Emma Condy1, Aaron J Kaat2, Lindsey Becker3, Nancy Sullivan4, Latha Soorya5, Natalie Berger5, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis5, Claire Michalak5, Audrey Thurm6. 1. National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States. 2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States. 3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, United States. 4. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States. 5. Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States. 6. National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: athurm@mail.nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many cognitive tests assess a limited developmental span, making longitudinal measurement for trials aimed at improving cognition challenging. Tests targeting transitional skills, which integrate foundational abilities into complex schemas, may be amenable to assessment across a wide developmental span. Furthermore, tablet-based tests permit computer adaptive testing (CAT), which is psychometrically more efficient and could increase testing motivation, especially for children with developmental delays. Such measures may be useful for research and clinical practice. AIMS: Outline the creation of a novel, tablet-based concept formation test, and evaluate its feasibility in individuals with mental ages less than 24-months. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Item generation, user interface construction, and pre-piloting were conducted in consultation with subject matter experts. Item content and interface parameters underwent iterative revisions, resulting in the pilot test. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: We created and piloted a tablet-based test of concept formation suitable for CAT-based administration with items of increasing difficulty based on target salience. We show feasibility in individuals with mental ages less than 24-months-old. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Tablet-based assessment of concept formation may be a useful outcome measure of an aspect of cognitive ability in young children. Future work will address optimizing the user interface and developing CAT administration. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Many cognitive tests assess a limited developmental span, making longitudinal measurement for trials aimed at improving cognition challenging. Tests targeting transitional skills, which integrate foundational abilities into complex schemas, may be amenable to assessment across a wide developmental span. Furthermore, tablet-based tests permit computer adaptive testing (CAT), which is psychometrically more efficient and could increase testing motivation, especially for children with developmental delays. Such measures may be useful for research and clinical practice. AIMS: Outline the creation of a novel, tablet-based concept formation test, and evaluate its feasibility in individuals with mental ages less than 24-months. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Item generation, user interface construction, and pre-piloting were conducted in consultation with subject matter experts. Item content and interface parameters underwent iterative revisions, resulting in the pilot test. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: We created and piloted a tablet-based test of concept formation suitable for CAT-based administration with items of increasing difficulty based on target salience. We show feasibility in individuals with mental ages less than 24-months-old. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Tablet-based assessment of concept formation may be a useful outcome measure of an aspect of cognitive ability in young children. Future work will address optimizing the user interface and developing CAT administration. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognitive development; Concept formation; Early childhood
Authors: Sandra Weintraub; Patricia J Bauer; Philip David Zelazo; Kathleen Wallner-Allen; Sureyya S Dikmen; Robert K Heaton; David S Tulsky; Jerry Slotkin; David L Blitz; Noelle E Carlozzi; Richard J Havlik; Jennifer L Beaumont; Dan Mungas; Jennifer J Manly; Beth G Borosh; Cindy J Nowinski; Richard C Gershon Journal: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev Date: 2013-08
Authors: Dorene M Rentz; Maria Dekhtyar; Julia Sherman; Samantha Burnham; Deborah Blacker; Sarah L Aghjayan; Kathryn V Papp; Rebecca E Amariglio; Adrian Schembri; Tanya Chenhall; Paul Maruff; Paul Aisen; Bradley T Hyman; Reisa A Sperling Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-03
Authors: Stephanie M Sansone; Andrea Schneider; Erika Bickel; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Christina Prescott; David Hessl Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Rebecca H Shields; Aaron J Kaat; Forrest J McKenzie; Andrea Drayton; Stephanie M Sansone; Jeanine Coleman; Claire Michalak; Karen Riley; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Richard C Gershon; Keith F Widaman; David Hessl Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 11.800