| Literature DB >> 34046332 |
Jae Guk Jang1, Seak Hee Oh1, Yu Bin Kim1, Seo Hee Kim1, Han-Wook Yoo1, Beom Hee Lee1, Jung-Man Namgoong2, Dae Yeon Kim2, Ki-Hun Kim2, Gi-Won Song3, Deok-Bog Moon3, Shin Hwang3, Sung-Gyu Lee3, Kyung Mo Kim1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite aggressive medical and nutritional management, patients with methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) often suffer from multi-organ damage. Early deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has emerged as an intervention to prevent disease progression. We investigated the efficacy of living donor LT (LDLT) with a potential carrier of MMA and a small volume of graft in patients with MMA as an alternative to DDLT.Entities:
Keywords: Child; Liver transplantation; Living donors; Methylmalonic acidemia
Year: 2021 PMID: 34046332 PMCID: PMC8128783 DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2021.24.3.288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr ISSN: 2234-8840
Genetic typing of the patients
| Case | Genetics |
|---|---|
| 1 | Compound heterozygote with two MUT0 (R228* and L494*) |
| 2 | Compound heterozygote with two MUT0 (E117* and V502fs) |
| 3 | Compound heterozygote with two MUT0 (I697F and E117*) |
| 4 | Compound heterozygote with two MUT0 (R108H and L494*) |
| 5 | Compound heterozygote with two MUT0 (R108H and L494*) |
Individual characteristics of patients with methylmalonic acidemia
| Case no. | Onset age (mo) | Sex | LDLT age (yr) | Follow-up period (yr) | Donor | ABO identical or compatible* | Graft type† | Auxiliary | Recipient weight (kg) | GRWR (%) | Duration of pre-LT CRRT (d) | Duration of post-LT CRRT (d) | ICU stay (d) | Hospital stay (d) | Immunosuppressant induction | Immunosuppressant maintenance | TAC induced nephrotoxicity | Complication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Female | 13.7 | 4.3 | Brother | 1 | LLS | Yes | 34.0 | 0.7 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 57 | TAC+PD+BSX | TAC+mTORi+PD | 0 | ACR |
| 2 | 3 | Male | 9.6 | 3.3 | Father | 0 | LL | No | 27.1 | 1.5 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 54 | TAC+PD+BSX | TAC+mTORi+PD | 0 | ACR, EBV infection |
| 3 | 1 | Male | 2.3 | 1.7 | Mother | 1 | LL | No | 12.2 | 2.2 | 1 | 3 | 51 | 65 | TAC+PD+BSX | TAC+PD | 0 | SIC, IN, ACR |
| 4 | 1 | Male | 1.3 | 1.5 | Mother | 0 | LLS | No | 11.3 | 2.0 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 43 | TAC+PD+BSX | TAC+PD | 0 | HVS |
| 5 | 4 | Female | 5.7 | 0.3 | Mother | 0 | LL | No | 21.0 | 1.1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 28 | TAC+PD+BSX | TAC+mTORi+PD | 0 | ACR |
LDLT: living donor liver transplantation, GRWR: graft-recipient weight ratio, CRRT: continuous renal replacement therapy, ICU: intensive care unit, LLS: left lateral segmentectomy, LL: left lobectomy, TAC: tacrolimus, PD: prednisolone, BSX: basiliximab, mTORi: mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, ACR: acute cellular rejection, EBV: Epstein-Barr virus, SIC: stress-induced cardiomyopathy, IN: intestinal necrosis, HVS: hepatic vein stenosis.
*ABO identical or compatible: identical=0, compatible=1. †Graft type: LLS=0, LL=1.
Perioperative characteristics of the patients
| WNL | Follow-up period (yr) | Metabolic decompensation rate (number/year) | Dietary protein intake (g/kg/day) | Feeding route | Carnitine supplementation | Ammonia lowering agent | Height (cm) (Z-score) | Weight (kg) (Z-score) | Echocardiography | Cystatin C (mL/min/1.73 m2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||
| 1 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 0 | 1.0–1.5 | 1.5–2.0 | Oral+gastrostomy | Oral+gastrostomy | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 125.0 (–5.3) | 136.3 (–4.9) | 33.0 (–2.7) | 39.5 (–2.5) | WNL | WNL | 34 | 21 |
| 2 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 0 | 1.0–1.5 | 1.5–2.0 | Oral | Oral | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 121.5 (–3.1) | 139.7 (–2.5) | 27.1 (–1.4) | 38.5 (–1.5) | WNL | WNL | 37 | 21 |
| 3 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 0 | 1.5–2.0 | 2.0–2.5 | Oral | Oral | Yes | Yes | No | No | 84.0 (–2.0) | 100.9 (–0.5) | 11.4 (–1.1) | 16.0 (–0.5) | WNL | CMP* | 120 | 93 |
| 4 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 0 | 2.0–2.5 | 2.0–2.5 | Oral | Oral | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 75.0 (–2.0) | 91.4 (–0.9) | 10.8 (0.2) | 14.0 (0.1) | WNL | WNL | 99 | 76 |
| 5 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0 | 1.5–2.0 | 1.5–2.0 | Oral | Oral | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 112.1 (–0.5) | 113.5 (–0.6) | 19.8 (–0.4) | 23.5 (0.6) | WNL | Not done | 104 | 78 |
WNL: within normal limit, CMP: cardiomyopathy.
*History of stress-induced cardiomyopathy, however, on the recent echocardiography, ejection fraction and fraction shortening were within the normal range.
Fig. 1Serum methylmalonic acid level (μmol/L, month). In four cases, changes in the serum methylmalonic acidemia level after transplantation decreased from a mean of 447.7 μmol/L (range, 67.4–1,165.7 μmol/L) to 188.5 μmol/L (range, 27.1–622.9 μmol/L) over a mean observation period of 1.5 years (range, 0.2–3.0 years).
Fig. 2Urine methylmalonic acid level (mmol/mol creatinine, month). Cases 2, 3, 4, and 5 were MUT0 heterozygotes. In these four cases, changes in the urine methylmalonic acidemia level after transplantation decreased from a mean of 15,670.1 mmol/mol creatinine (range, 1,308.7–30,831.1 mmol/mol) to a mean of 1,541.2 mmol/mol creatinine (range, 675.4–2,174.7 mmol/mol) over a mean observation period of 1.5 years (range, 0.2–3.0 years).