D model.

Mechanistic Studies

First, cell toxicity strongly depends on drug uptake, so ICP-MS was used to determine the intracellular Au content in A549 cells treated with either compound. At 24 h after treatment with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (1 μM), the Au content in A549 cells was 8-fold higher for [1]Cl (51 ng Au/1 × 106 cells) than for [2]Cl (6 ng Au/1 × 106 cells, Figure b), demonstrating the much more efficient cellular uptake of the cyclometalated rollover complex [1]Cl. Although usually cyclometalated complexes have a lower positive charge than that of noncyclometalated analogues, and it is often hypothesized that higher uptake is a consequence of increased passive diffusion through the cell membrane,[64] here the charges of [1]+ and [2]+ are identical, so such interpretation of the higher cellular uptake of [1]Cl cannot be made. On the one hand, the lower uptake of [2]Cl might be linked to its decomposition in the cell culture into Au+ ions that cannot be taken up efficiently, which also suggests that the toxicity of this complex might be that of the ligand H2biqbpy2. On the other hand, the higher uptake of [1]Cl might be due to the formation of nanoparticles in the cell medium (see above), which may help to trigger energy-dependent endocytosis-related transport pathways. To check this hypothesis, we compared Au cellular uptake at normal (37 °C) vs low (4 °C) temperature. Most often, nanoparticle uptake is strongly energy-dependent and can be inhibited by lower temperature,[65] while nonaggregated [2]Cl (or Au+ ions) might be internalized by less energy-dependent processes that are less affected by temperature. As shown in Figure c, after treatment with the gold complexes (5 μM) and 2 h incubation, the Au content of the cells treated with [1]Cl showed a significant decrease in gold uptake, from 87 ng Au/1 × 106 cells at 37 °C to 28 ng Au/1 × 106 cells at 4 °C, while [2]Cl only showed a slight decrease, from 61 to 47 ng Au/1 × 106 cells. This result suggested that [1]Cl may go through the cell membrane by energy-dependent pathways (which may include endocytosis), which is fully compatible with the hypothesis of uptake of a nanoaggregated compound, while cellular uptake of [2]Cl is taking place more via less energy-dependent pathways. It is interesting to note that in A549 cells the EC50 values under normoxia were very close for [1]Cl and for [2]Cl, despite the much higher cellular uptake of [1]Cl. Clearly, [1]Cl is less cytotoxic than [2]Cl, which was also confirmed in the noncancerous cell line MRC5.

In order to see where the complexes might be found in cells, commercial kits were used to fractionate A549 cells treated with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (1 μM) for 24 h and split them into four fractions (cytosol, membranes, nucleus, and cytoskeletal), the gold content of which was measured by ICP-MS. One should notice that the membrane fraction includes the cell membrane, lysosome, endosome, and mitochondria membranes. As showed in Figure S11 and Table S8, ICP-MS showed that, in cells treated with [1]Cl, the majority of the gold was found in the cytoskeletal (27.2 ng Au/1 × 106 cells, 48%) and membrane (17 ng Au/1 × 106 cells, 30%) fractions, but that 8.6 ng Au/1 × 106 cells (15%) was found in the nuclei, while the lowest fraction was found in the cytosol (3.5 ng Au/1 × 106 cells, 6%). For [2]Cl, gold uptake was, as above, much weaker than that for [1]Cl, and it was distributed only between the membrane (1.1 ng Au/1 × 106 cells, 63%) and cytosol (0.61 ng Au/1 × 106 cells, 37%) fractions, while the metal concentration for both the nucleus and cytoskeletal fractions remained lower than the detection limit. These ICP-MS data not only highlighted that the intracellular gold distribution with both compounds was completely different but also demonstrated that [1]Cl can be found in significant amounts in the nuclei and in membranes, while gold in cells treated with [2]Cl does not penetrate the nucleus but can be found in low amounts in the cytosol, where it may be able to interact with TrxR.

The important resistance of 1[Cl] against intracellular thiols makes it similar to the so-called “delocalized lipophilic cations” (DLCs).[66,67] DLCs are known to be selectively cytotoxic to carcinoma cells because of their direct interference with mitochondrial functions and in particular the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane. To check whether [1]Cl was indeed acting as a DLC, we measured the influence of both gold complexes on the mitochondrial membrane potential by using tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TRME), a cell-permeant, positively charged dye that readily accumulates in active mitochondria due to their relative negative charge.[45] As shown in Figure S12, after 24 h treatment of A549 cells with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (20 μM), according to FACS analysis both complexes showed very limited influence on the mitochondrial membrane potential, which was very similar to that of the negative control group, while the positive control group treated with carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone treatment (CCCP, 20 μM, 1 h) showed dramatically reduced percentage of intact mitochondrial membranes.[68] Moreover, DNA gel experiments using the pUC19 plasmid (Figure S13) demonstrated that [1]Cl had concentration-dependent, DNA-binding, and single-strand DNA cleavage properties, while [2]Cl did not show any significant DNA-binding or DNA-cleavage properties. To sum up, the two gold complexes were not interfering with the mitochondrial membrane in the tested conditions, while intracellular gold uptake and DNA gel electrophoresis experiments indicated that the cytotoxicity of [1]Cl might be partially attributed to its DNA cleavage property, whereas for [2]Cl its cytotoxicity is clearly independent of DNA interactions.

