We have developed an efficient methodology for the synthesis of (2R,3S,4R)-2-hydroxymethyl-3,4-dihydroxy-6-aryl-7-aroylchromanes in which the chirality at the C-2, C-3, and C-4 positions is being drawn from C-glucopyranosyl aldehyde, which in turn can be efficiently synthesized from d-glucose. Thus, the synthesis starts with the transformation of sugar aldehyde into 1-(E-1-arylpropenon-3-yl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-d-glucals using Claisen-Schmidt type condensation reaction with different acetophenones and then to 1,2-disubstituted glucals via Pd(II)-catalyzed cross dehydrogenative coupling reaction, which in turn has been efficiently converted into (2R,3S,4R)-chromanes via 6π-electrocyclization and in situ dehydrogenative aromatization.
We have developed an efficient methodology for the synthesis of (2R,3S,4R)-2-hydroxymethyl-3,4-dihydroxy-6-aryl-7-aroylchromanes in which the chirality at the C-2, C-3, and C-4 positions is being drawn from C-glucopyranosyl aldehyde, which in turn can be efficiently synthesized from d-glucose. Thus, the synthesis starts with the transformation of sugar aldehyde into 1-(E-1-arylpropenon-3-yl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-d-glucals using Claisen-Schmidt type condensation reaction with different acetophenones and then to 1,2-disubstituted glucals via Pd(II)-catalyzed cross dehydrogenative coupling reaction, which in turn has been efficiently converted into (2R,3S,4R)-chromanes via 6π-electrocyclization and in situ dehydrogenative aromatization.
Chromane scaffolds
are important structural units often found in
many natural products and bioactive compounds that exhibit anticancer,[1] anti-HIV,[2] antiplasmodial,[3] antitubercular,[4] antibacterial,
and antifungal activities.[5] The chromane
core makes the structural framework of complex compounds, including
constituents of vitamin E, catechin, mucroquinone, equol, hematoxylin,
brazilin, and other pharmaceutical drugs, such as symakalin, ormeloxifene,
cromakalim, sideroxylonal A, procyanidin B3, etc. (Figure ).[6]
Figure 1
Examples of natural products
and bioactive compounds with the chiral
chromane-core.
Examples of natural products
and bioactive compounds with the chiral
chromane-core.The biological importance of chiral
chromanes accelerated the development
of efficient methods for their synthesis. Among many reported strategies,
the reaction of salicylaldehyde and enolates or their equivalents
from acetophenones has gained prominent attention.[7] In most of the reported methods, the oxygenated heterocyclic
ring of chromane has been constructed on the prefunctionalized aromatic
ring systems to get such structural motifs, which generated different
levels of complexity in bringing defined chirality at the C-2, C-3, or C-4 position
of chromanes.[8] Due to these prefunctionalization
issues, utility of Pd-catalyzed direct C–C bond formation via cross dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) reaction at the C-1 or C-2 position of glycals has emerged
as an excellent tool with an advantage of higher atom economy and
fewer steps than conventional synthesis.[9]The arduous task of constructing an aromatic system onto the
glycopyranose
ring to synthesize chiral chromanes was first addressed by Werz and
co-workers[10] using functionalized 2-bromoglycals.
Recently, we have reported the synthesis of tetrasubstituted 2R,3S-chromane from C-1-substituted
glucal diene using Pd(II)-catalyzed oxidative cross coupling reaction
of different alkenes followed by thermal oxidative electrocyclization.[11] Herein, we report a better divergent route for
the synthesis of 1-(E-1-arylpropenon-3-yl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-d-glucals and their transformation into
pentasubstituted (2R,3S,4R)-chromanes via Pd(II)-catalyzed cross
dehydrogenative coupling reaction with various alkenes followed by
6π-electrocyclization and in situ dehydrogenative
aromatization.
Results and Discussion
The precursor C-glucopyranosyl aldehyde 1 for the synthesis
of stereochemically defined chromanes
was synthesized from d-glucose following a literature procedure.[12] It was envisioned that Claisen–Schmidt
condensation of C-glucosyl aldehyde with acetophenones
in the presence of base should led to the formation of chalcone-type
of compounds, i.e., 1-(E-1-arylpropenon-3-yl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-d-glucals. With this aim, condensation
of sugar aldehyde 1 with 4-methyl acetophenone (2a) was carried out in the presence of DBU and NaOMe as a
base in EtOH and MeOH, respectively, which led to the formation of
a mixture of glucalpropenone 3a and glucal aldehyde 4 in different ratios with later as the dominant product (Scheme , Table , entries 1 and 2).
