Literature DB >> 34047475

A genome-wide association study identifies novel association between genetic variants in GGT7 and LINC00944 and hypertension.

Chengcheng Tan1, Hongfu Zhang1, Dong Yu1, Yao Hu2, Pengxia Wang1, Dan Wang1, Jingjing Fa1, Han Ran1, Xiaoyu Zhang1, Yanming Chen3, Weixi Qin1,4, Chen Fang1, Tie Ke1, Nianguo Dong5, Jianping Cai6, Qing He7, Shaofeng Huo2, Junhan Wang3, Xiang Ren1, Xin Tu1, Xu Lin8,2, Qing Wang1, Chengqi Xu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047475      PMCID: PMC8140186          DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Med        ISSN: 2001-1326


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Hypertension affects one billion people in the world. Half of the Chinese population aged from 35 to 75 years is also affected with hypertension. Genetic factors contribute to hypertension. Different ethnic populations share some common genetic factors; however, population‐specific genetic factors also play important roles in common complex diseases in different ethnic populations. Most genome wide association study (GWAS) for blood pressure have been reported in European ancestry populations; thus, much more GWAS are needed for hypertension in non‐European ancestry populations, including the Chinese population. We designed a three‐phase GWAS as reported previously to identify novel genomic variants conferring risk to hypertension in the Chinese Han population. The overall study design is shown in Figure 1A. Genotyping, imputation, and principal component analyses were conducted in phase 1 GWAS samples with 353 cases with hypertension and 332 controls without hypertension (Figure S1). After quality control, 3,956,088 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed for their association with hypertension with adjustment of age, age2, gender, and the first three principal components (Figure S2). A total of 17,435 SNPs showing p value of <5.0 × 10–3 were selected for the phase 2 in silico replication study using GWAS summary data from the NHAPC cohort (1592 cases and 1302 controls). One hundred thirty‐six SNPs clustering into 15 independent loci (Table S2) showed nominal association with hypertension (p < 5 × 10–3). Sixteen leading SNPs representing 15 loci were selected for replication in the phase 3 population containing 3274 cases and 2734 controls. Fourteen SNPs at 13 loci were genotyped successfully (two of 16 SNPs failed in genotyping). Two SNPs, including rs10847208 in the last exon of a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) gene LINC00944 on 12q24.32 and rs2064453 in the promoter of GGT7 encoding gamma‐glutamyltransferase 7 on 20q11.22, showed significant association with hypertension with P adj of 3.31 × 10–3 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20) and 2.98 × 10–3 (OR = 1.14), respectively, after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (Figure 1B, Table S3). Analysis of the GWAS summary statistics for hypertension in the UK Biobank (https://pan.ukbb.broadinstitute.org.) showed that rs2064453 was associated with essential hypertension in the East Asian population (p = 0.004) and the European population (p = 0.01). SNP rs2064453 also showed positive association with diastolic blood pressure in 417,003 European individuals (p = 0.0055 with combined_medadj_raw).
FIGURE 1

Overall GWAS design and identification of two new loci for hypertension in a Chinese population. (A) Overall design of a three‐stage GWAS for hypertension in a Chinese population (discovery‐GeneID‐I, replication‐NHAPC, and validation‐GeneID‐II). (B) Association signals are shown for each of three Chinese populations GeneID‐I, NHAPC, and GeneID‐II. Abbreviations: CI, confident interval; OR, odds ratio