Proteins Binding and Inhibition Properties

Several gold complexes have been demonstrated to show significant binding and inhibition properties to several proteins, such as urease,[69] aquaporin,[70] and particularly TrxR.[11,60] To determine the inhibition properties of [1]Cl and [2]Cl toward mammalian TrxR, a spectrophotometric assay was realized using commercially available rat liver TrxR. As shown in Table , [1]Cl did not show any inhibition activity to TrxR at the tested concentration. This low inhibition property might be attributed to the weak reactivity of [1]Cl with biological thiols (see above). By contrast, [2]Cl showed significant TrxR inhibition activity, with a submicromolar IC50 (0.13 ± 0,02 μM), which may be attributed to its high reactivity with reducing thiols, which generates Au+ ions that are known inhibitors of TxrR. The significant difference between [1]Cl and [2]Cl indicates that rollover cyclometalation might represent a promising design strategy to generate anticancer gold compounds that show a target different from TxrR and do not release polypyridyl ligands upon reacting with cell medium or intracellular GSH.

Table 3

Binding of Tetrapyridyl Ligands and Their Au(III) Complexes to TrxR and Kv11.1 Proteins

compd	TrxR inhibition IC50 (μM)	[3H]dofetilide binding remaining (%)b	Kv11.1 binding (%)c
H2biqbpy1	NDa	64 ± 4	36 ± 4
[1]Cl	>5	8.7 ± 0.1	91.3 ± 0.1
H2biqbpy2	ND	16 ± 4	84 ± 4
[2]Cl	0.13 ± 0.02	7.9 ± 0.2	92.1 ± 0.2

ND = not determined.

tested concentration = 10 μM.

Kv11.1 binding (%) = 100%-[3H]dofetilide binding remaining (%).

Kv11.1 binpan>ding (%) = 100%-[3H]dofetilide binding remaining (%).

Indeed, next to releasing Au+ ions, reduction of [2]Cl by biological thiols also leads to the release of the free polypyridyl ligand H2biqbpy2, which might have unselective toxicity. This hypothesis stimulated us to look into the biological activity of the two polypyridyl ligands H2biqbpy1 and H2biqbpy2. N-Heterocyclic ligands are found in roughly 60% of FDA-approved drugs, and pyridine ring systems are prominent examples of such fragments.[71] Many N-heterocyclic ligands have been considered as potential inhibitors of potassium channels in the cell membrane or mitochondrial membrane.[72−74] Potassium channels have been proposed as emerging targets in cancer therapy for their overexpression in several cancer cell lines and their specific functions in cell proliferation as they control cell cycle progression.[75,76] On the other hand, a classical safety issue in medicinal chemistry is K+ channel inhibition, in particular the broad-substrate Kv11.1 (hERG) potassium channel, which is known to generate cardiac toxicity in vivo.[77−79] Here, we evaluated the Kv11.1 channel interaction of the two gold complexes [1]Cl and [2]Cl and their ligands H2biqbpy1 and H2biqbpy2 at a single concentration (10 μM) in a [3H]dofetilide displacement assay.[80] When a compound binds to the Kv11.1 channel, the binding of the reference hERG blocker [3H]dofetilide is decreased, which is used to quantify the Kv11.1 binding efficiency of the tested compounds. As shown in Table , all four compounds displaced [3H]dofetilide from the channel albeit to different degrees. While H2biqbpy1 was a poor binder, H2biqbpy2 displaced 84% of [3H]dofetilide binding. The gold complexes showed a (slightly) higher effect, i.e., 91% displacement for the rollover compound [1]Cl and 92% displacement for [2]Cl. Altogether, both [1]Cl and [2]Cl efficiently bind to the Kv11.1 channel, and while [2]Cl and H2biqbpy2 had similar Kv11.1 binding, for H2biqbpy1, rollover coordination to gold(III) leads to appreciably increased binding to Kv11.1. To evaluate whether ligand release and potassium channel binding may correlate to toxicity, we measured the cell growing inhibition properties (EC50) of the two tetrapyridyl ligands in A549 cancer cells. As shown in Figure S10, H2biqbpy1 was nontoxic to A549 cells (EC50 > 200 μM), while H2biqbpy2 had a rather low EC50 value (12 μM) and hence showed appreciable cytotoxicity. Interestingly, these results correlated appreciably to the Kv11.1 channel binding properties of both ligands: the less toxic ligand H2biqbpy1 bound not very well (36%) to the potassium channel, while the most cytotoxic ligand H2biqbpy2 bound significantly better to the membrane protein (84%).