Scheme 1
Synthesis
of C-1-Functionalized Unsaturated Sugar
Derivatives 3a–j
Table 1
Condensation of 4-Methyl Acetophenone
(2a) with Sugar Aldehyde 1 in Various Solvents
at 25 °C in the Presence of Different Bases and Reaction Times
Ranging from 2 to 24 ha
entry
solventb
base
reaction time (h)
glucalpropenone 3a (% yield)c
glucal aldehyde 4 (% yield)c
1
EtOH
DBU‡
6
25
50
2
MeOH
NaOMe‡
3
30
50
3
DCM
Pyrolidine‡
3
0
75
4
EtOH
Piperidine‡
24
0
75
5
MeOH
NEt3-proline‡ (1:1)
24
0
78
6
EtOH
Ba(OH)2¶
8
65
0
7
EtOH
KOH¶
2
75
0
8
EtOH
LiOH¶
3
70
0
9
EtOH
NaOH¶
2
85
0
10
EtOH/H2O (1:1)
NaOAc‡
24
NR
NR
11
EtOH
NaOH¶
2
92d
Reaction conditions: Compound 1 (0.181 mmol), 2a (0.181 mmol); ‡base (1 equiv.); ¶5% aq. base (1 mL); NR = No reaction.
Solvent used (1 mL).
Isolated yield.
Reaction performed without 2a.
Reaction conditions: Compound 1 (0.181 mmol), 2a (0.181 mmol); ‡base (1 equiv.); ¶5% aq. base (1 mL); NR = No reaction.Solvent used (1 mL).Isolated yield.Reaction performed without 2a.Further, the use of organic bases
such as pyrrolidine, piperidine,
or NEt3-proline (1:1) in DCM, EtOH, or MeOH, respectively,
for condensation of compounds 1 and 2a led
to the exclusive formation of glucal aldehyde 4 in 75
to 78% yields (Table , entries 3–5).[13] However, the
use of Ba(OH)2, KOH, LiOH, and NaOH in EtOH led to the
exclusive formation of glucalpropenone 3a in 65, 75,
70, and 85% yields, respectively (Table , entries 6–9). The use of NaOAc in
EtOH/H2O (1:1) for the condensation reaction did not yield
any product (Table , entries 10). The reaction carried out under the conditions of entry
9, but in the absence of acetophenone, (2a) led to the
formation of glucal aldehyde 4 only in 92% yield (Table , entry 11). The analysis
of results of these experiments showed that 5% aq. NaOH in EtOH is
the most suitable and highest yielding base for synthesizing compounds 3a and also glucal aldehyde 4 in the absence
of 4-methyl acetophenone (2a) (Table , entries 9 and 11). The optimized conditions
were used for the synthesis of C-1-functionalized
unsaturated sugar derivatives 3a–j by condensation of sugar aldehyde 1 with aryl methyl
ketones 2a–j in 68–88% yields
(Scheme ).A
representative mechanism for the synthesis of glucalpropenone 3a from the condensation of C-glucosyl aldehyde 1 and acetophenone (2a) is shown in Scheme . The formation of
product 3a′ without a double bond in the sugar
ring as shown in the bracket in Scheme was not observed in any of the reaction conditions
mentioned in Table .
Scheme 2
Proposed Mechanism for the Formation of Glucalpropenone 3a from Compounds 1 and 2a
The formation of a mixture of glucalpropenone 3a and
glucal aldehyde 4 in condensation reaction in the presence
of DBU in EtOH and NaOMe in MeOH (Table , entries 1 and 2), the exclusive formation
of glucal aldehyde 4 in reactions at entries 3–5
in Table , and exclusive
formation of compound 3a in reactions at entries 6–9
in Table have been
observed. These results indicate that C-glucosyl
aldehyde 1 first gets converted into glucal aldehyde 4, which then condenses with the enolate formed from acetophenone
to yield compound 3a (Scheme ). This is also supported by the HRMS (ESI)
data analysis of the reaction mixture after time intervals of 10,
30, and 45 min of the addition of aq. NaOH to the mixture of compounds 1 and 2a, which showed peaks at m/z [M + Na]+ for aldehyde 1 (calcd 575.2404; found 575.2402), glucalpropenone 3a (calcd 583.2455; found 583.2461), and glucal aldehyde 4 (calcd 467.1829; found 467.1820), but the corresponding peak for
saturated sugarpropenone 3a′, which should appear
at m/z 691.3030, was not observed.
