| Literature DB >> 34056418 |
Anusha Prabhu1, Hardik Singhal2, M S Giri Nandagopal3, Reshma Kulal1, Prakash Peralam Yegneswaran4,5, Naresh Kumar Mani1,5.
Abstract
Reproducible and in situ microbial detection, particularly of microbes significant in urinary tract infections (UTIs) such as Candida albicans, provides a unique opportunity to bring equity in the healthcare outcomes of disenfranchised groups like women in low-resource settings. Here, we demonstrate a system to potentially detect vulvovaginal candidiasis by leveraging the properties of multifilament cotton threads in the form of microfluidic-thread-based analytical devices (μTADs) to develop a frugal microbial identification assay. A facile mercerization method using heptane wash to boost reagent absorption and penetration is also performed and is shown to be robust compared to other existing conventional mercerization methods. Furthermore, the twisted mercerized fibers are drop-cast with media consisting of l-proline β-naphthylamide, which undergoes hydrolysis by the enzyme l-proline aminopeptidase secreted by C. albicans, hence signaling the presence of the pathogen via simple color change with a limit of detection of 0.58 × 106 cfu/mL. The flexible and easily disposable thread-based detection device when integrated with menstrual hygiene products showed a detection time of 10 min using spiked vaginal discharge. The developed method boasts a long shelf life and high stability, making it a discreet detection device for testing, which provides new vistas for self-testing multiple diseases that are considered taboo in certain societies.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34056418 PMCID: PMC8154238 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Schematic illustration of mercerized microfluidic-thread-based analytical devices (μTADs) and their utility in menstrual hygiene products.
Figure 2pH study and comparison of mercerization methods: (a) TMC thread and (b) piping thread.
Figure 3Water penetration rate (comparison) of (a) TMC thread and (b) piping thread.
Figure 4Water absorbency assay (comparison) of (a) TMC thread and (b) piping thread. Each experiment was performed three times. Average value ± standard deviation was measured.
Figure 5Stress–strain curve for different mercerization methods: (a) piping thread and (b) TMC thread.
Figure 6Thread-based colorimetric assay using heptane-mercerized (a) TMC thread and (b) piping thread.
Figure 7G-channel intensity comparison of mercerization methods in (a) TMC thread and (b) piping thread. Each experiment was performed three times. Average value ± standard deviation was measured.
Figure 8C. albicans detection in spiked vaginal discharge using thread-device embedded in sanitary napkins: (a) TMC thread and (b) piping thread.
Figure 9C. albicans detection in spiked vaginal discharge using thread-device embedded in tampons: (a) TMC thread and (b) piping thread.