Discussion

Many Au(III) compounds have been demonstrated to be potential anticancer metallodrugs due to their easy reduction to Au(I) upon intracellular uptake. Au(I) species always show strong binding affinity to the thiol groups of many key biomolecules and enzymes inside a cell, notably to glutathione (GSH) or thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), which are overexpressed in cancer cells because they control the redox balance of cells.[12,81,82] However, several cyclometalated Au(III) complexes have been shown to withstand reduction by biological thiols while keeping anticancer properties, indicating that a different anticancer mechanism may be operative.[83] Very limited research has focused on the comparison of cyclometalated vs classical nitrogen-coordinated gold compounds, both from the chemical structure point of view to that of the biological activities. The two Au(III) complexes discussed in this work are isomers, that differ solely by (1) the binding mode to the metal center, i.e., rollover cyclometalation for [1]+ and classical nitrogen coordination for [2]+; and (2) the protonation state of the noncoordinated amine bridges, which are protonated in [1]+ and deprotonated in [2]+. As a result, the two complexes showed strikingly similar helical molecular shapes and strictly identical charges (+1), but they exhibited dramatically different reactivity to GSH and TrxR proteins: [1]Cl showed no reaction to thiol groups and no TxrR inhibition, while [2]Cl reacted with thiol groups rather quickly, which is accompanied by the release of the tetradentate ligand and TxrR-inhibiting Au+ ions. The low thiol susceptibility of [1]+ should be attributed to the high stability of the M–C bond and of its LUMO orbital, and to the localization of its LUMO on the bipyridine group, without the involvement of metal–ligand bonds. By contrast, in [2]+, the LUMO is both high in energy and involves antibonding combination of the metal d orbitals with the ligand lone pair, which leads to easy release of the ligand upon reduction in biological media.

In biological terms, both compounds were found to be anticancer active, but in a quite different manner. On the one hand, [2]Cl is an interesting cytotoxic compound that upon reduction releases both a TxrR-inhibiting Au+ ion and a good Kv11.1 K+-channel blocker ligand H2biqbpy2. However, gold cellular uptake is strongly limited by thiol-induced decomposition before the complex crosses the cell membrane, i.e., outside the cells. When treating the cells with medium containing [2]Cl, it is hence a homogeneous mixture of Au+ ions and H2biqbpy2 ligand, probably stabilized in solution by BSA, that reaches the cells. The resulting toxicity in A549 cells (EC50 = 3.1 μM) is higher for [2]Cl than for H2biqbpy2 (EC50 = 12 μM), suggesting that although Au(I) ions are taken up in low amounts, they may contribute, by their TrxR-inhibiting properties, to the overall toxicity of the gold compound. At this stage, we do see a correlation between the toxicity of tetrapyridyl ligands and their ability to bind to hERG potassium channels, but in the absence of more advanced mechanistic observations it is not yet possible to conclude that the Kv11.1 channel binding properties of H2biqbpy2 are responsible for its cell-killing properties. Overall, Au(III) complexation of polypyridyl ligands appears as a potentially appealing design principle to prepare multitargeted Au(III)-based small molecular drugs that decompose, upon intracellular thiol reduction, into a TrxR inhibitor (Au+ ions) and a Kv11.1 channel inhibitor. However, the reduction kinetics in the medium before drug uptake would need to be better controlled than it is in [2]Cl, for which fast reduction results in high toxicity also to noncancerous cells, resulting in a comparatively low selectivity index.

On the other hand, the rollover cyclometalated complex [1]Cl is a more promising anticancer compound in several aspects. First, it shows a much higher selectivity index, being as toxic as cisplatin in cancerous cells but almost 10 times less toxic than cisplatin in noncancerous cells. Second, it has a high cellular uptake in cancer cells, which may be due to the formation of nanoparticles in the cell-growing medium, as observed by TEM and DLS. Our preliminary observations are reminiscent of the protein-stabilized aggregation recently described for other molecular drugs such as cisplatin[84] or experimental palladium-based cyclometalated compounds.[63] Third, once inside the cells, the intact Au(III) complex has excellent redox stability in spite of the high concentration of intracellular thiols, which allows it to distribute in the whole cells. Fourth, the presence of [1]Cl in the nucleus and in the membrane fractions, together with its ability to both generate single-strand DNA damage and bind to Kv11.1 potassium channels, suggests at least two possible modes of action explaining anticancer cytotoxicity. Contrary to expectations, this positively charged and hydrophobic gold compound neither inhibits TrxR nor destroys the mitochondrial membrane potential, which distinguishes it from many anticancer Au(I) compounds and “delocalized lipophilic cations”, respectively.