It was also demonstrated that glucalpropenone 3a can
also be prepared from condensation of glucal aldehyde 4 and 4-methyl acetophenone (2a) in EtOH in the presence
of 5% aq. NaOH in 90% yield.Three C-1-substituted
glucalpropenones 3a–c out of the
10 compounds 3a–j synthesized by
Claisen–Schmidt type condensation
of sugar aldehyde 1 and aryl methyl ketones 2a–c were converted into 1,2-disubstituted glucals6a–i by their Pd(II)-catalyzed cross dehydrogenative
coupling (CDC) reaction with different terminal alkenes 5a–g. Initially, the Pd(II)-catalyzed CDC reaction
for the synthesis of 1,2-disubstituted glucals was optimized by carrying
out the reaction in the presence of different alkenes in a solvent
or in a mixture of solvents. Thus, the reaction of glucalpropenone 3a and 4-methylstyrene (5a) in the presence of
Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %) and Cu(OAc)2, AgOAc, or
AgOTf (2 equiv.) as an oxidant in a mixture of DMF/DMSO (9:1, v/v)
at 80 °C led to the formation of the desired 1,2-disubstitutedglucal6a in 20, 50, and 40% yields, respectively (Table , entries 1–3).
Table 2
Optimization of Condition for CDC
Reaction of C-1-glucalpropenone 3a with
4-Methylstyrene (5a) to Synthesize 1,2-Disubstituted
Glucal 6a at 80 °C for 12 ha
entry
catalyst (10 mol %)
oxidant (equiv.)
co-oxidant (equiv.)
solvent
yield of 6a (%)b
1
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2 (2)
-
DMF/DMSO (9:1)
20
2
Pd(OAc)2
AgOAc (2)
-
DMF/DMSO (9:1)
50
3
Pd(OAc)2
AgOTf(2)
-
DMF/DMSO (9:1)
40
4
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2(1)
AgOAc (2)
DMF/DMSO (9:1)
80
5
Pd(OAc)2
CuI (1)
AgOTf
(2)
DMF/DMSO (9:1)
85
6
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2(1)
AgOAc (2)
THF
50
7
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2(1)
AgOAc (2)
DMF
65
8
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2(1)
AgOAc (2)
AcCN
55
9
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2(1)
AgOAc
(2)
acetone
60
10
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2(1)
AgOAc (2)
DCE
70
11
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2(1)
AgOAc (2)
dioxane
NR
12
Pd(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2 (1)
AgOAc (2)
toluene
NR
13
PdCl2
CuI (1)
AgOTf
(2)
DMF/DMSO (9:1)
40
14
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2
CuI (1)
AgOTf (2)
DMF/DMSO
(9:1)
50
Reaction conditions:
Compound 3a (0.18 mmol), 5a (0.2 mmol);
solvent used (2
mL); NR = No reaction.
Isolated
yield.
Reaction conditions:
Compound 3a (0.18 mmol), 5a (0.2 mmol);
solvent used (2
mL); NR = No reaction.Isolated
yield.Usage of a mixture,
rather than lone oxidants, i.e., Cu(OAc)2 (1 equiv.)/AgOAc (2 equiv.) or CuI (1 equiv.)/AgOTf
(2 equiv.), in a mixture of DMF/DMSO (9:1, v/v) increased the yields
of formation of 6a to 80 and 85%, respectively (Table , entries 4–5).
