Vince D Calhoun1, Godfrey D Pearlson2, Jing Sui1,3. 1. Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 3. Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The 'holy grail' of clinical applications of neuroimaging to neurological and psychiatric disorders via personalized biomarkers has remained mostly elusive, despite considerable effort. However, there are many reasons to continue to be hopeful, as the field has made remarkable advances over the past few years, fueled by a variety of converging technical and data developments. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss a number of advances that are accelerating the push for neuroimaging biomarkers including the advent of the 'neuroscience big data' era, biomarker data competitions, the development of more sophisticated algorithms including 'guided' data-driven approaches that facilitate automation of network-based analyses, dynamic connectivity, and deep learning. Another key advance includes multimodal data fusion approaches which can provide convergent and complementary evidence pointing to possible mechanisms as well as increase predictive accuracy. SUMMARY: The search for clinically relevant neuroimaging biomarkers for neurological and psychiatric disorders is rapidly accelerating. Here, we highlight some of these aspects, provide recent examples from studies in our group, and link to other ongoing work in the field. It is critical that access and use of these advanced approaches becomes mainstream, this will help propel the community forward and facilitate the production of robust and replicable neuroimaging biomarkers.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The 'holy grail' of clinical applications of neuroimaging to neurological and psychiatric disorders via personalized biomarkers has remained mostly elusive, despite considerable effort. However, there are many reasons to continue to be hopeful, as the field has made remarkable advances over the past few years, fueled by a variety of converging technical and data developments. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss a number of advances that are accelerating the push for neuroimaging biomarkers including the advent of the 'neuroscience big data' era, biomarker data competitions, the development of more sophisticated algorithms including 'guided' data-driven approaches that facilitate automation of network-based analyses, dynamic connectivity, and deep learning. Another key advance includes multimodal data fusion approaches which can provide convergent and complementary evidence pointing to possible mechanisms as well as increase predictive accuracy. SUMMARY: The search for clinically relevant neuroimaging biomarkers for neurological and psychiatric disorders is rapidly accelerating. Here, we highlight some of these aspects, provide recent examples from studies in our group, and link to other ongoing work in the field. It is critical that access and use of these advanced approaches becomes mainstream, this will help propel the community forward and facilitate the production of robust and replicable neuroimaging biomarkers.
Authors: Andrew T Drysdale; Logan Grosenick; Jonathan Downar; Katharine Dunlop; Farrokh Mansouri; Yue Meng; Robert N Fetcho; Benjamin Zebley; Desmond J Oathes; Amit Etkin; Alan F Schatzberg; Keith Sudheimer; Jennifer Keller; Helen S Mayberg; Faith M Gunning; George S Alexopoulos; Michael D Fox; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Henning U Voss; B J Casey; Marc J Dubin; Conor Liston Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Shile Qi; Gunter Schumann; Juan Bustillo; Jessica A Turner; Rongtao Jiang; Dongmei Zhi; Zening Fu; Andrew R Mayer; Victor M Vergara; Rogers F Silva; Armin Iraji; Jiayu Chen; Eswar Damaraju; Xiaohong Ma; Xiao Yang; Michael Stevens; Daniel H Mathalon; Judith M Ford; James Voyvodic; Bryon A Mueller; Aysenil Belger; Steven G Potkin; Adrian Preda; Chuanjun Zhuo; Yong Xu; Congying Chu; Tobias Banaschewski; Gareth J Barker; Arun L W Bokde; Erin Burke Quinlan; Sylvane Desrivières; Herta Flor; Antoine Grigis; Hugh Garavan; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Jean-Luc Martinot; Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot; Eric Artiges; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Tomáš Paus; Luise Poustka; Sarah Hohmann; Juliane H Fröhner; Michael N Smolka; Henrik Walter; Robert Whelan; Vince D Calhoun; Jing Sui Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 12.810
Authors: Anees Abrol; Eswar Damaraju; Robyn L Miller; Julia M Stephen; Eric D Claus; Andrew R Mayer; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Nalini M Singh; Jordan B Harrod; Sandya Subramanian; Mitchell Robinson; Ken Chang; Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak; Adrian Vasile Dalca; Simon Eickhoff; Michael Fox; Loraine Franke; Polina Golland; Daniel Haehn; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Lauren J O'Donnell; Yangming Ou; Yogesh Rathi; Shan H Siddiqi; Haoqi Sun; M Brandon Westover; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Randy L Gollub Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2022-03-28