Conclusion

Overall, rollover bis-cyclometalation generates Au(III) anticancer compounds that offer dramatically different chemical and biological properties compared to analogues bound to pyridyl ligands. In spite of its identical charge and helical molecular shape, [1]Cl is significantly more hydrophobic and less soluble in water than [2]Cl, leading [1]Cl to having aggregation properties in aqueous solutions that are not observed for [2]Cl. Critically, the additional electron density brought onto the Au(III) center by the two carbon ligands in [1]Cl dramatically destabilizes its LUMO compared to [2]Cl, thereby reducing its sensitivity to reduction and rendering its coordination sphere stable in biological media. As a side note, for [2]Cl, the tetradentate binding mode of the H2biqbpy2 ligand does not stabilize well enough the coordination sphere of the gold center in biological media, where fast reduction leads to ligand release. Chemically speaking, the redox stabilization brought by rollover cyclometalation in [1]Cl not only prevents thiol reduction or binding in cell-growing media and inside cells but also generates single-strand DNA damaging properties that are not observed for [2]Cl. Interestingly, the positive charge of both compounds and their similar molecular shape makes them equally good to bind to the poorly selective potassium channel hERG. For [2]Cl, this binding property is biologically poorly relevant, because it would probably be reduced and lose its ligand before coming into contact with any potassium channel. However, for [1]Cl, it is an interesting observation that makes rollover cyclometalation a promising strategy to design Au(III) anticancer drugs that enter the cell efficiently and inhibit proteins that are different from TxrR.

Experimental Section

All syntheses were performed in a dinitrogen atmosphere. All the chemical compounds and the other materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All reactants and solvents were used without further purification. All 1H NMR and 13C attached-proton-test NMR (13C-APT NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker DPX-300 or DMX-400 spectrometer. Chemical shifts are indicated in ppm relative to the residual solvent peak. Electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were recorded by using an MSQ Plus spectrometer in positive ionization mode. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) of two palladium complexes were recorded on a Waters XEVO-G2 XSQ-TOF) mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source in positive mode (source voltage 3.0 kV, desolvation gas flow 900 L/h, temperature 250 °C) with resolution R = 22 000 (mass range m/z = 50–2000) and 200 pg/μL Leu-enkephalin (m/z = 556.2771) as a “lock mass”. UV–vis spectra were recorded on a Cary 50 spectrometer from Varian. The DFT calculations were carried out using the Amsterdam Density Functional software (ADF2019) from SCM, the PBE0 functional, a triple-ζ basis set (TZP), and COSMO to simulate the solvents effects in methanol. Human cancer cell lines A549 (human lung carcinoma) and A431 (human skin carcinoma) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, distributed by the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, with and without phenol red, without glutamine), glutamine-S (GM; 200 mm), tris(hydroxylmethyl)aminomethane (Tris base), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), glacial acetic acid, and sulforhodamine B (SRB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The measurements of the cytotoxicity of the complexes were performed according to the literature.[85]

H2biqbpy1

This ligand was synthesized according to a literature procedure.[45] A mixture of 6,6′-dibromo-2,2′-bipyridine (1004 mg, 3.2 mmol), Pd(dba)2 (296 mg, 0.32 mmol), racemic BINAP (395 mg, 0.64 mmol), and cesium carbonate (4145 mg, 12.1 mmol) was partially dissolved in dry toluene (50 mL) under N2 atmosphere. The mixture was stirred for 10 min, and then 3-aminoisoquinoline (919 mg, 6.4 mmol) was added, followed by heating the reaction mixture to 85 °C. After 3 days of stirring, the brown mixture was cooled down. Demi water (75 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. The mixture was then filtered and dried under vacuum to obtain the light green product (1290 mg, 91% yield). ESI-MS m/z (calcd): 441.2 (441.2, H2biqbpy1 + H+). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d): δ 10.00 (s, 2H), 9.13 (s, 2H), 8.80 (s, 2H), 8.08–7.98 (m, 4H), 7.94 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.83 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). Characterization was identical to the reported one.[45]

H2biqbpy2

The synthesis of H2biqbpy2 is similar to that of H2biqbpy1, except that 2-aminoquinoline was used to replace 3-aminoisoquinoline. The yield was 943 mg, 2.14 mmol, 67%. ESI-MS m/z (calcd): 441.2 (441.2, H2biqbpy2 + H+). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): δ 10.15 (s, 2H), 8.46 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 8.22 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.04–7.90 (m, 4H), 7.80 (td, J = 9.1, 8.7, 1.8 Hz, 6H), 7.64 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (ddd, J = 8.1, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 2H). Characterization was identical to the reported one.[45]

[Au(biqbpy1)]Cl ([1]Cl)

