Literature DB >> 10380245

Techniques of body composition assessment: a review of laboratory and field methods.

D R Wagner1, V H Heyward.   

Abstract

Body composition is one of the major health-related components of fitness. Thus, it is important for health and fitness professionals to have a general understanding of the most commonly used techniques for assessing body composition. This review presents the developmental background and underlying principles and theory of four laboratory (hydrodensitometry, air displacement plethysmography, isotope dilution, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and four field (bioelectrical impedance analysis, near-infrared interactance, skinfolds, and anthropometry) methods of body composition assessment. In addition to a description of the methods, the validity, and reliability, strengths, and limitations of each measurement tool are examined. Highlights of the laboratory methods include the relatively new Bod Pod air displacement device, which is a promising assessment tool more convenient than hydrodensitometry but still lacking substantial validity testing and the ability of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure regional composition making it an attractive method for clinicians. Advancements in segmental and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance for compartmental analysis have enhanced the value of this field method, but research continues to show that commercially available near-infrared interactance units are invalid. With this knowledge, the clinician and researcher should be able to make an informed decision regarding the most appropriate measurement device for their body composition assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10380245     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  28 in total

Review 1.  A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance.

Authors:  David J Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Developing suitable methods of nutritional status assessment: a continuous challenge.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elmadfa; Alexa L Meyer
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Body composition and mortality in the general population: A review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2018-12-11

4.  Comparison of the Three-Site and Seven-Site Measurements in Female Collegiate Athletes Using BodyMetrix™.

Authors:  Amanda M Elsey; Alister K Lowe; Ashley N Cornell; Paul N Whitehead; Ryan T Conners
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  Utility of ultrasound for body fat assessment: validity and reliability compared to a multicompartment criterion.

Authors:  Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Malia N M Blue; Eric T Trexler; Katie R Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.273

6.  Validity of a 3-compartment body composition model using body volume derived from a novel 2-dimensional image analysis program.

Authors:  Katherine Sullivan; Bjoern Hornikel; Clifton J Holmes; Michael R Esco; Michael V Fedewa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Quantification of Absolute Fat Mass by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Validation Study against Chemical Analysis.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Yan Li; Tim R Nagy; Michael I Goran; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2011

8.  Body composition modifications in people with chronic spinal cord injury after supervised physical activity.

Authors:  Frederico Ribeiro Neto; Guilherme Henrique Lopes
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Predicting body composition in college students using the womersley and durnin body mass index equation.

Authors:  Jeremy P Loenneke; Kathryn M Hirt; Jacob M Wilson; Jeremy T Barnes; Thomas J Pujol
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2013-02-16

Review 10.  Ultrasound as a tool to assess body fat.

Authors:  Dale R Wagner
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2013-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.