| Literature DB >> 34054897 |
Jia Liu1,2, Lin Huang2, Tingxuan Li3, Yaxi Liu1,2,4, Zehong Yan1,2,4, Guan Tang2, Youliang Zheng1,2,4, Dengcai Liu1,2,4, Bihua Wu1,2,4.
Abstract
Wheat is one of the important staple crops as the resources of both food and micronutrient for most people of the world. However, the levels of micronutrients (especially Fe and Zn) in common wheat are inherently low. Biofortification is an effective way to increase the micronutrient concentration of wheat. Wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides, AABB, 2n = 4x = 28) is an important germplasm resource for wheat micronutrients improvement. In the present study, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed to characterize grain iron, zinc, and manganese concentration (GFeC, GZnC, and GMnC) in 161 advanced lines derived from wild emmer. Using both the general linear model and mixed linear model, we identified 14 high-confidence significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) that were associated with GFeC, GZnC, and GMnC of which nine MTAs were novel. Six MTAs distributed on chromosomes 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, and 7B were significantly associated with GFeC. Three MTAs on 1A and 2A were significantly associated with GZnC and five MTAs on 1B were significantly associated with GMnC. These MTAs show no negative effects on thousand kernel weight (TKW), implying the potential value for simultaneous improvement of micronutrient concentrations and TKW in breeding. Meanwhile, the GFeC, GZnC and GMnC are positively correlated, suggesting that these traits could be simultaneously improved. Genotypes containing high-confidence MTAs and 61 top genotypes with a higher concentration of grain micronutrients were recommended for wheat biofortification breeding. A total of 38 candidate genes related to micronutrient concentrations were identified. These candidates can be classified into four main groups: enzymes, transporter proteins, MYB transcription factor, and plant defense responses proteins. The MTAs and associated candidate genes provide essential information for wheat biofortification breeding through marker-assisted selection (MAS).Entities:
Keywords: GWAS; biofortification; common wheat; grain micronutrient concentrations; wide hybridization; wild emmer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34054897 PMCID: PMC8160437 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.651283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
The variation for GFeC, GZnC, GMnC, and TKW in advanced lines under four environments.
| GFeC (mg/kg) | 2015WJ | 49.20 | 110.21 | 109.68 | 46.91–168.00 | 24.35 | 769.83 | 0.98 |
| 2015CZ | 38.15 | 115.47 | 83.71 | 49.54–152.27 | 22.73 | 392.65 | 0.97 | |
| 2016WJ | 47.51 | 92.69 | 102.27 | 52.94–160.51 | 29.13 | 992.57 | 0.98 | |
| 2016CZ | 44.19 | 98.41 | 97.65 | 42.44–157.01 | 24.4 | 659.20 | 0.97 | |
| GZnC (mg/kg) | 2015WJ | 40.60 | 85.98 | 57.48 | 31.15–103.92 | 18.72 | 311.24 | 0.97 |
| 2015CZ | 41.64 | 80.91 | 55.99 | 30.17–120.52 | 21.65 | 331.89 | 0.98 | |
| 2016WJ | 37.07 | 97.87 | 68.75 | 31.67–111.28 | 17.48 | 269.20 | 0.96 | |
| 2016CZ | 36.67 | 81.62 | 60.24 | 32.09–100.71 | 19.27 | 206.58 | 0.96 | |
| GMnC (mg/kg) | 2015WJ | 25.68 | 35.42 | 37.14 | 21.69–53.85 | 14.81 | 19.47 | 0.94 |
| 2015CZ | 23.43 | 33.42 | 33.37 | 21.94–48.59 | 14.92 | 14.69 | 0.93 | |
| 2016WJ | 27.03 | 33.54 | 32.81 | 16.28–51.35 | 17.77 | 34.77 | 0.95 | |
| 2016CZ | 25.57 | 31.22 | 30.36 | 20.39–45.34 | 15.84 | 18.41 | 0.95 | |
| TKW (g) | 2015WJ | 43.19 | 19.21 | 46.08 | 30.70–57.00 | 10.07 | 18.58 | 0.73 |
| 2015CZ | 49.33 | 15.00 | 52.90 | 37.08–64.63 | 8.22 | 24.49 | 0.89 | |
| 2016WJ | 49.22 | 32.80 | 49.88 | 33.93–60.11 | 8.58 | 17.21 | 0.88 | |
| 2016CZ | 42.70 | 31.63 | 49.06 | 35.00–60.88 | 9.21 | 14.92 | 0.67 | |
Significant differences at the 0.05 level. CV, coefficient of variation; Env, environment; σ.