However, a change of the solvent system from DMF/DMSO to pure THF,
DMF, acetonitrile, acetone, and dichloroethane resulted in lower yields,
while the use of dioxane and toluene did not yield the desired product 6a at all (Table , entries 6–12). The change of Pd-salt from Pd(OAc)2 to PdCl2 or Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 also resulted in the lowering of yields to 40 and 50% (Table , entries 13–14).The optimized conditions, i.e., the Pd(OAc)2-catalyst in the presence of a mixture of CuI (1 equiv.)/AgOTf
(2 equiv.) as the oxidant in DMF/DMSO (9:1, v/v), were used for CDC
reaction of glucalpropenone 3a with various styrenes
and acrylates 5a–f, such as 4-methyl
styrene (5a), styrene (5b), 4-nitrostyrene
(5c), 2-chlorostyrene (5d), 2,2,2-trifluoroethylacrylate
(5e), and benzyl acrylate (5f), to afford
the corresponding 1,2-disubstituted glucals6a–f with (E)-stereoselectivity in 78–88%
yields. The broader substrate scope of the optimized reaction was
further demonstrated by the successful CDC reaction of glucalpropenone 3b with styrene 5b and glucalpropenone3c with 4-methyl styrene (5a) and 4-methoxy styrene
(5g) to afford 1,2-disubstituted glucals 6g–i in 80 to 90% yields (Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Synthesis of 1,2-Disubstituted Glucals 6a–i from Glucalpropenone 3a–c Using Pd(II)-Catalyzed CDC Reaction
The CDC products 1,2-disubstituted glucals6a–i containing an E,Z,E-triene system on 6π-electrocyclization
in xylene
in a sealed vessel at 160 °C followed by in situ dehydrogenative aromatization afforded (2R,3S,4R)-2-benzyloxymethyl-3,4-dibenzyloxy-6-aryl-7-aroyloxychromanes7a–d and 7g–i in 66–73% yields. The electrocyclization of disubstituted
glucals6e and 6f bearing C-6 carbo(2,2,2-trifluoro)-ethoxy and carbo-benzyloxy substituents
led to the decomposition of the starting material (Scheme ). The electrocyclization reaction
carried out in hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA), ethylene glycol, or
nitrobenzene at different temperatures either led to no reaction or
decomposition of the starting material or formation of the product
albeit in much lower yield. Further, an attempt to isolate the cyclohexadiene
intermediate on electrocyclization of 1,2-disubstituted glucals by
carrying out the reaction at a different temperature under a N2 atmosphere or by cooling the incomplete reaction mixture
to −10 °C was unsuccessful.
Scheme 4
Synthesis of (2R,3S,4R)-Pentasubstituted
Chromanes 8a–d and 8g–i from 1,2-Disubstituted
Glucals 6a–i
The debenzylation of compound 7a was initially tried
by hydrogenation with 10% Pd/C-H2 in methanol at 25 °C.
Although Pd/C-H2 in methanol efficiently affected complete
debenzylation in compound 7a, it also led to the reduction
of benzoyl to the benzyl group at the C-7 position
of chromane to afford compound 9a.[14] Finally, debenzylations of chromane 7a–d and 7g–i were affected
with 1 M BCl3 in DCM at −78 °C to afford (2R,3S,4R)-2-hydroxymethyl-3,4-dihydroxy-6-aryl-7-aroyloxychromanes8a–d and 8g–i in 82–92% yields (Scheme ).[15]A plausible
mechanism for the formation of chromane 7viaPd-catalyzed CDC reaction of glucalpropenone 3 with
styrene/acrylate 5 followed by 6π-electrocyclization
reaction of the resulting 1,2-disubstituted glucal 6 starts
with the heteroatom-directed electrophilic reaction of Pd(II) species
at electron-rich C2-carbon of glucalpropenone 3. This follows hydrogen abstraction resulting in the formation
of C2-palladized intermediate I, which
on olefin coordination and carbopalladation afforded C2-alkyl-palladium intermediate II. Finally, β-hydride
elimination from the second intermediate led to the formation of 1,2-disubstitutedglucal 6. The Pd(0) generated after the reductive elimination
step is regenerated to active Pd(II) species by CuI and AgOTf to maintain
the continuity of the catalytic cycle. Further, 1,2-disubstitutedglucal 6 on heating in xylene at 160 °C undergoes
6π-electrocyclization to an unstable cyclic diene intermediate III that spontaneously undergoes in situ dehydrogenative
aromatization to afford chiral chromane 7 (Scheme ).[16]
Scheme 5
Plausible Reaction Mechanism for Formation of 1,2-Disubstituted Glucal 6 and Its Conversion into (2R,3S,4R)-Pentasubstituted Chromane 7
The structures of all synthesized compounds, i.e., 3a–j, 4, 6a–i, 7a–d, 7g–i, 8a–d, 8g–i, and 9a, were
unambiguously established based
on their IR, 1H-, 13C-, 19F NMR spectra
and HRMS data analysis. The structure of known compound 4 was further confirmed by comparison of its spectral data with those
reported in the literature.[13a] Further,
the structure of compound 8a was unambiguously confirmed
based on their X-ray data analysis (Figure , details in the Supporting Information).
Figure 2
ORTEP diagram of compound 8a drawn in 50%
thermal
probability ellipsoids showing the atomic numbering scheme. Solvent
molecules in the lattice are omitted for the sake of clarity. Only
one molecule of the asymmetric unit has been shown.
ORTEP diagram of compound 8a drawn in 50%
thermal
probability ellipsoids showing the atomic numbering scheme. Solvent
molecules in the lattice are omitted for the sake of clarity. Only
one molecule of the asymmetric unit has been shown.
