Literature DB >> 34047452

SARS-CoV-2 first contact: Spike-ACE2 interactions in COVID-19.

Salvatore Nesci1.   

Abstract

The full-length human ACE2 in complex with B0 AT1 is anchored to two S in open pre-fusion state which allows establishing pre-invasion interactions with the ACE2 N-terminal domain.
© 2021 The Authors. Chemical Biology & Drug Design published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047452      PMCID: PMC8239675          DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des        ISSN: 1747-0277            Impact factor:   2.873


Nowadays, a severe acute respiratory syndrome and pneumonia named COVID‐19 has emerged as a serious pandemic (Wu et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020) caused by a new coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2; Wu et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020). Recently, the Cryo‐EM structure of three receptor‐binding domains (RBDs) of the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike (S) in receptor‐accessible conformation is obtained (Walls et al., 2020; Wrapp et al., 2020). Accordingly, the docking of RBD S onto the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2, known as ACE2, of host cells allows facing the therapeutic treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (Lan et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020). Indeed, the virus anchors the host cells by the interaction of the S protein with the human ACE2 receptor, triggering the pre/postfusion conformational change responsible for the virus entry into the host cell (Mercurio et al., 2021). Each protomer of S glycoprotein is composed of S1 and S2 subunits. The S1 subunit includes N‐terminal domain and the RBD bearing the receptor recognition/attachment site, and the S2 subunit includes the C‐terminal domain of glycoprotein responsible for viral and cellular membrane fusion. The S glycoprotein prefusion state undergoes conformational changes after a cleavage event, led by host proteases, occurring at the furin‐binding region. The furin cleavage site is located at the boundary between the S1 and S2 subunits. After protease cut, the S2 refolding induces S postfusion conformation. In the prefusion conformation, the three protomers of S undergo two different states with high flexibility (Mercurio et al., 2021). Indeed, the RBDs of the S1 subunit can move from ‘RBD down’ to ‘RBD up’ conformation. The former corresponds to the receptor‐inaccessible binding site, and the latter is the receptor‐accessible binding site. However, the predominant state of S glycoprotein in the prefusion conformation has two protomers in ‘RBD down’ and one in ‘RBD up’ conformation (Pierri, 2020; Turoňová et al., 2020; Figure 1a). Since at least one protomer of S homotrimer is in receptor‐accessible conformation, this may be needed to gain entry into the host.
FIGURE 1

‘Corona’ of SARS‐CoV‐2 and ACE2 engagement. (a) The SARS‐CoV‐2 S glycoprotein. The homotrimeric S protein in the prefusion conformation with one RBD up conformation (left structure) and an S trimer in a non‐accessible conformation with three RBD down (right structure). The side boxes show the subunits (S1 and S2) of an S protomer with RBD rotated up (left) and down (right). S glycoproteins are drawn as ribbon representations obtained from modified PDB ID codes: 6VSB (left) and 6VXX (right). (b) Structure of the atomic model of the ACE2‐B0AT1 complex linked to RBDs of SARS‐CoV‐2. The ribbon representation is obtained from modified PDB ID codes: 6M17. Insert: interactions between SARS‐CoV‐2–RBD up conformation and PD of ACE2. Amino acid sequence of PD beta strands is highlighted in red [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

