| Literature DB >> 34050206 |
Hai-Lu Zhu1,2,3, Yan Liu1,2, Jian Zhang3, Ming-Xu Wang3, Hong Jiang3, Fang Guo3,4, Ming Li5, Fei-Fei Qi6, Xiao-Hong Liu7, Le Ma8.
Abstract
Controversial results have been reported about the association of calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus and stroke risk, but none in China. To investigate the association between dietary calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and stroke incidence in Chinese adults, we collected data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) from 2004 to 2011, including 6411 participants aged 45-79 years and free of stroke at baseline. Diet was assessed by interviews combining 3-d 24-h food recalls and household food inventory weighing at each survey round. The stroke incident was identified based on the validated self-report. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For 32,024 person-years of follow-up, 179 stroke cases were documented. After adjustment for major lifestyle and dietary risk factors, calcium intake was positively associated with reduced stroke risk, and the HR of stroke comparing extreme quartiles was 0.53 (95% CI 0.29-0.96, Ptrend = 0.03). In further stratified analyses, significant heterogeneity across sex strata was found (Pinteraction = 0.03). Dietary calcium intake among men was more inversely related to stroke, with HRs being 0.33 (95% CI 0.15-0.76, P trend = 0.02), compared to 1.24 (95% CI 0.46-3.35, Ptrend = 0.89) among women. However, no significant association between stroke and magnesium or phosphorus was revealed. Our findings suggest that higher dietary calcium intake was associated with a lower risk of stroke in Chinese adults, particularly in men.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34050206 PMCID: PMC8163833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90388-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of participants according to quartiles of dietary calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus intakes
| Characteristics1 | Total | Calcium intake | P | Magnesium intake | P | Phosphorus intake | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | |||||
| No. of subjects (n) | 6411 | 1602 | 1603 | 1602 | 1603 | 1603 | 1603 | |||
| Age at cohort entry (years) | 56.0 | 57.0 | 55.9 | < 0.001 | 57.9 | 55.1 | < 0.001 | 58.1 | 54.6 | < 0.001 |
| Man (%) | 48.2 | 39.4 | 55.1 | < 0.001 | 34.8 | 62.4 | < 0.001 | 32.6 | 64.9 | < 0.001 |
| Urbanization Index (%) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.01 | |||||||
| Low | 33.3 | 39.1 | 23.6 | 27.2 | 39.8 | 32.7 | 35.3 | |||
| Medium | 33.3 | 33.8 | 31.7 | 31.7 | 36.5 | 32.6 | 34.0 | |||
| High | 33.4 | 27.1 | 44.7 | 41.2 | 23.6 | 34.7 | 30.7 | |||
| Education attained (%) | < 0.001 | 0.66 | < 0.001 | |||||||
| Primary | 77.7 | 82.9 | 71.2 | 78.4 | 79.3 | 81.8 | 74.1 | |||
| Secondary | 13.2 | 11.2 | 15.1 | 13.2 | 13.7 | 11.3 | 15.4 | |||
| College/University | 9.1 | 5.9 | 13.7 | 8.4 | 9.2 | 6.9 | 10.5 | |||
| Household income (%) | < 0.001 | 0.07 | < 0.001 | |||||||
| Low | 44.5 | 53.9 | 32.8 | 47.1 | 41.8 | 50.8 | 37.2 | |||
| Middle | 33.6 | 29.3 | 37.6 | 31.0 | 36.6 | 31.5 | 36.6 | |||
| High | 21.9 | 16.8 | 29.6 | 22.0 | 21.6 | 17.7 | 26.2 | |||
| Smoker (%) | 34.6 | 29.3 | 39.4 | < 0.001 | 24.7 | 44.4 | < 0.001 | 25.1 | 45.6 | < 0.001 |
| Alcohol consumption (%) | 34.1 | 24.2 | 42.3 | < 0.001 | 23.2 | 45.5 | < 0.001 | 22.0 | 47.3 | < 0.001 |
| Physical activity level (%) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||||||
| Light | 31.3 | 40.5 | 29.3 | 42.1 | 29.4 | 42.4 | 27.6 | |||
| Moderate | 35.3 | 29.6 | 37.9 | 33.9 | 30.6 | 32.3 | 32.3 | |||
| Vigorous | 33.4 | 29.9 | 32.8 | 24.0 | 39.9 | 25.3 | 40.0 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.6 | 23.1 | 23.9 | < 0.001 | 23.3 | 23.6 | 0.03 | 23.2 | 23.8 | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension (%) | 38.5 | 40.6 | 38.8 | 0.31 | 42.4 | 35.1 | < 0.001 | 40.9 | 36.3 | 0.01 |