Overall GWAS design and identification of two new loci for hypertension in a Chinese population. (A) Overall design of a three‐stage GWAS for hypertension in a Chinese population (discovery‐GeneID‐I, replication‐NHAPC, and validation‐GeneID‐II). (B) Association signals are shown for each of three Chinese populations GeneID‐I, NHAPC, and GeneID‐II. Abbreviations: CI, confident interval; OR, odds ratio SNP rs2064453 is located within a CpG island in the promoter of GGT7 and in a DNase I Hypersensitivity Peak Cluster (Figure 2A). From the GTEx data, the TT and TC genotypes of rs2064453 showed significantly higher expression of GGT7 than the CC genotype in 12 tissues. We also performed eQTL (expression quantitative trait locus) analysis in blood leucocytes from 309 Chinese study subjects, and significant eQTL was identified between rs2064453 and GGT7 under a dominant model (TT+TC > CC, p = 0.003), an additive model (TT > TC/CC, p = 0.001), and a recessive model (TT > TC+CC, p = 0.018) after adjusting for age and gender (Figures 2B–2D). The data suggest that risk allele T of rs2064453 increases risk of hypertension by increasing the expression level of GGT7. SNP rs2064453 did not show association with the expression levels of nearby genes, including GSS, ACSS2, MAP1LC3A, and NCOA6 (Figure S3). To determine how risk allele T of rs2064453 increases the expression level of GGT7, we cloned a 2 kb GGT7 promoter and regulatory region containing either the C allele or T allele of rs2064453 into the pGL3‐basic luciferase reporter vector (Figure 2E). Luciferase assays showed that the T allele had a significantly higher luciferase activity than the C allele (Figure 2F). Together with the eQTL data, these data suggest that risk allele T of rs2064453 can increase expression of GGT7 by enhancing the transcription activation of GGT7.
FIGURE 2

Risk allele T of the lead variant rs2064453 at the new hypertension locus on chromosome 20q11.22 shows association with upregulation of GGT7 and significantly increases transcription activation from GGT7 promoter. (A) SNP rs2064453 is located within a CpG island in the promoter/regulatory region of GGT7, and a DNase I Hypersensitivity Peak Cluster (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi‐bin/hgTrackUi?db = hg19&g = wgEncodeRegTfbsClusteredV3). (B‐D) Significant eQTL of variant rs2064453 with GGT7 under an additive, dominant, or recessive model. The number of study subjects is indicated with N. (E) Luciferase reports pGL3‐Basic‐rs2064453‐T and pGL3‐Basic‐rs2064453‐C with the 2040 bp GGT7 promoter/regulatory region with wither risk allele T and allele C cloned upstream of the firefly luciferase gene in the pGL3‐basic vector. SNP rs2064453 is located at ‐166 bp from the transcriptional start site (TSS) of GGT7 gene. (F) Luciferase assays showing that risk allele T of rs2064453 promotes a significantly more transcription activation than allele C (n = 23). Empty pGL3‐basic vector was used as a negative control. **p < 0.01. Line is for mean with SD. p value of B‐D was obtained by linear regression after adjustment with age and gender. p value of F was obtained by Student's t test

Risk allele T of the lead variant rs2064453 at the new hypertension locus on chromosome 20q11.22 shows association with upregulation of GGT7 and significantly increases transcription activation from GGT7 promoter. (A) SNP rs2064453 is located within a CpG island in the promoter/regulatory region of GGT7, and a DNase I Hypersensitivity Peak Cluster (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi‐bin/hgTrackUi?db = hg19&g = wgEncodeRegTfbsClusteredV3). (B‐D) Significant eQTL of variant rs2064453 with GGT7 under an additive, dominant, or recessive model. The number of study subjects is indicated with N. (E) Luciferase reports pGL3‐Basic‐rs2064453‐T and pGL3‐Basic‐rs2064453‐C with the 2040 bp GGT7 promoter/regulatory region with wither risk allele T and allele C cloned upstream of the firefly luciferase gene in the pGL3‐basic vector. SNP rs2064453 is located at ‐166 bp from the transcriptional start site (TSS) of GGT7 gene. (F) Luciferase assays showing that risk allele T of rs2064453 promotes a significantly more transcription activation than allele C (n = 23). Empty pGL3‐basic vector was used as a negative control. **p < 0.01. Line is for mean with SD. p value of B‐D was obtained by linear regression after adjustment with age and gender. p value of F was obtained by Student's t test GGT7 encodes an extracellular gamma‐glutamyl transferase and acts as an extracellular enzyme. Thus, we purified 6xHis‐tagged GGT7 protein and used it to treat endothelial cells (EA.hy926). Compared with control, 30 min treatment with the GGT7 protein significantly reduced the level of phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in endothelial cells (Figures 3A and 3B). Moreover, GGT7 treatment consistently reduced ERK1/2 activation at different time points of 0.5, 2, 7, 22, 27, and 31 h (Figures 3C and 3D). A recent finding showed that both the systolic and diastolic blood pressure was increased in mice deficient of Erk1 and Erk2 in endothelial cells. These data suggest that GGT7 variant rs2064453 increases risk of hypertension by reducing ERK1/2 activation.
FIGURE 3