‘Corona’ of SARS‐CoV‐2 and ACE2 engagement. (a) The SARS‐CoV‐2 S glycoprotein. The homotrimeric S protein in the prefusion conformation with one RBD up conformation (left structure) and an S trimer in a non‐accessible conformation with three RBD down (right structure). The side boxes show the subunits (S1 and S2) of an S protomer with RBD rotated up (left) and down (right). S glycoproteins are drawn as ribbon representations obtained from modified PDB ID codes: 6VSB (left) and 6VXX (right). (b) Structure of the atomic model of the ACE2‐B0AT1 complex linked to RBDs of SARS‐CoV‐2. The ribbon representation is obtained from modified PDB ID codes: 6M17. Insert: interactions between SARS‐CoV‐2–RBD up conformation and PD of ACE2. Amino acid sequence of PD beta strands is highlighted in red [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] SARS‐CoV‐2 uses the cell entry receptor ACE2 as SARS‐CoV‐1, responsible of SARS2003 (Lan et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020). Therefore, S glycoproteins establish strong binding interactions with human ACE2 (Mercurio et al., 2021; Turoňová et al., 2020) more efficiently than SARS‐CoV‐1, thereby increasing the ability of SARS‐CoV‐2 to transmit from person to person. ACE2 is an ACE homologue protease expressed in the lungs, heart, kidneys, liver, small intestine and testis. ACE2 has broad substrate specificity acting on the metabolism of the various angiotensin peptides obtained from the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Therefore, ACE2 is implicated in a variety of (un)known pathophysiological processes (Hamming et al., 2007). The monomer of homodimeric ACE2 is a type 1 transmembrane protein with a single transmembrane α‐helix in the C‐terminal region similar to the collectrin domain. The N‐terminal extracellular side consists of the protease domain (PD) with two lobes close to each other after substrate binding, though are in fully open conformation without the substrate (Towler et al., 2004). The syncytia formation between S glycoprotein and ACE2 does not occlude the peptidase active site, suggesting that the active site of PD does not interact with RBD of SARS‐CoV‐2 (Li et al., 2005). Interestingly, ACE2 is moonlighting protein (a protein encoded by a single gene that can perform more than one function) which is assembled with B0AT1, a member of neutral amino acid transport family, and forms a dimer of ACE2‐B0AT1 heterodimers. In other words, two ACE2 proteins in the dimeric form are connected to two monomers of B0AT1 (Camargo et al., 2009; Figure 1b). The ACE2 homodimer is structurally possible without B0AT1, but the architecture of the complex is not stabilized. However, the B0AT1 role is unknown for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. ‘RBD up’ conformation of SARS‐CoV‐2 directly binds to the PD of the ACE2 monomer, and two trimeric S glycoproteins can simultaneously bind to the full‐length human ACE2‐B0AT1 complex (Yan et al., 2020). Because ACE2 is a dimer and S is a trimer, it might be even speculated that a complete fusion mechanism might involve three ACE2 dimers and two spike trimers, simultaneously (Mercurio et al., 2021). SARS‐CoV‐2 is unable to use ACE2 proteins from mice as a cellular entry receptor because they are refractory to virus (Zhou et al., 2020). Conversely, overexpression of human ACE2 enhanced disease severity in the mouse model of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Thus, the viral entry into target host cells is a critical step. However, the injury was reported to be attenuated by blocking the renin–angiotensin pathway and ACE2 expression (Imai et al., 2005). ACE2 is the molecular key of SARS‐CoV‐2 to facilitate the infection of cells (Yan et al., 2020). Therefore, PD‐ACE2 ‘receptor’ is a potential and scientifically validated therapeutic target to fight the current COVID‐19 pandemic (Zhang et al., 2020). The development of an RBD‐based vaccine is related to the biological interaction between PD‐ACE2 and RBD‐S (Lan et al., 2020; Mercurio et al., 2021; Walls et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020). S glycoprotein of SARS‐CoV‐1 and SARS‐CoV‐2 has a high degree of structural homology but different cross‐reactivity of the RBD‐directed monoclonal antibodies (Ahmed et al., 2020). The epitopes of antibodies represent a relatively small percentage of the surface area of interaction into SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD. Therefore, mAB cross‐reactivity could be directed to target a specific RBD region (Lan et al., 2020) or, by considering the two RBD states of S in the prefusion conformation, might target a site of an RBD that protrudes toward the central cavity of the S protein trimer (Mercurio et al., 2021). Sequence alignments of human and mouse ACE2 have a high level of similarity. Nevertheless, the beta strands, which are highlighted with multiple sequence alignment on human ACE2, are not found in the mouse and rat (Figure 2). In particular, the amino acid sequence T and D, which form an antiparallel β sheet, is localized on the binding interface between PD‐ACE2 and RBD‐S (Figure 1b). Accordingly, the species specificity of SARS‐CoV‐2 mainly relies on the S‐receptor interaction with specific structural conformation and/or differences of PD‐ACE2. In particular, the molecular mechanism of host receptor adaptation could be exploited in the development of therapeutic targets (Lu et al., 2020).
FIGURE 2

Multiple sequence alignment for ACE2. Entry names of protein sequences: ACE2_HUMAN (Homo sapiens accession no. Q9BYF1); ACE2_MOUSE (Mus musculus accession no. Q8R0I0); ACE2_RAT (Rattus norvegicus accession no. Q5EGZ1). Active site, signal peptide, beta strand, transmembrane and binding site amino acids are highlighted by the colours shown in the respective boxes. The beta strand sequences in the black rectangles located at the level of the RBD‐S/PD‐ACE2 interaction region [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Multiple sequence alignment for ACE2. Entry names of protein sequences: ACE2_HUMAN (Homo sapiens accession no. Q9BYF1); ACE2_MOUSE (Mus musculus accession no. Q8R0I0); ACE2_RAT (Rattus norvegicus accession no. Q5EGZ1). Active site, signal peptide, beta strand, transmembrane and binding site amino acids are highlighted by the colours shown in the respective boxes. The beta strand sequences in the black rectangles located at the level of the RBD‐S/PD‐ACE2 interaction region [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] The global pandemic situation is a state of emergency due to the presence of the new SARS‐CoV‐2. Therefore, apart from the development of effective vaccines, which represent an alternative approach to fight this pandemic, the design of drugs to counteract all the emerging COVID‐19 virus variants represents a great challenge for the research community.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares no conflict of interest.
  18 in total

1.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target.

