Literature DB >> 3405077

Molecular coevolution among cryptically simple expansion segments of eukaryotic 26S/28S rRNAs.

J M Hancock1, G A Dover.   

Abstract

The set of "expansion segments" of any eukaryotic 26S/28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is responsible for the bulk of the difference in length between the prokaryotic 23S rRNA gene and the eukaryotic 26S/28S rRNA gene. The expansion segments are also responsible for interspecific fluctuations in length during eukaryotic evolution. They show a consistent bias in base composition in any species; for example, they are AT rich in Drosophila melanogaster and GC rich in vertebrate species. Dot-matrix comparisons of sets of expansion segments reveal high similarities between members of a set within any 28S rRNA gene of a species, in contrast to the little or spurious similarity that exists between sets of expansion segments from distantly related species. Similarities among members of a set of expansion segments within any 28S rRNA gene cannot be accounted for by their base-compositional bias alone. In contrast, no significant similarity exists within a set of "core" segments (regions between expansion segments) of any 28S rRNA gene, although core segments are conserved between species. The set of expansion segments of a 26S/28S gene is coevolving as a unit in each species, at the same time as the family of 28S rRNA genes, as a whole, is undergoing continual homogenization, making all sets of expansion segments from all ribosomal DNA (rDNA) arrays in a species similar in sequence. Analysis of DNA simplicity of 26S/28S rRNA genes shows a direct correlation between significantly high relative simplicity factors (RSFs) and sequence similarity among a set of expansion segments. A similar correlation exists between RSF values, overall rDNA lengths, and the lengths of individual expansion segments. Such correlations suggest that most length fluctuations reflect the gain and loss of simple sequence motifs by slippage-like mechanisms. We discuss the molecular coevolution of expansion segments, which takes place against a background of slippage-like and unequal crossing-over mechanisms of turnover that are responsible for the accumulation of interspecific differences in rDNA sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3405077     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  37 in total

1.  Secondary structure of two regions in expansion segments ES3 and ES6 with the potential of forming a tertiary interaction in eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunits.

Authors:  Gunnar Alkemar; Odd Nygård
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  'Compensatory slippage' in the evolution of ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  J M Hancock; G A Dover
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  rRNA genes from the lower chordate Herdmania momus: structural similarity with higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  B M Degnan; J Yan; C J Hawkins; M F Lavin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Predicted secondary structure for 28S and 18S rRNA from Ichneumonoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apocrita): impact on sequence alignment and phylogeny estimation.

Authors:  Joseph J Gillespie; Matthew J Yoder; Robert A Wharton
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species.

Authors:  Deborah E Stage; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  The contribution of DNA slippage to eukaryotic nuclear 18S rRNA evolution.

Authors:  J M Hancock
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  GC balance in the internal transcribed spacers ITS 1 and ITS 2 of nuclear ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  R A Torres; M Ganal; V Hemleben
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Modelling the secondary structures of slippage-prone hypervariable RNA regions: the example of the tiger beetle 18S rRNA variable region V4.

Authors:  J M Hancock; A P Vogler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Divergence towards a dead end? Cleavage of the divergent domains of ribosomal RNA in apoptosis.

Authors:  G Houge; S O Døskeland
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1996-10-31

10.  Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers are highly divergent in the phytopathogenic ascomycete Fusarium sambucinum (Gibberella pulicaris).

Authors:  K O'Donnell
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.