Literature DB >> 34055499

Backpropagation Neural Network-Based Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Blood Urea and Glucose in CKD Patients.

Jivan Parab1, Marlon Sequeira1, Madhusudan Lanjewar1, Caje Pinto1, Gourish Naik1.   

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus and its complication such as heart disease, stroke, kidney failure, etc. is a serious concern all over the world. Hence, monitoring some important blood parameters non-invasively is of utmost importance, that too with high accuracy. This paper presents an in-house developed system, which will be helpful for diabetes patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) to monitor blood urea and glucose. This manuscript discusses a comparative study for the prediction of blood urea and glucose using Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network (BP- ANN) and Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR) model. The NVIDIA Jetson Nano board controls the five fixed LED wavelengths in the Near Infrared (NIR) region from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] with a constant emission power of 1.2 mW. The spectra for 57 laboratory prepared samples conforming with major blood constituents of the blood sample were recorded. From these samples, 53 spectra were used for training/calibration of the BP-ANN/PLSR model and the remaining 4 samples were used for validating the model. The PLSR model predicts blood urea and glucose with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.88 & 12.01 mg/dL, Coefficient of Determination R2 = 0.93 & R2 = 0.97, Accuracy of 94.2 % and 90.14 %, respectively. To improve the prediction accuracy, BP-ANN model is applied. Later the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique was applied to these 57 spectra values. These PCA values were used to train and validate the BP-ANN model. After applying the BP-ANN model, the prediction of blood urea & glucose improved remarkably, which achieved RMSE of 0.69 mg/dL, R2 = 0.96, Accuracy of 95.96 % for urea and RMSE of 2.06 mg/dL, R2 = 0.99, and Accuracy of 98.65 % for glucose. The system performance is then evaluated with Bland Altman analysis and Clarke Error Grid Analysis (CEGA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial Neural Network; Diabetes mellitus; Jetson Nano; PLSR; chronic kidney; diabetes nephropathy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34055499      PMCID: PMC8159148          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3079714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  18 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Influence of in vivo hemoglobin carbamylation on HbA1c measurements by various methods.

Authors:  A Chachou; C Randoux; H Millart; J Chanard; P Gillery
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Proteinuria and other markers of chronic kidney disease: a position statement of the national kidney foundation (NKF) and the national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases (NIDDK).

Authors:  Garabed Eknoyan; Thomas Hostetter; George L Bakris; Lee Hebert; Andrew S Levey; Hans-Henrik Parving; Michael W Steffes; Robert Toto
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 4.  Non-invasive glucose measurement technologies: an update from 1999 to the dawn of the new millennium.

Authors:  Omar S Khalil
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 5.  Spectroscopic and clinical aspects of noninvasive glucose measurements.

Authors:  O S Khalil
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  National kidney foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  J D Kopple
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 7.  Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thaminda Liyanage; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Vivekanand Jha; Bruce Neal; Halle Marie Patrice; Ikechi Okpechi; Ming-hui Zhao; Jicheng Lv; Amit X Garg; John Knight; Anthony Rodgers; Martin Gallagher; Sradha Kotwal; Alan Cass; Vlado Perkovic
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.

Authors:  Sarah Wild; Gojka Roglic; Anders Green; Richard Sicree; Hilary King
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Human oral mucosa studies with varying blood glucose concentration by non-invasive ATR-FT-IR-spectroscopy.

Authors:  H M Heise; R Marbach
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.770

10.  Incidences, treatments, outcomes, and sex effect on survival in patients with end-stage renal disease by diabetes status in Australia and New Zealand (1991 2005).

Authors:  Emmanuel Villar; Sean Haw Chang; Stephen Peter McDonald
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  1 in total

1.  Smart deployment of IoT-TelosB service care StreamRobot using software-defined reliability optimisation design.

Authors:  Kennedy Chinedu Okafor; Omowunmi Mary Longe
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.