Literature DB >> 34046731

Initial experience with dual-layer detector spectral CT for diagnosis of blood or contrast after endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.

Marie Louise E Bernsen1, Peter B Veendrick2, Jasper M Martens2, Milan E J Pijl2, Jeannette Hofmeijer3,4, Maarten J van Gorp2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether spectral detector CT (SDCT) with a plain non-enhanced monochromatic CT, a water-weighted image after iodine removal, an iodine map, and Mono energetic images changes the diagnosis and classification of intracranial hemorrhage based on single energy CT after endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke.
METHODS: Two readers evaluated single energy and SD CT data collected from 63 patients within one week after EVT. They diagnosed ICH or contrast staining, and graded ICH according to the Heidelberg and Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) classification. Differences in diagnosis between single energy and SD CT were tested with Pearson's chi-squared test. Diagnostic values of single energy CT were calculated. Interrater agreement was based on Cohen's Kappa.
RESULTS: When spectral data were added to single energy CT, the diagnosis of ICH changed in 8 CT scans (13%): in 4, the diagnosis of ICH was rejected and in 4, initially undetected ICH was diagnosed. In an additional 3 patients, the ICH grade was modified. CT alone had 88% sensitivity, 87% specificity, 88% positive diagnostic value, 87% negative diagnostic value, and 87% overall accuracy for ICH compared to SDCT. Interreader agreement on the presence of ICH was 0.84 (95% CI 0.51-0.86) for spectral CT and 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97) for single energy CT.
CONCLUSION: SD CT after endovascular treatment contributes to the distinction between intracranial hemorrhage and contrast staining.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Endovascular treatment; Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH); Spectral computed tomography; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34046731     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02736-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  28 in total

1.  Hemorrhage/contrast staining areas after mechanical intra-arterial thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: imaging findings and clinical significance.

Authors:  G Parrilla; B García-Villalba; M Espinosa de Rueda; J Zamarro; E Carrión; F Hernández-Fernández; J Martín; R Hernández-Clares; A Morales; A Moreno
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Clinical significance of post-interventional cerebral hyperdensities after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Omid Nikoubashman; Arno Reich; Mirco Gindullis; Katharina Frohnhofen; Rastislav Pjontek; Marc-Alexander Brockmann; Jörg B Schulz; Martin Wiesmann
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Effects of iodinated contrast agents in MR imaging.

Authors:  K Hergan; W Doringer; M Längle; W Oser
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Dual energy CT after stroke thrombectomy alters assessment of hemorrhagic complications.

Authors:  Håkan Almqvist; Staffan Holmin; Michael V Mazya
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  The role of dual energy CT in differentiating between brain haemorrhage and contrast medium after mechanical revascularisation in acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  M P M Tijssen; P A M Hofman; A A R Stadler; W van Zwam; R de Graaf; R J van Oostenbrugge; E Klotz; J E Wildberger; A A Postma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials.

Authors:  Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Wim H van Zwam; Diederik W J Dippel; Peter J Mitchell; Andrew M Demchuk; Antoni Dávalos; Charles B L M Majoie; Aad van der Lugt; Maria A de Miquel; Geoffrey A Donnan; Yvo B W E M Roos; Alain Bonafe; Reza Jahan; Hans-Christoph Diener; Lucie A van den Berg; Elad I Levy; Olvert A Berkhemer; Vitor M Pereira; Jeremy Rempel; Mònica Millán; Stephen M Davis; Daniel Roy; John Thornton; Luis San Román; Marc Ribó; Debbie Beumer; Bruce Stouch; Scott Brown; Bruce C V Campbell; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael D Hill; Tudor G Jovin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Relevance of blood-brain barrier disruption after endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke: dual-energy computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Arturo Renú; Sergio Amaro; Carlos Laredo; Luis San Román; Laura Llull; Antonio Lopez; Xabier Urra; Jordi Blasco; Laura Oleaga; Ángel Chamorro
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Contrast Extravasation versus Hemorrhage after Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Vivek Yedavalli; Steffen Sammet
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Dual-energy CT for detection of contrast enhancement or leakage within high-density haematomas in patients with intracranial haemorrhage.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Akio Tsukabe; Yuki Kunitomi; Mitsuo Nishizawa; Atsuko Arisawa; Hisashi Tanaka; Kazuhisa Yoshiya; Takeshi Shimazu; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Distinction between contrast staining and hemorrhage after endovascular stroke treatment: one CT is not enough.

Authors:  Sven Dekeyzer; Omid Nikoubashman; Bart Lutin; Jeroen De Groote; Evelien Vancaester; Sofie De Blauwe; Dimitri Hemelsoet; Martin Wiesmann; Luc Defreyne
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.