Renske Altena1,2, Laila Hubbert3, Narsis A Kiani4, Yvonne Wengström5, Jonas Bergh4,6, Elham Hedayati4,6. 1. Department of Oncology and Pathology Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. renske.altena@ki.se. 2. Medical Unit breast, endocrine tumours and sarcoma, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Solna, Sweden. renske.altena@ki.se. 3. Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden. 4. Department of Oncology and Pathology Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Medical Unit breast, endocrine tumours and sarcoma, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Solna, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment-related morbidity relevantly compromises health status in cancer survivors, and efforts to optimise health-related outcomes in this population are vital to maximising healthy survivorship. A pre-treatment assessment - and possibly preventive management strategies - of cancer patients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) seems a rational approach in this regard. Definitive evidence for such strategies is largely lacking, thereby impeding the formulation of firm recommendations. RESULTS: The current scoping review aims to summarise and grade the evidence regarding strategies for prediction and prevention of CVD in adults in relation to oncological treatments. We conducted a scoping literature search for different strategies for primary prevention, such as medical and lifestyle interventions, as well as the use of predictive risk scores. We identified studies with moderate to good strength and up to now limited evidence to recommend primary preventive strategies in unselected patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic oncologic therapies. CONCLUSION: Efforts to minimize the CVD burden in cancer survivors are needed to accomplish healthy survivorship. This can be done by means of robust models predictive for CVD events or application of interventions during or after oncological treatments. Up to now there is insufficient evidence to implement preventive strategies in an unselected group of patients treated with potential cardiotoxic oncological treatments. We conclude that randomised controlled trials are needed that evaluate medical and lifestyle interventions in groups at increased risk for complications, in order to be able to influence chronic illness risks, such as cardiovascular complications, for cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND:Cancer treatment-related morbidity relevantly compromises health status in cancer survivors, and efforts to optimise health-related outcomes in this population are vital to maximising healthy survivorship. A pre-treatment assessment - and possibly preventive management strategies - of cancerpatients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) seems a rational approach in this regard. Definitive evidence for such strategies is largely lacking, thereby impeding the formulation of firm recommendations. RESULTS: The current scoping review aims to summarise and grade the evidence regarding strategies for prediction and prevention of CVD in adults in relation to oncological treatments. We conducted a scoping literature search for different strategies for primary prevention, such as medical and lifestyle interventions, as well as the use of predictive risk scores. We identified studies with moderate to good strength and up to now limited evidence to recommend primary preventive strategies in unselected patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic oncologic therapies. CONCLUSION: Efforts to minimize the CVD burden in cancer survivors are needed to accomplish healthy survivorship. This can be done by means of robust models predictive for CVD events or application of interventions during or after oncological treatments. Up to now there is insufficient evidence to implement preventive strategies in an unselected group of patients treated with potential cardiotoxic oncological treatments. We conclude that randomised controlled trials are needed that evaluate medical and lifestyle interventions in groups at increased risk for complications, in order to be able to influence chronic illness risks, such as cardiovascular complications, for cancer survivors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer survivor; Cardiotoxicity; Evidence-based; Exercise; Lifestyle; Prevention
Authors: Carolyn Taylor; Candace Correa; Frances K Duane; Marianne C Aznar; Stewart J Anderson; Jonas Bergh; David Dodwell; Marianne Ewertz; Richard Gray; Reshma Jagsi; Lori Pierce; Kathleen I Pritchard; Sandra Swain; Zhe Wang; Yaochen Wang; Tim Whelan; Richard Peto; Paul McGale Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edoardo Colzani; Annelie Liljegren; Anna L V Johansson; Jan Adolfsson; Henrik Hellborg; Per F L Hall; Kamila Czene Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Curigliano; H J Burstein; E P Winer; M Gnant; P Dubsky; S Loibl; M Colleoni; M M Regan; M Piccart-Gebhart; H-J Senn; B Thürlimann; F André; J Baselga; J Bergh; H Bonnefoi; S Y Brucker; F Cardoso; L Carey; E Ciruelos; J Cuzick; C Denkert; A Di Leo; B Ejlertsen; P Francis; V Galimberti; J Garber; B Gulluoglu; P Goodwin; N Harbeck; D F Hayes; C-S Huang; J Huober; K Hussein; J Jassem; Z Jiang; P Karlsson; M Morrow; R Orecchia; K C Osborne; O Pagani; A H Partridge; K Pritchard; J Ro; E J T Rutgers; F Sedlmayer; V Semiglazov; Z Shao; I Smith; M Toi; A Tutt; G Viale; T Watanabe; T J Whelan; B Xu Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: György Fogarassy; Ágnes Vathy-Fogarassy; István Kenessey; Miklós Kásler; Tamás Forster Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Cathee Till; Sherry Shen; Jason D Wright; Scott D Ramsey; William E Barlow; Joseph M Unger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 44.544