Literature DB >> 34052693

Mechanics of cadaveric anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions during simulated jump landing tasks: Lessons learned from a pilot investigation.

Nathan D Schilaty1, R Kyle Martin2, Ryo Ueno3, Luca Rigamonti4, Nathaniel A Bates5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Around half of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are treated through reconstruction, but the literature lacks mechanical investigation of reconstructions in a dynamic athletic task and rupture environment. The current objective was to ascertain the feasibility of investigating ACL reconstructions in a rupture environment during simulated landing tasks in a validated mechanical impact simulator.
METHODS: Four cadaveric lower extremities were subjected to simulated landing in a mechanical impact simulator. External joint loads that mimicked magnitudes recorded from an in vivo population were applied to each joint in a stepwise manner. Simulations were repeated until ACL failure was achieved. Repeated measures design was used to test each specimen in the native ACL and hamstrings, quadriceps, and patellar tendon reconstructed states.
FINDINGS: ACL injuries were generated in 100% of specimens. Graft substance damage occurred in 58% of ACLRs, and in 75% of bone tendon bone grafts. Bone tendon bone and quadriceps grafts survived greater simulated loading than hamstrings grafts, but smaller simulated loading than the native ACL. Median peak strain prior to failure was 20.3% (11.6, 24.5) for the native ACL and 17.4% (9.5, 23.3) across all graft types.
INTERPRETATION: The simulator was a viable construct for mechanical examination of ACLR grafts in rupture environments. Post-surgery, ACL reconstruction complexes are weaker than the native ACL when subjected to equivalent loading. Bone tendon bone grafts most closely resembled the native ligament and provided the most consistently relevant rupture results. This model advocated reconstruction graft capacity to sustain forces generated from immediate gait and weightbearing during rehabilitation from an ACL injury.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; ACL reconstruction; Knee biomechanics; Simulated landing; Sports medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34052693      PMCID: PMC8278414          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.034


  73 in total

1.  Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; David S Logerstedt; Airelle Hunter-Giordano; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Exploring the High Reinjury Rate in Younger Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Location-dependent variations in the material properties of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  D L Butler; Y Guan; M D Kay; J F Cummings; S M Feder; M S Levy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Novel mechanical impact simulator designed to generate clinically relevant anterior cruciate ligament ruptures.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Nathan D Schilaty; Christopher V Nagelli; Aaron J Krych; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 5.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Mechanical properties of suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the fixed-length loop device versus the adjustable-length loop device.

Authors:  Akio Eguchi; Mitsuo Ochi; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Atsuo Nakamae; Muhammad Andry Usman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Low Rates of Return to Preinjury Sport After Bilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller; Alexander J Kimp; Timothy S Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Anterior cruciate ligament biomechanics during robotic and mechanical simulations of physiologic and clinical motion tasks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Gregory D Myer; Jason T Shearn; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  How should clinicians rehabilitate patients after ACL reconstruction? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with a focus on quality appraisal (AGREE II).

Authors:  Renato Andrade; Rogério Pereira; Robert van Cingel; J Bart Staal; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Sex-Based Differences of Medial Collateral Ligament and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strains With Cadaveric Impact Simulations.

Authors:  Nathan D Schilaty; Nathaniel A Bates; Christopher V Nagelli; Aaron J Krych; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.