A mixture of H2biqbpy1 (100 mg, 0.23 mmol) and HAuCl4 (85 mg, 0.25 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (30 mL) and stirred under N2 atmosphere at 75 °C for 3 days. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica (DCM-MeOH 10:2, Rf = 0.35). Then the complex was dissolved in MeOH and across the Cl– ion-exchange resin to unify the counterion as Cl–. The yield of final product [1]Cl was 25 mg, 0.03 mmol, 13%. HRMS m/z (calcd): 635.1258 (635.1244, [1]+). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 11.70 (s, 2H, H6), 9.08 (d, J = 0.7 Hz, 2H, H5), 8.25 (dd, J = 8.4, 7.5 Hz, 2H, H8), 8.19 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.1 Hz, 2H, H9), 7.87 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.1 Hz, 2H, H7), 7.78 (dt, J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz, 2H, H4), 7.29 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.0 Hz, 2H, H1), 7.09 (ddd, J = 8.0, 6.8, 1.1 Hz, 2H, H3), 6.84 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.4 Hz, 2H, H2). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 153.10, 151.91, 148.04, 141.22, 140.81, 139.21, 129.38, 128.91, 127.24, 126.25, 125.28, 116.34, 115.44, 113.03. Elemental analysis: calcd for [1]Cl + 4H2O: C 45.27, H 3.53, N 11.31; found C 45.49, H 3.63, N 11.29.

[Au(biqbpy2)]Cl ([2]Cl)

A mixture of H2biqbpy2 (100 mg, 0.23 mmol) and HAuCl4 (85 mg, 0.25 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (30 mL) and stirred under N2 atmosphere at 75 °C for 72 h. Then the solvent was rotary evaporated. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica (DCM-MeOH 10:2, Rf = 0.3). Then the complex was dissolved in MeOH and across the Cl– ion-exchange resin to unify the counterion as Cl–. The yield of final product [2]Cl was 27 mg, 0.04 mmol, 18%. HRMS m/z (calcd): 635.1258 (635.1236, [2]+). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.21 (dd, J = 8.4, 7.4 Hz, 2H, H8), 8.10 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.3 Hz, 2H, H7), 7.96 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, H5), 7.63 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz, 2H, H9), 7.59–7.52 (m, 2H, H2), 7.41–7.34 (m, 2H, H4), 7.28 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, H6), 6.98–6.88 (m, 4H, H3. H1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O): δ 7.99 (t, J = 8.4, 7.4 Hz, 2H, H8), 7.49 (d, J = 7.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H, H7), 7.45 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, H6), 7.30 (d, J = 8.3, 1.1 Hz, 2H, H9), 6.83 (d, 2H, H3), 6.70–6.54 (m, 6H, H4, H5, H1), 6.47 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, H2). 13C NMR, (101 MHz, D2O): 175.78, 152.50, 149.51, 142.01, 140.66, 139.92, 129.11, 128.65, 126.46, 125.70, 125.57, 122.93, 118.65, 116.89. Elemental analysis: calcd for [2]Cl + 4H2O: C 45.27, H 3.53, N 11.31; found C 45.26, H 3.51, N 11.30.

Solubility Determination

Excess complex ([1]Cl or [2]Cl) was dissolved in Milli-Q water until precipitate was observed in the solution. Then the solution was centrifuged for 10 min (5000 rpm, room temperature). After that, a 5.0 μL sample of the supernatant was taken and diluted to 10.0 mL with Milli-Q water for ICP-MS measurement. The calculated water solubility for [1]Cl is 0.0064 mg/mL water, and that for [2]Cl is 1.45 mg/mL water.

Lipophilicity (log Pow) Determination

The n-octanol-saturated water and water-saturated n-octanol were prepared using Milli-Q water stirred with n-octanol for 24 h. The two layers were separated by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min. Then the excess of the two gold complexes was dissolved in water-saturated n-octanol and heated at 100 °C for 10 min. After being centrifuged for 5 min at 4000 rpm, the supernatant solution was collected. Three aliquots (50, 70, 100 μL) of each stock solution were transferred into six 15 mL Corning tubes and diluted to 1 mL with water-saturated n-octanol. Then 1 mL of n-octanol-saturated water was added. This mixture was shaken on a GFL 3016 reciprocating shaker at 60 rpm for 24 h. Then all six tubes were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min to obtain a clear separation between the two layers in each tube. Next, using a syringe needle, 0.5 mL aliquots from the aqueous phase were transferred to a new Corning 15 mL tube, digested using 0.5 mL of 65% HNO3, mixed, and then diluted with 9 mL of Milli-Q water to make total volume to 10.0 mL. A volume of 10 μL of each starting stock solution of both complexes was digested by adding 1 mL of 65% HNO3 and shaking for 1 h, and then each sample was diluted to 10 mL by adding Milli-Q water. The gold concentration in the water phase of each biphasic mixture and that of the stock solution were determined by ICP-MS. Partition coefficients (log P) were calculated using the following formula.

