Literature DB >> 3404328

Analysis and measurement of neck loads.

S P Moroney1, A B Schultz, J A Miller.   

Abstract

To examine the loads imposed on the structures of the neck by the performance of physical tasks, a biomechanical model of the neck was constructed. The model incorporated 14 bilateral pairs of muscle equivalents crossing the C4 level. A double linear programming optimization scheme that minimized maximum muscle contraction intensity and then vertebral compression force while equilibrating external loads was used to calculate the muscle contraction forces required and the motion segment reactions produced by task performance. To test model validity, 14 healthy adult subjects performed a series of isometric tasks requiring use of their neck muscles. These tasks included exertions in attempted flexion, extension, and left and right lateral bending and twisting. Subjects exerted maximum and submaximum voluntary efforts. During the performance, surface myoelectric activities were recorded at eight locations around the periphery of the neck at the C4 level. Calculated forces and measured myoelectric activities were then linearly correlated. Mean measured voluntary neck strengths in 10 male subjects were as large as 29.7 Nm. Four female subjects developed mean strengths that were approximately 60%-90% of those of the males. In both sexes, neck muscle strengths were approximately one order of magnitude lower than previously measured lumbar trunk strengths. Mean calculated neck muscle contraction forces ranged to 180 N. Mean calculated compression forces on the C4-5 motion segment ranged to 1164 N, lateral shear forces ranged to 125 N, and anteroposterior shear forces ranged to 135 N. Correlation coefficients between the calculated muscle forces and the measured myoelectric activities were as large as 0.85 in some muscles, but generally were smaller than this.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3404328     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100060514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  23 in total

1.  Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation.

Authors:  P C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; S Ito; P A Cripton; J L Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical facet joint kinematics during bilateral facet dislocation.

Authors:  Manohar M Panjabi; Andrew K Simpson; Paul C Ivancic; Adam M Pearson; Yasuhiro Tominaga; James J Yue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Subject-specific inverse dynamics of the head and cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Biomechanical analysis of expansion screws and cortical screws used for ventral plate fixation on the cervical spine.

Authors:  Klaus Röhl; Bernhard Ullrich; Gerd Huber; Michael M Morlock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Work load during floor cleaning. The effect of cleaning methods and work technique.

Authors:  K Søgaard; N Fallentin; J Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

6.  The relationship between the electromyogram-amplitude and isometric extension torques of neck muscles at different positions of the cervical spine.

Authors:  F Queisser; R Blüthner; D Bräuer; H Seidel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

7.  Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; M N Tzermiadianos; P P Tsitsopoulos; L I Voronov; S M Renner; M L Reo; G Carandang; K Ritter-Lang; R M Havey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Cervical spine intervertebral kinematics with respect to the head are different during flexion and extension motions.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Static and dynamic fatigue behavior of topology designed and conventional 3D printed bioresorbable PCL cervical interbody fusion devices.

Authors:  Ashleen R Knutsen; Sean L Borkowski; Edward Ebramzadeh; Colleen L Flanagan; Scott J Hollister; Sophia N Sangiorgio
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-05-27

10.  Biomechanics of sports-induced axial-compression injuries of the neck.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.