Literature DB >> 34056436

Fluoride Ion-Initiated Decarboxylation of Silyl Alkynoates to Alkynylsilanes.

Takahiro Kawatsu1, Sho Kataoka2, Norihisa Fukaya1, Jun-Chul Choi1, Kazuhiko Sato1, Kazuhiro Matsumoto1.   

Abstract

This communication describes the development of a metal-free catalytic decarboxylation of silyl alkynoates to alkynylsilanes. Treatment of a silyl alkynoate with a catalytic amount of tetrabutylammonium difluorotriphenylsilicate (TBAT) in N,N-dimethylformamide at 150 °C resulted in decarboxylation to give the corresponding alkynylsilane in good to excellent yield (75 → 95%). The TBAT system was applicable to the decarboxylation of sterically demanding silyl alkynoates such as tert-butyldiphenylsilyl 3-phenylpropiolate. Mechanistic studies revealed that the tetrabutylammonium alkynoate derived from TBAT and the silyl alkynoate act as a catalyst for the decarboxylation.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34056436      PMCID: PMC8154224          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Decarboxylative transformations are recognized as useful reactions in organic synthesis, because carboxylic acids and their ester derivatives are readily available starting materials.[1] Among them, the class of decarboxylation reactions that connect two moieties in a molecule separated by a carboxyl group, such as the protodecarboxylation of carboxylic acids and decarboxylative allylic alkylation of β-keto allyl esters, are operationally advantageous: the only stoichiometric coproduct is carbon dioxide, which is nontoxic, nonflammable, and readily removable from the reaction medium.[2] Alkynylsilanes are useful building blocks in organic synthesis.[3] While the nucleophilic substitution of a halosilane with a metal acetylide prepared by deprotonating a terminal alkyne with an organometallic reagent is one of the most common methods for the synthesis of alkynylsilanes (Scheme a),[4] the high nucleophilicity of metal acetylides limits their functional group tolerance, and the coproducts derived from the organometallic reagents are sometimes problematic from the viewpoints of practicality and atom economy. Therefore, the catalytic Si–C cross-coupling of a terminal alkyne with a silicon electrophile has attracted increasing attention, and various silicon electrophiles such as halosilanes,[5,6] hydrosilanes,[7] and vinylsilanes[8] are now available for this purpose (Scheme b). On the other hand, we recently reported a catalytic decarboxylation approach for the synthesis of alkynylsilanes (Scheme c).[9−11] In the presence of a copper-based catalyst, a silyl alkynoate is decarboxylated to afford the corresponding alkynylsilane. Although the copper-catalyzed system has some advantages such as a low catalyst loading, mild reaction conditions, and easy-to-remove carbon dioxide as the coproduct, the steric hindrance of the silyl substituents strongly affected the reaction progress and the decarboxylation of silyl alkynoates with bulky silyl groups such as the triisopropylsilyl group was significantly impeded.
Scheme 1

Approaches to the Synthesis of Alkynylsilanes

Owing to the high affinity of the fluoride ion to silicon atoms, the activation of organosilicon compounds by fluoride ion is a common procedure for the transformations of organosilicon compounds.[12] Indeed, alkaline metal fluorides have been applied as catalysts in the decarboxylation of trimethylsilyl perfluorobenzoates.[13] Although the applicable substrates are limited to trimethylsilyl penta- and tetrafluorobenzoates, and the applicability of the approach to the decarboxylation of other silyl esters was unclear, we expected that the small, hard fluoride ion would activate silyl alkynoates to induce decarboxylation, irrespective of the steric bulk of the silyl substituents (Scheme d).

Results and Discussion

The decarboxylation of triisopropylsilyl 3-phenylpropiolate (1a) was initially investigated in the presence of 5 mol % KF in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 150 °C, and the desired alkynylsilane 2a was obtained in 42% yield after 1 h (Table , entry 1). Other potassium salts (KCl, KBr, and KI) showed remarkably diminished catalytic performance, demonstrating the importance of fluoride ion (entries 2–4). While NaF gave an inferior result (entry 5), a higher yield of 55% was observed in the decarboxylation with CsF (entry 6). An alkaline earth metal fluoride, MgF2, was also examined, but only a trace amount of alkynylsilane 2a was produced (entry 7). Next, we investigated organic fluorides instead of metal fluorides. When tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) was used as a catalyst, the yield of 2a was 50%, even though 1a was completely consumed (entry 8). The major byproduct was the corresponding alkynoic acid, which was generated by hydrolysis of 1a with the water contained in TBAF.[14] Therefore, we focused on anhydrous organic fluoride sources, and found that tetrabutylammonium difluorotriphenylsilicate (TBAT) gave 2a in a higher yield of 75%, albeit with 19% of the hydrolyzed byproduct, the corresponding alkynoic acid (entry 9).[15] Because the participation of water from the glassware was suspected in the hydrolysis, the decarboxylation was conducted in a poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) vessel, which afforded the product in 65% with a negligible amount of the hydrolyzed byproduct (entry 10). Finally, when the reaction was carried out for 3 h, silyl alkynoate 1a was completely consumed, yielding the desired alkynylsilane 2a in 93% (entry 11).
Table 1