Conclusions
We have described the efficient synthesis of C1-glucalpropenones in 68–88% yields and 1-formyl
glucal in
92% yield. The glucalpropenones have been used as precursors for Pd(II)-catalyzed
CDC reaction with styrenes and acrylates to synthesize 1,2-disubstitutedglucals with (E)-stereoselectivity in 78–90%
yields. Further, 1,2-disubstituted glucals have been subjected to
6π-electrocyclization on heating with xylene, which concomitantly
affected in situ dehydrogenative aromatization to
afford (2R,3S,4R)-2-benzyloxymethyl-3,4-dibenzyloxy-6-aryl-7-aroyloxychromanes in
66–73% yields. The debenzylation of synthesized chromanes has
been achieved with boron trichloride in DCM to afford (2R,3S,4R)-trihydroxychromanes in
82–92% yields. C-7 Benzylchromane has also
been synthesized by affecting debenzylation with Pd/C-H2 in methanol that led to the reduction of C-7 benzoyl
to the benzyl group along with the removal of benzyl protection. The
developed method is highly successful in generating a diversified
library of chromanes with three inbuilt chiral centers derived from
the precursor sugar. In addition, the developed methodology has the
capability to generate diversity at both C6- and C7-positions of chromane. Although we have recently reported
the synthesis of (2R,3S)-2-hydroxymethyl-3-hydroxychromanes
from the sugar precursor, the advantage of the present synthesis is
the import of three chiral centers from the sugar precursor into the
chromane instead of only two and the possibility of generation of
diversity at both C6- and C7-positions
of chromane compared to only at the C6-position.
Thus, the use of the present methodology for the synthesis of chromane
shall generate a much larger library of structurally defined chromanes
for drug discovery application and therefore is more useful.
Experimental
Section
General
All commercially available reagents and absorbents
were used without further purification. All solvents were distilled
before use. The IR spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer model 2000
FTIR spectrometer by making a KBr disk for solid samples. 1H-,13C-, and 19F- NMR spectra were recorded
on JEOL Delta 400, 100.6, and 376 MHz spectrometers, respectively,
using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. The chemical
shift values are on the δ scale, and the coupling constant (J) are in hertz. HRMS recording was carried out using a
Q-TOF mass spectrometer in ESI mode. The specific rotations of synthesized
compounds were measured on a Rudolph autopol II automatic polarimeter
using light of 589 nm wavelength. Analytical TLCs were performed on
precoated fluorescent plates; visualization of the developed plates
was performed under UV light or by charring with 5% alcoholic H2SO4 solution. Silica gel (100–200 mesh)
was used for column chromatography.
General Procedure for Synthesis
of 1-(E-1-Arylpropenon-3-yl)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-d-glucals (3a–j)
To a solution of β-C-glucopyranosyl
aldehyde 1 (600 mg, 1.09 mmol) and aryl methyl ketones 2a-j (1.09 mmol) in ethanol (12 mL), an aqueous solution of
5% NaOH (12 mL) was added dropwise with continuous stirring at 0 °C
and further stirred for 2–6 h at 25 °C. After completion
of the reaction as indicated by TLC examination, the reaction mixture
was concentrated at reduced pressure keeping bath temperature below
40 °C and the thick liquid thus obtained was extracted with ethyl
acetate (2 × 50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over
Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated at reduced
pressure to give the crude product, which was purified over a silica
gel column with 5–10% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether as the
eluent to afford pure products 3a–j in 68 to 88% yields.
Synthesis of 3,4,6-Tri-O-benzyl-1-formylglucal
(4)
To a solution of β-C-glucopyranosyl aldehyde 1 (500 mg, 0.90 mmol) in ethanol
(10 mL), an aqueous solution of 5% NaOH (10 mL) was added dropwise
with continuous stirring at room temperature and further stirred for
1 h. After the completion of the reaction as indicated on TLC examination,
the reaction mixture was concentrated at reduced pressure and the
thick liquid thus obtained was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 ×
50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated at reduced pressure to give a
crude product, which was purified over a silica gel column with 5%
ethyl acetate in petroleum ether as an eluent to afford pure product 4 as light brown oil (370 mg) in 92% yield. It was characterized
by comparing its 1H and 13C NMR data with those
reported in the literature.13a
General Procedure for the
Synthesis of 1,2-Disubstituted Glucals
(6a–i)
Glucalpropenones 3a–c (400 mg, 1 equiv.), styrenes/acrylates 5a–g (1.1 equiv.), AgOTf (2 equiv.), CuI
(1 equiv.), and Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %) in a solvent mixture
of DMF/DMSO (8 mL, v/v 9/1) were stirred at 80 °C in a 15 mL
sealed tube for 12 h. After completion of the reaction as indicated
on TLC examination, the resulting mixture was cooled to room temperature
and extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 50 mL). The combined organic
phase was washed with brine (1 × 20 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. The organic phase was concentrated
at reduced pressure, and the resulting residue was purified by silica
gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (5–10%)
as the eluent to furnish the desired products 6a–i in 78 to 90% yields.