Figure 1Heat map of GFeC, GZnC, and GMnC of the advanced lines grown at 2015WJ, 2015CZ, 2016WJ, and 2016CZ.
Figure 2Frequency distribution of GFeC, GZnC, GMnC, and TKW under four environments in the advanced lines. Solid arrows represent the values of D1. Dashed arrows represent the values of CN16.
Pearson's correlation coefficients of GFeC, GZnC, GMnC, and TKW in advanced lines based on BLUP data.
| GZnC | 0.267 | ||
| GMnC | 0.395 | 0.323 | |
| TKW | 0.056 | 0.006 | 0.175 |
and
,significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 level (2-tailed), respectively.
Significant MTAs identified by GWAS using GLM and MLM model.
| GFeC | MLM | 7 | 3.40 | 3.05–4.06 | 8.57 | 7.18–10.45 | 6 |
| GLM | 512 | 4.05 | 3.00–8.93 | 8.44 | 5.83–18.70 | ||
| GZnC | MLM | 7 | 3.19 | 3.10–3.41 | 7.68 | 7.30–8.16 | 3 |
| GLM | 24 | 3.38 | 3.02–4.19 | 7.91 | 6.80–9.92 | ||
| GMnC | MLM | 8 | 3.46 | 3.01–4.56 | 8.81 | 7.18–11.84 | 5 |
| GLM | 20 | 3.39 | 3.04–4.48 | 6.35 | 5.45–8.43 |
The number of MTAs identified by MLM or GLM.
The number of shared significant MTAs.
PVE, phenotypic variation explained.
Figure 3Manhattan plots of GWAS scan for GFeC, GZnC, and GMnC in four environments. Significant MTAs identified by MLM (A) and GLM (B). Red lines: the –log10(p) threshold of 3.00. The quantile-quantile charts of MLM (C) and GLM (D). Black line: the expected values.
Significant high-confidence MTAs for GFeC, GZnC, and GMnC identified by MLM and GLM.
| GFeC | 1210301 | 3B | 10.84 | 3.16 | 8.10 | 3.94 | 8.44 |
| 2255722 | 4A | 46.59 | 4.06 | 10.45 | 7.99 | 17.12 | |
| 3024845 | 4B | 108.47 | 3.11 | 8.31 | 7.63 | 17.42 | |
| 2258533 | 5A | 0.00 | 3.31 | 7.85 | 8.93 | 18.70 | |
| 3033960 | 5A | 0.38 | 3.82 | 9.47 | 6.87 | 14.81 | |
| 1274451 | 7B | 94.72 | 3.05 | 7.18 | 3.56 | 7.49 | |
| GZnC | 1136167 | 1A | 359.46 | 3.10 | 7.60 | 3.69 | 8.69 |
| 1077698 | 2A | 139.90 | 3.24 | 7.88 | 4.19 | 9.92 | |
| 1234362 | 2A | 145.15 | 3.19 | 7.86 | 3.32 | 7.70 | |
| GMnC | 3023738 | 1B | 167.84 | 3.97 | 11.04 | 3.91 | 7.53 |
| 2326413 | 1B | 170.19 | 4.56 | 11.84 | 4.11 | 7.81 | |
| 1114828 | 1B | 181.69 | 3.17 | 8.16 | 3.33 | 6.57 | |
| 1215559 | 1B | 204.13 | 3.27 | 8.04 | 4.48 | 8.43 | |
| 1105781 | 1B | 211.25 | 3.61 | 8.98 | 3.27 | 6.15 | |
PVE, phenotypic variation explained.
Chromosomal location information based on the wheat consensus map version 3.0 (.
Figure 4Potential genotypes with high micronutrient concentrations selected from the RILs based on high-confidence MTAs associated with GFeC, GZnC, and GMnC.