Literature DB >> 34052575

Daily cannabis use in adolescents who smoke tobacco is associated with altered late-stage feedback processing: A high-density electrical mapping study.

Kristen P Morie1, Jia Wu2, Marc N Potenza3, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin3, Linda C Mayes4, Christopher J Hammond5, Michael J Crowley2.   

Abstract

Impairments in feedback processing, often associated with risk-taking behavior, may have implications for development of substance abuse in adolescents. The most commonly used substances by adolescents include tobacco and cannabis, with some individuals using both substances, potentially heightening risk. Our objective was to examine feedback processing and impulsivity in adolescents who smoke cigarettes and use cannabis daily (N = 21), comparing them with adolescents who smoke cigarettes daily and use cannabis occasionally (N = 18) and non-smoking (N = 27) adolescents. To do this, the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) with concurrent EEG was used to measure risk-related feedback processing, and impulsivity was measured using the Barratt's impulsiveness scale (BIS-11). It was found that adolescent daily tobacco/cannabis smoking was associated with higher BIS-11 scores, shortened feedback-related-negativity (FRN) latencies and reduced P300 amplitudes. In addition, FRN latencies during win conditions were inversely associated with tobacco-use severity, indicated by scores on the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), and with BIS-11 scores. Adolescents with concurrent tobacco and cannabis use show altered feedback processing and higher impulsivity. Future work should disentangle whether the effect reflects risk, consequences of use or both.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addictive behaviors; Adolescents; Cannabis; Electroencephalography; Feedback processing; Impulsivity; Risk-taking; Tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34052575      PMCID: PMC8314801          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  64 in total

1.  Adolescent gambling: understanding the role of stress and coping.

Authors:  Tanya Bergevin; Rina Gupta; Jeffrey Derevensky; Felicia Kaufman
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2006-07-12

2.  Smaller feedback ERN amplitudes during the BART are associated with a greater family history density of alcohol problems in treatment-naïve alcoholics.

Authors:  George Fein; Maria Chang
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Stages of dysfunctional decision-making in addiction.

Authors:  Antonio Verdejo-Garcia; Trevor T-J Chong; Julie C Stout; Murat Yücel; Edythe D London
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Neural outcome processing of peer-influenced risk-taking behavior in late adolescence: Preliminary evidence for gene × environment interactions.

Authors:  Troy A Webber; Heather E Soder; Geoffrey F Potts; Jong Y Park; Marina A Bornovalova
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.

Authors:  Scott A K Oberg; Gregory J Christie; Matthew S Tata
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Feedback processing in adolescents with prenatal cocaine exposure: an electrophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Kristen P Morie; Jia Wu; Nicole Landi; Marc N Potenza; Linda C Mayes; Michael J Crowley
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Regulating task-monitoring systems in response to variable reward contingencies and outcomes in cocaine addicts.

Authors:  Kristen P Morie; Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Hugh Garavan; John J Foxe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Auditory event-related potentials (P3) and cognitive performance in recreational ecstasy polydrug users: evidence from a 12-month longitudinal study.

Authors:  Susana de Sola; Thais Tarancón; Jordi Peña-Casanova; Josep María Espadaler; Klaus Langohr; Sandra Poudevida; Magí Farré; Antonio Verdejo-García; Rafael de la Torre
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Marginally perceptible outcome feedback, motor learning and implicit processes.

Authors:  Rich S W Masters; Jon P Maxwell; Frank F Eves
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-04-17

10.  Is all risk bad? Young adult cigarette smokers fail to take adaptive risk in a laboratory decision-making test.

Authors:  Andy C Dean; Catherine A Sugar; Gerhard Hellemann; Edythe D London
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.