General Procedure for the
Synthesis of Chiral Chromane Derivatives
(7a–d and 7g–i)
In a 15 mL sealed tube, compound 6a–i (350 mg, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in xylene
(5 mL) and the reaction mixture was stirred at 160 °C for 2 h
(progress of reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography).
After completion, the solvent was removed over a rotary evaporator
and the thick liquid thus obtained was extracted with ethyl acetate
(2 × 15 mL). The organic phase was washed with saturated aqueous
NaCl (1 × 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and
filtered. Ethyl acetate was evaporated on a rotavapor, and the resulting
residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 5–10%
ethyl acetate in petroleum ether as an eluent to obtain the desired
products 7a–d and 7g–i in 66–73% yields. The reaction with
1,2-disubstituted glucaltrienones6e and 6f led to the decomposition of the precursor, and product formation
was not observed.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Chiral Trihydroxychromane
Derivatives (8a–d and 8g–i)
In a 15 mL glass reaction tube,
compound 7a–d and 7g–i (200 mg) was dissolved in dichloromethane
(2 mL) and stirred at −78 °C. After 10 min, 1 M BCl3 in dichloromethane (1 mL) was added dropwise to the reaction
mixture and stirring was continued for another 0.5 to 1 h (progress
of the reaction was monitored by TLC). On completion, the temperature
of the reaction mixture was raised to −40 °C, and methanol
(1 mL) was added and stirred for another 15 min. Further, the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for half an hour, neutralized
with AmberliteIRA-402(OH) ion exchange resin, and filtered. The filtrate
was concentrated using a rotavapor, and the crude product thus obtained
was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0.5–2%
methanol in chloroform as an eluent to obtain the desired products 8a–d and 8g–i in 82–92% yields.
Synthesis of (2R,3S,4R)-2-Hydroxymethyl-3,4-dihydroxy-6-(4-methyl)phenyl-7-(4-methyl)benzylchromane
(9a)
In a 10 mL round bottom flask, compound 7a (200 mg) in methanol (4 mL) was added followed by the addition
of 10% Pd/C (20 mg) and the reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C
for 4 h under a H2 atmosphere. On completion (progress
of the reaction was monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was passed
through celite to remove Pd/C and the filtrate was evaporated on a
rotavapor to get the crude product. The crude product thus obtained
was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 1% methanol
in chloroform as an eluent to get the pure desired product as a white
solid (104 mg) in 90% yield. mp: 140–143 °C; IR (KBr,
cm–1): 3304, 3024, 2928, 1616, 1568, 1485, 1413,
1286, 1222, 1111, 1047, 997, 912, 879, 815, 767, 700; [α]D27 = +71.72 (c 0.1, dichloromethane); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 3.51–3.56
(m, 1H), 3.62–3.68 (m, 1H), 3.78 (s, 2H), 3.80–3.84
(m, 2H), 4.44 (t, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz), 4.70 (t, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 5.34 (d, 1H, J = 4.6 Hz),
5.54 (d, 1H, J = 6.2 Hz), 6.45 (s, 1H), 6.86 (d,
2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.03 (d, 2H, J =
7.7 Hz), 7.14 (d, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.19–7.22
(m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100.6 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 21.1, 21.3, 38.8, 61.2, 68.7, 70.6, 80.3,
116.9, 124.2, 129.1, 129.3, 129.4, 129.6, 129.9, 134.2, 135.3, 136.2,
138.5, 138.7, 139.0, 153.0; HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C25H26O4Na 413.1723; found 413.1755.
Authors: Markus Leibeling; Dennis C Koester; Martin Pawliczek; Svenia C Schild; Daniel B Werz Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2010-01-24 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Alexey Volkov; Karl P J Gustafson; Cheuk-Wai Tai; Oscar Verho; Jan-E Bäckvall; Hans Adolfsson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 15.336