| Diabetes (%) | 2.6 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 0.04 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.99 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 0.82 |
| Myocardial infarction (%) | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.27 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.04 |
| Medication use (%) | 9.5 | 8.2 | 11.3 | 0.01 | 11.6 | 8.2 | 0.01 | 10.8 | 8.7 | 0.04 |
| Nutrient intake | ||||||||||
| Energy (kcal/d) | 2220.9 | 1830.8 | 2544.9 | < 0.001 | 1694.7 | 2768.5 | < 0.001 | 1638.4 | 2832.6 | < 0.001 |
| Whole grain (g/d) | 403.8 | 356.2 | 420.8 | < 0.001 | 313.5 | 504.4 | < 0.001 | 310.7 | 509.8 | < 0.001 |
| Red meat (g/d) | 71.9 | 58.1 | 86.0 | < 0.001 | 61.6 | 74.1 | < 0.001 | 46.7 | 90.6 | < 0.001 |
| fruits (g/d) | 43.7 | 25.9 | 69.5 | < 0.001 | 29.6 | 51.9 | < 0.001 | 30.9 | 48.7 | < 0.001 |
| vegetables (g/d) | 347.8 | 267.7 | 431.2 | < 0.001 | 267.9 | 420.5 | < 0.001 | 272.9 | 419.5 | < 0.001 |
| SFA (g/d) | 9.6 | 8.0 | 11.7 | < 0.001 | 8.4 | 11.0 | < 0.001 | 7.7 | 11.4 | < 0.001 |
| PUFA (g/d) | 16.9 | 13.3 | 20.8 | < 0.001 | 13.5 | 20.7 | < 0.001 | 13.3 | 20.6 | < 0.001 |
| Cereal fiber (g/d) | 12.0 | 8.0 | 15.6 | < 0.001 | 7.6 | 18.0 | < 0.001 | 8.0 | 17.5 | < 0.001 |
| Na (mg/d) | 5413.2 | 4349.7 | 6434.1 | < 0.001 | 4305.1 | 6709.1 | < 0.001 | 4510.1 | 6358.2 | < 0.001 |
| K (mg/d) | 1690.7 | 1258.9 | 2233.6 | < 0.001 | 1178.6 | 2312.1 | < 0.001 | 1169.9 | 2318.5 | < 0.001 |
| Cholesterol (g/d) | 261.4 | 198.9 | 342.4 | < 0.001 | 226.5 | 286.1 | < 0.001 | 180.8 | 328.3 | < 0.001 |
BMI, body mass index; SFA, Saturated fatty acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated fatty acids.
1Data are expressed as mean values for continuous variables or percentage (%) for categorical variables.
The t-test is used for the continuous variables with normal distribution. The non-parametric test is applied to the continuous variables with non-normal distribution, and the chi-square test is used for the classified variables.
Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of stroke according to quartiles of dietary calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus intakes
| Dietary nutrition intake | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q 1 (low) | Q 2 | Q 3 | Q 4 (high) | ||
| Median intake (mg/d) | 222 | 321 | 413 | 677 | |
| Person-years | 5748 | 6705 | 6770 | 6021 | |
| Stroke cases (n) | 52 | 51 | 43 | 33 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.87 (0.59, 1.28) | 0.72 (0.48, 1.08) | 0.59 (0.38, 0.92) | 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.90 (0.60, 1.35) | 0.65 (0.42, 1.02) | 0.59 (0.37, 0.94) | 0.02 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.87 (0.57, 1.34) | 0.66 (0.41, 1.07) | 0.53 (0.29, 0.96) | 0.03 |
| Median intake (mg/d) | 200 | 265 | 320 | 443 | |
| Person-years | 5466 | 6625 | 6798 | 6356 | |
| Stroke cases (n) | 53 | 39 | 41 | 46 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.66 (0.43, 1.00) | 0.70 (0.46, 1.06) | 0.77 (0.51, 1.17) | 0.43 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.69 (0.44, 1.07) | 0.72 (0.46, 1.12) | 0.96 (0.62, 1.48) | 0.85 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.76 (0.47, 1.21) | 0.78 (0.47, 1.31) | 0.97 (0.51, 1.85) | 0.90 |
| Median intake (mg/d) | 667 | 875 | 1043 | 1393 | |
| Person-years | 5732 | 6618 | 6722 | 6172 | |
| Stroke cases (n) | 61 | 46 | 28 | 44 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 (0.48, 1.04) | 0.41 (0.26, 0.64) | 0.67 (0.45, 1.01) | 0.05 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.75 (0.49, 1.12) | 0.41 (0.25, 0.66) | 0.80 (0.52, 1.24) | 0.26 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.84 (0.53, 1.31) | 0.47 (0.26, 0.85) | 0.92 (0.41, 2.03) | 0.82 |
1Tests for trend were conducted by modeling the median of each quartile-defined category as a continuous variable in Cox proportional hazards models.