GGT7 protein activates ERK1/2 signaling and identification of downstream genes regulated by GGT7. (A) Western blot analysis showing that treatment of EA.hy926 endothelial cells with the GGT7 protein for 30 min decreases ERK1/2 phosphorylation. (B) Western blot images as in (A) were scanned, quantified and plotted (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis showing that GGT7 consistently reduces ERK1/2 activation at different time points of 0.5, 2, 7, 22, 27, and 31 h. T‐ERK1/2, total ERK1/2; P‐ERK1/2, phosphorylated ERK1/2 at Thr202/Tyr204. (D) Western blot images as in (C) were scanned, quantified, and plotted (n = 3). (E) Real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) analysis showing successful knockdown of GGT7 by transient transfection of EA.hy926 ECs with GGT7 siRNA (GGT7‐si) compared with negative control siRNA (NC‐si) (n = 6). (F) Real‐time RT‐PCR analysis showing that knockdown of GGT7 expression significantly increased the expression of MAPKAP1, PIGU, PNKD, PPP6C, PRPF40B, and UQCC1. (G) Summary data from real‐time RT‐PCR analysis as in (F). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Line is for mean with SD. p value was obtained by Student's t test

GGT7 protein activates ERK1/2 signaling and identification of downstream genes regulated by GGT7. (A) Western blot analysis showing that treatment of EA.hy926 endothelial cells with the GGT7 protein for 30 min decreases ERK1/2 phosphorylation. (B) Western blot images as in (A) were scanned, quantified and plotted (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis showing that GGT7 consistently reduces ERK1/2 activation at different time points of 0.5, 2, 7, 22, 27, and 31 h. T‐ERK1/2, total ERK1/2; P‐ERK1/2, phosphorylated ERK1/2 at Thr202/Tyr204. (D) Western blot images as in (C) were scanned, quantified, and plotted (n = 3). (E) Real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) analysis showing successful knockdown of GGT7 by transient transfection of EA.hy926 ECs with GGT7 siRNA (GGT7‐si) compared with negative control siRNA (NC‐si) (n = 6). (F) Real‐time RT‐PCR analysis showing that knockdown of GGT7 expression significantly increased the expression of MAPKAP1, PIGU, PNKD, PPP6C, PRPF40B, and UQCC1. (G) Summary data from real‐time RT‐PCR analysis as in (F). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Line is for mean with SD. p value was obtained by Student's t test We also used HumanBase database to identify candidate genes whose expression or function is linked to GGT7 and validated them in EA.hy926 endothelial cells. Knockdown of GGT7 with siRNA affected the expression of MAPKAP1, PIGU, PNKD, PPP6C, PRPF40B, and UQCC1 (Figure 3). Importantly, knockdown of GGT7 significantly increased the expression level of PPP6C by 1.63 fold (p < 0.01) (Figure 3C). Recently, Li et al showed that conditional knockout mice for Ppp6c in T cells showed significantly increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure upon induction with angiotensin II. These data suggest that GGT7 variant rs2064453 increases risk of hypertension by reducing PPP6C expression, too. SNP rs10847208 shows a sQTL (splice quantitative trait locus) with LINC00944 (normalized effect size = 0.41, p = 7.8 × 10–7) in testes in the GTEx Portal database (Figure S3B). Meanwhile, we explored the effect of rs10847208 on a potential enhancer activity or binding of potential microRNA by cloning a 201 bp genomic DNA fragment with either allele C or T in the middle into pGL3‐promoter and pMIR luciferase reporter, respectively; however, no effect was observed for rs10847208 (Figures S3 and C‐F). Further studies are needed to determine how SNP rs10847208 increases risk of hypertension. The NHAPC cohort, that is, the phase 2 replication population for our GWAS, was also used as one of the six cohorts in a previous GWAS for blood pressure in the Chinese population by Lu et al. Comparison between the two GWAS identified one potential overlapping locus for hypertension at FSTL5. We found that SNP rs28587458 in intron 11 of FSTL5 showed positive association with hypertension in the discovery population (p = 3.7 × 10–3), the replication population (p = 4.1 × 10–3), and the combined population (p = 5.9 × 10–4) (Table S2). In the third validation population, although the allelic association was not significant, significant genotypic association was detected between SNP rs28587458 and hypertension under an autosomal recessive model (p = 8.13 × 10–4, Table S4). Our finding that FSTL5 is likely to be a possible susceptibility gene for hypertension is supported by the supplementary data in Table S7 in Lu et al : SNP rs12512822 in intron nine of FSTL5 and 37 kb from rs28587458 (r2 = 0.09, D’ = 0.31) showed suggestive association with blood pressure (p < 0.0001). FSTL5 encodes a secretory glycoprotein of Follistatin Like 5 that inhibits the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway, but its function in hypertension is not clear. One major limitation of the current study is the size of the phase 1 discovery population was small. Therefore, the phase 1 GWAS population may be underpowered. However, this limitation may be attenuated by a multi‐stage study design with the discovery phase study followed by two consecutive validation and replication studies. Another limitation is that the functional studies were performed in endothelial cells in vitro, and the results may need to be validated in animal models or human patients in vivo. In conclusion, our study identified two novel loci for hypertension, including SNP rs2064453 in the promoter of GGT7 and SNP rs10847208 in lncRNA gene LINC00943 LINC00944. Our data also provide mechanistic insights into the genetic mechanism of hypertension and suggest that the risk allele T of rs2064453 increases risk of hypertension by increasing the expression of GGT7, which leads to reduced ERK1/2 activation and decreased expression of PPP6C.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The studies were approved by the ethics committees of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health (CAS) and Beijing Hospital. The studies conformed to the guidelines set forth by the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from the participants.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This work was supported by the China National Natural Science Foundation grants (grant numbers: 81630002, 31671302, and 32070581).

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the public Locuszoom (http://locuszoom.sph.umich.edu/) (accession number: 936641; Study ID: GeneID). SUPPORTING INFORMATION Click here for additional data file.
  9 in total

1.  Down-regulated FSTL5 promotes cell proliferation and survival by affecting Wnt/β-catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dengyong Zhang; Xiang Ma; Wanliang Sun; Peiyuan Cui; Zheng Lu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  MicroRNA-31 Regulates Immunosuppression in Ang II (Angiotensin II)-induced Hypertension by Targeting Ppp6C (Protein Phosphatase 6c).

Authors:  Xiangxiao Li; Wei Cai; Wenda Xi; Weihong Sun; Weili Shen; Tong Wei; Xiaohui Chen; Libo Sun; Hong Zhou; Yang Sun; Wendong Chen; Pingjin Gao; Honglin Wang; Qun Li
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Genome-wide association identifies a susceptibility locus for coronary artery disease in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Fan Wang; Cheng-Qi Xu; Qing He; Jian-Ping Cai; Xiu-Chun Li; Dan Wang; Xin Xiong; Yu-Hua Liao; Qiu-Tang Zeng; Yan-Zong Yang; Xiang Cheng; Cong Li; Rong Yang; Chu-Chu Wang; Gang Wu; Qiu-Lun Lu; Ying Bai; Yu-Feng Huang; Dan Yin; Qing Yang; Xiao-Jing Wang; Da-Peng Dai; Rong-Feng Zhang; Jing Wan; Jiang-Hua Ren; Si-Si Li; Yuan-Yuan Zhao; Fen-Fen Fu; Yuan Huang; Qing-Xian Li; Sheng-Wei Shi; Nan Lin; Zhen-Wei Pan; Yue Li; Bo Yu; Yan-Xia Wu; Yu-He Ke; Jian Lei; Nan Wang; Chun-Yan Luo; Li-Ying Ji; Lian-Jun Gao; Lei Li; Hui Liu; Er-Wen Huang; Jin Cui; Na Jia; Xiang Ren; Hui Li; Tie Ke; Xian-Qin Zhang; Jing-Yu Liu; Mu-Gen Liu; Hao Xia; Bo Yang; Li-Song Shi; Yun-Long Xia; Xin Tu; Qing K Wang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Genome-wide association study in Chinese identifies novel loci for blood pressure and hypertension.