Single Crystal X-ray Crystallography

The single crystals of [1]Cl and [2]AuCl4 were obtained by slow evaporation of ether into a saturated DCM/MeOH (5:1) solution of [1]Cl and [2]AuCl4. All reflection intensities were measured at 110(2) K using a SuperNova diffractometer (equipped with Atlas detector) with either Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) for [2]AuCl4 or Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) for [1]Cl under the program CrysAlisPro (version CrysAlisPro 1.171.39.29c, Rigaku OD, 2017). The same program was used to refine the cell dimensions and for data reduction. The two structures were solved with the program SHELXS-2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015) and were refined on F with SHELXL-2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015). For [1]Cl, Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model was applied using CrysAlisPro. For [2]AuCl4, numerical absorption correction based on Gaussian integration over a multifaceted crystal model was applied using CrysAlisPro. The temperature of the data collection was controlled using the system Cryojet (manufactured by Oxford Instruments). The CCDC deposition numbers of [1]Cl and [2]AuCl4 are 2043618 and 2043617, respectively.

Refinement of [1]Cl

The H atoms were placed at calculated positions using the instructions AFIX 43 with isotropic displacement parameters having the values 1.2 or 1.5 Ueq for the attached C or N (atoms N2X and N5X, X = A, B, C, D, E, are protonated as the N–C bond distances are consistent with protonation). The H atoms attached to O1W and O2W could not be retrieved from the difference Fourier maps (see below for further details). A careful look at the difference Fourier maps near N1X/N6X suggests that no H atoms are attached to N1X and N6X (X = A, B, C, D, E). The structure is significantly disordered. Two of the three crystallographically independent Au complexes (Au1 and Au3) are disordered over two orientations, and the occupancy factors of the major components of the disorder refine to 0.649(13) (Au1) and 0.584(4) (Au3). The remaining Au complex (Au2) is ordered. In the final refinement, the counterion Cl3 is fully occupied, whereas the counterions Cl1, Cl2, Cl4, and Cl5 are found to be partially occupied, and their occupancy factors refine to 0.762(3), 0.865(3), 0.202(3), and 0.171(2), respectively. The sum of the occupancy factors for Cl1/Cl2/Cl4 and Cl5 has been constrained to be equal to 2 using the SUMP instruction. Some amount of partially occupied lattice water molecules (O1W and O2W in the asymmetric unit) are found near the sites occupied by Cl4 and Cl5. O1W and O2W are most likely lattice water molecules, as the N···OnW (n = 1, 2) distances are found within the 2.8–2.9 Å range. The crystal lattice contains some amount of very disordered lattice solvent molecules. Their contribution has been removed from the final refinement using the SQUEEZE procedure in Platon.[86]

Refinement of [2]AuCl4

The H atoms were placed at calculated positions using the instructions AFIX 43 with isotropic displacement parameters having the value 1.2 for the attached C atoms. The structure is disordered. The Au complex and the AuCl4– counterion are found to be wholly disordered over two orientations. The occupancy factors of the major components of the disorder refine to 0.651(10) and 0.735(16). The crystal was found to be twinned, and the general twin relationship corresponds to a 2-fold axis along the c* direction as the true monoclinic cell emulates an orthorhombic cell with a β angle close to 90°. In the final refinement, general and racemic twinning were refined simultaneously using the instruction TWIN 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -1 -4, and the three BASF scale factors refine to 0.010(6), 0.36(6), and 0.18(6).

DFT Calculation

[1]+ and [2]+ were minimized by DFT at the PBE0/TZP level of theory using scalar relativity effects and COSMO in water to simulate solvent effects, as implemented in the ADF2019 program from SCM,[87] starting from the coordinates obtained in the crystal structures. The 20 first Franck–Condon singlet–singlet transitions were calculated by TDDFT at the same level of theory, using the Davidson method and the DFT-minimized geometries.

Cytotoxicity

Cell culture and cytotoxicity measurements were performed according to previously published methods.[85] In short: A549, A375, MCF7, or MRC5 cells were seeded at t = 0 in 96-well plates at a density of 5000, 7000, 8000, and 6000 cells/well (100 μL), respectively, in OptiMEM supplemented with 2.4% v/v FCS, 0.2% v/v P/S, and 1.0% v/v GM (called OptiMEM complete) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 7.0% CO2. At t = 24 h, aliquots (100 μL) of six different concentrations of freshly prepared stock solutions of the compounds in OptiMEM complete were added to the wells in triplicate and incubated for 72 h. Sterilized dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was used to prepare stock solution of the compounds, in such amounts that the maximum v/v % of DMSO per well did not exceed 0.5%. At t = 96 h, the cells were fixated by adding cold TCA (10% w/v; 100 μL) in each well and the plates were stored at 4 °C for at least 4 h as part of the SRB assay that was adapted from Vichai and Kirtikara.[88] In short, after fixation, the TCA medium mixture was removed from the wells and the wells were rinsed with demineralized water three times. Next, each well was stained with 100 μL of SRB (0.6% w/v in 1% v/v acetic acid) for 30 min. The SRB was removed by washing with acetic acid (1% v/v) and the plate was air-dried. The SRB dye was solubilized with Tris base (10 mM; 200 μL) overnight, and the absorbance in each well was read at λ = 510 nm.

