Literature DB >> 34050041

Patient specific, imaging-informed modeling of rhenium-186 nanoliposome delivery via convection-enhanced delivery in glioblastoma multiforme.

Ryan T Woodall1, David A Hormuth Ii2,3, Chengyue Wu2, Michael R A Abdelmalik2,4, William T Phillips5, Ande Bao6,7, Thomas J R Hughes2,8, Andrew J Brenner9, Thomas E Yankeelov1,2,10,3,11,12.   

Abstract

Convection-enhanced delivery of rhenium-186 (186Re)-nanoliposomes is a promising approach to provide precise delivery of large localized doses of radiation for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Current approaches for treatment planning utilizing convection-enhanced delivery are designed for small molecule drugs and not for larger particles such as186Re-nanoliposomes. To enable the treatment planning for186Re-nanoliposomes delivery, we have developed a computational fluid dynamics approach to predict the distribution of nanoliposomes for individual patients. In this work, we construct, calibrate, and validate a family of computational fluid dynamics models to predict the spatio-temporal distribution of186Re-nanoliposomes within the brain, utilizing patient-specific pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assign material properties for an advection-diffusion transport model. The model family is calibrated to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images acquired during and after the infusion of186Re-nanoliposomes for five patients enrolled in a Phase I/II trial (NCT Number NCT01906385), and is validated using a leave-one-out bootstrapping methodology for predicting the final distribution of the particles. After calibration, our models are capable of predicting the mid-delivery and final spatial distribution of186Re-nanoliposomes with a Dice value of 0.69 ± 0.18 and a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.88 ± 0.12 (mean ± 95% confidence interval), using only the patient-specific, pre-operative MRI data, and calibrated model parameters from prior patients. These results demonstrate a proof-of-concept for a patient-specific modeling framework, which predicts the spatial distribution of nanoparticles. Further development of this approach could enable optimizing catheter placement for future studies employing convection-enhanced delivery.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational fluid dynamics; computational oncology; convection-enhanced delivery; glioblastoma multiforme; radiation therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050041      PMCID: PMC9332136          DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac02a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express        ISSN: 2057-1976


  31 in total

1.  Analysis of a simulation algorithm for direct brain drug delivery.

Authors:  Kathryn Hammond Rosenbluth; Jan Felix Eschermann; Gabriele Mittermeyer; Rowena Thomson; Stephan Mittermeyer; Krystof S Bankiewicz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Multimodal image driven patient specific tumor growth modeling.

Authors:  Yixun Liu; Samira M Sadowski; Allison B Weisbrod; Electron Kebebew; Ronald M Summers; Jianhua Yao
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

4.  Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.

Authors:  K Yamaoka; T Nakagawa; T Uno
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-04

5.  Phase III randomized trial of CED of IL13-PE38QQR vs Gliadel wafers for recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sandeep Kunwar; Susan Chang; Manfred Westphal; Michael Vogelbaum; John Sampson; Gene Barnett; Mark Shaffrey; Zvi Ram; Joseph Piepmeier; Michael Prados; David Croteau; Christoph Pedain; Pamela Leland; Syed R Husain; Bharat H Joshi; Raj K Puri
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Management of Glioblastoma, Present and Future.

Authors:  Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Mathematical model of the effect of interstitial fluid pressure on angiogenic behavior in solid tumors.

Authors:  Colin Phipps; Mohammad Kohandel
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Diffusion MRI quality control and functional diffusion map results in ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625: a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Eunhee Kim; Davis C Woodworth; Helga Marques; Jerrold L Boxerman; Yair Safriel; Robert C McKinstry; Felix Bokstein; Rajan Jain; T Linda Chi; A Gregory Sorensen; Mark R Gilbert; Daniel P Barboriak
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 9.  User's guide to correlation coefficients.

Authors:  Haldun Akoglu
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-07

10.  Glioblastoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Hiroaki Wakimoto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  3 in total

1.  Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Antiangiogenic Drugs and Liposomal Cytotoxic Drugs to Heterogeneous Brain Tumor for Combination Therapy.

Authors:  Ajay Bhandari; Kartikey Jaiswal; Anup Singh; Wenbo Zhan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Guillermo Lorenzo; David A Hormuth; Ernesto A B F Lima; Kalina P Slavkova; Julie C DiCarlo; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Debra Patt; Caroline Chung; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 3.  Rhenium Radioisotopes for Medicine, a Focus on Production and Applications.

Authors:  Licia Uccelli; Petra Martini; Luca Urso; Teresa Ghirardi; Lorenza Marvelli; Corrado Cittanti; Aldo Carnevale; Melchiore Giganti; Mirco Bartolomei; Alessandra Boschi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.