Optimization of the Reaction Conditions

entrycatalystconv. (%)yield (%)a
1KF4642
2KCl2319
3KBr112
4KI<5trace
5NaF2722
6CsF6555
7MgF2<5trace
8TBAF>9550
9TBAT9475
10bTBAT7165
11b,cTBAT>9593 (89)d

Determined by 1H NMR analysis using mesitylene as internal standard.

PTFE vessel was used instead of glassware.

The reaction was carried out for 3 h.

Isolated yield.

Determined by 1H NMR analysis using mesitylene as internal standard. PTFE vessel was used instead of glassware. The reaction was carried out for 3 h. Isolated yield. Under the optimal reaction conditions, the scope of silyl alkynoates was investigated (Table ). The decarboxylation of trimethylsilyl 3-phenylpropiolate (1b) was completed in 1 h, affording desired alkynylsilane 2b in 94% yield. Triphenylsilyl 3-phenylpropiolate (1c) and tert-butyldimethylsilyl 3-phenylpropiolate (1d) were completely consumed in 3 h, furnishing products 2c (86%) and 2d (89%), respectively. Even more sterically demanding tert-butyldiphenylsilyl 3-phenylpropiolate (1e) was efficiently decarboxylated to give alkynylsilane 2e in 76% yield, albeit with a longer reaction time of 12 h. Silyl alkynoates with vinyl (1f) and allyl (1g) groups on the silicon atom were also decarboxylated in excellent yields without any side reactions. The reactions of trimethylsilyl 3-arylpropiolates with either electron-donating (−Me and −OMe) or electron-withdrawing (−Cl, −Br, and −NO2) groups at the para- and ortho-position on the benzene ring afforded the corresponding alkynylsilanes (2h–2m) in high yields (88 → 95%). These results show that the electronic nature of the aryl groups has little effect on the product yield. It is noteworthy that, because this system contains no transition metals, substrates with C–Cl and C–Br functional groups are tolerated under the reaction conditions. Silyl alkynoate 1n with an acetoxy group was found to decompose to some extent at 150 °C; thus, the reaction was carried out at 80 °C for 6 h to give alkynylsilane 2n in 94% yield. Diisopropylsilanediyl bis(3-phenylpropiolate) (1o) smoothly underwent two-fold decarboxylation to give the corresponding dialkynylsilane (2o) in 82% yield. Bis((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)benzene (2p) was afforded in 75% yield by the two-fold decarboxylation of silyl alkynoate 1p.
Table 2

Scope and Limitations of Silyl Alkynoates

Reaction was carried out at 80 °C.

Reaction was carried out at 80 °C. To shed light on the reaction mechanism, the decarboxylation of 1a was followed by 19F NMR spectroscopy (Figure S1). When 1a was reacted with 5 mol % TBAT in DMF-d7 at room temperature, the complete consumption of TBAT and the formation of iPr3SiF and Ph3SiF were observed; no other compounds containing fluorine atoms were detected. The production of iPr3SiF and Ph3SiF was also confirmed by 29Si{1H} NMR spectroscopy (Figure S2). These observations suggest that TBAT is not the true catalyst for the decarboxylation, but rather, the tetrabutylammonium alkynoate that is produced by the reaction of the silyl alkynoate with TBAT functions catalytically. Indeed, tetrabutylammonium 3-phenylpropiolate, which was prepared from 3-phenylpropiolic acid, NaH, and tetrabutylammonium chloride, smoothly catalyzed the decarboxylation of silyl alkynoate 1a to give alkynylsilane 2a in 95% NMR yield under fluoride-free conditions (Scheme a). The clean decarboxylation of 1a with 5 mol % nBu4NOAc also indicated that the fluoride ion is not an essential component of the catalyst, but that the carboxylate ion plays a critical role in the decarboxylation (Scheme b). While the formation of alkynylsilane 2a was not observed in the stoichiometric reaction of tetrabutylammonium 3-phenylpropiolate and iPr3SiF (Scheme c and Figure S3), not only alkynytriisopropylsilane 2a (11%) but also alkynyltriphenylsilane 2c (13%) were produced in the stoichiometric reaction of silyl alkynoate 1a and TBAT (Scheme d and Figure S4), implying that the formation of the tetrabutylammonium alkynoate is reversible.
Scheme 2