ICP-MS Analysis

Materials

Nitric acid (65%, Suprapur, Merck) was used in the sample digestion process, while diluted nitric acid (1%, v/v) was used as a carrying solution throughout the ICP measurements. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable 1000 mg/L elemental standards were used (TraceCERT, Fluka) for preparation of calibration and internal standards. Approximately 18 MΩ cm–1 water (Milli-Q) was used in all sample preparation and analysis steps.

Instrumentation

Calibration standards were prepared in a Secuflow fume hood (SCALA) to prevent contamination by atmospheric particulates. The standard samples and measurement samples were analyzed for trace elements using the NexION 2000 (PerkinElmer) ICP-MS instrument equipped with a concentric glass nebulizer and Peltier-cooled glass spray chamber. An SC2 DX autosampler (PerkinElmer) was connected to the ICP-MS for sample introduction. Syngistix software for ICP-MS (v.2.5, PerkinElmer) was used for all data recording and processing. Five trace elemental calibration standards for ICP-MS analysis were prepared using NIST-traceable 1000 mg/L Au standards: 0, 1, 5, 20, and 100 μg/L. Samples were analyzed without dilution in the original delivery containers to minimize the possibility of contamination. Here, 10 μg/L Rh and In were used as internal standards. To check the calibration, samples were analyzed with a blank measurement and a repeat measurement of one of the calibration standards. For the calibration curve, the accepted correlation coefficient (Cor.Coeff) was to be found higher than 0.999.

Gold Cellular Uptake

A549 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate (2 × 105 cells, 1 mL of Opti-MEM complete per well). At t = 24 h, the cells were treated with complexes [1]Cl or [2]Cl (1 μM, 1 mL Opti-MEM complete). After 24 h treatment, the cells were washed with PBS (1 mL) three times, harvested by trypsinzation (5% v/v in PBS), counted with trypan blue on a TC20 automated cell counter, and centrifuged in 15 mL tubes. After removing the supernatant, the cell pellets were lysed by adding 0.5 mL of HNO3 (65%) into the tubes and shaking for 24 h. After that, the cell solution was diluted to 10 mL using Milli-Q water, and the Au content in the solution was determined by ICP-MS (NexION 2000, PerkinElmer) according to the protocol described above. The final results are the mean of three independent experiments.

Cellular Uptake Inhibition

A549 cells were seeded in two 12-well plates (5 × 105 cells, 1 mL of Opti-MEM complete per well) and labeled as 4 and 37 °C groups, respectively. At t = 23.5 h, the cells in the 4 °C group were cooled to 4 °C for 30 min. At t = 24 h, the cells in the 4 and 37 °C groups were treated with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (5 μM, 1 mL of Opti-MEM complete) and incubated at the set temperature for another 2 h. Then the same procedure as that described above was used to for the ICP-MS sample preparation and measurement. The final results are the mean of three independent experiments.

Cell Fractionation and Localization of Gold

A549 cells were seeded into 10 cm dishes (5 × 105 cells, 10 mL of Opti-MEM completed) and incubated in normoxic conditions for 3 days. Then the cells were treated with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (1 μM, 10 mL of Opti-MEM complete) for another 24 h. After that, the medium was removed and cells were washed three times with PBS and harvested by trypsinization. The cell pellets were collected after 3 min of centrifugation (2000 rpm) and removing the supernatant. Then the cell pellets were fractionated to collect the cytosol, membrane, nucleus, and cytoskeletal fractions using the fractionPREP cell fractionation kit from BioVision according to the instructions of the supplier. Then each fraction solution was acidified by adding 0.5 mL of 65% HNO3 and shaking at room temperature for 24 h. After that, the membrane fractions were treated with 0.5 mL of 30% H2O2 and heated at 90 °C in an oven for 24 h to dissolve all biological materials. Then the Au content in each fraction was measured using ICP-MS. The final gold content was averaged from three replicate experiments; values are reported in Table S8 and Figure S11.

Mitochondrial Potential Determination

A549 cells were seeded in to 12 well plates (1 × 105 cells, 1 mL) and incubated for 24 h in normoxic conditions. After that the cells were treated with [1]Cl or [2]Cl (20 μM) and incubated for another 24 h. Then the cells were washed with PBS one time and stained with TRME (150 nM) for 30 min. The cells in the positive group were treated with CCCP (20 μM) for 1 h prior to the treatment with TRME. The cells were harvested, and then the emission of TRME in cells was detected by flow cytometry using the yellow-blue channel (488 excitation, 575 emission).