Authors:  Haibo Zhang; Josef M Penninger; Yimin Li; Nanshan Zhong; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Preliminary Identification of Potential Vaccine Targets for the COVID-19 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Based on SARS-CoV Immunological Studies.

Authors:  Syed Faraz Ahmed; Ahmed A Quadeer; Matthew R McKay
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding.

Authors:  Roujian Lu; Xiang Zhao; Juan Li; Peihua Niu; Bo Yang; Honglong Wu; Wenling Wang; Hao Song; Baoying Huang; Na Zhu; Yuhai Bi; Xuejun Ma; Faxian Zhan; Liang Wang; Tao Hu; Hong Zhou; Zhenhong Hu; Weimin Zhou; Li Zhao; Jing Chen; Yao Meng; Ji Wang; Yang Lin; Jianying Yuan; Zhihao Xie; Jinmin Ma; William J Liu; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Edward C Holmes; George F Gao; Guizhen Wu; Weijun Chen; Weifeng Shi; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure.

Authors:  Yumiko Imai; Keiji Kuba; Shuan Rao; Yi Huan; Feng Guo; Bin Guan; Peng Yang; Renu Sarao; Teiji Wada; Howard Leong-Poi; Michael A Crackower; Akiyoshi Fukamizu; Chi-Chung Hui; Lutz Hein; Stefan Uhlig; Arthur S Slutsky; Chengyu Jiang; Josef M Penninger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  SARS-CoV-2 is an appropriate name for the new coronavirus.

Authors:  Yuntao Wu; Wenzhe Ho; Yaowei Huang; Dong-Yan Jin; Shiyue Li; Shan-Lu Liu; Xuefeng Liu; Jianming Qiu; Yongming Sang; Qiuhong Wang; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Zhi-Ming Zheng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Protein structure analysis of the interactions between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the human ACE2 receptor: from conformational changes to novel neutralizing antibodies.

Authors:  Ivan Mercurio; Vincenzo Tragni; Francesco Busto; Anna De Grassi; Ciro Leonardo Pierri
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 9.207

7.  Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein.

Authors:  Alexandra C Walls; Young-Jun Park; M Alejandra Tortorici; Abigail Wall; Andrew T McGuire; David Veesler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges.

Authors:  Beata Turoňová; Mateusz Sikora; Christoph Schürmann; Wim J H Hagen; Sonja Welsch; Florian E C Blanc; Sören von Bülow; Michael Gecht; Katrin Bagola; Cindy Hörner; Ger van Zandbergen; Jonathan Landry; Nayara Trevisan Doimo de Azevedo; Shyamal Mosalaganti; Andre Schwarz; Roberto Covino; Michael D Mühlebach; Gerhard Hummer; Jacomine Krijnse Locker; Martin Beck
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: flexibility as a new target for fighting infection.

Authors:  Ciro Leonardo Pierri
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-10-30

10.  ACE2 X-ray structures reveal a large hinge-bending motion important for inhibitor binding and catalysis.

Authors:  Paul Towler; Bart Staker; Sridhar G Prasad; Saurabh Menon; Jin Tang; Thomas Parsons; Dominic Ryan; Martin Fisher; David Williams; Natalie A Dales; Michael A Patane; Michael W Pantoliano
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cardiovascular and haematological events post COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review.

Authors:  Dana Al-Ali; Abdallah Elshafeey; Malik Mushannen; Hussam Kawas; Ameena Shafiq; Narjis Mhaimeed; Omar Mhaimeed; Nada Mhaimeed; Rached Zeghlache; Mohammad Salameh; Pradipta Paul; Moayad Homssi; Ibrahim Mohammed; Adeeb Narangoli; Lina Yagan; Bushra Khanjar; Sa'ad Laws; Mohamed B Elshazly; Dalia Zakaria
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 5.310

2.  Consensus docking and MM-PBSA computations identify putative furin protease inhibitors for developing potential therapeutics against COVID-19.

Authors:  Bismark Dankwa; Emmanuel Broni; Kweku S Enninful; Samuel K Kwofie; Michael D Wilson
Journal:  Struct Chem       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 1.795

3.  SARS-CoV-2 first contact: Spike-ACE2 interactions in COVID-19.

Authors:  Salvatore Nesci
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.873

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.