Model 1, adjusted for age and sex.
Model 2, further adjusted for urbanization index, education, household income, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, and medication use based on model 1.
Model 3, further adjusted for energy, whole grain, red meat, fruits, vegetables, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, cereal fiber, Na, K, and cholesterol intakes based on model 2.
Stratified hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals)1 of stroke according to quartiles of dietary calcium intake by various characteristics of participants.
| Dietary calcium intake | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q 1 (low) | Q 2 | Q 3 | Q 4 (high) | |||
| Man | 1.00 | 0.53 (0.31, 0.91) | 0.53 (0.29, 0.97) | 0.33 (0.15, 0.76) | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Women | 1.00 | 1.95 (0.92, 4.14) | 0.93 (0.38, 2.35) | 1.24 (0.46, 3.35) | 0.89 | |
| < 60 | 1.00 | 0.68 (0.37, 1.27) | 0.59 (0.28, 1.24) | 0.28 (0.09, 0.80) | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| ≥ 60 | 1.00 | 1.09 (0.59, 2.00) | 0.73 (0.36, 1.48) | 0.90 (0.39, 2.06) | 0.66 | |
| Yes | 1.00 | 0.82 (0.41, 1.61) | 0.81 (0.37, 1.77) | 0.93 (0.37, 2.32) | 0.95 | 0.99 |
| No | 1.00 | 0.90 (0.51, 1.59) | 0.59 (0.31, 1.13) | 0.30 (0.12, 0.74) | 0.01 | |
| Yes | 1.00 | 0.63 (0.31, 1.30) | 0.64 (0.29, 1.43) | 0.39 (0.14, 1.18) | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| No | 1.00 | 1.02 (0.59, 1.74) | 0.62 (0.32, 1.18) | 0.58 (0.26, 1.27) | 0.11 | |
| < 24 | 1.00 | 0.69 (0.37, 1.30) | 0.66 (0.33, 1.32) | 0.53 (0.20, 1.38) | 0.21 | 0.87 |
| 24 ~ 28 | 1.00 | 0.88 (0.57, 1.34) | 0.78 (0.48, 1.26) | 0.59 (0.32, 1.09) | 0.09 | |
| > 28 | 1.00 | 1.27 (0.47, 3.41) | 0.98 (0.31, 3.08) | 1.12 (0.27, 4.64) | 0.97 | |
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.23 (0.70, 2.13) | 0.62 (0.31, 1.24) | 0.80 (0.36, 1.76) | 0.33 | 0.85 |
| No | 1.00 | 0.45 (0.22, 0.93) | 0.55 (0.26, 1.17) | 0.18 (0.06, 0.57) | 0.01 | |
| Diabetes | ||||||
| Yes | 1.00 | 0.41 (0.15, 1.23) | 0.48 (0.21, 1.15) | 0.26 (0.17, 0.93) | 0.67 | 0.89 |
| No | 1.00 | 0.83 (0.54, 1.29) | 0.60 (0.36, 1.00) | 0.46 (0.23, 0.89) | 0.02 | |
| Yes | 1.00 | 0.68 (0.33, 1.25) | 0.78 (0.37, 1.44) | 0.59 (0.18, 1.24) | 0.23 | 0.33 |
| No | 1.00 | 0.87 (0.56, 1.35) | 0.66 (0.39, 1.09) | 0.52 (0.27, 1.00) | 0.04 | |
1Covariates: age (continuous), sex (men/woman), urbanization index (low, medium, high), education (primary, secondary, college/university), household income (low, middle, high), smoking status (yes/no), alcohol intake (yes/no), physical activity levels (light, moderate, vigorous), BMI (< 24, 24–28, or > 28 kg/m2), hypertension (yes/no), diabetes (yes/no), myocardial infarction (yes/no), medication use (yes/no), energy, whole grain, red meat, fruits, vegetables, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, cereal fiber, Na, K and cholesterol intakes (continuous), except for the stratifying variables per se.
2P for trend values were calculated by modeling the median of each quartile-defined category as a continuous variable in the model.
3P for interaction values were calculated using the likelihood-ratio test.
4In the stratified analysis, characteristics of participants at baseline were used for stratification and adjustment.