Authors:  Xiangfeng Lu; Laiyuan Wang; Xu Lin; Jianfeng Huang; C Charles Gu; Meian He; Hongbing Shen; Jiang He; Jingwen Zhu; Huaixing Li; James E Hixson; Tangchun Wu; Juncheng Dai; Ling Lu; Chong Shen; Shufeng Chen; Lin He; Zengnan Mo; Yongchen Hao; Xingbo Mo; Xueli Yang; Jianxin Li; Jie Cao; Jichun Chen; Zhongjie Fan; Ying Li; Liancheng Zhao; Hongfan Li; Fanghong Lu; Cailiang Yao; Lin Yu; Lihua Xu; Jianjun Mu; Xianping Wu; Ying Deng; Dongsheng Hu; Weidong Zhang; Xu Ji; Dongshuang Guo; Zhirong Guo; Zhengyuan Zhou; Zili Yang; Renping Wang; Jun Yang; Xiaoyang Zhou; Weili Yan; Ningling Sun; Pingjin Gao; Dongfeng Gu
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China: data from 1·7 million adults in a population-based screening study (China PEACE Million Persons Project).

Authors:  Jiapeng Lu; Yuan Lu; Xiaochen Wang; Xinyue Li; George C Linderman; Chaoqun Wu; Xiuyuan Cheng; Lin Mu; Haibo Zhang; Jiamin Liu; Meng Su; Hongyu Zhao; Erica S Spatz; John A Spertus; Frederick A Masoudi; Harlan M Krumholz; Lixin Jiang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Endothelial ERK1/2 signaling maintains integrity of the quiescent endothelium.

Authors:  Thomas W Chittenden; Michael Simons; Nicolas Ricard; Rizaldy P Scott; Carmen J Booth; Heino Velazquez; Nicholas A Cilfone; Javier L Baylon; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Susan E Quaggin
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  A genome-wide association study identifies GRK5 and RASGRP1 as type 2 diabetes loci in Chinese Hans.

Authors:  Huaixing Li; Wei Gan; Ling Lu; Xiao Dong; Xueyao Han; Cheng Hu; Zhen Yang; Liang Sun; Wei Bao; Pengtao Li; Meian He; Liangdan Sun; Yiqin Wang; Jingwen Zhu; Qianqian Ning; Yong Tang; Rong Zhang; Jie Wen; Di Wang; Xilin Zhu; Kunquan Guo; Xianbo Zuo; Xiaohui Guo; Handong Yang; Xianghai Zhou; Xuejun Zhang; Lu Qi; Ruth J F Loos; Frank B Hu; Tangchun Wu; Ying Liu; Liegang Liu; Ze Yang; Renming Hu; Weiping Jia; Linong Ji; Yixue Li; Xu Lin
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Deep learning sequence-based ab initio prediction of variant effects on expression and disease risk.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Chandra L Theesfeld; Kevin Yao; Kathleen M Chen; Aaron K Wong; Olga G Troyanskaya
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data.

Authors:  Clare Bycroft; Colin Freeman; Desislava Petkova; Gavin Band; Lloyd T Elliott; Kevin Sharp; Allan Motyer; Damjan Vukcevic; Olivier Delaneau; Jared O'Connell; Adrian Cortes; Samantha Welsh; Alan Young; Mark Effingham; Gil McVean; Stephen Leslie; Naomi Allen; Peter Donnelly; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.