DNA Gel Electrophoresis

The pUC19 plasmid used for this study (2686 bp) exists in three forms: supercoiled (SC), single-nicked open circular (OC), and linear dimer (LD). If the metal complexes can cleave DNA single strands, the proportion of the SC part will decrease while that of OC will increase; if the complex does cleave double stranded DNA, then the LD proportion increases at the cost of the other bands. Agarose gel electrophoresis was used to evaluate the DNA cleavage properties of [1]Cl and [2]Cl in different base pair/metal complex ratios (BP:MC). Two buffers were used for the experiments: 5× tris-boric acid buffer (TBA) and phosphate buffer (PB). The 5× tris-boric acid (TBA) buffer (45 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane and 45 mM boric acid, pH = 7.4) was used as the gel and running buffer. Phosphate buffer (PB, 100 mM NaH2PO4, pH = 7.0) was used for DNA–MC interactions. The molar concentration of the pUC19 plasmid DNA base pairs (BPs) was determined using the extinction coefficient (ε260nm = 13 200 M–1cm–1).[89]

Agarose gel electrophoresis was used to assay the thermal and photoinduced binding of [1]Cl and [2]Cl to pUC19 plasmid DNA. The agarose gels were 0.8% w/w agarose gel (0.24 g agarose, 24 g of DI H2O, and 6 mL of TBA). Two buffers were used for the experiments: 5× TBA and PB. The 5× TBA buffer (45 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)amino methane and 45 mM boric acid, pH = 7.4) was used as the gel and running buffer. PB (100 mM NaH2PO4, pH = 7.0) was used for DNA–-MC interactions. Before starting the gel electrophoresis, the electrophoresis chamber was filled with 50 mL of TBA and 210 mL of deionized water (running buffer).

The contents of each lane in the gel were set according to Table S9. After incubation with the gold complexes or cisplatin for 24 h at 37 °C, 12 μL of each samples was transferred to the gel and the gel was run at a constant voltage of 105 V for 90 min. The gel was stained using 10 μL (10 mg/mL) of ethidium bromide in 200 mL of deionized water for 30 min with slight shaking and then destained in 200 mL of deionized water for 20 min. Immediately following destaining, the gel was imaged using a BioRad ChemiDoc imaging system (ethidium bromide setting). Image Lab software was used to process the images.

TrxR Inhibition Property Determination

To determine the inhibition of mammalian thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), a spectrophotometric assay was done using commercially available rat liver TrxR (Sigma-Aldrich). The enzyme was diluted with distilled water to achieve a concentration of 2.5 U/mL. The gold complexes were freshly dissolved in DMF to get a stock solution of 10 mM. To a 25 μL aliquot of the enzyme solution, 25 μL of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing the complexes at different concentrations or vehicle (DMF) without compounds (control probe) was added, and the resulting solutions (final concentration of DMF: max. 0.5% v/v) were incubated with moderate shaking for 75 min at 37 °C in a 96-well plate. Subsequently, to each well, 225 μL of the reaction mixture (1000 μL of reaction mixture consisted of 500 μL of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 80 μL of EDTA solution (100 mM, pH 7.5), 20 μL of BSA solution (0.2%), 100 μL of NADPH solution (20 mM), and 300 μL of distilled water) was added. The reaction was started by the addition of 25 μL of an ethanolic 5,5′-dithiobis 2-nitrobenzoic solution (DTNB, 20 mM). After proper mixing, the formation of 5-TNB was monitored with a microplate reader (PerkinElmer Victor X4) at 405 nm in 10 s intervals for 10 min. The increase in 5-TNB concentration over time followed a linear trend (R2 ≥ 0.99), and the enzymatic activities were calculated as the slopes (increase in absorbance per second) thereof. For each tested compound, the noninterference with the assay components was confirmed by a negative control experiment using an enzyme-free solution. The IC50 values were calculated as the concentration of complexes decreasing the enzymatic activity of the untreated control by 50% and are given as the means and standard deviations of two independent experiments.

Kv11.1 Potassium Channel Binding Affinity

This experiment was carried out according to a literature procedure.[80] Briefly, the cell membranes of HEK293 Kv 11.1 cells were collected. Then the loading of [3H]astemizole on the cell membranes was performed by mixing membrane aliquots containing 30 μg of protein with 2 nM [3H]dofetilide in a total volume of 100 μL of incubation buffer at 15 °C for 90 min. After loading, a single point dissociation assay was initiated by the addition of 10 μM dofetilide in the absence (control) or presence of 10 μM of gold complexes and corresponding ligands. After 10 min of incubation, samples were separated by rapid filtration through a 96-well GF/B filter plate using a PerkinElmer Filtermate harvester (PerkinElmer, Groningen, The Netherlands). Filters were subsequently washed with ice-cold wash buffer two times. Then the filter-bound radioactivity was determined by scintillation spectrometry by using the 1450 Microbeta Wallac Trilux scintillation counter (PerkinElmer) after the addition of 37.5 μL of Microscint and for another 2 h extraction. The binding of [3H]dofetilide in the control was set as 100%.