| Literature DB >> 34048834 |
Shadpour Mallakpour1, Elham Azadi2, Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain3.
Abstract
Pathogen transmission is a widespread threat to global human health. Vaccines are very important during the outbreak of a pandemic. Destructive fractures caused by a sudden outbreak of COVID-19 have spurred vaccine production at an unprecedented rate. The strategy of an effective vaccine delivery system is opening up novel probabilities to make more immunization. Indeed, vaccination is the most successful way to prevent deaths from infectious diseases. In order to optimal immune response production or improvement in the effectiveness of vaccines, delivery systems or adjuvants are required. Natural polymers such as chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid, gums, and β-glucan with antiviral activity have good potential as adjuvant or delivery systems for vaccine formulation development and design vaccine delivery devices. According to the antiviral performance and immunomodulation of these biopolymers, they will play significant characters in the anti-COVID-19 field. In this mini-review, the recent progress in vaccine development by using biopolymers is presented which, provides a reference for their research on anti-COVID-19 drugs and vaccines.Entities:
Keywords: Alginate; Chitosan; Gums; Hyaluronic acid; Vaccines; β-Glucan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34048834 PMCID: PMC8146404 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Macromol ISSN: 0141-8130 Impact factor: 6.953
Fig. 1The proposed mechanisms of polysaccharides anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Reproduced with permission from ref [13] Copyright 2020 Elsevier).
Fig. 2Proposed β-chitosan and quaternized ammonium chitosan derivatives preventing the SARS-CoV-2 infection by inhibiting the binding of spike protein to ACE2 receptors (recognized as primary receptor for SARS-CoV-2 binding). Alongside, interaction of ACE2 to receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 has been displayed (Reproduced with permission from ref [20] Copyright 2021 Elsevier).
Fig. 3A, DNA vaccine induction of humoral and cellular mucosal immune response. 1 transfection of epithelial cell 2 expression of S1 protein, 3 secretion of S1 protein, 4 S1 protein taken up by M cells, 5 transported to immune cells with 6 uptake by dendritic cells and MHC II antigen presentation to T-cells with subsequent draining into lymph node stimulating humoral response. 8. MHC 1 presentation stimulated cytotoxic lymphocyte response. B, DNA vaccine treatment with secreted S1 spike protein acting as a competitive antagonist by interfering with the coronavirus binding to ACE2 receptors. 1 transfected cell 2.expression of S1 protein, 3 secretion of the S1 protein, and 4 ACE2 receptor blockade by S1 protein preventing SARS-CoV-2 from binding to ACE2 receptor (Reproduced with permission from ref [28] Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons).
Fig. 4Schematic representation of chitosan based nanoparticle used for delivering bacterial and viral vaccine to mucosal sites of poultry and pigs, and the vaccine induced mucosal immune responses [31].
Fig. 5a: Anchoring of LPS with chitosan nanoparticles using the layer-by-layer (LbL) technique, b: TEM images of chitosan nanoparticles: (A) LPS-HB-ACNPs; (B) ACNPs (Reproduced with permission from ref [27] Copyright 2020 Elsevier).
Fig. 6A: The working principle of drug-coated IRMNs. (a) Application of drug-coated IRMNs into skin. (b) Embedment of tips in the skin upon removal of bases. (c) Rapid dissolution of the drug-containing coating layer. (d) Complete dissolution of the tips. B: Optical images of vaccine-coated IRMNs. (a) IRMNs before insertion. (b) IRMNs after insertion showing successful separation of tips. (c) The site of IRMNs insertion on the guinea pig skin (Reproduced with permission from ref [42] Copyright 2018 Elsevier).
Fig. 7Schematic illustration of the proposed dual targeting aminated b-glucan nanoparticles for induction of antigen specific immunity. Firstly, b-glucan was aminated, and then the nanoparticles were made from aminated b-glucan, CpG-OND and OVA by ionic complexation method. Having been vaccinated, the nanoparticles were internalized by APCs, and the uptake of the nanoparticles was mediated by dectin-1. Then, the nanoparticles were unfolded in acidic environment of endosome/lysosome, resulting in CpG-OND and OVA released from the nanoparticles. CpG-OND was recognized by TLR9 on endosome/lysosome. OVA in endosome/lysosome was loaded into MHC II where it can be presented to CD4+ through specific interaction with TCR on CD4+, inducing Th1 and Th2 responses. Th1 responses further promoted CTL responses. The OVA delivered to cytosol was loaded into MHC I where it can be presented to CD8+ through specific interaction with TCR on CD8+, inducing CTL responses. Synergistic stimulation of APCs by dectin-1 and TLR9 resulted in upregulation of Th1 cytokines and chemokines. Th1 cells and CTLs induced cellular immunity. Meanwhile, Th2 cells induced humoral immunity. The specific interaction of costimulatory molecules (CD80/CD86) on APCs with CD28 on CD4+/CD8+ was essential for induction of antigen specific immunity, and the expression levels of costimulatory molecules were also enhanced by synergistic stimulation of APCs by dectin-1 and TLR9 (Reproduced with permission from ref [50] Copyright 2018 Elsevier).
Application of chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid, gums, and β-glucan as potent adjuvants and vaccine delivery systems.
| Ref | Results | vaccine adjuvants for: | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 65–73.9% encapsulation efficiency, 27.7–67.5% loading capacity, sustained-release | Hepatitis E virus | Chitosan/truncated capsid protein p146 nanoparticles |
| [ | Great antigen loading, remarkable stability, and enhanced immunogenicity effect | Hepatitis B virus | Chitosan/polyethylene glycol nanocomposite |
| [ | Inexpensive antagonist toward attachment of coronavirus host cells | SARS-CoV-2 virus | Chitosan-coated DNA vaccine |
| [ | Vaccines prepared with the help of alginate/chitosan improved the immunity (antibody levels were increased) | Hepatitis A virus | Alum-, chitosan-, and alginate/chitosan-based vaccine |
| [ | The less expensive vaccine was prepared with a strong impact on the immune response | Hepatitis B virus | Chitosan/alginate |
| [ | Higher immunogenic response for alginate/chitosan-based vaccine compared to Alum-adjuvanted | Alginate/chitosan | |
| [ | Strong humoral and cellular immune response was observed | Influenza virus | Alginate nanoparticles |
| [ | High immunogenicity was observed after injection | Hepatitis B virus | Alginate/chitosan |
| [ | Improvement in immune response | Influenza virus | Trimethylchitosan/alginate |
| [ | Improvement in immune response | H1N1 influenza virus | Alginate |
| [ | Good potential for delivery of vaccine in oral mucosal immunization | Hepatitis B virus | Alginate |
| [ | Increase immunity and the ability to protect against viral infection. | Influenza virus | Hyaluronic acid |
| [ | Safety of adjuvant for mucosal influenza vaccination | Influenza virus | Hyaluronic acid |
| [ | Release the drug properly without fracture | Influenza virus | Hyaluronic acid and polycaprolactone |
| [ | Higher antibody IgG1 production compared to controls | Influenza virus | Xanthan gum/ovalbumin antigen |
| [ | Acceptable increase in level of antibodies | DNA vaccine | Xanthan gum |
| [ | and reduces in the incidence of influenza | Influenza virus | Partially hydrolyzed guar gum |
| [ | Better immunity and fewer clinical symptoms | Infectious bursal disease virus | Natural gums ( |
| [ | Strong immune responses (humoral and cellular) without toxicity | – | Aminated β-glucan |
| [ | Antibodies produced by chitosan: glucan was higher than others | Hepatitis B virus | Chitosan and glucan |