(a) Catalytic Reaction of Silyl Alkynoate 1a with Tetrabutylammonium 3-Phenylpropiolate, (b) Catalytic Reaction of 1a with nBu4NOAc, (c) Stoichiometric Reaction of Tetrabutylammonium 3-Phenylpropiolate and iPr3SiF, and (d) Stoichiometric Reaction of 1a and TBAT

Based on these findings, a possible reaction mechanism is proposed, as illustrated in Scheme . First, TBAT reacts with the silyl alkynoate to produce a tetrabutylammonium alkynoate as well as two fluorosilanes (R3SiF and Ph3SiF) derived from the silyl alkynoate and TBAT. The thus-obtained tetrabutylammonium alkynoate reacts with the silyl alkynoate to form a pentacoordinate silicon intermediate, which undergoes decarboxylation to give the desired alkynylsilane and carbon dioxide with regeneration of the tetrabutylammonium alkynoate.
Scheme 3

Proposed Reaction Mechanism for the Catalytic Decarboxylation of Silyl Alkynoates with TBAT

In summary, we have developed a facile method for the synthesis of alkynylsilanes by decarboxylating silyl alkynoates in the presence of a catalytic amount of commercially available TBAT. A wide variety of substrates, including those with bulky silyl groups such as the tert-butyldiphenylsilyl group or functional groups such as chloro, bromo, and acetoxy groups, were efficiently decarboxylated in good to excellent yields. Mechanistic studies revealed that the tetrabutylammonium alkynoate is the catalyst for the decarboxylation and TBAT acts as a precatalyst. Our group is now investigating catalytic systems for the decarboxylation of silyl esters other than silyl alkynoates.

Experimental Section

General Procedure for Decarboxylation of Silyl Alkynoates 1

In a PTFE vessel, a solution of silyl alkynoate 1 (0.50 mmol) and tetrabuthylammonium difluorotriphenylsilicate (5 mol %, 0.025 mmol) in DMF (1.0 mL) was stirred at 150 °C. After 1–12 h, the reaction mixture was diluted in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL) and passed through a silica gel column. After evaporation, the desired alkynylsilane 2 was obtained in 75 → 95% yield.
  9 in total

1.  A new catalytic route for the activation of sp-hybridized carbon-hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  Bogdan Marciniec; Beata Dudziec; Ireneusz Kownacki
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 2.  Silver-catalyzed C(sp)-H and C(sp)-Si bond transformations and related processes.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Yamamoto
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Transition metal-catalyzed decarboxylative allylation and benzylation reactions.

Authors:  Jimmie D Weaver; Antonio Recio; Alexander J Grenning; Jon A Tunge
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Metal-Catalyzed Decarboxylative C-H Functionalization.

Authors:  Ye Wei; Peng Hu; Min Zhang; Weiping Su
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Decarboxylation as the Key Step in C-C Bond-Forming Reactions.

Authors:  Tuhin Patra; Debabrata Maiti
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Decarboxylative coupling reactions: a modern strategy for C-C-bond formation.

Authors:  Nuria Rodríguez; Lukas J Goossen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Alkali Metal-Hydroxide-Catalyzed C(sp)-H Bond silylation.

Authors:  Anton A Toutov; Kerry N Betz; David P Schuman; Wen-Bo Liu; Alexey Fedorov; Brian M Stoltz; Robert H Grubbs
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Zinc-catalyzed silylation of terminal alkynes.

Authors:  Ronald J Rahaim; Jared T Shaw
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 4.354

9.  B(C6 F5 )3 /Amine-Catalyzed C(sp)-H Silylation of Terminal Alkynes with Hydrosilanes: Experimental and Theoretical Studies.

Authors:  Yuanhong Ma; Shao-Jie Lou; Gen Luo; Yong Luo; Gu Zhan; Masayoshi Nishiura; Yi Luo; Zhaomin Hou
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 15.336

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Cobalt-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative C-H Silylation of Alkynylsilanes.

Authors:  Hanna Stachowiak; Krzysztof Kuciński; Fabian Kallmeier; Rhett Kempe; Grzegorz Hreczycho
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.020

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.